Optimizing Technology R&D Supply Chain Problem Under Technology Concern Uncertainty
Technology research and development (R&D) plays an increasingly critical role in emerging supply chains by endowing products with desirable technical features. Due to unpredictable market acceptance, the technology concern coefficient, namely, the sensitivity of price to the technology level of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of fuzzy systems 2023-03, Vol.25 (2), p.916-939 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 939 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 916 |
container_title | International journal of fuzzy systems |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Chen, Aixia Liu, Yankui |
description | Technology research and development (R&D) plays an increasingly critical role in emerging supply chains by endowing products with desirable technical features. Due to unpredictable market acceptance, the technology concern coefficient, namely, the sensitivity of price to the technology level of technological products is uncertain in the process of R&D, and usually only its partial distribution information can be obtained by referring to similar products or resorting to experts in related fields. It reflects the subjective uncertainty of technology concern, which is different from the existing relevant literature. Motivated by this challenge, we construct a new ambiguity set of possibility distributions to characterize the distribution uncertainty of technology concern and build a novel robust fuzzy tri-level optimization model for decision-making in technology R&D supply chain (tRDsc) with government subsidy. Based on the proposed ambiguity set, we have derived the closed-form equilibrium solutions to the developed robust optimization model. At the same time, the equilibrium under manufacturer subsidy is consistent with that under consumer subsidy. Besides, manufacturer subsidy is more beneficial to the supplier, while technology supplier subsidy benefits the manufacturer more when the subsidy ratio is big enough. Finally, an application case about electric vehicles is studied to illustrate the effectiveness of our new optimization method. The case study shows that the government’s subsidy strategy may change when the uncertainty perturbation parameters change. That is, taking investment efficiency as the selection criterion, the change of perturbation set will influence subsidy policy choices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40815-022-01418-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2922076609</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2922076609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-3ef9728cc1f5278a30a4b9675ee010d6fd1189abc01f4fe911bc4b4cbd171b963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAURYMoOIzzB1wVBHfR95K2aZZSP0EYcWbWoU3TmUonrUlnUX-90Qq6cnUX79z74BByjnCFAOLax5BhQoExChhjRpMjMmMoJeUM8ZjMMEkZZbGQp2ThfVMCR5byJOUzslr2Q7NvPhq7jdZG72zXdtsxer28jVaHvm_HKN8VjY1eXFe2Zh9tbGXcXzLvrDbOhkOIIaDDeEZO6qL1ZvGTc7K5v1vnj_R5-fCU3zxTzQQMlJtaCpZpjXXCRFZwKOJSpiIxBhCqtK4QM1mUGrCOayMRSx2XsS4rFBhAPicX027vuveD8YN66w7OhpeKScZApCnIQLGJ0q7z3pla9a7ZF25UCOrLn5r8qeBPfftTSSjxqeQDbLfG_U7_0_oEuEFy5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2922076609</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizing Technology R&D Supply Chain Problem Under Technology Concern Uncertainty</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Chen, Aixia ; Liu, Yankui</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Aixia ; Liu, Yankui</creatorcontrib><description>Technology research and development (R&D) plays an increasingly critical role in emerging supply chains by endowing products with desirable technical features. Due to unpredictable market acceptance, the technology concern coefficient, namely, the sensitivity of price to the technology level of technological products is uncertain in the process of R&D, and usually only its partial distribution information can be obtained by referring to similar products or resorting to experts in related fields. It reflects the subjective uncertainty of technology concern, which is different from the existing relevant literature. Motivated by this challenge, we construct a new ambiguity set of possibility distributions to characterize the distribution uncertainty of technology concern and build a novel robust fuzzy tri-level optimization model for decision-making in technology R&D supply chain (tRDsc) with government subsidy. Based on the proposed ambiguity set, we have derived the closed-form equilibrium solutions to the developed robust optimization model. At the same time, the equilibrium under manufacturer subsidy is consistent with that under consumer subsidy. Besides, manufacturer subsidy is more beneficial to the supplier, while technology supplier subsidy benefits the manufacturer more when the subsidy ratio is big enough. Finally, an application case about electric vehicles is studied to illustrate the effectiveness of our new optimization method. The case study shows that the government’s subsidy strategy may change when the uncertainty perturbation parameters change. That is, taking investment efficiency as the selection criterion, the change of perturbation set will influence subsidy policy choices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1562-2479</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2199-3211</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40815-022-01418-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; American Recovery & Reinvestment Act 2009-US ; Artificial Intelligence ; Computational Intelligence ; Costs ; Decision making ; Electric vehicles ; Engineering ; Equilibrium ; Government subsidies ; Innovations ; Literature reviews ; Management Science ; Manufacturers ; Operations Research ; Optimization ; Optimization models ; Parameter uncertainty ; Perturbation ; R&D ; Research & development ; Subsidies ; Suppliers ; Supply chains ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>International journal of fuzzy systems, 2023-03, Vol.25 (2), p.916-939</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Taiwan Fuzzy Systems Association 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-3ef9728cc1f5278a30a4b9675ee010d6fd1189abc01f4fe911bc4b4cbd171b963</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3106-6761</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40815-022-01418-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2922076609?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21367,27901,27902,33721,41464,42533,43781,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Aixia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yankui</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizing Technology R&D Supply Chain Problem Under Technology Concern Uncertainty</title><title>International journal of fuzzy systems</title><addtitle>Int. J. Fuzzy Syst</addtitle><description>Technology research and development (R&D) plays an increasingly critical role in emerging supply chains by endowing products with desirable technical features. Due to unpredictable market acceptance, the technology concern coefficient, namely, the sensitivity of price to the technology level of technological products is uncertain in the process of R&D, and usually only its partial distribution information can be obtained by referring to similar products or resorting to experts in related fields. It reflects the subjective uncertainty of technology concern, which is different from the existing relevant literature. Motivated by this challenge, we construct a new ambiguity set of possibility distributions to characterize the distribution uncertainty of technology concern and build a novel robust fuzzy tri-level optimization model for decision-making in technology R&D supply chain (tRDsc) with government subsidy. Based on the proposed ambiguity set, we have derived the closed-form equilibrium solutions to the developed robust optimization model. At the same time, the equilibrium under manufacturer subsidy is consistent with that under consumer subsidy. Besides, manufacturer subsidy is more beneficial to the supplier, while technology supplier subsidy benefits the manufacturer more when the subsidy ratio is big enough. Finally, an application case about electric vehicles is studied to illustrate the effectiveness of our new optimization method. The case study shows that the government’s subsidy strategy may change when the uncertainty perturbation parameters change. That is, taking investment efficiency as the selection criterion, the change of perturbation set will influence subsidy policy choices.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>American Recovery & Reinvestment Act 2009-US</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Computational Intelligence</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Government subsidies</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Management Science</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>Operations Research</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Optimization models</subject><subject>Parameter uncertainty</subject><subject>Perturbation</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>1562-2479</issn><issn>2199-3211</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAURYMoOIzzB1wVBHfR95K2aZZSP0EYcWbWoU3TmUonrUlnUX-90Qq6cnUX79z74BByjnCFAOLax5BhQoExChhjRpMjMmMoJeUM8ZjMMEkZZbGQp2ThfVMCR5byJOUzslr2Q7NvPhq7jdZG72zXdtsxer28jVaHvm_HKN8VjY1eXFe2Zh9tbGXcXzLvrDbOhkOIIaDDeEZO6qL1ZvGTc7K5v1vnj_R5-fCU3zxTzQQMlJtaCpZpjXXCRFZwKOJSpiIxBhCqtK4QM1mUGrCOayMRSx2XsS4rFBhAPicX027vuveD8YN66w7OhpeKScZApCnIQLGJ0q7z3pla9a7ZF25UCOrLn5r8qeBPfftTSSjxqeQDbLfG_U7_0_oEuEFy5A</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Chen, Aixia</creator><creator>Liu, Yankui</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3106-6761</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Optimizing Technology R&D Supply Chain Problem Under Technology Concern Uncertainty</title><author>Chen, Aixia ; Liu, Yankui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-3ef9728cc1f5278a30a4b9675ee010d6fd1189abc01f4fe911bc4b4cbd171b963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>American Recovery & Reinvestment Act 2009-US</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Computational Intelligence</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Government subsidies</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Management Science</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>Operations Research</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Optimization models</topic><topic>Parameter uncertainty</topic><topic>Perturbation</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Aixia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yankui</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of fuzzy systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Aixia</au><au>Liu, Yankui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizing Technology R&D Supply Chain Problem Under Technology Concern Uncertainty</atitle><jtitle>International journal of fuzzy systems</jtitle><stitle>Int. J. Fuzzy Syst</stitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>916</spage><epage>939</epage><pages>916-939</pages><issn>1562-2479</issn><eissn>2199-3211</eissn><abstract>Technology research and development (R&D) plays an increasingly critical role in emerging supply chains by endowing products with desirable technical features. Due to unpredictable market acceptance, the technology concern coefficient, namely, the sensitivity of price to the technology level of technological products is uncertain in the process of R&D, and usually only its partial distribution information can be obtained by referring to similar products or resorting to experts in related fields. It reflects the subjective uncertainty of technology concern, which is different from the existing relevant literature. Motivated by this challenge, we construct a new ambiguity set of possibility distributions to characterize the distribution uncertainty of technology concern and build a novel robust fuzzy tri-level optimization model for decision-making in technology R&D supply chain (tRDsc) with government subsidy. Based on the proposed ambiguity set, we have derived the closed-form equilibrium solutions to the developed robust optimization model. At the same time, the equilibrium under manufacturer subsidy is consistent with that under consumer subsidy. Besides, manufacturer subsidy is more beneficial to the supplier, while technology supplier subsidy benefits the manufacturer more when the subsidy ratio is big enough. Finally, an application case about electric vehicles is studied to illustrate the effectiveness of our new optimization method. The case study shows that the government’s subsidy strategy may change when the uncertainty perturbation parameters change. That is, taking investment efficiency as the selection criterion, the change of perturbation set will influence subsidy policy choices.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s40815-022-01418-5</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3106-6761</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1562-2479 |
ispartof | International journal of fuzzy systems, 2023-03, Vol.25 (2), p.916-939 |
issn | 1562-2479 2199-3211 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2922076609 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Ambiguity American Recovery & Reinvestment Act 2009-US Artificial Intelligence Computational Intelligence Costs Decision making Electric vehicles Engineering Equilibrium Government subsidies Innovations Literature reviews Management Science Manufacturers Operations Research Optimization Optimization models Parameter uncertainty Perturbation R&D Research & development Subsidies Suppliers Supply chains Sustainable development |
title | Optimizing Technology R&D Supply Chain Problem Under Technology Concern Uncertainty |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T09%3A32%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing%20Technology%20R&D%20Supply%20Chain%20Problem%20Under%20Technology%20Concern%20Uncertainty&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20fuzzy%20systems&rft.au=Chen,%20Aixia&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=916&rft.epage=939&rft.pages=916-939&rft.issn=1562-2479&rft.eissn=2199-3211&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40815-022-01418-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2922076609%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2922076609&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |