Variations in body condition of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in two nearby foraging grounds indicate their sensitivity to foraging habitats

Coastal seagrass habitats are critical foraging grounds for endangered green turtles (Chelonia mydas). However, these habitats are vulnerable to anthropogenic effects, potentially leading to their degradation with consequent impacts on the health status of foraging green turtles. Two foraging habita...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aquatic conservation 2024-01, Vol.34 (1), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Nishizawa, Hideaki, Joseph, Juanita, Jolis, Gavin, Isnain, Irwan, Muin, Hussien, Johari, Sofia, Saleh, Ejria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Aquatic conservation
container_volume 34
creator Nishizawa, Hideaki
Joseph, Juanita
Jolis, Gavin
Isnain, Irwan
Muin, Hussien
Johari, Sofia
Saleh, Ejria
description Coastal seagrass habitats are critical foraging grounds for endangered green turtles (Chelonia mydas). However, these habitats are vulnerable to anthropogenic effects, potentially leading to their degradation with consequent impacts on the health status of foraging green turtles. Two foraging habitats of green turtles in Tun Mustapha Park, Sabah, Malaysia were surveyed: Kudat Mainland and Balambangan Island, by capturing green turtles and evaluating their physical body condition as well as assessing seagrass cover. Despite having similar genetic compositions, the Kudat Mainland aggregation had significantly higher body size (curved carapace length: 61.7 ± 14.5 cm, body weight: 30.0 ± 22.2 kg), Fulton's body condition index (BCI: 1.49 ± 0.13), barnacle (Chelonibia testudinaria) occurrence (78.8%) and barnacle abundance (5.46 ± 9.90 barnacles/turtle) than the Balambangan Island aggregation (curved carapace length: 51.6 ± 8.1 cm, body weight: 17.3 ± 7.7 kg, BCI: 1.40 ± 0.09, barnacle occurrence: 31.0%, barnacle abundance: 0.50 ± 0.92 barnacles/turtle). The differences in BCI between the nearby aggregations could not be attributed to size and barnacle occurrence differences, suggesting the foraging habitat is the primary factor affecting the body condition of green turtles. Seagrass cover at Kudat Mainland was only slightly higher than at Balambangan Island. These findings suggest that the body condition of green turtles is potentially sensitive to the quality of foraging habitats such as nutrients and water quality. It is crucial to monitor the health of foraging habitats and their impact on the body condition of turtles. It is recommended that habitat‐turtle dynamics are given conservation priority, in parallel to water quality monitoring – with action taken to reduce pollution if necessary. A holistic approach to turtle conservation is therefore required.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/aqc.4038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2919806508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2919806508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-1faf46b43cfc350e31f93a2dfd4ef4b873289c309d7fedf10ad18ba86a3a70d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKfgTwh4My86k6ZfuRzFLxiIoN6W0ybZMrpkS1JHf4T_2dYJXnl1DofnfQ88CF1TMqeExHewb-YJYcUJmlDCeUTyND0d9zSO8oyyc3Th_YYQwjOaTdDXBzgNQVvjsTa4tqLHjTVCjydsFV45KQ0OnQut9HhWrmVrjQa87QX42zETDhYbCa7usbIOVtqshpTtjBgrhW4gSBzWUjvspfFD86cOPQ72D19DrQMEf4nOFLReXv3OKXp_uH8rn6Lly-NzuVhGTcxZEVEFKsnqhDWqYSmRjCrOIBZKJFIldZGzuOANI1zkSgpFCQha1FBkwCAnomBTdHPs3Tm776QP1cZ2zgwvq5hTXpAsJSM1O1KNs947qaqd01twfUVJNcquBtnVKHtAoyN60K3s_-WqxWv5w38D6WiDjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919806508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variations in body condition of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in two nearby foraging grounds indicate their sensitivity to foraging habitats</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Nishizawa, Hideaki ; Joseph, Juanita ; Jolis, Gavin ; Isnain, Irwan ; Muin, Hussien ; Johari, Sofia ; Saleh, Ejria</creator><creatorcontrib>Nishizawa, Hideaki ; Joseph, Juanita ; Jolis, Gavin ; Isnain, Irwan ; Muin, Hussien ; Johari, Sofia ; Saleh, Ejria</creatorcontrib><description>Coastal seagrass habitats are critical foraging grounds for endangered green turtles (Chelonia mydas). However, these habitats are vulnerable to anthropogenic effects, potentially leading to their degradation with consequent impacts on the health status of foraging green turtles. Two foraging habitats of green turtles in Tun Mustapha Park, Sabah, Malaysia were