Transmission Performance Evaluation of Local 5G Downlink Data Channel in SU-MIMO System under Outdoor Environments
We evaluated the transmission performance, including received power and transmission throughput characteristics, in 4×4 single-user multiple-input multiple-output (SU-MIMO) transmission for synchronous time division duplex (TDD) and downlink data channels in comparison with single-input single-outpu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEICE Transactions on Communications 2024/01/01, Vol.E107.B(1), pp.63-73 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 73 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 63 |
container_title | IEICE Transactions on Communications |
container_volume | E107.B |
creator | URASAWA, Hiroki SOYA, Hayato YAMAGUCHI, Kazuhiro MATSUE, Hideaki |
description | We evaluated the transmission performance, including received power and transmission throughput characteristics, in 4×4 single-user multiple-input multiple-output (SU-MIMO) transmission for synchronous time division duplex (TDD) and downlink data channels in comparison with single-input single-output (SISO) transmission in an environment where a local 5G wireless base station was installed on the roof of a research building at our university. Accordingly, for the received power characteristics, the difference between the simulation value, which was based on the ray tracing method, and the experimental value at 32 points in the area was within a maximum difference of approximately 10 dB, and sufficient compliance was obtained. Regarding the transmission throughput versus received power characteristics, after showing a simulation method for evaluating throughput characteristics in MIMO, we compared the results with experimental results. The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the transmission throughput shows that, at a CDF of 50%, in SISO transmission, the simulated value is approximately 115Mbps, and the experimental value is 105Mbps, within a difference of approximately 10Mbps. By contrast, in MIMO transmission, the simulation value is 380Mbps, and the experimental value is approximately 420Mbps, which is a difference of approximately 40Mbps. It was shown that the received power and transmission throughput characteristics can be predicted with sufficient accuracy by obtaining the delay profile and the system model at each reception point using the both ray tracing and MIMO simulation methods in actual environments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1587/transcom.2023WWP0002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2926366966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2926366966</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-a6020d9b40fd9ff0973a8b3f56430afe6a4b758e21a7db653b4e5fd8b98da26e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxBywssQ74ETvJEkqBSq2KKKhLa5LYNCWxwXZA_D2tSoHVjEbn3JEuQmeUXFCRZ5fRgw2V6y4YYXyxeCCEsD00oFkqEspTsY8GpKAyyQWVh-gohBUhNGeUDZB_2rhdE0LjLH7Q3jjfga00Hn1A20PcnJ3BE1dBi8UdvnGftm3sK76BCHi4BGt1ixuL58_JdDyd4flXiLrDva21x7M-1s55PLIfjXe20zaGE3RgoA369Gceo-fb0dPwPpnM7sbDq0lSpUzGBCRhpC7KlJi6MIYUGYe85EbIlBMwWkJaZiLXjEJWl1LwMtXC1HlZ5DUwqfkxOt_mvnn33usQ1cr13q5fKlYwyaUspFxT6ZaqvAvBa6PefNOB_1KUqE27ateu-tfuWnvcaqsQ4UX_SuBjU7X6TxpRkqlrRXfLv5BfuFqCV9rybzGOjmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2926366966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transmission Performance Evaluation of Local 5G Downlink Data Channel in SU-MIMO System under Outdoor Environments</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>URASAWA, Hiroki ; SOYA, Hayato ; YAMAGUCHI, Kazuhiro ; MATSUE, Hideaki</creator><creatorcontrib>URASAWA, Hiroki ; SOYA, Hayato ; YAMAGUCHI, Kazuhiro ; MATSUE, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluated the transmission performance, including received power and transmission throughput characteristics, in 4×4 single-user multiple-input multiple-output (SU-MIMO) transmission for synchronous time division duplex (TDD) and downlink data channels in comparison with single-input single-output (SISO) transmission in an environment where a local 5G wireless base station was installed on the roof of a research building at our university. Accordingly, for the received power characteristics, the difference between the simulation value, which was based on the ray tracing method, and the experimental value at 32 points in the area was within a maximum difference of approximately 10 dB, and sufficient compliance was obtained. Regarding the transmission throughput versus received power characteristics, after showing a simulation method for evaluating throughput characteristics in MIMO, we compared the results with experimental results. The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the transmission throughput shows that, at a CDF of 50%, in SISO transmission, the simulated value is approximately 115Mbps, and the experimental value is 105Mbps, within a difference of approximately 10Mbps. By contrast, in MIMO transmission, the simulation value is 380Mbps, and the experimental value is approximately 420Mbps, which is a difference of approximately 40Mbps. It was shown that the received power and transmission throughput characteristics can be predicted with sufficient accuracy by obtaining the delay profile and the system model at each reception point using the both ray tracing and MIMO simulation methods in actual environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0916-8516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-1345</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1587/transcom.2023WWP0002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers</publisher><subject>5G mobile communication ; Distribution functions ; Downlinking ; error vector magnitude (EVM) ; local 5G ; MIMO communication ; Performance evaluation ; Ray tracing ; ray tracing method ; received power characteristics ; Simulation ; SISO (control systems) ; SISO transmission ; SU-MIMO transmission ; synchronous TDD ; transmission throughput characteristics</subject><ispartof>IEICE Transactions on Communications, 2024/01/01, Vol.E107.B(1), pp.63-73</ispartof><rights>2024 The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers</rights><rights>Copyright Japan Science and Technology Agency 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-a6020d9b40fd9ff0973a8b3f56430afe6a4b758e21a7db653b4e5fd8b98da26e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>URASAWA, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SOYA, Hayato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAMAGUCHI, Kazuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MATSUE, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><title>Transmission Performance Evaluation of Local 5G Downlink Data Channel in SU-MIMO System under Outdoor Environments</title><title>IEICE Transactions on Communications</title><addtitle>IEICE Trans. Commun.</addtitle><description>We evaluated the transmission performance, including received power and transmission throughput characteristics, in 4×4 single-user multiple-input multiple-output (SU-MIMO) transmission for synchronous time division duplex (TDD) and downlink data channels in comparison with single-input single-output (SISO) transmission in an environment where a local 5G wireless base station was installed on the roof of a research building at our university. Accordingly, for the received power characteristics, the difference between the simulation value, which was based on the ray tracing method, and the experimental value at 32 points in the area was within a maximum difference of approximately 10 dB, and sufficient compliance was obtained. Regarding the transmission throughput versus received power characteristics, after showing a simulation method for evaluating throughput characteristics in MIMO, we compared the results with experimental results. The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the transmission throughput shows that, at a CDF of 50%, in SISO transmission, the simulated value is approximately 115Mbps, and the experimental value is 105Mbps, within a difference of approximately 10Mbps. By contrast, in MIMO transmission, the simulation value is 380Mbps, and the experimental value is approximately 420Mbps, which is a difference of approximately 40Mbps. It was shown that the received power and transmission throughput characteristics can be predicted with sufficient accuracy by obtaining the delay profile and the system model at each reception point using the both ray tracing and MIMO simulation methods in actual environments.</description><subject>5G mobile communication</subject><subject>Distribution functions</subject><subject>Downlinking</subject><subject>error vector magnitude (EVM)</subject><subject>local 5G</subject><subject>MIMO communication</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Ray tracing</subject><subject>ray tracing method</subject><subject>received power characteristics</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>SISO (control systems)</subject><subject>SISO transmission</subject><subject>SU-MIMO transmission</subject><subject>synchronous TDD</subject><subject>transmission throughput characteristics</subject><issn>0916-8516</issn><issn>1745-1345</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxBywssQ74ETvJEkqBSq2KKKhLa5LYNCWxwXZA_D2tSoHVjEbn3JEuQmeUXFCRZ5fRgw2V6y4YYXyxeCCEsD00oFkqEspTsY8GpKAyyQWVh-gohBUhNGeUDZB_2rhdE0LjLH7Q3jjfga00Hn1A20PcnJ3BE1dBi8UdvnGftm3sK76BCHi4BGt1ixuL58_JdDyd4flXiLrDva21x7M-1s55PLIfjXe20zaGE3RgoA369Gceo-fb0dPwPpnM7sbDq0lSpUzGBCRhpC7KlJi6MIYUGYe85EbIlBMwWkJaZiLXjEJWl1LwMtXC1HlZ5DUwqfkxOt_mvnn33usQ1cr13q5fKlYwyaUspFxT6ZaqvAvBa6PefNOB_1KUqE27ateu-tfuWnvcaqsQ4UX_SuBjU7X6TxpRkqlrRXfLv5BfuFqCV9rybzGOjmQ</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>URASAWA, Hiroki</creator><creator>SOYA, Hayato</creator><creator>YAMAGUCHI, Kazuhiro</creator><creator>MATSUE, Hideaki</creator><general>The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers</general><general>Japan Science and Technology Agency</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Transmission Performance Evaluation of Local 5G Downlink Data Channel in SU-MIMO System under Outdoor Environments</title><author>URASAWA, Hiroki ; SOYA, Hayato ; YAMAGUCHI, Kazuhiro ; MATSUE, Hideaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-a6020d9b40fd9ff0973a8b3f56430afe6a4b758e21a7db653b4e5fd8b98da26e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>5G mobile communication</topic><topic>Distribution functions</topic><topic>Downlinking</topic><topic>error vector magnitude (EVM)</topic><topic>local 5G</topic><topic>MIMO communication</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Ray tracing</topic><topic>ray tracing method</topic><topic>received power characteristics</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>SISO (control systems)</topic><topic>SISO transmission</topic><topic>SU-MIMO transmission</topic><topic>synchronous TDD</topic><topic>transmission throughput characteristics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>URASAWA, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SOYA, Hayato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAMAGUCHI, Kazuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MATSUE, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEICE Transactions on Communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>URASAWA, Hiroki</au><au>SOYA, Hayato</au><au>YAMAGUCHI, Kazuhiro</au><au>MATSUE, Hideaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transmission Performance Evaluation of Local 5G Downlink Data Channel in SU-MIMO System under Outdoor Environments</atitle><jtitle>IEICE Transactions on Communications</jtitle><addtitle>IEICE Trans. Commun.</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>E107.B</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>63-73</pages><artnum>2023WWP0002</artnum><issn>0916-8516</issn><eissn>1745-1345</eissn><abstract>We evaluated the transmission performance, including received power and transmission throughput characteristics, in 4×4 single-user multiple-input multiple-output (SU-MIMO) transmission for synchronous time division duplex (TDD) and downlink data channels in comparison with single-input single-output (SISO) transmission in an environment where a local 5G wireless base station was installed on the roof of a research building at our university. Accordingly, for the received power characteristics, the difference between the simulation value, which was based on the ray tracing method, and the experimental value at 32 points in the area was within a maximum difference of approximately 10 dB, and sufficient compliance was obtained. Regarding the transmission throughput versus received power characteristics, after showing a simulation method for evaluating throughput characteristics in MIMO, we compared the results with experimental results. The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the transmission throughput shows that, at a CDF of 50%, in SISO transmission, the simulated value is approximately 115Mbps, and the experimental value is 105Mbps, within a difference of approximately 10Mbps. By contrast, in MIMO transmission, the simulation value is 380Mbps, and the experimental value is approximately 420Mbps, which is a difference of approximately 40Mbps. It was shown that the received power and transmission throughput characteristics can be predicted with sufficient accuracy by obtaining the delay profile and the system model at each reception point using the both ray tracing and MIMO simulation methods in actual environments.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers</pub><doi>10.1587/transcom.2023WWP0002</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0916-8516 |
ispartof | IEICE Transactions on Communications, 2024/01/01, Vol.E107.B(1), pp.63-73 |
issn | 0916-8516 1745-1345 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2926366966 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | 5G mobile communication Distribution functions Downlinking error vector magnitude (EVM) local 5G MIMO communication Performance evaluation Ray tracing ray tracing method received power characteristics Simulation SISO (control systems) SISO transmission SU-MIMO transmission synchronous TDD transmission throughput characteristics |
title | Transmission Performance Evaluation of Local 5G Downlink Data Channel in SU-MIMO System under Outdoor Environments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T13%3A16%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transmission%20Performance%20Evaluation%20of%20Local%205G%20Downlink%20Data%20Channel%20in%20SU-MIMO%20System%20under%20Outdoor%20Environments&rft.jtitle=IEICE%20Transactions%20on%20Communications&rft.au=URASAWA,%20Hiroki&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=E107.B&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=63-73&rft.artnum=2023WWP0002&rft.issn=0916-8516&rft.eissn=1745-1345&rft_id=info:doi/10.1587/transcom.2023WWP0002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2926366966%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2926366966&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |