Total and Organic Mercury in Fish from Different Geographical Areas in the North Atlantic Ocean and Health Risk Assessment

Fish consumption is considered the main route of exposure to mercury for the human population. In this sense, this study analysed the total and organic mercury content present in the muscle tissue of 38 fish species caught in different geographical areas of the North Atlantic Ocean (included in FAO...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Exposure and health 2021-09, Vol.13 (3), p.361-373
Hauptverfasser: Vieira, H. C., Ramirez, M. M. B., Bordalo, M. D., Rodrigues, A. C. M., Soares, A. M. V. M., Abreu, S. N., Morgado, F., Rendón-von Osten, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 373
container_issue 3
container_start_page 361
container_title Exposure and health
container_volume 13
creator Vieira, H. C.
Ramirez, M. M. B.
Bordalo, M. D.
Rodrigues, A. C. M.
Soares, A. M. V. M.
Abreu, S. N.
Morgado, F.
Rendón-von Osten, J.
description Fish consumption is considered the main route of exposure to mercury for the human population. In this sense, this study analysed the total and organic mercury content present in the muscle tissue of 38 fish species caught in different geographical areas of the North Atlantic Ocean (included in FAO fishing areas 27 and 31). The potential risk to human health through fish consumption was assessed using the maximum limit for mercury intake of 1.3 μg methylmercury Kg body weight −1  week −1 . The results show that carnivorous species presented higher mercury content (range 0.03–0.88 μg g −1 ) when compared to omnivorous (range 0.003–0.19 μg g −1 ) in all sampling sites. Furthermore, demersal fish exhibited higher mercury levels (range 0.01–0.88 μg g −1 ) than the pelagic species (range 0.003–0.38 μg g −1 ) did. From the 38 species analysed only Zeus faber presented mercury levels (0.68  ±  0.07 μg g −1 ) above the maximum limit (0.5 μg g −1 ) established for human consumption. On the other hand, mercury intake can be higher than the recommended due to the consumption of 13 species from fishing area 27 (Azores archipelago and Northwest Portuguese coast) and one species ( Cynoscion nebulosus ) from fishing area 31 (Southeast Mexican coast). However, only the consumption of Zeus faber and Aphanopus carbo from the fishing area 27 is discouraged. Thus, the fish consumption per capita in a specific area can exceed the limits of mercury ingestion, even when the mercury content in the fish is below the recommended for consumption.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12403-021-00388-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2919908117</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2919908117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-cbdefb39d081b8be29231aa52f7b3fe847c178915e1eaf0bcb8f8d8243069bde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEElXpD7CyxDrgRx72Miq0RSpUQmVtOc64SUmdYqeL8vW4DYgdqxlp7jkj3Si6JfieYJw_eEITzGJMSYwx4zzOL6IRTVISi4ynl797nmXX0cT7LcaYZCkJ1Cj6Wne9apGyFVq5jbKNRi_g9MEdUWPRrPE1Mq7bocfGGHBgezSHbuPUvm504AoHyp-SfQ3otXN9jYq-VbYPnpUGZc_mBag2XN4a_4EK78H7XTDdRFdGtR4mP3Mcvc-e1tNFvFzNn6fFMtaMiD7WZQWmZKLCnJS8BCooI0ql1OQlM8CTXJOcC5ICAWVwqUtueMVpwnAmAsvG0d3g3bvu8wC-l9vu4Gx4KakgQgQvyUOKDintOu8dGLl3zU65oyRYnmqWQ80y1CzPNcsTxAbIh7DdgPtT_0N9A3oPgKY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919908117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Total and Organic Mercury in Fish from Different Geographical Areas in the North Atlantic Ocean and Health Risk Assessment</title><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Vieira, H. C. ; Ramirez, M. M. B. ; Bordalo, M. D. ; Rodrigues, A. C. M. ; Soares, A. M. V. M. ; Abreu, S. N. ; Morgado, F. ; Rendón-von Osten, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vieira, H. C. ; Ramirez, M. M. B. ; Bordalo, M. D. ; Rodrigues, A. C. M. ; Soares, A. M. V. M. ; Abreu, S. N. ; Morgado, F. ; Rendón-von Osten, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Fish consumption is considered the main route of exposure to mercury for the human population. In this sense, this study analysed the total and organic mercury content present in the muscle tissue of 38 fish species caught in different geographical areas of the North Atlantic Ocean (included in FAO fishing areas 27 and 31). The potential risk to human health through fish consumption was assessed using the maximum limit for mercury intake of 1.3 μg methylmercury Kg body weight −1  week −1 . The results show that carnivorous species presented higher mercury content (range 0.03–0.88 μg g −1 ) when compared to omnivorous (range 0.003–0.19 μg g −1 ) in all sampling sites. Furthermore, demersal fish exhibited higher mercury levels (range 0.01–0.88 μg g −1 ) than the pelagic species (range 0.003–0.38 μg g −1 ) did. From the 38 species analysed only Zeus faber presented mercury levels (0.68  ±  0.07 μg g −1 ) above the maximum limit (0.5 μg g −1 ) established for human consumption. On the other hand, mercury intake can be higher than the recommended due to the consumption of 13 species from fishing area 27 (Azores archipelago and Northwest Portuguese coast) and one species ( Cynoscion nebulosus ) from fishing area 31 (Southeast Mexican coast). However, only the consumption of Zeus faber and Aphanopus carbo from the fishing area 27 is discouraged. Thus, the fish consumption per capita in a specific area can exceed the limits of mercury ingestion, even when the mercury content in the fish is below the recommended for consumption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2451-9766</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2451-9685</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12403-021-00388-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Aquatic Pollution ; Archipelagoes ; Bioaccumulation ; Body weight ; Consumption ; Dimethylmercury ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environment ; Environmental Health ; Fatty acids ; Fish ; Fishing ; Food ; Health risks ; Human populations ; Ingestion ; Lifestyles ; Mercury ; Mercury (metal) ; Methylmercury ; Original Paper ; Plankton ; Pollution ; Risk assessment ; Species ; Sport fishing ; Waste Water Technology ; Water and Health ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Water Quality/Water Pollution ; Zeus faber</subject><ispartof>Exposure and health, 2021-09, Vol.13 (3), p.361-373</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-cbdefb39d081b8be29231aa52f7b3fe847c178915e1eaf0bcb8f8d8243069bde3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-cbdefb39d081b8be29231aa52f7b3fe847c178915e1eaf0bcb8f8d8243069bde3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8394-6816</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12403-021-00388-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2919908117?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21387,21388,27923,27924,33529,33743,41487,42556,43658,43804,51318,64384,64388,72240</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vieira, H. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramirez, M. M. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordalo, M. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, A. C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares, A. M. V. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abreu, S. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgado, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rendón-von Osten, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Total and Organic Mercury in Fish from Different Geographical Areas in the North Atlantic Ocean and Health Risk Assessment</title><title>Exposure and health</title><addtitle>Expo Health</addtitle><description>Fish consumption is considered the main route of exposure to mercury for the human population. In this sense, this study analysed the total and organic mercury content present in the muscle tissue of 38 fish species caught in different geographical areas of the North Atlantic Ocean (included in FAO fishing areas 27 and 31). The potential risk to human health through fish consumption was assessed using the maximum limit for mercury intake of 1.3 μg methylmercury Kg body weight −1  week −1 . The results show that carnivorous species presented higher mercury content (range 0.03–0.88 μg g −1 ) when compared to omnivorous (range 0.003–0.19 μg g −1 ) in all sampling sites. Furthermore, demersal fish exhibited higher mercury levels (range 0.01–0.88 μg g −1 ) than the pelagic species (range 0.003–0.38 μg g −1 ) did. From the 38 species analysed only Zeus faber presented mercury levels (0.68  ±  0.07 μg g −1 ) above the maximum limit (0.5 μg g −1 ) established for human consumption. On the other hand, mercury intake can be higher than the recommended due to the consumption of 13 species from fishing area 27 (Azores archipelago and Northwest Portuguese coast) and one species ( Cynoscion nebulosus ) from fishing area 31 (Southeast Mexican coast). However, only the consumption of Zeus faber and Aphanopus carbo from the fishing area 27 is discouraged. Thus, the fish consumption per capita in a specific area can exceed the limits of mercury ingestion, even when the mercury content in the fish is below the recommended for consumption.</description><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Archipelagoes</subject><subject>Bioaccumulation</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Dimethylmercury</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Human populations</subject><subject>Ingestion</subject><subject>Lifestyles</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Mercury (metal)</subject><subject>Methylmercury</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Sport fishing</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water and Health</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Water Quality/Water Pollution</subject><subject>Zeus faber</subject><issn>2451-9766</issn><issn>2451-9685</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEElXpD7CyxDrgRx72Miq0RSpUQmVtOc64SUmdYqeL8vW4DYgdqxlp7jkj3Si6JfieYJw_eEITzGJMSYwx4zzOL6IRTVISi4ynl797nmXX0cT7LcaYZCkJ1Cj6Wne9apGyFVq5jbKNRi_g9MEdUWPRrPE1Mq7bocfGGHBgezSHbuPUvm504AoHyp-SfQ3otXN9jYq-VbYPnpUGZc_mBag2XN4a_4EK78H7XTDdRFdGtR4mP3Mcvc-e1tNFvFzNn6fFMtaMiD7WZQWmZKLCnJS8BCooI0ql1OQlM8CTXJOcC5ICAWVwqUtueMVpwnAmAsvG0d3g3bvu8wC-l9vu4Gx4KakgQgQvyUOKDintOu8dGLl3zU65oyRYnmqWQ80y1CzPNcsTxAbIh7DdgPtT_0N9A3oPgKY</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Vieira, H. C.</creator><creator>Ramirez, M. M. B.</creator><creator>Bordalo, M. D.</creator><creator>Rodrigues, A. C. M.</creator><creator>Soares, A. M. V. M.</creator><creator>Abreu, S. N.</creator><creator>Morgado, F.</creator><creator>Rendón-von Osten, J.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8394-6816</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Total and Organic Mercury in Fish from Different Geographical Areas in the North Atlantic Ocean and Health Risk Assessment</title><author>Vieira, H. C. ; Ramirez, M. M. B. ; Bordalo, M. D. ; Rodrigues, A. C. M. ; Soares, A. M. V. M. ; Abreu, S. N. ; Morgado, F. ; Rendón-von Osten, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-cbdefb39d081b8be29231aa52f7b3fe847c178915e1eaf0bcb8f8d8243069bde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Archipelagoes</topic><topic>Bioaccumulation</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Dimethylmercury</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Human populations</topic><topic>Ingestion</topic><topic>Lifestyles</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Mercury (metal)</topic><topic>Methylmercury</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Sport fishing</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water and Health</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Water Quality/Water Pollution</topic><topic>Zeus faber</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vieira, H. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramirez, M. M. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordalo, M. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, A. C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares, A. M. V. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abreu, S. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgado, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rendón-von Osten, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Exposure and health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vieira, H. C.</au><au>Ramirez, M. M. B.</au><au>Bordalo, M. D.</au><au>Rodrigues, A. C. M.</au><au>Soares, A. M. V. M.</au><au>Abreu, S. N.</au><au>Morgado, F.</au><au>Rendón-von Osten, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Total and Organic Mercury in Fish from Different Geographical Areas in the North Atlantic Ocean and Health Risk Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Exposure and health</jtitle><stitle>Expo Health</stitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>373</epage><pages>361-373</pages><issn>2451-9766</issn><eissn>2451-9685</eissn><abstract>Fish consumption is considered the main route of exposure to mercury for the human population. In this sense, this study analysed the total and organic mercury content present in the muscle tissue of 38 fish species caught in different geographical areas of the North Atlantic Ocean (included in FAO fishing areas 27 and 31). The potential risk to human health through fish consumption was assessed using the maximum limit for mercury intake of 1.3 μg methylmercury Kg body weight −1  week −1 . The results show that carnivorous species presented higher mercury content (range 0.03–0.88 μg g −1 ) when compared to omnivorous (range 0.003–0.19 μg g −1 ) in all sampling sites. Furthermore, demersal fish exhibited higher mercury levels (range 0.01–0.88 μg g −1 ) than the pelagic species (range 0.003–0.38 μg g −1 ) did. From the 38 species analysed only Zeus faber presented mercury levels (0.68  ±  0.07 μg g −1 ) above the maximum limit (0.5 μg g −1 ) established for human consumption. On the other hand, mercury intake can be higher than the recommended due to the consumption of 13 species from fishing area 27 (Azores archipelago and Northwest Portuguese coast) and one species ( Cynoscion nebulosus ) from fishing area 31 (Southeast Mexican coast). However, only the consumption of Zeus faber and Aphanopus carbo from the fishing area 27 is discouraged. Thus, the fish consumption per capita in a specific area can exceed the limits of mercury ingestion, even when the mercury content in the fish is below the recommended for consumption.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s12403-021-00388-7</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8394-6816</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2451-9766
ispartof Exposure and health, 2021-09, Vol.13 (3), p.361-373
issn 2451-9766
2451-9685
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2919908117
source ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central
subjects Aquatic Pollution
Archipelagoes
Bioaccumulation
Body weight
Consumption
Dimethylmercury
Earth and Environmental Science
Environment
Environmental Health
Fatty acids
Fish
Fishing
Food
Health risks
Human populations
Ingestion
Lifestyles
Mercury
Mercury (metal)
Methylmercury
Original Paper
Plankton
Pollution
Risk assessment
Species
Sport fishing
Waste Water Technology
Water and Health
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
Water Quality/Water Pollution
Zeus faber
title Total and Organic Mercury in Fish from Different Geographical Areas in the North Atlantic Ocean and Health Risk Assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T01%3A54%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Total%20and%20Organic%20Mercury%20in%20Fish%20from%20Different%20Geographical%20Areas%20in%20the%20North%20Atlantic%20Ocean%20and%20Health%20Risk%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Exposure%20and%20health&rft.au=Vieira,%20H.%20C.&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=373&rft.pages=361-373&rft.issn=2451-9766&rft.eissn=2451-9685&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12403-021-00388-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2919908117%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919908117&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true