surveyed: Kudat Mainland and Balambangan Island, by capturing green turtles and evaluating their physical body condition as well as assessing seagrass cover. Despite having similar genetic compositions, the Kudat Mainland aggregation had significantly higher body size (curved carapace length: 61.7 ± 14.5 cm, body weight: 30.0 ± 22.2 kg), Fulton's body condition index (BCI: 1.49 ± 0.13), barnacle (Chelonibia testudinaria) occurrence (78.8%) and barnacle abundance (5.46 ± 9.90 barnacles/turtle) than the Balambangan Island aggregation (curved carapace length: 51.6 ± 8.1 cm, body weight: 17.3 ± 7.7 kg, BCI: 1.40 ± 0.09, barnacle occurrence: 31.0%, barnacle abundance: 0.50 ± 0.92 barnacles/turtle). The differences in BCI between the nearby aggregations could not be attributed to size and barnacle occurrence differences, suggesting the foraging habitat is the primary factor affecting the body condition of green turtles. Seagrass cover at Kudat Mainland was only slightly higher than at Balambangan Island. These findings suggest that the body condition of green turtles is potentially sensitive to the quality of foraging habitats such as nutrients and water quality. It is crucial to monitor the health of foraging habitats and their impact on the body condition of turtles. It is recommended that habitat‐turtle dynamics are given conservation priority, in parallel to water quality monitoring – with action taken to reduce pollution if necessary. A holistic approach to turtle conservation is therefore required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-7613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aqc.4038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Aggregation ; Anthropogenic factors ; Aquatic reptiles ; barnacle ; Body condition ; body condition index ; Body size ; Body weight ; Carapace ; Chelonia mydas ; Cirripedia ; Coastal ecology ; Conservation ; Ecological aggregations ; Foraging ; Foraging habitats ; Habitats ; Human influences ; Man-induced effects ; Marine crustaceans ; natal origin ; Nutrients ; Pollution control ; Pollution monitoring ; Reptiles &amp; amphibians ; Sea grasses ; sea turtle ; seagrass ; Small mammals ; South‐East Asia ; Turtles ; Water monitoring ; Water quality ; Water quality management ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Aquatic conservation, 2024-01, Vol.34 (1), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-1faf46b43cfc350e31f93a2dfd4ef4b873289c309d7fedf10ad18ba86a3a70d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-1faf46b43cfc350e31f93a2dfd4ef4b873289c309d7fedf10ad18ba86a3a70d83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0232-2180 ; 0000-0002-6995-7973</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Faqc.4038$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Faqc.4038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nishizawa, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joseph, Juanita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolis, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isnain, Irwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muin, Hussien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johari, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Ejria</creatorcontrib><title>Variations in body condition of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in two nearby foraging grounds indicate their sensitivity to foraging habitats</title><title>Aquatic conservation</title><description>Coastal seagrass habitats are critical foraging grounds for endangered green turtles (Chelonia mydas). However, these habitats are vulnerable to anthropogenic effects, potentially leading to their degradation with consequent impacts on the health status of foraging green turtles. Two foraging habitats of green turtles in Tun Mustapha Park, Sabah, Malaysia were surveyed: Kudat Mainland and Balambangan Island, by capturing green turtles and evaluating their physical body condition as well as assessing seagrass cover. Despite having similar genetic compositions, the Kudat Mainland aggregation had significantly higher body size (curved carapace length: 61.7 ± 14.5 cm, body weight: 30.0 ± 22.2 kg), Fulton's body condition index (BCI: 1.49 ± 0.13), barnacle (Chelonibia testudinaria) occurrence (78.8%) and barnacle abundance (5.46 ± 9.90 barnacles/turtle) than the Balambangan Island aggregation (curved carapace length: 51.6 ± 8.1 cm, body weight: 17.3 ± 7.7 kg, BCI: 1.40 ± 0.09, barnacle occurrence: 31.0%, barnacle abundance: 0.50 ± 0.92 barnacles/turtle). The differences in BCI between the nearby aggregations could not be attributed to size and barnacle occurrence differences, suggesting the foraging habitat is the primary factor affecting the body condition of green turtles. Seagrass cover at Kudat Mainland was only slightly higher than at Balambangan Island. These findings suggest that the body condition of green turtles is potentially sensitive to the quality of foraging habitats such as nutrients and water quality. It is crucial to monitor the health of foraging habitats and their impact on the body condition of turtles. It is recommended that habitat‐turtle dynamics are given conservation priority, in parallel to water quality monitoring – with action taken to reduce pollution if necessary. A holistic approach to turtle conservation is therefore required.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Aggregation</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aquatic reptiles</subject><subject>barnacle</subject><subject>Body condition</subject><subject>body condition index</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Carapace</subject><subject>Chelonia mydas</subject><subject>Cirripedia</subject><subject>Coastal ecology</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Ecological aggregations</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Foraging habitats</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Man-induced effects</subject><subject>Marine crustaceans</subject><subject>natal origin</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Pollution monitoring</subject><subject>Reptiles &amp; amphibians</subject><subject>Sea grasses</subject><subject>sea turtle</subject><subject>seagrass</subject><subject>Small mammals</subject><subject>South‐East Asia</subject><subject>Turtles</subject><subject>Water monitoring</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water quality management</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1052-7613</issn><issn>1099-0755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKfgTwh4My86k6ZfuRzFLxiIoN6W0ybZMrpkS1JHf4T_2dYJXnl1DofnfQ88CF1TMqeExHewb-YJYcUJmlDCeUTyND0d9zSO8oyyc3Th_YYQwjOaTdDXBzgNQVvjsTa4tqLHjTVCjydsFV45KQ0OnQut9HhWrmVrjQa87QX42zETDhYbCa7usbIOVtqshpTtjBgrhW4gSBzWUjvspfFD86cOPQ72D19DrQMEf4nOFLReXv3OKXp_uH8rn6Lly-NzuVhGTcxZEVEFKsnqhDWqYSmRjCrOIBZKJFIldZGzuOANI1zkSgpFCQha1FBkwCAnomBTdHPs3Tm776QP1cZ2zgwvq5hTXpAsJSM1O1KNs947qaqd01twfUVJNcquBtnVKHtAoyN60K3s_-WqxWv5w38D6WiDjA</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Nishizawa, Hideaki</creator><creator>Joseph, Juanita</creator><creator>Jolis, Gavin</creator><creator>Isnain, Irwan</creator><creator>Muin, Hussien</creator><creator>Johari, Sofia</creator><creator>Saleh, Ejria</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0232-2180</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6995-7973</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Variations in body condition of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in two nearby foraging grounds indicate their sensitivity to foraging habitats</title><author>Nishizawa, Hideaki ; Joseph, Juanita ; Jolis, Gavin ; Isnain, Irwan ; Muin, Hussien ; Johari, Sofia ; Saleh, Ejria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-1faf46b43cfc350e31f93a2dfd4ef4b873289c309d7fedf10ad18ba86a3a70d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Aggregation</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aquatic reptiles</topic><topic>barnacle</topic><topic>Body condition</topic><topic>body condition index</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Carapace</topic><topic>Chelonia mydas</topic><topic>Cirripedia</topic><topic>Coastal ecology</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Ecological aggregations</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Foraging habitats</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Man-induced effects</topic><topic>Marine crustaceans</topic><topic>natal origin</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Pollution monitoring</topic><topic>Reptiles &amp; amphibians</topic><topic>Sea grasses</topic><topic>sea turtle</topic><topic>seagrass</topic><topic>Small mammals</topic><topic>South‐East Asia</topic><topic>Turtles</topic><topic>Water monitoring</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water quality management</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nishizawa, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joseph, Juanita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolis, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isnain, Irwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muin, Hussien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johari, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Ejria</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquatic conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nishizawa, Hideaki</au><au>Joseph, Juanita</au><au>Jolis, Gavin</au><au>Isnain, Irwan</au><au>Muin, Hussien</au><au>Johari, Sofia</au><au>Saleh, Ejria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variations in body condition of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in two nearby foraging grounds indicate their sensitivity to foraging habitats</atitle><jtitle>Aquatic conservation</jtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1052-7613</issn><eissn>1099-0755</eissn><abstract>Coastal seagrass habitats are critical foraging grounds for endangered green turtles (Chelonia mydas). However, these habitats are vulnerable to anthropogenic effects, potentially leading to their degradation with consequent impacts on the health status of foraging green turtles. Two foraging habitats of green turtles in Tun Mustapha Park, Sabah, Malaysia were surveyed: Kudat Mainland and Balambangan Island, by capturing green turtles and evaluating their physical body condition as well as assessing seagrass cover. Despite having similar genetic compositions, the Kudat Mainland aggregation had significantly higher body size (curved carapace length: 61.7 ± 14.5 cm, body weight: 30.0 ± 22.2 kg), Fulton's body condition index (BCI: 1.49 ± 0.13), barnacle (Chelonibia testudinaria) occurrence (78.8%) and barnacle abundance (5.46 ± 9.90 barnacles/turtle) than the Balambangan Island aggregation (curved carapace length: 51.6 ± 8.1 cm, body weight: 17.3 ± 7.7 kg, BCI: 1.40 ± 0.09, barnacle occurrence: 31.0%, barnacle abundance: 0.50 ± 0.92 barnacles/turtle). The differences in BCI between the nearby aggregations could not be attributed to size and barnacle occurrence differences, suggesting the foraging habitat is the primary factor affecting the body condition of green turtles. Seagrass cover at Kudat Mainland was only slightly higher than at Balambangan Island. These findings suggest that the body condition of green turtles is potentially sensitive to the quality of foraging habitats such as nutrients and water quality. It is crucial to monitor the health of foraging habitats and their impact on the body condition of turtles. It is recommended that habitat‐turtle dynamics are given conservation priority, in parallel to water quality monitoring – with action taken to reduce pollution if necessary. A holistic approach to turtle conservation is therefore required.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/aqc.4038</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0232-2180</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6995-7973</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1052-7613
ispartof Aquatic conservation, 2024-01, Vol.34 (1), p.n/a
issn 1052-7613
1099-0755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2919806508
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Abundance
Aggregation
Anthropogenic factors
Aquatic reptiles
barnacle
Body condition
body condition index
Body size
Body weight
Carapace
Chelonia mydas
Cirripedia
Coastal ecology
Conservation
Ecological aggregations
Foraging
Foraging habitats
Habitats
Human influences
Man-induced effects
Marine crustaceans
natal origin
Nutrients
Pollution control
Pollution monitoring
Reptiles & amphibians
Sea grasses
sea turtle
seagrass
Small mammals
South‐East Asia
Turtles
Water monitoring
Water quality
Water quality management
Wildlife conservation
title Variations in body condition of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in two nearby foraging grounds indicate their sensitivity to foraging habitats
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T21%3A20%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variations%20in%20body%20condition%20of%20green%20turtles%20(Chelonia%20mydas)%20in%20two%20nearby%20foraging%20grounds%20indicate%20their%20sensitivity%20to%20foraging%20habitats&rft.jtitle=Aquatic%20conservation&rft.au=Nishizawa,%20Hideaki&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1052-7613&rft.eissn=1099-0755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aqc.4038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2919806508%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919806508&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true