Efficacy of a Combined Approach to Tier 2 Social-Emotional and Behavioral Intervention and the Moderating Effects of Function

Systematic literature reviews have supported the effectiveness of behavioral Tier 2 interventions, with research being particularly plentiful in relation to Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) and social skills training (SST). Though findings indicate either approach is effective in isolation, a recent study...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:School mental health 2019-12, Vol.11 (4), p.678-691
Hauptverfasser: Eklund, Katie, Kilgus, Stephen P., Taylor, Crystal, Allen, Amanda, Meyer, Lauren, Izumi, Jared, Beardmore, Megan, Frye, Sara, McLean, Deija, Calderon, Fedra, Kilpatrick, Kayla
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 691
container_issue 4
container_start_page 678
container_title School mental health
container_volume 11
creator Eklund, Katie
Kilgus, Stephen P.
Taylor, Crystal
Allen, Amanda
Meyer, Lauren
Izumi, Jared
Beardmore, Megan
Frye, Sara
McLean, Deija
Calderon, Fedra
Kilpatrick, Kayla
description Systematic literature reviews have supported the effectiveness of behavioral Tier 2 interventions, with research being particularly plentiful in relation to Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) and social skills training (SST). Though findings indicate either approach is effective in isolation, a recent study suggested these approaches might be particularly effective when integrated. The purpose of the current study was to build upon this initial single-case design study with a larger sample within a randomized controlled trial. Participants included 91 elementary students who had been identified as being at risk of social-emotional and behavioral difficulties. Students were randomized into three intervention conditions: CICO only, SST only, and CICO + SST. Prior to intervention, information was collected regarding the function of student problem behavior and the extent of social skill deficits. Systematic direct observation data were then completed at pre- and post-test regarding student positive and negative social engagement. Multivariate general linear models were then conducted, with pre-test scores serving as covariates and intervention group and behavioral function serving as fixed factors. Results indicated that implementation of CICO, SST, and a combined CICO + SST was functionally related to a reduction in negative social engagement. Follow-up post hoc tests indicated that after adjusting for pre-test responding, the difference between conditions in effectiveness was moderated by behavioral function. Specifically, SST was less effective for students whose behavior functioned to escape social and academic situations. No such differences were noted between students whose behavior functioned to attain adult or peer attention. Implications for practice, methodological limitations, and directions for future research are reviewed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12310-019-09321-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2919916009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1234622</ericid><sourcerecordid>2919916009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-29f59c685b2fe318c2e5a192048b1df2788dd635c62ed441482e6076035ca0c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EElD4A0hIljgH7HXixkeoUh4CcaCcLdfZUKM2LnaK1AP_HadBcOPkx8zOaD9Czji75IyNryIHwVnGuMqYEsCzYo8c8VLKDKQQ-793KA7JcYzvjEkBkh2Rr6ppnDV2S31DDZ341dy1WNPr9Tp4Yxe083TmMFCgL946s8yqle-cb82SmramN7gwn86H9LxvOwyf2PbqTusWSJ98jcF0rn2jqQltF_ui6aa1ve2EHDRmGfH05xyR12k1m9xlj8-395Prx8yKnHcZqKZQVpbFHBoUvLSAheEKWF7Oed3AuCzrWorCSsA6z3leAko2lix9GWYLMSIXQ25a6mODsdPvfhPSDlGD4kpxyRK2EYHBZYOPMWCj18GtTNhqznSPWQ-YdcKsd5h1H30-DGFw9negekjOXAIkXQx6TFr7huGv-p_Ub2YBiL8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919916009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of a Combined Approach to Tier 2 Social-Emotional and Behavioral Intervention and the Moderating Effects of Function</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Eklund, Katie ; Kilgus, Stephen P. ; Taylor, Crystal ; Allen, Amanda ; Meyer, Lauren ; Izumi, Jared ; Beardmore, Megan ; Frye, Sara ; McLean, Deija ; Calderon, Fedra ; Kilpatrick, Kayla</creator><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Katie ; Kilgus, Stephen P. ; Taylor, Crystal ; Allen, Amanda ; Meyer, Lauren ; Izumi, Jared ; Beardmore, Megan ; Frye, Sara ; McLean, Deija ; Calderon, Fedra ; Kilpatrick, Kayla</creatorcontrib><description>Systematic literature reviews have supported the effectiveness of behavioral Tier 2 interventions, with research being particularly plentiful in relation to Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) and social skills training (SST). Though findings indicate either approach is effective in isolation, a recent study suggested these approaches might be particularly effective when integrated. The purpose of the current study was to build upon this initial single-case design study with a larger sample within a randomized controlled trial. Participants included 91 elementary students who had been identified as being at risk of social-emotional and behavioral difficulties. Students were randomized into three intervention conditions: CICO only, SST only, and CICO + SST. Prior to intervention, information was collected regarding the function of student problem behavior and the extent of social skill deficits. Systematic direct observation data were then completed at pre- and post-test regarding student positive and negative social engagement. Multivariate general linear models were then conducted, with pre-test scores serving as covariates and intervention group and behavioral function serving as fixed factors. Results indicated that implementation of CICO, SST, and a combined CICO + SST was functionally related to a reduction in negative social engagement. Follow-up post hoc tests indicated that after adjusting for pre-test responding, the difference between conditions in effectiveness was moderated by behavioral function. Specifically, SST was less effective for students whose behavior functioned to escape social and academic situations. No such differences were