Skilling up : evaluation of a design-based research methodology
This paper reports on the external evaluation of a two-year project aimed at improving educational opportunities for Aboriginal Education Workers (AEWs) through technology-based pedagogy. A design-based approach was selected by the research team to increase the relevance of the research for both pra...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Australian educational researcher 2020-04, Vol.47 (2), p.357-375 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 375 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 357 |
| container_title | Australian educational researcher |
| container_volume | 47 |
| creator | Trimmer, Karen |
| description | This paper reports on the external evaluation of a two-year project aimed at improving educational opportunities for Aboriginal Education Workers (AEWs) through technology-based pedagogy. A design-based approach was selected by the research team to increase the relevance of the research for both praxis and practice, with emphasis on improvement of practice through evidence-based education throughout the project. To complement this research approach, a design-based approach was also adopted for the external evaluation that was undertaken in parallel to the research study. Design-based methodology has advantages and issues for an independent evaluator due to the inter-relationship of the research team in iteratively using findings of phases of the evaluation to inform and enhance the project. Internal evaluative data collected by the research team need to be balanced with that collected independently by the external evaluator to ensure authentic evaluation of the nature and effects of the interventions on participants. The paper reports on the outcomes of the external evaluation process and reflects on its capacity to serve dual objectives for evaluator and research team. [Author abstract] |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13384-019-00336-0 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2919973260</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1248619</ericid><informt_id>10.3316/aeipt.226388</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2919973260</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-cf53115be34c52748151a35a312eb5106d5400d27d924c40d40465ffefcbd0703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LJDEQhoO44OjuH1gQGjxHK6mku-NBkcGvRdjDrueQ6SRttKfTJj2C_94eW_TmqaDejyoeQn4zOGYA1UlmiLWgwBQFQCwp7JAF5wyoRF7vkgUgY7RUSu2R_ZwfJxNHzhfk_N9T6LrQt8VmKE4L92K6jRlD7IvoC1NYl0Pb05XJzhbJZWdS81Cs3fgQbexi-_qT_PCmy-7Xxzwg91eX_5c39O7v9e3y4o42QsBIGy-nB-TKoWgkr0TNJDMoDTLuVpJBaaUAsLyyiotGgBUgSum9883KQgV4QI7m3iHF543Lo36Mm9RPJzVXTKkKebl18dnVpJhzcl4PKaxNetUM9BaUnkHpCZR-B6W3ocM55FJoPgOXfxgXdcnUpOOs50nrW5e-Tn_bejan0jqM2gzGj3rGp0Pv4_s2plbbGLY1iKzUxoVh1JyXWNf4BhPtiOM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919973260</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Skilling up : evaluation of a design-based research methodology</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Trimmer, Karen</creator><creatorcontrib>Trimmer, Karen</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports on the external evaluation of a two-year project aimed at improving educational opportunities for Aboriginal Education Workers (AEWs) through technology-based pedagogy. A design-based approach was selected by the research team to increase the relevance of the research for both praxis and practice, with emphasis on improvement of practice through evidence-based education throughout the project. To complement this research approach, a design-based approach was also adopted for the external evaluation that was undertaken in parallel to the research study. Design-based methodology has advantages and issues for an independent evaluator due to the inter-relationship of the research team in iteratively using findings of phases of the evaluation to inform and enhance the project. Internal evaluative data collected by the research team need to be balanced with that collected independently by the external evaluator to ensure authentic evaluation of the nature and effects of the interventions on participants. The paper reports on the outcomes of the external evaluation process and reflects on its capacity to serve dual objectives for evaluator and research team. [Author abstract]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0311-6999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2210-5328</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13384-019-00336-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Aboriginal education ; Aboriginal Education Workers (AEW) ; Accountability ; Collaboration ; Curricula ; Data Collection ; Design ; Design based research ; Education ; Educational Improvement ; Educational Opportunities ; Educational Policy and Politics ; Educational Practices ; Educational Psychology ; Educational research ; Evidence Based Practice ; Focus groups ; Foreign Countries ; Formative evaluation ; Funding ; Higher education ; Hypothesis testing ; Indigenous Populations ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Native education ; Native peoples ; Pedagogy ; Praxis ; Professional development ; Program Evaluation ; Research Methodology ; Research projects ; Teachers ; Teaching and Teacher Education ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Australian educational researcher, 2020-04, Vol.47 (2), p.357-375</ispartof><rights>The Australian Association for Research in Education, Inc. 2019</rights><rights>The Australian Association for Research in Education, Inc. 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-cf53115be34c52748151a35a312eb5106d5400d27d924c40d40465ffefcbd0703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-cf53115be34c52748151a35a312eb5106d5400d27d924c40d40465ffefcbd0703</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6511-9043</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13384-019-00336-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13384-019-00336-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1248619$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trimmer, Karen</creatorcontrib><title>Skilling up : evaluation of a design-based research methodology</title><title>Australian educational researcher</title><addtitle>Aust. Educ. Res</addtitle><description>This paper reports on the external evaluation of a two-year project aimed at improving educational opportunities for Aboriginal Education Workers (AEWs) through technology-based pedagogy. A design-based approach was selected by the research team to increase the relevance of the research for both praxis and practice, with emphasis on improvement of practice through evidence-based education throughout the project. To complement this research approach, a design-based approach was also adopted for the external evaluation that was undertaken in parallel to the research study. Design-based methodology has advantages and issues for an independent evaluator due to the inter-relationship of the research team in iteratively using findings of phases of the evaluation to inform and enhance the project. Internal evaluative data collected by the research team need to be balanced with that collected independently by the external evaluator to ensure authentic evaluation of the nature and effects of the interventions on participants. The paper reports on the outcomes of the external evaluation process and reflects on its capacity to serve dual objectives for evaluator and research team. [Author abstract]</description><subject>Aboriginal education</subject><subject>Aboriginal Education Workers (AEW)</subject><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design based research</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Improvement</subject><subject>Educational Opportunities</subject><subject>Educational Policy and Politics</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>Evidence Based Practice</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Formative evaluation</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Hypothesis testing</subject><subject>Indigenous Populations</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Native education</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Praxis</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Research projects</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching and Teacher Education</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>0311-6999</issn><issn>2210-5328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LJDEQhoO44OjuH1gQGjxHK6mku-NBkcGvRdjDrueQ6SRttKfTJj2C_94eW_TmqaDejyoeQn4zOGYA1UlmiLWgwBQFQCwp7JAF5wyoRF7vkgUgY7RUSu2R_ZwfJxNHzhfk_N9T6LrQt8VmKE4L92K6jRlD7IvoC1NYl0Pb05XJzhbJZWdS81Cs3fgQbexi-_qT_PCmy-7Xxzwg91eX_5c39O7v9e3y4o42QsBIGy-nB-TKoWgkr0TNJDMoDTLuVpJBaaUAsLyyiotGgBUgSum9883KQgV4QI7m3iHF543Lo36Mm9RPJzVXTKkKebl18dnVpJhzcl4PKaxNetUM9BaUnkHpCZR-B6W3ocM55FJoPgOXfxgXdcnUpOOs50nrW5e-Tn_bejan0jqM2gzGj3rGp0Pv4_s2plbbGLY1iKzUxoVh1JyXWNf4BhPtiOM</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Trimmer, Karen</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6511-9043</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Skilling up : evaluation of a design-based research methodology</title><author>Trimmer, Karen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-cf53115be34c52748151a35a312eb5106d5400d27d924c40d40465ffefcbd0703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aboriginal education</topic><topic>Aboriginal Education Workers (AEW)</topic><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design based research</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Improvement</topic><topic>Educational Opportunities</topic><topic>Educational Policy and Politics</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>Evidence Based Practice</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Formative evaluation</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Hypothesis testing</topic><topic>Indigenous Populations</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Native education</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Praxis</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Research projects</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching and Teacher Education</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trimmer, Karen</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Australian educational researcher</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trimmer, Karen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1248619</ericid><atitle>Skilling up : evaluation of a design-based research methodology</atitle><jtitle>Australian educational researcher</jtitle><stitle>Aust. Educ. Res</stitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>357</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>357-375</pages><issn>0311-6999</issn><eissn>2210-5328</eissn><abstract>This paper reports on the external evaluation of a two-year project aimed at improving educational opportunities for Aboriginal Education Workers (AEWs) through technology-based pedagogy. A design-based approach was selected by the research team to increase the relevance of the research for both praxis and practice, with emphasis on improvement of practice through evidence-based education throughout the project. To complement this research approach, a design-based approach was also adopted for the external evaluation that was undertaken in parallel to the research study. Design-based methodology has advantages and issues for an independent evaluator due to the inter-relationship of the research team in iteratively using findings of phases of the evaluation to inform and enhance the project. Internal evaluative data collected by the research team need to be balanced with that collected independently by the external evaluator to ensure authentic evaluation of the nature and effects of the interventions on participants. The paper reports on the outcomes of the external evaluation process and reflects on its capacity to serve dual objectives for evaluator and research team. [Author abstract]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s13384-019-00336-0</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6511-9043</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0311-6999 |
| ispartof | Australian educational researcher, 2020-04, Vol.47 (2), p.357-375 |
| issn | 0311-6999 2210-5328 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2919973260 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Aboriginal education Aboriginal Education Workers (AEW) Accountability Collaboration Curricula Data Collection Design Design based research Education Educational Improvement Educational Opportunities Educational Policy and Politics Educational Practices Educational Psychology Educational research Evidence Based Practice Focus groups Foreign Countries Formative evaluation Funding Higher education Hypothesis testing Indigenous Populations Learning Learning Processes Native education Native peoples Pedagogy Praxis Professional development Program Evaluation Research Methodology Research projects Teachers Teaching and Teacher Education Teaching Methods |
| title | Skilling up : evaluation of a design-based research methodology |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T22%3A30%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Skilling%20up%20:%20evaluation%20of%20a%20design-based%20research%20methodology&rft.jtitle=Australian%20educational%20researcher&rft.au=Trimmer,%20Karen&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=357&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=357-375&rft.issn=0311-6999&rft.eissn=2210-5328&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13384-019-00336-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sprin%3E2919973260%3C/proquest_sprin%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919973260&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1248619&rft_informt_id=10.3316/aeipt.226388&rfr_iscdi=true |