Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Measurement Properties
This study sought to investigate the measurement properties of a "gold standard" instrument for measuring burnout, the Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey (MBI-GS), with a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies that had as the primary aim its psychometric validati...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of psychological assessment : official organ of the European Association of Psychological Assessment 2024, Vol.40 (5), p.360-375 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 375 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 360 |
| container_title | European journal of psychological assessment : official organ of the European Association of Psychological Assessment |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | De Beer, Leon T. van der Vaart, Leoni Escaffi-Schwarz, Maximiliano De Witte, Hans Schaufeli, Wilmar B. |
| description | This study sought to investigate the measurement
properties of a "gold standard" instrument for measuring burnout,
the Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey (MBI-GS), with a
systematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies that had as the
primary aim its psychometric validation. The search spanned from January 1996 to
December 2022 using the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, APA
PsychINFO, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Our
search identified 35 eligible studies for inclusion in the systematic review. Of
these, 17 were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of the original
16-item version studies supported a three-dimensional representation of burnout
with modest internal consistencies. However, similar to the narrative findings,
it also indicated the viability of a two-factor solution. Consequently, the
structural validity of the MBI-GS remains unclear, and so does its
cross-cultural validity. The criterion validity of the cynicism and personal
efficacy scales also raised a few questions. Overall, the findings provided some
support for the adequacy of the measurement properties of the MBI-GS as a
research tool measuring exhaustion, cynicism, and professional efficacy.
However, we also identified challenges and practices of which researchers should
be cognisant and that they should consider in future burnout projects. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1027/1015-5759/a000797 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2926704121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2926704121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a176t-1ef054bb4ae98c2ec64928f14b74b671c9c0ec441a66b6576250c289f5d266f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFPwzAMhSMEEmXwA7hV4gYqs7PEaY4wwZg0xAE4R2lIxarSlqSd1H9Pp02cLNnv2f4eY9cI9whczRFQZlJJPbcAoLQ6YQlHiRkXnE5Z8j8_ZxcxVgCY5wQJu321sbbuO30cQtMOfbpudr7p2zCmWbryjQ-2Tt-HsPPjJTsrbR391bHO2Ofz08fyJdu8rdbLh01mUVGfoS9BiqIQ1uvcce9IaJ6XKAolClLotAPvhEBLVJBUxCU4nutSfnGiUi9m7Oawtwvt7-Bjb6p2em46abjmpEAgx0mFB5ULbYzBl6YL2x8bRoNg9pGYPbLZI5tjJJPn7uCxnTVdHJ0N_dbVProhhInaVFNfgJFmQbD4A8euYRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2926704121</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Measurement Properties</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>De Beer, Leon T. ; van der Vaart, Leoni ; Escaffi-Schwarz, Maximiliano ; De Witte, Hans ; Schaufeli, Wilmar B.</creator><contributor>Rusu, Andrei ; Greiff, Samuel ; Iliescu, Dragos</contributor><creatorcontrib>De Beer, Leon T. ; van der Vaart, Leoni ; Escaffi-Schwarz, Maximiliano ; De Witte, Hans ; Schaufeli, Wilmar B. ; Rusu, Andrei ; Greiff, Samuel ; Iliescu, Dragos</creatorcontrib><description>This study sought to investigate the measurement
properties of a "gold standard" instrument for measuring burnout,
the Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey (MBI-GS), with a
systematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies that had as the
primary aim its psychometric validation. The search spanned from January 1996 to
December 2022 using the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, APA
PsychINFO, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Our
search identified 35 eligible studies for inclusion in the systematic review. Of
these, 17 were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of the original
16-item version studies supported a three-dimensional representation of burnout
with modest internal consistencies. However, similar to the narrative findings,
it also indicated the viability of a two-factor solution. Consequently, the
structural validity of the MBI-GS remains unclear, and so does its
cross-cultural validity. The criterion validity of the cynicism and personal
efficacy scales also raised a few questions. Overall, the findings provided some
support for the adequacy of the measurement properties of the MBI-GS as a
research tool measuring exhaustion, cynicism, and professional efficacy.
However, we also identified challenges and practices of which researchers should
be cognisant and that they should consider in future burnout projects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1015-5759</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-2426</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000797</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hogrefe Publishing</publisher><subject>Employee Well Being ; Human ; Inventories ; Measurement Invariance ; Occupational Stress ; Organizational and Occupational Measures ; Psychometrics ; Test Reliability ; Test Validity</subject><ispartof>European journal of psychological assessment : official organ of the European Association of Psychological Assessment, 2024, Vol.40 (5), p.360-375</ispartof><rights>2024 Hogrefe Publishing</rights><rights>2024, Hogrefe Publishing</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a176t-1ef054bb4ae98c2ec64928f14b74b671c9c0ec441a66b6576250c289f5d266f93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4371-8739 ; 0000-0002-8236-0637 ; 0000-0001-6900-2192 ; 0000-0002-6691-517X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Rusu, Andrei</contributor><contributor>Greiff, Samuel</contributor><contributor>Iliescu, Dragos</contributor><creatorcontrib>De Beer, Leon T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Vaart, Leoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escaffi-Schwarz, Maximiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Witte, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaufeli, Wilmar B.</creatorcontrib><title>Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Measurement Properties</title><title>European journal of psychological assessment : official organ of the European Association of Psychological Assessment</title><description>This study sought to investigate the measurement
properties of a "gold standard" instrument for measuring burnout,
the Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey (MBI-GS), with a
systematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies that had as the
primary aim its psychometric validation. The search spanned from January 1996 to
December 2022 using the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, APA
PsychINFO, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Our
search identified 35 eligible studies for inclusion in the systematic review. Of
these, 17 were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of the original
16-item version studies supported a three-dimensional representation of burnout
with modest internal consistencies. However, similar to the narrative findings,
it also indicated the viability of a two-factor solution. Consequently, the
structural validity of the MBI-GS remains unclear, and so does its
cross-cultural validity. The criterion validity of the cynicism and personal
efficacy scales also raised a few questions. Overall, the findings provided some
support for the adequacy of the measurement properties of the MBI-GS as a
research tool measuring exhaustion, cynicism, and professional efficacy.
However, we also identified challenges and practices of which researchers should
be cognisant and that they should consider in future burnout projects.</description><subject>Employee Well Being</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Inventories</subject><subject>Measurement Invariance</subject><subject>Occupational Stress</subject><subject>Organizational and Occupational Measures</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><issn>1015-5759</issn><issn>2151-2426</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEFPwzAMhSMEEmXwA7hV4gYqs7PEaY4wwZg0xAE4R2lIxarSlqSd1H9Pp02cLNnv2f4eY9cI9whczRFQZlJJPbcAoLQ6YQlHiRkXnE5Z8j8_ZxcxVgCY5wQJu321sbbuO30cQtMOfbpudr7p2zCmWbryjQ-2Tt-HsPPjJTsrbR391bHO2Ofz08fyJdu8rdbLh01mUVGfoS9BiqIQ1uvcce9IaJ6XKAolClLotAPvhEBLVJBUxCU4nutSfnGiUi9m7Oawtwvt7-Bjb6p2em46abjmpEAgx0mFB5ULbYzBl6YL2x8bRoNg9pGYPbLZI5tjJJPn7uCxnTVdHJ0N_dbVProhhInaVFNfgJFmQbD4A8euYRg</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>De Beer, Leon T.</creator><creator>van der Vaart, Leoni</creator><creator>Escaffi-Schwarz, Maximiliano</creator><creator>De Witte, Hans</creator><creator>Schaufeli, Wilmar B.</creator><general>Hogrefe Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4371-8739</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8236-0637</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6900-2192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6691-517X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey</title><author>De Beer, Leon T. ; van der Vaart, Leoni ; Escaffi-Schwarz, Maximiliano ; De Witte, Hans ; Schaufeli, Wilmar B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a176t-1ef054bb4ae98c2ec64928f14b74b671c9c0ec441a66b6576250c289f5d266f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Employee Well Being</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Inventories</topic><topic>Measurement Invariance</topic><topic>Occupational Stress</topic><topic>Organizational and Occupational Measures</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Beer, Leon T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Vaart, Leoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escaffi-Schwarz, Maximiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Witte, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaufeli, Wilmar B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>European journal of psychological assessment : official organ of the European Association of Psychological Assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Beer, Leon T.</au><au>van der Vaart, Leoni</au><au>Escaffi-Schwarz, Maximiliano</au><au>De Witte, Hans</au><au>Schaufeli, Wilmar B.</au><au>Rusu, Andrei</au><au>Greiff, Samuel</au><au>Iliescu, Dragos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Measurement Properties</atitle><jtitle>European journal of psychological assessment : official organ of the European Association of Psychological Assessment</jtitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>360</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>360-375</pages><issn>1015-5759</issn><eissn>2151-2426</eissn><abstract>This study sought to investigate the measurement
properties of a "gold standard" instrument for measuring burnout,
the Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey (MBI-GS), with a
systematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies that had as the
primary aim its psychometric validation. The search spanned from January 1996 to
December 2022 using the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, APA
PsychINFO, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Our
search identified 35 eligible studies for inclusion in the systematic review. Of
these, 17 were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of the original
16-item version studies supported a three-dimensional representation of burnout
with modest internal consistencies. However, similar to the narrative findings,
it also indicated the viability of a two-factor solution. Consequently, the
structural validity of the MBI-GS remains unclear, and so does its
cross-cultural validity. The criterion validity of the cynicism and personal
efficacy scales also raised a few questions. Overall, the findings provided some
support for the adequacy of the measurement properties of the MBI-GS as a
research tool measuring exhaustion, cynicism, and professional efficacy.
However, we also identified challenges and practices of which researchers should
be cognisant and that they should consider in future burnout projects.</abstract><pub>Hogrefe Publishing</pub><doi>10.1027/1015-5759/a000797</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4371-8739</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8236-0637</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6900-2192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6691-517X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1015-5759 |
| ispartof | European journal of psychological assessment : official organ of the European Association of Psychological Assessment, 2024, Vol.40 (5), p.360-375 |
| issn | 1015-5759 2151-2426 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2926704121 |
| source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
| subjects | Employee Well Being Human Inventories Measurement Invariance Occupational Stress Organizational and Occupational Measures Psychometrics Test Reliability Test Validity |
| title | Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Measurement Properties |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T18%3A16%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maslach%20Burnout%20Inventory%20-%20General%20Survey:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Measurement%20Properties&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20psychological%20assessment%20:%20official%20organ%20of%20the%20European%20Association%20of%20Psychological%20Assessment&rft.au=De%20Beer,%20Leon%20T.&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=360&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=360-375&rft.issn=1015-5759&rft.eissn=2151-2426&rft_id=info:doi/10.1027/1015-5759/a000797&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2926704121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2926704121&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |