Critical assessment of medical devices on reliability, replacement prioritization and maintenance strategy criterion: Case study of Malaysian hospitals

The Biomedical Engineering Maintenance Services (BEMS) is a comprehensive maintenance program that ensures the safety and reliability of medical devices. Significant and crucial devices are identified and prioritized for best practice prior to the equipment life cycle to mitigate functional problems...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quality and reliability engineering international 2024-03, Vol.40 (2), p.970-1001
Hauptverfasser: Amran, Mohd Effendi, Aziz, Sa'ardin Abdul, Muhtazaruddin, Mohd Nabil, Masrom, Maslin, Haron, Habibah Norehan, Bani, Nurul Aini, Mohd Izhar, Mohd Azri, Usman, Sahnius, Sarip, Shamsul, Najamudin, Siti Sara, Zamzam, Aizat Hilmi, Ahmad Kamil, Ahmad Safwan, Azilah, Nurul Farhana, Muhammad‐Sukki, Firdaus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1001
container_issue 2
container_start_page 970
container_title Quality and reliability engineering international
container_volume 40
creator Amran, Mohd Effendi
Aziz, Sa'ardin Abdul
Muhtazaruddin, Mohd Nabil
Masrom, Maslin
Haron, Habibah Norehan
Bani, Nurul Aini
Mohd Izhar, Mohd Azri
Usman, Sahnius
Sarip, Shamsul
Najamudin, Siti Sara
Zamzam, Aizat Hilmi
Ahmad Kamil, Ahmad Safwan
Azilah, Nurul Farhana
Muhammad‐Sukki, Firdaus
description The Biomedical Engineering Maintenance Services (BEMS) is a comprehensive maintenance program that ensures the safety and reliability of medical devices. Significant and crucial devices are identified and prioritized for best practice prior to the equipment life cycle to mitigate functional problems, alarmed by the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) underlying the modernization agenda. A model of multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM) to prioritize medical devices according to their criticality is presented in this paper, with the utilization of quality function deployment (QFD) and fuzzy logic in the development of the model through a quantitative survey of experts from all regions in Malaysia. As a result, a customized version of the Asset Criticality Assessment (ACA) is developed and is recommended for use in more than 144 Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals. Subsequently, real data of four selected devices are pulled from the Asset and Services Information System (ASIS) to demonstrate a relevant and comparable end‐result using the QFD and fuzzy logic. In essence, the key contribution of the customized ACA model is that it assesses a promising evaluation with a broader range on both the performance of medical devices and the appropriate asset replacement choices. This leads to an effective maintenance strategy for each device and the modernization of reliability computation metrics.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/qre.3447
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2922459055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2922459055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-1ce63fa98dd1d67ef8174583b03d451f7607a5e1a0cbf5ed35111739c10ae9a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10N9LwzAQB_AgCs4p-CcEfPHBzqRpm9Y3GfMHTETR53JLrprRpTPJlPqP-O-abr76dNzlwx35EnLK2YQzll5-OJyILJN7ZMRZVSW8EOU-GTGZlUnJuDwkR94vGYu4KkfkZ-pMMApaCt6j9yu0gXYNXaHeTjV-GoWedpY6bA0sTGtCfxGbdQsKt3ztTDds-YZgogOr6QqMDWjBKqQ-OAj41lMVEUZrr-gU_PCw0f1w7AFa6L0BS987vzYBWn9MDppY8OSvjsnrzexlepfMH2_vp9fzRIlUyoQrLEQDVak114XEpuQyy0uxYEJnOW9kwSTkyIGpRZOjFjnnXIpKcQZYQSnG5Gy3d-26jw36UC-7jbPxZJ1WaZrlFcvzqM53SrnOe4dNHf-8AtfXnNVD7HWMvR5ijzTZ0S_TYv-vq5-eZ1v_C5oRh38</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2922459055</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critical assessment of medical devices on reliability, replacement prioritization and maintenance strategy criterion: Case study of Malaysian hospitals</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Amran, Mohd Effendi ; Aziz, Sa'ardin Abdul ; Muhtazaruddin, Mohd Nabil ; Masrom, Maslin ; Haron, Habibah Norehan ; Bani, Nurul Aini ; Mohd Izhar, Mohd Azri ; Usman, Sahnius ; Sarip, Shamsul ; Najamudin, Siti Sara ; Zamzam, Aizat Hilmi ; Ahmad Kamil, Ahmad Safwan ; Azilah, Nurul Farhana ; Muhammad‐Sukki, Firdaus</creator><creatorcontrib>Amran, Mohd Effendi ; Aziz, Sa'ardin Abdul ; Muhtazaruddin, Mohd Nabil ; Masrom, Maslin ; Haron, Habibah Norehan ; Bani, Nurul Aini ; Mohd Izhar, Mohd Azri ; Usman, Sahnius ; Sarip, Shamsul ; Najamudin, Siti Sara ; Zamzam, Aizat Hilmi ; Ahmad Kamil, Ahmad Safwan ; Azilah, Nurul Farhana ; Muhammad‐Sukki, Firdaus</creatorcontrib><description>The Biomedical Engineering Maintenance Services (BEMS) is a comprehensive maintenance program that ensures the safety and reliability of medical devices. Significant and crucial devices are identified and prioritized for best practice prior to the equipment life cycle to mitigate functional problems, alarmed by the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) underlying the modernization agenda. A model of multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM) to prioritize medical devices according to their criticality is presented in this paper, with the utilization of quality function deployment (QFD) and fuzzy logic in the development of the model through a quantitative survey of experts from all regions in Malaysia. As a result, a customized version of the Asset Criticality Assessment (ACA) is developed and is recommended for use in more than 144 Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals. Subsequently, real data of four selected devices are pulled from the Asset and Services Information System (ASIS) to demonstrate a relevant and comparable end‐result using the QFD and fuzzy logic. In essence, the key contribution of the customized ACA model is that it assesses a promising evaluation with a broader range on both the performance of medical devices and the appropriate asset replacement choices. This leads to an effective maintenance strategy for each device and the modernization of reliability computation metrics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-8017</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1638</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/qre.3447</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>analytical hierarchy process (AHP) ; asset criticality assessment (ACA) ; Best practice ; Biomedical engineering ; Customization ; Fuzzy logic ; Hospitals ; Industry 4.0 ; Maintenance ; Medical devices ; Medical electronics ; Medical equipment ; Modernization ; Quality function deployment ; quality function deployment (QFD) ; Reliability</subject><ispartof>Quality and reliability engineering international, 2024-03, Vol.40 (2), p.970-1001</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-1ce63fa98dd1d67ef8174583b03d451f7607a5e1a0cbf5ed35111739c10ae9a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-1ce63fa98dd1d67ef8174583b03d451f7607a5e1a0cbf5ed35111739c10ae9a83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4300-4194 ; 0000-0003-2226-9839 ; 0000-0002-5415-2259 ; 0000-0001-6308-2857 ; 0000-0002-3240-5550 ; 0000-0003-2405-1673 ; 0000-0003-3761-0630</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fqre.3447$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fqre.3447$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amran, Mohd Effendi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Sa'ardin Abdul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhtazaruddin, Mohd Nabil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masrom, Maslin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haron, Habibah Norehan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bani, Nurul Aini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohd Izhar, Mohd Azri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usman, Sahnius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarip, Shamsul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Najamudin, Siti Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamzam, Aizat Hilmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad Kamil, Ahmad Safwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azilah, Nurul Farhana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhammad‐Sukki, Firdaus</creatorcontrib><title>Critical assessment of medical devices on reliability, replacement prioritization and maintenance strategy criterion: Case study of Malaysian hospitals</title><title>Quality and reliability engineering international</title><description>The Biomedical Engineering Maintenance Services (BEMS) is a comprehensive maintenance program that ensures the safety and reliability of medical devices. Significant and crucial devices are identified and prioritized for best practice prior to the equipment life cycle to mitigate functional problems, alarmed by the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) underlying the modernization agenda. A model of multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM) to prioritize medical devices according to their criticality is presented in this paper, with the utilization of quality function deployment (QFD) and fuzzy logic in the development of the model through a quantitative survey of experts from all regions in Malaysia. As a result, a customized version of the Asset Criticality Assessment (ACA) is developed and is recommended for use in more than 144 Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals. Subsequently, real data of four selected devices are pulled from the Asset and Services Information System (ASIS) to demonstrate a relevant and comparable end‐result using the QFD and fuzzy logic. In essence, the key contribution of the customized ACA model is that it assesses a promising evaluation with a broader range on both the performance of medical devices and the appropriate asset replacement choices. This leads to an effective maintenance strategy for each device and the modernization of reliability computation metrics.</description><subject>analytical hierarchy process (AHP)</subject><subject>asset criticality assessment (ACA)</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Biomedical engineering</subject><subject>Customization</subject><subject>Fuzzy logic</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Industry 4.0</subject><subject>Maintenance</subject><subject>Medical devices</subject><subject>Medical electronics</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Modernization</subject><subject>Quality function deployment</subject><subject>quality function deployment (QFD)</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><issn>0748-8017</issn><issn>1099-1638</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp10N9LwzAQB_AgCs4p-CcEfPHBzqRpm9Y3GfMHTETR53JLrprRpTPJlPqP-O-abr76dNzlwx35EnLK2YQzll5-OJyILJN7ZMRZVSW8EOU-GTGZlUnJuDwkR94vGYu4KkfkZ-pMMApaCt6j9yu0gXYNXaHeTjV-GoWedpY6bA0sTGtCfxGbdQsKt3ztTDds-YZgogOr6QqMDWjBKqQ-OAj41lMVEUZrr-gU_PCw0f1w7AFa6L0BS987vzYBWn9MDppY8OSvjsnrzexlepfMH2_vp9fzRIlUyoQrLEQDVak114XEpuQyy0uxYEJnOW9kwSTkyIGpRZOjFjnnXIpKcQZYQSnG5Gy3d-26jw36UC-7jbPxZJ1WaZrlFcvzqM53SrnOe4dNHf-8AtfXnNVD7HWMvR5ijzTZ0S_TYv-vq5-eZ1v_C5oRh38</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Amran, Mohd Effendi</creator><creator>Aziz, Sa'ardin Abdul</creator><creator>Muhtazaruddin, Mohd Nabil</creator><creator>Masrom, Maslin</creator><creator>Haron, Habibah Norehan</creator><creator>Bani, Nurul Aini</creator><creator>Mohd Izhar, Mohd Azri</creator><creator>Usman, Sahnius</creator><creator>Sarip, Shamsul</creator><creator>Najamudin, Siti Sara</creator><creator>Zamzam, Aizat Hilmi</creator><creator>Ahmad Kamil, Ahmad Safwan</creator><creator>Azilah, Nurul Farhana</creator><creator>Muhammad‐Sukki, Firdaus</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4300-4194</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2226-9839</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5415-2259</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6308-2857</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3240-5550</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2405-1673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3761-0630</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Critical assessment of medical devices on reliability, replacement prioritization and maintenance strategy criterion: Case study of Malaysian hospitals</title><author>Amran, Mohd Effendi ; Aziz, Sa'ardin Abdul ; Muhtazaruddin, Mohd Nabil ; Masrom, Maslin ; Haron, Habibah Norehan ; Bani, Nurul Aini ; Mohd Izhar, Mohd Azri ; Usman, Sahnius ; Sarip, Shamsul ; Najamudin, Siti Sara ; Zamzam, Aizat Hilmi ; Ahmad Kamil, Ahmad Safwan ; Azilah, Nurul Farhana ; Muhammad‐Sukki, Firdaus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-1ce63fa98dd1d67ef8174583b03d451f7607a5e1a0cbf5ed35111739c10ae9a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>analytical hierarchy process (AHP)</topic><topic>asset criticality assessment (ACA)</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Biomedical engineering</topic><topic>Customization</topic><topic>Fuzzy logic</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Industry 4.0</topic><topic>Maintenance</topic><topic>Medical devices</topic><topic>Medical electronics</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Modernization</topic><topic>Quality function deployment</topic><topic>quality function deployment (QFD)</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amran, Mohd Effendi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Sa'ardin Abdul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhtazaruddin, Mohd Nabil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masrom, Maslin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haron, Habibah Norehan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bani, Nurul Aini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohd Izhar, Mohd Azri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usman, Sahnius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarip, Shamsul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Najamudin, Siti Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamzam, Aizat Hilmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad Kamil, Ahmad Safwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azilah, Nurul Farhana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhammad‐Sukki, Firdaus</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Quality and reliability engineering international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amran, Mohd Effendi</au><au>Aziz, Sa'ardin Abdul</au><au>Muhtazaruddin, Mohd Nabil</au><au>Masrom, Maslin</au><au>Haron, Habibah Norehan</au><au>Bani, Nurul Aini</au><au>Mohd Izhar, Mohd Azri</au><au>Usman, Sahnius</au><au>Sarip, Shamsul</au><au>Najamudin, Siti Sara</au><au>Zamzam, Aizat Hilmi</au><au>Ahmad Kamil, Ahmad Safwan</au><au>Azilah, Nurul Farhana</au><au>Muhammad‐Sukki, Firdaus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Critical assessment of medical devices on reliability, replacement prioritization and maintenance strategy criterion: Case study of Malaysian hospitals</atitle><jtitle>Quality and reliability engineering international</jtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>970</spage><epage>1001</epage><pages>970-1001</pages><issn>0748-8017</issn><eissn>1099-1638</eissn><abstract>The Biomedical Engineering Maintenance Services (BEMS) is a comprehensive maintenance program that ensures the safety and reliability of medical devices. Significant and crucial devices are identified and prioritized for best practice prior to the equipment life cycle to mitigate functional problems, alarmed by the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) underlying the modernization agenda. A model of multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM) to prioritize medical devices according to their criticality is presented in this paper, with the utilization of quality function deployment (QFD) and fuzzy logic in the development of the model through a quantitative survey of experts from all regions in Malaysia. As a result, a customized version of the Asset Criticality Assessment (ACA) is developed and is recommended for use in more than 144 Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals. Subsequently, real data of four selected devices are pulled from the Asset and Services Information System (ASIS) to demonstrate a relevant and comparable end‐result using the QFD and fuzzy logic. In essence, the key contribution of the customized ACA model is that it assesses a promising evaluation with a broader range on both the performance of medical devices and the appropriate asset replacement choices. This leads to an effective maintenance strategy for each device and the modernization of reliability computation metrics.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/qre.3447</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4300-4194</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2226-9839</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5415-2259</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6308-2857</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3240-5550</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2405-1673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3761-0630</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-8017
ispartof Quality and reliability engineering international, 2024-03, Vol.40 (2), p.970-1001
issn 0748-8017
1099-1638
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2922459055
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects analytical hierarchy process (AHP)
asset criticality assessment (ACA)
Best practice
Biomedical engineering
Customization
Fuzzy logic
Hospitals
Industry 4.0
Maintenance
Medical devices
Medical electronics
Medical equipment
Modernization
Quality function deployment
quality function deployment (QFD)
Reliability
title Critical assessment of medical devices on reliability, replacement prioritization and maintenance strategy criterion: Case study of Malaysian hospitals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T21%3A45%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20assessment%20of%20medical%20devices%20on%20reliability,%20replacement%20prioritization%20and%20maintenance%20strategy%20criterion:%20Case%20study%20of%20Malaysian%20hospitals&rft.jtitle=Quality%20and%20reliability%20engineering%20international&rft.au=Amran,%20Mohd%20Effendi&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=970&rft.epage=1001&rft.pages=970-1001&rft.issn=0748-8017&rft.eissn=1099-1638&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/qre.3447&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2922459055%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2922459055&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true