Residual Contaminations of Silicon-Based Glass, Alumina and Aluminum Grits on a Titanium Surface After Sandblasting
Sandblasting (grit-blasting) is a commonly used surface treatment method for roughening the surface of titanium dental implants. Today, alumina (Al 2 O 3 ) grits with various sizes are widely used for this purpose, due to their good surface roughening effects. However, sandblasting with Al 2 O 3 gri...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | SILICON 2019-10, Vol.11 (5), p.2313-2320 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2320 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 2313 |
| container_title | SILICON |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Guo, Cecilia Yan Matinlinna, Jukka Pekka Tsoi, James Kit-Hon Hong Tang, Alexander Tin |
| description | Sandblasting (grit-blasting) is a commonly used surface treatment method for roughening the surface of titanium dental implants. Today, alumina (Al
2
O
3
) grits with various sizes are widely used for this purpose, due to their good surface roughening effects. However, sandblasting with Al
2
O
3
grits also introduces impurities to the surface of the Ti implant, which may adversely affect the osseointegration process of the implant. This raises the question as to the use of Al
2
O
3
as the most suitable type of sandblasting grit, considering the contaminations to the titanium implant in addition to roughening effects. This study evaluates Al
2
O
3
, a silicon-based (silica, SiO
2
) glass and Al metal grits in terms of both roughing effects and contamination to the titanium implant surface. Thirty commercially pure grade 2 (CP2) titanium plates were grit-blasted using various grits. Surface roughness average (R
a
) of all grit-blasted plate was measured. In addition, SEM/EDX analysis was performed to detect the morphology and elements on the titanium specimen surface before and after sandblasting. Results showed that each type of grits has its own advantages and disadvantages. This said, Al
2
O
3
might be the most suitable material among the three tested grit materials for sandblasting a titanium dental implant surface. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12633-015-9287-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2920373629</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2920373629</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-65a3dee00b2c2f0146425ebf3543bd7af7a36feb449a52cd66a75e60ea1696473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWLQfwFvAq9H82U12j7VoFQqCreAtzO4mJWWbrUn24Lc3pUVPzmUew--9gYfQDaP3jFL1EBmXQhDKSlLzShF5hiasUpLUNavOfzX9vETTGLc0j-CqkvUExXcTXTdCj-eDT7BzHpIbfMSDxSvXu3bw5BGi6fCihxjv8KwfDxAG3530uMOL4FK2eAx47RJ4l2-rMVhoDZ7ZZAJeZb7JCcn5zTW6sNBHMz3tK_Tx_LSev5Dl2-J1PluSVlQyEVmC6IyhtOEtt5QVsuClaawoC9F0CqwCIa1piqKGkredlKBKI6kBJmtZKHGFbo-5-zB8jSYmvR3G4PNLzWtOhRKS15liR6oNQ4zBWL0PbgfhWzOqD_XqY70616sP9WqZPfzoiZn1GxP-kv83_QDFZH2o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2920373629</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Residual Contaminations of Silicon-Based Glass, Alumina and Aluminum Grits on a Titanium Surface After Sandblasting</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Guo, Cecilia Yan ; Matinlinna, Jukka Pekka ; Tsoi, James Kit-Hon ; Hong Tang, Alexander Tin</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Cecilia Yan ; Matinlinna, Jukka Pekka ; Tsoi, James Kit-Hon ; Hong Tang, Alexander Tin</creatorcontrib><description>Sandblasting (grit-blasting) is a commonly used surface treatment method for roughening the surface of titanium dental implants. Today, alumina (Al
2
O
3
) grits with various sizes are widely used for this purpose, due to their good surface roughening effects. However, sandblasting with Al
2
O
3
grits also introduces impurities to the surface of the Ti implant, which may adversely affect the osseointegration process of the implant. This raises the question as to the use of Al
2
O
3
as the most suitable type of sandblasting grit, considering the contaminations to the titanium implant in addition to roughening effects. This study evaluates Al
2
O
3
, a silicon-based (silica, SiO
2
) glass and Al metal grits in terms of both roughing effects and contamination to the titanium implant surface. Thirty commercially pure grade 2 (CP2) titanium plates were grit-blasted using various grits. Surface roughness average (R
a
) of all grit-blasted plate was measured. In addition, SEM/EDX analysis was performed to detect the morphology and elements on the titanium specimen surface before and after sandblasting. Results showed that each type of grits has its own advantages and disadvantages. This said, Al
2
O
3
might be the most suitable material among the three tested grit materials for sandblasting a titanium dental implant surface.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1876-990X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-9918</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12633-015-9287-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Aluminum oxide ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Contamination ; Dental implants ; Environmental Chemistry ; Inorganic Chemistry ; Lasers ; Materials Science ; Metal plates ; Optical Devices ; Optics ; Original Paper ; Photonics ; Polymer Sciences ; Roughening ; Sandblasting ; Silica glass ; Silicon dioxide ; Surface roughness ; Surface treatment ; Titanium</subject><ispartof>SILICON, 2019-10, Vol.11 (5), p.2313-2320</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-65a3dee00b2c2f0146425ebf3543bd7af7a36feb449a52cd66a75e60ea1696473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-65a3dee00b2c2f0146425ebf3543bd7af7a36feb449a52cd66a75e60ea1696473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12633-015-9287-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2920373629?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21371,27907,27908,33727,41471,42540,43788,51302,64366,64370,72220</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Cecilia Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matinlinna, Jukka Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsoi, James Kit-Hon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong Tang, Alexander Tin</creatorcontrib><title>Residual Contaminations of Silicon-Based Glass, Alumina and Aluminum Grits on a Titanium Surface After Sandblasting</title><title>SILICON</title><addtitle>Silicon</addtitle><description>Sandblasting (grit-blasting) is a commonly used surface treatment method for roughening the surface of titanium dental implants. Today, alumina (Al
2
O
3
) grits with various sizes are widely used for this purpose, due to their good surface roughening effects. However, sandblasting with Al
2
O
3
grits also introduces impurities to the surface of the Ti implant, which may adversely affect the osseointegration process of the implant. This raises the question as to the use of Al
2
O
3
as the most suitable type of sandblasting grit, considering the contaminations to the titanium implant in addition to roughening effects. This study evaluates Al
2
O
3
, a silicon-based (silica, SiO
2
) glass and Al metal grits in terms of both roughing effects and contamination to the titanium implant surface. Thirty commercially pure grade 2 (CP2) titanium plates were grit-blasted using various grits. Surface roughness average (R
a
) of all grit-blasted plate was measured. In addition, SEM/EDX analysis was performed to detect the morphology and elements on the titanium specimen surface before and after sandblasting. Results showed that each type of grits has its own advantages and disadvantages. This said, Al
2
O
3
might be the most suitable material among the three tested grit materials for sandblasting a titanium dental implant surface.</description><subject>Aluminum oxide</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Inorganic Chemistry</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Metal plates</subject><subject>Optical Devices</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Photonics</subject><subject>Polymer Sciences</subject><subject>Roughening</subject><subject>Sandblasting</subject><subject>Silica glass</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Surface roughness</subject><subject>Surface treatment</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><issn>1876-990X</issn><issn>1876-9918</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWLQfwFvAq9H82U12j7VoFQqCreAtzO4mJWWbrUn24Lc3pUVPzmUew--9gYfQDaP3jFL1EBmXQhDKSlLzShF5hiasUpLUNavOfzX9vETTGLc0j-CqkvUExXcTXTdCj-eDT7BzHpIbfMSDxSvXu3bw5BGi6fCihxjv8KwfDxAG3530uMOL4FK2eAx47RJ4l2-rMVhoDZ7ZZAJeZb7JCcn5zTW6sNBHMz3tK_Tx_LSev5Dl2-J1PluSVlQyEVmC6IyhtOEtt5QVsuClaawoC9F0CqwCIa1piqKGkredlKBKI6kBJmtZKHGFbo-5-zB8jSYmvR3G4PNLzWtOhRKS15liR6oNQ4zBWL0PbgfhWzOqD_XqY70616sP9WqZPfzoiZn1GxP-kv83_QDFZH2o</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Guo, Cecilia Yan</creator><creator>Matinlinna, Jukka Pekka</creator><creator>Tsoi, James Kit-Hon</creator><creator>Hong Tang, Alexander Tin</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Residual Contaminations of Silicon-Based