Why Democrats Should Be Committed to Future Generations
In response to the claim that democracies are inherently short-termist, this article argues for a new way to understand them as being committed to future generations. If taking turns among rulers and ruled is a normative idea inherent to the concept of democracy, then such turn-taking commits democr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association 2023-12, Vol.62 (3), p.459-474 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 474 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 459 |
| container_title | Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association |
| container_volume | 62 |
| creator | Fritsch, Matthias |
| description | In response to the claim that democracies are inherently short-termist, this article argues for a new way to understand them as being committed to future generations. If taking turns among rulers and ruled is a normative idea inherent to the concept of democracy, then such turn-taking commits democrats to a fair turn with future generations. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0012217323000173 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2923109575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0012217323000173</cupid><sourcerecordid>2923109575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-960880cf89a057c3d69c5a4e086d15969c78bda5a22ed9047a02844417b1672d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqHwA9gsMQfu7DiORwi0IFViKIgxcmOHpmriYjtD_31TtRIDYro7ve-9kx4htwj3CCgfFgDIGErOOIyr5GckQSlUCipT5yQ5yOlBvyRXIawBGJfIEiK_Vjv6bDtXex0DXazcsDH0ydLSdV0bozU0Ojod4uAtndnejljr-nBNLhq9CfbmNCfkc_ryUb6m8_fZW_k4T2uOLKYqh6KAuimUBiFrbnJVC51ZKHKDQo2XLJZGC82YNQoyqYEVWZahXGIumeETcnfM3Xr3M9gQq7UbfD--rJhiHEEJKUYKj1TtXQjeNtXWt532uwqhOvRT_eln9PCTR3dL35pv-xv9v2sPFOJkSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2923109575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why Democrats Should Be Committed to Future Generations</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Fritsch, Matthias</creator><creatorcontrib>Fritsch, Matthias</creatorcontrib><description>In response to the claim that democracies are inherently short-termist, this article argues for a new way to understand them as being committed to future generations. If taking turns among rulers and ruled is a normative idea inherent to the concept of democracy, then such turn-taking commits democrats to a fair turn with future generations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-2173</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1759-0949</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0012217323000173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Authoritarianism ; Capitalism ; Citizen participation ; Climate change ; Consent ; Decision making ; Democracy ; Environmental policy ; Equal rights ; Politics ; Special Issue: Canadian Philosophical Association 2023 Prize Winning Papers ; This Paper Won a Tenured Faculty Prize at the 2023 Canadian Philosophical Association Conference</subject><ispartof>Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association, 2023-12, Vol.62 (3), p.459-474</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Canadian Philosophical Association/Publié par Cambridge University Press au nom de l’Association canadienne de philosophie</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Canadian Philosophical Association/Publié par Cambridge University Press au nom de l’Association canadienne de philosophie. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-4100-9023</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0012217323000173/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fritsch, Matthias</creatorcontrib><title>Why Democrats Should Be Committed to Future Generations</title><title>Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association</title><addtitle>Dialogue</addtitle><description>In response to the claim that democracies are inherently short-termist, this article argues for a new way to understand them as being committed to future generations. If taking turns among rulers and ruled is a normative idea inherent to the concept of democracy, then such turn-taking commits democrats to a fair turn with future generations.</description><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Equal rights</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Special Issue: Canadian Philosophical Association 2023 Prize Winning Papers</subject><subject>This Paper Won a Tenured Faculty Prize at the 2023 Canadian Philosophical Association Conference</subject><issn>0012-2173</issn><issn>1759-0949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqHwA9gsMQfu7DiORwi0IFViKIgxcmOHpmriYjtD_31TtRIDYro7ve-9kx4htwj3CCgfFgDIGErOOIyr5GckQSlUCipT5yQ5yOlBvyRXIawBGJfIEiK_Vjv6bDtXex0DXazcsDH0ydLSdV0bozU0Ojod4uAtndnejljr-nBNLhq9CfbmNCfkc_ryUb6m8_fZW_k4T2uOLKYqh6KAuimUBiFrbnJVC51ZKHKDQo2XLJZGC82YNQoyqYEVWZahXGIumeETcnfM3Xr3M9gQq7UbfD--rJhiHEEJKUYKj1TtXQjeNtXWt532uwqhOvRT_eln9PCTR3dL35pv-xv9v2sPFOJkSg</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Fritsch, Matthias</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4100-9023</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Why Democrats Should Be Committed to Future Generations</title><author>Fritsch, Matthias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-960880cf89a057c3d69c5a4e086d15969c78bda5a22ed9047a02844417b1672d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Equal rights</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Special Issue: Canadian Philosophical Association 2023 Prize Winning Papers</topic><topic>This Paper Won a Tenured Faculty Prize at the 2023 Canadian Philosophical Association Conference</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fritsch, Matthias</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge University Press Wholly Gold Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Access via Art, Design & Architecture Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fritsch, Matthias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why Democrats Should Be Committed to Future Generations</atitle><jtitle>Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association</jtitle><addtitle>Dialogue</addtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>459</spage><epage>474</epage><pages>459-474</pages><issn>0012-2173</issn><eissn>1759-0949</eissn><abstract>In response to the claim that democracies are inherently short-termist, this article argues for a new way to understand them as being committed to future generations. If taking turns among rulers and ruled is a normative idea inherent to the concept of democracy, then such turn-taking commits democrats to a fair turn with future generations.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0012217323000173</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4100-9023</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0012-2173 |
| ispartof | Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association, 2023-12, Vol.62 (3), p.459-474 |
| issn | 0012-2173 1759-0949 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2923109575 |
| source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Authoritarianism Capitalism Citizen participation Climate change Consent Decision making Democracy Environmental policy Equal rights Politics Special Issue: Canadian Philosophical Association 2023 Prize Winning Papers This Paper Won a Tenured Faculty Prize at the 2023 Canadian Philosophical Association Conference |
| title | Why Democrats Should Be Committed to Future Generations |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T03%3A03%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20Democrats%20Should%20Be%20Committed%20to%20Future%20Generations&rft.jtitle=Dialogue%20-%20Canadian%20Philosophical%20Association&rft.au=Fritsch,%20Matthias&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=459&rft.epage=474&rft.pages=459-474&rft.issn=0012-2173&rft.eissn=1759-0949&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0012217323000173&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2923109575%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2923109575&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0012217323000173&rfr_iscdi=true |