noted between students whose behavior functioned to attain adult or peer attention. Implications for practice, methodological limitations, and directions for future research are reviewed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-2625</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-2633</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12310-019-09321-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>At Risk Students ; Behavior ; Behavior Modification ; Behavior Patterns ; Behavior Problems ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child and School Psychology ; Clinical Psychology ; Communication ; Developmental Psychology ; Education ; Elementary School Students ; Emotional Problems ; Feedback ; Functional Behavioral Assessment ; Interpersonal Competence ; Intervention ; Learning ; Learning Disabilities ; Original Paper ; Outcomes of Treatment ; Positive reinforcement ; Program Effectiveness ; Psychology ; Report Cards ; Response to Intervention ; Skill Development ; Social skills ; Student Behavior ; Student Needs ; Students ; Teachers ; Training</subject><ispartof>School mental health, 2019-12, Vol.11 (4), p.678-691</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-29f59c685b2fe318c2e5a192048b1df2788dd635c62ed441482e6076035ca0c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-29f59c685b2fe318c2e5a192048b1df2788dd635c62ed441482e6076035ca0c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12310-019-09321-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12310-019-09321-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1234622$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilgus, Stephen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Crystal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izumi, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beardmore, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frye, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLean, Deija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calderon, Fedra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilpatrick, Kayla</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of a Combined Approach to Tier 2 Social-Emotional and Behavioral Intervention and the Moderating Effects of Function</title><title>School mental health</title><addtitle>School Mental Health</addtitle><description>Systematic literature reviews have supported the effectiveness of behavioral Tier 2 interventions, with research being particularly plentiful in relation to Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) and social skills training (SST). Though findings indicate either approach is effective in isolation, a recent study suggested these approaches might be particularly effective when integrated. The purpose of the current study was to build upon this initial single-case design study with a larger sample within a randomized controlled trial. Participants included 91 elementary students who had been identified as being at risk of social-emotional and behavioral difficulties. Students were randomized into three intervention conditions: CICO only, SST only, and CICO + SST. Prior to intervention, information was collected regarding the function of student problem behavior and the extent of social skill deficits. Systematic direct observation data were then completed at pre- and post-test regarding student positive and negative social engagement. Multivariate general linear models were then conducted, with pre-test scores serving as covariates and intervention group and behavioral function serving as fixed factors. Results indicated that implementation of CICO, SST, and a combined CICO + SST was functionally related to a reduction in negative social engagement. Follow-up post hoc tests indicated that after adjusting for pre-test responding, the difference between conditions in effectiveness was moderated by behavioral function. Specifically, SST was less effective for students whose behavior functioned to escape social and academic situations. No such differences were noted between students whose behavior functioned to attain adult or peer attention. Implications for practice, methodological limitations, and directions for future research are reviewed.</description><subject>At Risk Students</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior Modification</subject><subject>Behavior Patterns</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Developmental Psychology</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Emotional Problems</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Functional Behavioral Assessment</subject><subject>Interpersonal Competence</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Disabilities</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Outcomes of Treatment</subject><subject>Positive reinforcement</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Report Cards</subject><subject>Response to Intervention</subject><subject>Skill Development</subject><subject>Social skills</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><subject>Student Needs</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1866-2625</issn><issn>1866-2633</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EElD4A0hIljgH7HXixkeoUh4CcaCcLdfZUKM2LnaK1AP_HadBcOPkx8zOaD9Czji75IyNryIHwVnGuMqYEsCzYo8c8VLKDKQQ-793KA7JcYzvjEkBkh2Rr6ppnDV2S31DDZ341dy1WNPr9Tp4Yxe083TmMFCgL946s8yqle-cb82SmramN7gwn86H9LxvOwyf2PbqTusWSJ98jcF0rn2jqQltF_ui6aa1ve2EHDRmGfH05xyR12k1m9xlj8-395Prx8yKnHcZqKZQVpbFHBoUvLSAheEKWF7Oed3AuCzrWorCSsA6z3leAko2lix9GWYLMSIXQ25a6mODsdPvfhPSDlGD4kpxyRK2EYHBZYOPMWCj18GtTNhqznSPWQ-YdcKsd5h1H30-DGFw9negekjOXAIkXQx6TFr7huGv-p_Ub2YBiL8</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Eklund, Katie</creator><creator>Kilgus, Stephen P.</creator><creator>Taylor, Crystal</creator><creator>Allen, Amanda</creator><creator>Meyer, Lauren</creator><creator>Izumi, Jared</creator><creator>Beardmore, Megan</creator><creator>Frye, Sara</creator><creator>McLean, Deija</creator><creator>Calderon, Fedra</creator><creator>Kilpatrick, Kayla</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Efficacy of a Combined Approach to Tier 2 Social-Emotional and Behavioral Intervention and the Moderating Effects of Function</title><author>Eklund, Katie ; Kilgus, Stephen P. ; Taylor, Crystal ; Allen, Amanda ; Meyer, Lauren ; Izumi, Jared ; Beardmore, Megan ; Frye, Sara ; McLean, Deija ; Calderon, Fedra ; Kilpatrick, Kayla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-29f59c685b2fe318c2e5a192048b1df2788dd635c62ed441482e6076035ca0c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>At Risk Students</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior Modification</topic><topic>Behavior Patterns</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Developmental Psychology</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Emotional Problems</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Functional Behavioral Assessment</topic><topic>Interpersonal Competence</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Disabilities</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Outcomes of Treatment</topic><topic>Positive reinforcement</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Report Cards</topic><topic>Response to Intervention</topic><topic>Skill Development</topic><topic>Social skills</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><topic>Student Needs</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilgus, Stephen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Crystal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izumi, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beardmore, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frye, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLean, Deija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calderon, Fedra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilpatrick, Kayla</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>School mental health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eklund, Katie</au><au>Kilgus, Stephen P.</au><au>Taylor, Crystal</au><au>Allen, Amanda</au><au>Meyer, Lauren</au><au>Izumi, Jared</au><au>Beardmore, Megan</au><au>Frye, Sara</au><au>McLean, Deija</au><au>Calderon, Fedra</au><au>Kilpatrick, Kayla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1234622</ericid><atitle>Efficacy of a Combined Approach to Tier 2 Social-Emotional and Behavioral Intervention and the Moderating Effects of Function</atitle><jtitle>School mental health</jtitle><stitle>School Mental Health</stitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>678</spage><epage>691</epage><pages>678-691</pages><issn>1866-2625</issn><eissn>1866-2633</eissn><abstract>Systematic literature reviews have supported the effectiveness of behavioral Tier 2 interventions, with research being particularly plentiful in relation to Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) and social skills training (SST). Though findings indicate either approach is effective in isolation, a recent study suggested these approaches might be particularly effective when integrated. The purpose of the current study was to build upon this initial single-case design study with a larger sample within a randomized controlled trial. Participants included 91 elementary students who had been identified as being at risk of social-emotional and behavioral difficulties. Students were randomized into three intervention conditions: CICO only, SST only, and CICO + SST. Prior to intervention, information was collected regarding the function of student problem behavior and the extent of social skill deficits. Systematic direct observation data were then completed at pre- and post-test regarding student positive and negative social engagement. Multivariate general linear models were then conducted, with pre-test scores serving as covariates and intervention group and behavioral function serving as fixed factors. Results indicated that implementation of CICO, SST, and a combined CICO + SST was functionally related to a reduction in negative social engagement. Follow-up post hoc tests indicated that after adjusting for pre-test responding, the difference between conditions in effectiveness was moderated by behavioral function. Specifically, SST was less effective for students whose behavior functioned to escape social and academic situations. No such differences were noted between students whose behavior functioned to attain adult or peer attention. Implications for practice, methodological limitations, and directions for future research are reviewed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12310-019-09321-5</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1866-2625
ispartof School mental health, 2019-12, Vol.11 (4), p.678-691
issn 1866-2625
1866-2633
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2919916009
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects At Risk Students
Behavior
Behavior Modification
Behavior Patterns
Behavior Problems
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Child and School Psychology
Clinical Psychology
Communication
Developmental Psychology
Education
Elementary School Students
Emotional Problems
Feedback
Functional Behavioral Assessment
Interpersonal Competence
Intervention
Learning
Learning Disabilities
Original Paper
Outcomes of Treatment
Positive reinforcement
Program Effectiveness
Psychology
Report Cards
Response to Intervention
Skill Development
Social skills
Student Behavior
Student Needs
Students
Teachers
Training
title Efficacy of a Combined Approach to Tier 2 Social-Emotional and Behavioral Intervention and the Moderating Effects of Function
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A46%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20a%20Combined%20Approach%20to%20Tier%202%20Social-Emotional%20and%20Behavioral%20Intervention%20and%20the%20Moderating%20Effects%20of%20Function&rft.jtitle=School%20mental%20health&rft.au=Eklund,%20Katie&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=678&rft.epage=691&rft.pages=678-691&rft.issn=1866-2625&rft.eissn=1866-2633&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12310-019-09321-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2919916009%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919916009&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1234622&rfr_iscdi=true