Glass, Alumina and Aluminum Grits on a Titanium Surface After Sandblasting</title><author>Guo, Cecilia Yan ; Matinlinna, Jukka Pekka ; Tsoi, James Kit-Hon ; Hong Tang, Alexander Tin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-65a3dee00b2c2f0146425ebf3543bd7af7a36feb449a52cd66a75e60ea1696473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aluminum oxide</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Inorganic Chemistry</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Metal plates</topic><topic>Optical Devices</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Photonics</topic><topic>Polymer Sciences</topic><topic>Roughening</topic><topic>Sandblasting</topic><topic>Silica glass</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Surface roughness</topic><topic>Surface treatment</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Cecilia Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matinlinna, Jukka Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsoi, James Kit-Hon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong Tang, Alexander Tin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>SILICON</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Cecilia Yan</au><au>Matinlinna, Jukka Pekka</au><au>Tsoi, James Kit-Hon</au><au>Hong Tang, Alexander Tin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Residual Contaminations of Silicon-Based Glass, Alumina and Aluminum Grits on a Titanium Surface After Sandblasting</atitle><jtitle>SILICON</jtitle><stitle>Silicon</stitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2313</spage><epage>2320</epage><pages>2313-2320</pages><issn>1876-990X</issn><eissn>1876-9918</eissn><abstract>Sandblasting (grit-blasting) is a commonly used surface treatment method for roughening the surface of titanium dental implants. Today, alumina (Al
2
O
3
) grits with various sizes are widely used for this purpose, due to their good surface roughening effects. However, sandblasting with Al
2
O
3
grits also introduces impurities to the surface of the Ti implant, which may adversely affect the osseointegration process of the implant. This raises the question as to the use of Al
2
O
3
as the most suitable type of sandblasting grit, considering the contaminations to the titanium implant in addition to roughening effects. This study evaluates Al
2
O
3
, a silicon-based (silica, SiO
2
) glass and Al metal grits in terms of both roughing effects and contamination to the titanium implant surface. Thirty commercially pure grade 2 (CP2) titanium plates were grit-blasted using various grits. Surface roughness average (R
a
) of all grit-blasted plate was measured. In addition, SEM/EDX analysis was performed to detect the morphology and elements on the titanium specimen surface before and after sandblasting. Results showed that each type of grits has its own advantages and disadvantages. This said, Al
2
O
3
might be the most suitable material among the three tested grit materials for sandblasting a titanium dental implant surface.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s12633-015-9287-6</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1876-990X |
| ispartof | SILICON, 2019-10, Vol.11 (5), p.2313-2320 |
| issn | 1876-990X 1876-9918 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2920373629 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central |
| subjects | Aluminum oxide Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Contamination Dental implants Environmental Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry Lasers Materials Science Metal plates Optical Devices Optics Original Paper Photonics Polymer Sciences Roughening Sandblasting Silica glass Silicon dioxide Surface roughness Surface treatment Titanium |
| title | Residual Contaminations of Silicon-Based Glass, Alumina and Aluminum Grits on a Titanium Surface After Sandblasting |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A14%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Residual%20Contaminations%20of%20Silicon-Based%20Glass,%20Alumina%20and%20Aluminum%20Grits%20on%20a%20Titanium%20Surface%20After%20Sandblasting&rft.jtitle=SILICON&rft.au=Guo,%20Cecilia%20Yan&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2313&rft.epage=2320&rft.pages=2313-2320&rft.issn=1876-990X&rft.eissn=1876-9918&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12633-015-9287-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2920373629%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2920373629&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |