Assessing the reliability and feasibility of frailty screening tools among hospitalised older adults
Background The 29-item Frail-Physical, Psychological and Social (Frail-PPS) and the 14-item Frailty Assessment Measure (FAM) were developed in Singapore to identify risk of frailty among community dwelling older adults and validated for use among hospitalised older adults. Objectives This study aime...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare 2023-11, Vol.32 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Lim, Siew Hoon Malhotra, Rahul Østbye, Truls Ang, Shin Yuh Ng, Xin Ping Agus, Nurliyana Binte Sunari, Raden Nurheryany Aloweni, Fazila |
| description | Background
The 29-item Frail-Physical, Psychological and Social (Frail-PPS) and the 14-item Frailty Assessment Measure (FAM) were developed in Singapore to identify risk of frailty among community dwelling older adults and validated for use among hospitalised older adults.
Objectives
This study aimed to establish the interrater reliability and feasibility of the two screening tools ‒ FAM and Frail-PPS, for assessing frailty among hospitalized older adults.
Methods
The FAM and Frail-PPS were administered during the initial nursing assessment by nurses to 62 patients aged 65 years and older within 24 h of admission. Interrater reliability, convergent validity and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were established. Feasibility was determined by the time of administration.
Results
ICCs for Frail-PPS and FAM were 0.95 and 0.95 respectively. A positive correlation was established (r = 0.97). The administration time for Frail-PPS averaged 6.7 min, and 3.3 min for FAM.
Conclusions
The FAM, with its high reliability and convergent validity, as well as shorter administration time, may be the preferred screening tool for use in acute care settings. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/20101058231215167 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2920172570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_20101058231215167</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8304a22fbcde4d5f98a0c2488389775d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2920172570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-b49cc672166e2738ac113dfa73db095fa302119228bf4694a00393bb82edae453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1P5DAMrRArgYAfsLdKnAux0zbJEaHlQ0Lay3KO3HwMGYXJEHcO_PvtMIg9rJAPfrbee7bspvkJ4gpAqWsUsMSgUQLCAKM6ak5RDKZDieZ4j0F0e8JJc8G8FkLAKBUAnjb-hjkwp82qnV9CW0NONKWc5veWNr6NgTh91iW2sVLKC2RXQ9h8iErJ3NJrWfBL4W2aKScOvi3Zh9qS3-WZz5sfkTKHi8981jzf_fpz-9A9_b5_vL156pxUcu6m3jg3KoRxDKikJgcgfSQl_STMEEkKBDCIeor9aHoSQho5TRqDp9AP8qx5PPj6Qmu7remV6rstlOxHo9SVpTonl4PVUvSEGCfnQ--HaDQJh73WUhulBr94XR68trW87QLPdl12dbOsb9EsB1U4KLGw4MBytTDXEL-mgrD739j_frNorg4aplX45_q94C83Lo3d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2920172570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the reliability and feasibility of frailty screening tools among hospitalised older adults</title><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><creator>Lim, Siew Hoon ; Malhotra, Rahul ; Østbye, Truls ; Ang, Shin Yuh ; Ng, Xin Ping ; Agus, Nurliyana ; Binte Sunari, Raden Nurheryany ; Aloweni, Fazila</creator><creatorcontrib>Lim, Siew Hoon ; Malhotra, Rahul ; Østbye, Truls ; Ang, Shin Yuh ; Ng, Xin Ping ; Agus, Nurliyana ; Binte Sunari, Raden Nurheryany ; Aloweni, Fazila</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The 29-item Frail-Physical, Psychological and Social (Frail-PPS) and the 14-item Frailty Assessment Measure (FAM) were developed in Singapore to identify risk of frailty among community dwelling older adults and validated for use among hospitalised older adults.
Objectives
This study aimed to establish the interrater reliability and feasibility of the two screening tools ‒ FAM and Frail-PPS, for assessing frailty among hospitalized older adults.
Methods
The FAM and Frail-PPS were administered during the initial nursing assessment by nurses to 62 patients aged 65 years and older within 24 h of admission. Interrater reliability, convergent validity and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were established. Feasibility was determined by the time of administration.
Results
ICCs for Frail-PPS and FAM were 0.95 and 0.95 respectively. A positive correlation was established (r = 0.97). The administration time for Frail-PPS averaged 6.7 min, and 3.3 min for FAM.
Conclusions
The FAM, with its high reliability and convergent validity, as well as shorter administration time, may be the preferred screening tool for use in acute care settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2010-1058</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2059-2329</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/20101058231215167</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Frailty ; Hospitalization ; Inpatient care ; Medical screening ; Older people</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare, 2023-11, Vol.32</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-b49cc672166e2738ac113dfa73db095fa302119228bf4694a00393bb82edae453</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7529-5358 ; 0000-0002-9559-0909</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20101058231215167$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20101058231215167$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,21945,27830,27901,27902,44921,45309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lim, Siew Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malhotra, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Østbye, Truls</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ang, Shin Yuh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Xin Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agus, Nurliyana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binte Sunari, Raden Nurheryany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aloweni, Fazila</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the reliability and feasibility of frailty screening tools among hospitalised older adults</title><title>Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare</title><description>Background
The 29-item Frail-Physical, Psychological and Social (Frail-PPS) and the 14-item Frailty Assessment Measure (FAM) were developed in Singapore to identify risk of frailty among community dwelling older adults and validated for use among hospitalised older adults.
Objectives
This study aimed to establish the interrater reliability and feasibility of the two screening tools ‒ FAM and Frail-PPS, for assessing frailty among hospitalized older adults.
Methods
The FAM and Frail-PPS were administered during the initial nursing assessment by nurses to 62 patients aged 65 years and older within 24 h of admission. Interrater reliability, convergent validity and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were established. Feasibility was determined by the time of administration.
Results
ICCs for Frail-PPS and FAM were 0.95 and 0.95 respectively. A positive correlation was established (r = 0.97). The administration time for Frail-PPS averaged 6.7 min, and 3.3 min for FAM.
Conclusions
The FAM, with its high reliability and convergent validity, as well as shorter administration time, may be the preferred screening tool for use in acute care settings.</description><subject>Frailty</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Inpatient care</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Older people</subject><issn>2010-1058</issn><issn>2059-2329</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1P5DAMrRArgYAfsLdKnAux0zbJEaHlQ0Lay3KO3HwMGYXJEHcO_PvtMIg9rJAPfrbee7bspvkJ4gpAqWsUsMSgUQLCAKM6ak5RDKZDieZ4j0F0e8JJc8G8FkLAKBUAnjb-hjkwp82qnV9CW0NONKWc5veWNr6NgTh91iW2sVLKC2RXQ9h8iErJ3NJrWfBL4W2aKScOvi3Zh9qS3-WZz5sfkTKHi8981jzf_fpz-9A9_b5_vL156pxUcu6m3jg3KoRxDKikJgcgfSQl_STMEEkKBDCIeor9aHoSQho5TRqDp9AP8qx5PPj6Qmu7remV6rstlOxHo9SVpTonl4PVUvSEGCfnQ--HaDQJh73WUhulBr94XR68trW87QLPdl12dbOsb9EsB1U4KLGw4MBytTDXEL-mgrD739j_frNorg4aplX45_q94C83Lo3d</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Lim, Siew Hoon</creator><creator>Malhotra, Rahul</creator><creator>Østbye, Truls</creator><creator>Ang, Shin Yuh</creator><creator>Ng, Xin Ping</creator><creator>Agus, Nurliyana</creator><creator>Binte Sunari, Raden Nurheryany</creator><creator>Aloweni, Fazila</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7529-5358</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9559-0909</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Assessing the reliability and feasibility of frailty screening tools among hospitalised older adults</title><author>Lim, Siew Hoon ; Malhotra, Rahul ; Østbye, Truls ; Ang, Shin Yuh ; Ng, Xin Ping ; Agus, Nurliyana ; Binte Sunari, Raden Nurheryany ; Aloweni, Fazila</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-b49cc672166e2738ac113dfa73db095fa302119228bf4694a00393bb82edae453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Frailty</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Inpatient care</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Older people</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lim, Siew Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malhotra, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Østbye, Truls</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ang, Shin Yuh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Xin Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agus, Nurliyana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binte Sunari, Raden Nurheryany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aloweni, Fazila</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lim, Siew Hoon</au><au>Malhotra, Rahul</au><au>Østbye, Truls</au><au>Ang, Shin Yuh</au><au>Ng, Xin Ping</au><au>Agus, Nurliyana</au><au>Binte Sunari, Raden Nurheryany</au><au>Aloweni, Fazila</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the reliability and feasibility of frailty screening tools among hospitalised older adults</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issn>2010-1058</issn><eissn>2059-2329</eissn><abstract>Background
The 29-item Frail-Physical, Psychological and Social (Frail-PPS) and the 14-item Frailty Assessment Measure (FAM) were developed in Singapore to identify risk of frailty among community dwelling older adults and validated for use among hospitalised older adults.
Objectives
This study aimed to establish the interrater reliability and feasibility of the two screening tools ‒ FAM and Frail-PPS, for assessing frailty among hospitalized older adults.
Methods
The FAM and Frail-PPS were administered during the initial nursing assessment by nurses to 62 patients aged 65 years and older within 24 h of admission. Interrater reliability, convergent validity and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were established. Feasibility was determined by the time of administration.
Results
ICCs for Frail-PPS and FAM were 0.95 and 0.95 respectively. A positive correlation was established (r = 0.97). The administration time for Frail-PPS averaged 6.7 min, and 3.3 min for FAM.
Conclusions
The FAM, with its high reliability and convergent validity, as well as shorter administration time, may be the preferred screening tool for use in acute care settings.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/20101058231215167</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7529-5358</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9559-0909</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2010-1058 |
| ispartof | Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare, 2023-11, Vol.32 |
| issn | 2010-1058 2059-2329 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2920172570 |
| source | EZB Free E-Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 |
| subjects | Frailty Hospitalization Inpatient care Medical screening Older people |
| title | Assessing the reliability and feasibility of frailty screening tools among hospitalised older adults |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A16%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20reliability%20and%20feasibility%20of%20frailty%20screening%20tools%20among%20hospitalised%20older%20adults&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20Singapore%20Healthcare&rft.au=Lim,%20Siew%20Hoon&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issn=2010-1058&rft.eissn=2059-2329&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/20101058231215167&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2920172570%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2920172570&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_20101058231215167&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_8304a22fbcde4d5f98a0c2488389775d&rfr_iscdi=true |