Robot Feedback Design for Response Delay

We investigated an effective human-robot interaction design to alleviate the user’s negative experience caused by the response delay of a robot. The feedback regarding a robot’s delayed response was designed using human-like and machine-like approaches. The first experiment was conducted in task-bas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of social robotics 2024-02, Vol.16 (2), p.341-361
Hauptverfasser: Kang, Dahyun, Nam, Changjoo, Kwak, Sonya S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 361
container_issue 2
container_start_page 341
container_title International journal of social robotics
container_volume 16
creator Kang, Dahyun
Nam, Changjoo
Kwak, Sonya S.
description We investigated an effective human-robot interaction design to alleviate the user’s negative experience caused by the response delay of a robot. The feedback regarding a robot’s delayed response was designed using human-like and machine-like approaches. The first experiment was conducted in task-based interaction to explore the effects of the feedback type (human-like or machine-like feedback versus a baseline robot) and task type (a high-cognitive-demand task versus a low-cognitive-demand task) on the understandability, perceived waiting time, and service evaluation of the robot ( N = 36). The robot with machine-like feedback was rated the most positive in terms of understandability, perceived waiting time, and service evaluation. The perceived waiting time mediated the effect of feedback type on service evaluation. There were significant effects between the feedback types and the task types on understandability, perceived waiting time, and service evaluation. In a low-cognitive-demand task, machine-like feedback was evaluated more positively than human-like feedback, while in a high-cognitive-demand task, there was no significant difference between human-like feedback and machine-like feedback. In addition, the second experiment was conducted in social interaction between humans and robots to explore the effect of the two feedback types on the understandability, perceived waiting time, sociability, and service evaluation of the robot ( N = 36). The robots providing feedback were evaluated more positively than the baseline robot, which did not provide any feedback, and sociability mediated the effect of feedback type on service evaluation.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12369-023-01068-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2923575485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2923575485</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-b506d8421cba9352330711cd727b99ba4b6486601cfef1d133317499a0dd6ed93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGr_gKcFL16imXxujlJtFQpC0XNINtnSWjc12R7aX290FW_OZYbh_YAHoUsgN0CIus1AmdSYUIYJEFnj4wkaQa0E5jURp7-30nCOJjlvSBlGlVJyhK6X0cW-moXgnW3eqvuQ16uuamOqliHvYpdD-W3t4QKdtXabw-Rnj9Hr7OFl-ogXz_On6d0CNwx4j50g0tecQuOsZoIyRhRA4xVVTmtnuZO8lpJA04YWPDDGQHGtLfFeBq_ZGF0NubsUP_Yh92YT96krlYZqyoQSvBZFRQdVk2LOKbRml9bvNh0MEPMFxQxQTIFivqGYYzGxwZSLuFuF9Bf9j-sTQhdiPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2923575485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robot Feedback Design for Response Delay</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Kang, Dahyun ; Nam, Changjoo ; Kwak, Sonya S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kang, Dahyun ; Nam, Changjoo ; Kwak, Sonya S.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated an effective human-robot interaction design to alleviate the user’s negative experience caused by the response delay of a robot. The feedback regarding a robot’s delayed response was designed using human-like and machine-like approaches. The first experiment was conducted in task-based interaction to explore the effects of the feedback type (human-like or machine-like feedback versus a baseline robot) and task type (a high-cognitive-demand task versus a low-cognitive-demand task) on the understandability, perceived waiting time, and service evaluation of the robot ( N = 36). The robot with machine-like feedback was rated the most positive in terms of understandability, perceived waiting time, and service evaluation. The perceived waiting time mediated the effect of feedback type on service evaluation. There were significant effects between the feedback types and the task types on understandability, perceived waiting time, and service evaluation. In a low-cognitive-demand task, machine-like feedback was evaluated more positively than human-like feedback, while in a high-cognitive-demand task, there was no significant difference between human-like feedback and machine-like feedback. In addition, the second experiment was conducted in social interaction between humans and robots to explore the effect of the two feedback types on the understandability, perceived waiting time, sociability, and service evaluation of the robot ( N = 36). The robots providing feedback were evaluated more positively than the baseline robot, which did not provide any feedback, and sociability mediated the effect of feedback type on service evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1875-4791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-4805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12369-023-01068-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Control ; Demand ; Engineering ; Feedback ; Human engineering ; Mechatronics ; Robotics ; Robots ; Social factors</subject><ispartof>International journal of social robotics, 2024-02, Vol.16 (2), p.341-361</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-b506d8421cba9352330711cd727b99ba4b6486601cfef1d133317499a0dd6ed93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2763-2716</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12369-023-01068-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12369-023-01068-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kang, Dahyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Changjoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwak, Sonya S.