Efficacy of a Combined Approach to Tier 2 Social-Emotional and Behavioral Intervention and the Moderating Effects of Function
Systematic literature reviews have supported the effectiveness of behavioral Tier 2 interventions, with research being particularly plentiful in relation to Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) and social skills training (SST). Though findings indicate either approach is effective in isolation, a recent study...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | School mental health 2019-12, Vol.11 (4), p.678-691 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 691 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 678 |
container_title | School mental health |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Eklund, Katie Kilgus, Stephen P. Taylor, Crystal Allen, Amanda Meyer, Lauren Izumi, Jared Beardmore, Megan Frye, Sara McLean, Deija Calderon, Fedra Kilpatrick, Kayla |
description | Systematic literature reviews have supported the effectiveness of behavioral Tier 2 interventions, with research being particularly plentiful in relation to Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) and social skills training (SST). Though findings indicate either approach is effective in isolation, a recent study suggested these approaches might be particularly effective when integrated. The purpose of the current study was to build upon this initial single-case design study with a larger sample within a randomized controlled trial. Participants included 91 elementary students who had been identified as being at risk of social-emotional and behavioral difficulties. Students were randomized into three intervention conditions: CICO only, SST only, and CICO + SST. Prior to intervention, information was collected regarding the function of student problem behavior and the extent of social skill deficits. Systematic direct observation data were then completed at pre- and post-test regarding student positive and negative social engagement. Multivariate general linear models were then conducted, with pre-test scores serving as covariates and intervention group and behavioral function serving as fixed factors. Results indicated that implementation of CICO, SST, and a combined CICO + SST was functionally related to a reduction in negative social engagement. Follow-up post hoc tests indicated that after adjusting for pre-test responding, the difference between conditions in effectiveness was moderated by behavioral function. Specifically, SST was less effective for students whose behavior functioned to escape social and academic situations. No such differences were noted between students whose behavior functioned to attain adult or peer attention. Implications for practice, methodological limitations, and directions for future research are reviewed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12310-019-09321-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2919916009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1234622</ericid><sourcerecordid>2919916009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-29f59c685b2fe318c2e5a192048b1df2788dd635c62ed441482e6076035ca0c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EElD4A0hIljgH7HXixkeoUh4CcaCcLdfZUKM2LnaK1AP_HadBcOPkx8zOaD9Czji75IyNryIHwVnGuMqYEsCzYo8c8VLKDKQQ-793KA7JcYzvjEkBkh2Rr6ppnDV2S31DDZ341dy1WNPr9Tp4Yxe083TmMFCgL946s8yqle-cb82SmramN7gwn86H9LxvOwyf2PbqTusWSJ98jcF0rn2jqQltF_ui6aa1ve2EHDRmGfH05xyR12k1m9xlj8-395Prx8yKnHcZqKZQVpbFHBoUvLSAheEKWF7Oed3AuCzrWorCSsA6z3leAko2lix9GWYLMSIXQ25a6mODsdPvfhPSDlGD4kpxyRK2EYHBZYOPMWCj18GtTNhqznSPWQ-YdcKsd5h1H30-DGFw9negekjOXAIkXQx6TFr7huGv-p_Ub2YBiL8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919916009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of a Combined Approach to Tier 2 Social-Emotional and Behavioral Intervention and the Moderating Effects of Function</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Eklund, Katie ; Kilgus, Stephen P. ; Taylor, Crystal ; Allen, Amanda ; Meyer, Lauren ; Izumi, Jared ; Beardmore, Megan ; Frye, Sara ; McLean, Deija ; Calderon, Fedra ; Kilpatrick, Kayla</creator><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Katie ; Kilgus, Stephen P. ; Taylor, Crystal ; Allen, Amanda ; Meyer, Lauren ; Izumi, Jared ; Beardmore, Megan ; Frye, Sara ; McLean, Deija ; Calderon, Fedra ; Kilpatrick, Kayla</creatorcontrib><description>Systematic literature reviews have supported the effectiveness of behavioral Tier 2 interventions, with research being particularly plentiful in relation to Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) and social skills training (SST). Though findings indicate either approach is effective in isolation, a recent study suggested these approaches might be particularly effective when integrated. The purpose of the current study was to build upon this initial single-case design study with a larger sample within a randomized controlled trial. Participants included 91 elementary students who had been identified as being at risk of social-emotional and behavioral difficulties. Students were randomized into three intervention conditions: CICO only, SST only, and CICO + SST. Prior to intervention, information was collected regarding the function of student problem behavior and the extent of social skill deficits. Systematic direct observation data were then completed at pre- and post-test regarding student positive and negative social engagement. Multivariate general linear models were then conducted, with pre-test scores serving as covariates and intervention group and behavioral function serving as fixed factors. Results indicated that implementation of CICO, SST, and a combined CICO + SST was functionally related to a reduction in negative social engagement. Follow-up post hoc tests indicated that after adjusting for pre-test responding, the difference between conditions in effectiveness was moderated by behavioral function. Specifically, SST was less effective for students whose behavior functioned to escape social and academic situations. No such differences were noted between students whose behavior functioned to attain adult or peer attention. Implications for practice, methodological limitations, and directions for future research are reviewed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-2625</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-2633</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12310-019-09321-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>At Risk Students ; Behavior ; Behavior Modification ; Behavior Patterns ; Behavior Problems ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child and School Psychology ; Clinical Psychology ; Communication ; Developmental Psychology ; Education ; Elementary School Students ; Emotional Problems ; Feedback ; Functional Behavioral Assessment ; Interpersonal Competence ; Intervention ; Learning ; Learning Disabilities ; Original Paper ; Outcomes of Treatment ; Positive reinforcement ; Program Effectiveness ; Psychology ; Report Cards ; Response to Intervention ; Skill Development ; Social skills ; Student Behavior ; Student Needs ; Students ; Teachers ; Training</subject><ispartof>School mental health, 2019-12, Vol.11 (4), p.678-691</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-29f59c685b2fe318c2e5a192048b1df2788dd635c62ed441482e6076035ca0c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-29f59c685b2fe318c2e5a192048b1df2788dd635c62ed441482e6076035ca0c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12310-019-09321-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12310-019-09321-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1234622$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilgus, Stephen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Crystal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izumi, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beardmore, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frye, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLean, Deija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calderon, Fedra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilpatrick, Kayla</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of a Combined Approach to Tier 2 Social-Emotional and Behavioral Intervention and the Moderating Effects of Function</title><title>School mental health</title><addtitle>School Mental Health</addtitle><description>Systematic literature reviews have supported the effectiveness of behavioral Tier 2 interventions, with research being particularly plentiful in relation to Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) and social skills training (SST). Though findings indicate either approach is effective in isolation, a recent study suggested these approaches might be particularly effective when integrated. The purpose of the current study was to build upon this initial single-case design study with a larger sample within a randomized controlled trial. Participants included 91 elementary students who had been identified as being at risk of social-emotional and behavioral difficulties. Students were randomized into three intervention conditions: CICO only, SST only, and CICO + SST. Prior to intervention, information was collected regarding the function of student problem behavior and the extent of social skill deficits. Systematic direct observation data were then completed at pre- and post-test regarding student positive and negative social engagement. Multivariate general linear models were then conducted, with pre-test scores serving as covariates and intervention group and behavioral function serving as fixed factors. Results indicated that implementation of CICO, SST, and a combined CICO + SST was functionally related to a reduction in negative social engagement. Follow-up post hoc tests indicated that after adjusting for pre-test responding, the difference between conditions in effectiveness was moderated by behavioral function. Specifically, SST was less effective for students whose behavior functioned to escape social and academic situations. No such differences were noted between students whose behavior functioned to attain adult or peer attention. Implications for practice, methodological limitations, and directions for future research are reviewed.</description><subject>At Risk Students</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior Modification</subject><subject>Behavior Patterns</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Developmental Psychology</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Emotional Problems</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Functional Behavioral Assessment</subject><subject>Interpersonal Competence</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Disabilities</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Outcomes of Treatment</subject><subject>Positive reinforcement</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Report Cards</subject><subject>Response to Intervention</subject><subject>Skill Development</subject><subject>Social skills</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><subject>Student Needs</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1866-2625</issn><issn>1866-2633</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EElD4A0hIljgH7HXixkeoUh4CcaCcLdfZUKM2LnaK1AP_HadBcOPkx8zOaD9Czji75IyNryIHwVnGuMqYEsCzYo8c8VLKDKQQ-793KA7JcYzvjEkBkh2Rr6ppnDV2S31DDZ341dy1WNPr9Tp4Yxe083TmMFCgL946s8yqle-cb82SmramN7gwn86H9LxvOwyf2PbqTusWSJ98jcF0rn2jqQltF_ui6aa1ve2EHDRmGfH05xyR12k1m9xlj8-395Prx8yKnHcZqKZQVpbFHBoUvLSAheEKWF7Oed3AuCzrWorCSsA6z3leAko2lix9GWYLMSIXQ25a6mODsdPvfhPSDlGD4kpxyRK2EYHBZYOPMWCj18GtTNhqznSPWQ-YdcKsd5h1H30-DGFw9negekjOXAIkXQx6TFr7huGv-p_Ub2YBiL8</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Eklund, Katie</creator><creator>Kilgus, Stephen P.</creator><creator>Taylor, Crystal</creator><creator>Allen, Amanda</creator><creator>Meyer, Lauren</creator><creator>Izumi, Jared</creator><creator>Beardmore, Megan</creator><creator>Frye, Sara</creator><creator>McLean, Deija</creator><creator>Calderon, Fedra</creator><creator>Kilpatrick, Kayla</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Efficacy of a Combined Approach to Tier 2 Social-Emotional and Behavioral Intervention and the Moderating Effects of Function</title><author>Eklund, Katie ; Kilgus, Stephen P. ; Taylor, Crystal ; Allen, Amanda ; Meyer, Lauren ; Izumi, Jared ; Beardmore, Megan ; Frye, Sara ; McLean, Deija ; Calderon, Fedra ; Kilpatrick, Kayla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-29f59c685b2fe318c2e5a192048b1df2788dd635c62ed441482e6076035ca0c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>At Risk Students</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior Modification</topic><topic>Behavior Patterns</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Developmental Psychology</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Emotional Problems</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Functional Behavioral Assessment</topic><topic>Interpersonal Competence</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Disabilities</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Outcomes of Treatment</topic><topic>Positive reinforcement</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Report Cards</topic><topic>Response to Intervention</topic><topic>Skill Development</topic><topic>Social skills</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><topic>Student Needs</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilgus, Stephen P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Crystal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izumi, Jared</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beardmore, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frye, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLean, Deija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calderon, Fedra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilpatrick, Kayla</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>School mental health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eklund, Katie</au><au>Kilgus, Stephen P.</au><au>Taylor, Crystal</au><au>Allen, Amanda</au><au>Meyer, Lauren</au><au>Izumi, Jared</au><au>Beardmore, Megan</au><au>Frye, Sara</au><au>McLean, Deija</au><au>Calderon, Fedra</au><au>Kilpatrick, Kayla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1234622</ericid><atitle>Efficacy of a Combined Approach to Tier 2 Social-Emotional and Behavioral Intervention and the Moderating Effects of Function</atitle><jtitle>School mental health</jtitle><stitle>School Mental Health</stitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>678</spage><epage>691</epage><pages>678-691</pages><issn>1866-2625</issn><eissn>1866-2633</eissn><abstract>Systematic literature reviews have supported the effectiveness of behavioral Tier 2 interventions, with research being particularly plentiful in relation to Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) and social skills training (SST). Though findings indicate either approach is effective in isolation, a recent study suggested these approaches might be particularly effective when integrated. The purpose of the current study was to build upon this initial single-case design study with a larger sample within a randomized controlled trial. Participants included 91 elementary students who had been identified as being at risk of social-emotional and behavioral difficulties. Students were randomized into three intervention conditions: CICO only, SST only, and CICO + SST. Prior to intervention, information was collected regarding the function of student problem behavior and the extent of social skill deficits. Systematic direct observation data were then completed at pre- and post-test regarding student positive and negative social engagement. Multivariate general linear models were then conducted, with pre-test scores serving as covariates and intervention group and behavioral function serving as fixed factors. Results indicated that implementation of CICO, SST, and a combined CICO + SST was functionally related to a reduction in negative social engagement. Follow-up post hoc tests indicated that after adjusting for pre-test responding, the difference between conditions in effectiveness was moderated by behavioral function. Specifically, SST was less effective for students whose behavior functioned to escape social and academic situations. No such differences were noted between students whose behavior functioned to attain adult or peer attention. Implications for practice, methodological limitations, and directions for future research are reviewed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12310-019-09321-5</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1866-2625 |
ispartof | School mental health, 2019-12, Vol.11 (4), p.678-691 |
issn | 1866-2625 1866-2633 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2919916009 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | At Risk Students Behavior Behavior Modification Behavior Patterns Behavior Problems Behavioral Science and Psychology Child and School Psychology Clinical Psychology Communication Developmental Psychology Education Elementary School Students Emotional Problems Feedback Functional Behavioral Assessment Interpersonal Competence Intervention Learning Learning Disabilities Original Paper Outcomes of Treatment Positive reinforcement Program Effectiveness Psychology Report Cards Response to Intervention Skill Development Social skills Student Behavior Student Needs Students Teachers Training |
title | Efficacy of a Combined Approach to Tier 2 Social-Emotional and Behavioral Intervention and the Moderating Effects of Function |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A46%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20a%20Combined%20Approach%20to%20Tier%202%20Social-Emotional%20and%20Behavioral%20Intervention%20and%20the%20Moderating%20Effects%20of%20Function&rft.jtitle=School%20mental%20health&rft.au=Eklund,%20Katie&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=678&rft.epage=691&rft.pages=678-691&rft.issn=1866-2625&rft.eissn=1866-2633&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12310-019-09321-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2919916009%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919916009&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1234622&rfr_iscdi=true |