</creatorcontrib><title>Robot Feedback Design for Response Delay</title><title>International journal of social robotics</title><addtitle>Int J of Soc Robotics</addtitle><description>We investigated an effective human-robot interaction design to alleviate the user’s negative experience caused by the response delay of a robot. The feedback regarding a robot’s delayed response was designed using human-like and machine-like approaches. The first experiment was conducted in task-based interaction to explore the effects of the feedback type (human-like or machine-like feedback versus a baseline robot) and task type (a high-cognitive-demand task versus a low-cognitive-demand task) on the understandability, perceived waiting time, and service evaluation of the robot ( N = 36). The robot with machine-like feedback was rated the most positive in terms of understandability, perceived waiting time, and service evaluation. The perceived waiting time mediated the effect of feedback type on service evaluation. There were significant effects between the feedback types and the task types on understandability, perceived waiting time, and service evaluation. In a low-cognitive-demand task, machine-like feedback was evaluated more positively than human-like feedback, while in a high-cognitive-demand task, there was no significant difference between human-like feedback and machine-like feedback. In addition, the second experiment was conducted in social interaction between humans and robots to explore the effect of the two feedback types on the understandability, perceived waiting time, sociability, and service evaluation of the robot ( N = 36). The robots providing feedback were evaluated more positively than the baseline robot, which did not provide any feedback, and sociability mediated the effect of feedback type on service evaluation.</description><subject>Control</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Human engineering</subject><subject>Mechatronics</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><issn>1875-4791</issn><issn>1875-4805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGr_gKcFL16imXxujlJtFQpC0XNINtnSWjc12R7aX290FW_OZYbh_YAHoUsgN0CIus1AmdSYUIYJEFnj4wkaQa0E5jURp7-30nCOJjlvSBlGlVJyhK6X0cW-moXgnW3eqvuQ16uuamOqliHvYpdD-W3t4QKdtXabw-Rnj9Hr7OFl-ogXz_On6d0CNwx4j50g0tecQuOsZoIyRhRA4xVVTmtnuZO8lpJA04YWPDDGQHGtLfFeBq_ZGF0NubsUP_Yh92YT96krlYZqyoQSvBZFRQdVk2LOKbRml9bvNh0MEPMFxQxQTIFivqGYYzGxwZSLuFuF9Bf9j-sTQhdiPw</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Kang, Dahyun</creator><creator>Nam, Changjoo</creator><creator>Kwak, Sonya S.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2763-2716</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Robot Feedback Design for Response Delay</title><author>Kang, Dahyun ; Nam, Changjoo ; Kwak, Sonya S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-b506d8421cba9352330711cd727b99ba4b6486601cfef1d133317499a0dd6ed93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Control</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Human engineering</topic><topic>Mechatronics</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kang, Dahyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Changjoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwak, Sonya S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of social robotics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kang, Dahyun</au><au>Nam, Changjoo</au><au>Kwak, Sonya S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robot Feedback Design for Response Delay</atitle><jtitle>International journal of social robotics</jtitle><stitle>Int J of Soc Robotics</stitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>341</spage><epage>361</epage><pages>341-361</pages><issn>1875-4791</issn><eissn>1875-4805</eissn><abstract>We investigated an effective human-robot interaction design to alleviate the user’s negative experience caused by the response delay of a robot. The feedback regarding a robot’s delayed response was designed using human-like and machine-like approaches. The first experiment was conducted in task-based interaction to explore the effects of the feedback type (human-like or machine-like feedback versus a baseline robot) and task type (a high-cognitive-demand task versus a low-cognitive-demand task) on the understandability, perceived waiting time, and service evaluation of the robot ( N = 36). The robot with machine-like feedback was rated the most positive in terms of understandability, perceived waiting time, and service evaluation. The perceived waiting time mediated the effect of feedback type on service evaluation. There were significant effects between the feedback types and the task types on understandability, perceived waiting time, and service evaluation. In a low-cognitive-demand task, machine-like feedback was evaluated more positively than human-like feedback, while in a high-cognitive-demand task, there was no significant difference between human-like feedback and machine-like feedback. In addition, the second experiment was conducted in social interaction between humans and robots to explore the effect of the two feedback types on the understandability, perceived waiting time, sociability, and service evaluation of the robot ( N = 36). The robots providing feedback were evaluated more positively than the baseline robot, which did not provide any feedback, and sociability mediated the effect of feedback type on service evaluation.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s12369-023-01068-z</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2763-2716</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1875-4791
ispartof International journal of social robotics, 2024-02, Vol.16 (2), p.341-361
issn 1875-4791
1875-4805
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2923575485
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Control
Demand
Engineering
Feedback
Human engineering
Mechatronics
Robotics
Robots
Social factors
title Robot Feedback Design for Response Delay
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A52%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robot%20Feedback%20Design%20for%20Response%20Delay&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20social%20robotics&rft.au=Kang,%20Dahyun&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=341&rft.epage=361&rft.pages=341-361&rft.issn=1875-4791&rft.eissn=1875-4805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12369-023-01068-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2923575485%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2923575485&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true