Variations in body condition of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in two nearby foraging grounds indicate their sensitivity to foraging habitats
Coastal seagrass habitats are critical foraging grounds for endangered green turtles (Chelonia mydas). However, these habitats are vulnerable to anthropogenic effects, potentially leading to their degradation with consequent impacts on the health status of foraging green turtles. Two foraging habita...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aquatic conservation 2024-01, Vol.34 (1), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Aquatic conservation |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Nishizawa, Hideaki Joseph, Juanita Jolis, Gavin Isnain, Irwan Muin, Hussien Johari, Sofia Saleh, Ejria |
description | Coastal seagrass habitats are critical foraging grounds for endangered green turtles (Chelonia mydas). However, these habitats are vulnerable to anthropogenic effects, potentially leading to their degradation with consequent impacts on the health status of foraging green turtles.
Two foraging habitats of green turtles in Tun Mustapha Park, Sabah, Malaysia were surveyed: Kudat Mainland and Balambangan Island, by capturing green turtles and evaluating their physical body condition as well as assessing seagrass cover.
Despite having similar genetic compositions, the Kudat Mainland aggregation had significantly higher body size (curved carapace length: 61.7 ± 14.5 cm, body weight: 30.0 ± 22.2 kg), Fulton's body condition index (BCI: 1.49 ± 0.13), barnacle (Chelonibia testudinaria) occurrence (78.8%) and barnacle abundance (5.46 ± 9.90 barnacles/turtle) than the Balambangan Island aggregation (curved carapace length: 51.6 ± 8.1 cm, body weight: 17.3 ± 7.7 kg, BCI: 1.40 ± 0.09, barnacle occurrence: 31.0%, barnacle abundance: 0.50 ± 0.92 barnacles/turtle). The differences in BCI between the nearby aggregations could not be attributed to size and barnacle occurrence differences, suggesting the foraging habitat is the primary factor affecting the body condition of green turtles.
Seagrass cover at Kudat Mainland was only slightly higher than at Balambangan Island. These findings suggest that the body condition of green turtles is potentially sensitive to the quality of foraging habitats such as nutrients and water quality.
It is crucial to monitor the health of foraging habitats and their impact on the body condition of turtles. It is recommended that habitat‐turtle dynamics are given conservation priority, in parallel to water quality monitoring – with action taken to reduce pollution if necessary. A holistic approach to turtle conservation is therefore required. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/aqc.4038 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2919806508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2919806508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-1faf46b43cfc350e31f93a2dfd4ef4b873289c309d7fedf10ad18ba86a3a70d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKfgTwh4My86k6ZfuRzFLxiIoN6W0ybZMrpkS1JHf4T_2dYJXnl1DofnfQ88CF1TMqeExHewb-YJYcUJmlDCeUTyND0d9zSO8oyyc3Th_YYQwjOaTdDXBzgNQVvjsTa4tqLHjTVCjydsFV45KQ0OnQut9HhWrmVrjQa87QX42zETDhYbCa7usbIOVtqshpTtjBgrhW4gSBzWUjvspfFD86cOPQ72D19DrQMEf4nOFLReXv3OKXp_uH8rn6Lly-NzuVhGTcxZEVEFKsnqhDWqYSmRjCrOIBZKJFIldZGzuOANI1zkSgpFCQha1FBkwCAnomBTdHPs3Tm776QP1cZ2zgwvq5hTXpAsJSM1O1KNs947qaqd01twfUVJNcquBtnVKHtAoyN60K3s_-WqxWv5w38D6WiDjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919806508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variations in body condition of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in two nearby foraging grounds indicate their sensitivity to foraging habitats</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Nishizawa, Hideaki ; Joseph, Juanita ; Jolis, Gavin ; Isnain, Irwan ; Muin, Hussien ; Johari, Sofia ; Saleh, Ejria</creator><creatorcontrib>Nishizawa, Hideaki ; Joseph, Juanita ; Jolis, Gavin ; Isnain, Irwan ; Muin, Hussien ; Johari, Sofia ; Saleh, Ejria</creatorcontrib><description>Coastal seagrass habitats are critical foraging grounds for endangered green turtles (Chelonia mydas). However, these habitats are vulnerable to anthropogenic effects, potentially leading to their degradation with consequent impacts on the health status of foraging green turtles.
Two foraging habitats of green turtles in Tun Mustapha Park, Sabah, Malaysia were surveyed: Kudat Mainland and Balambangan Island, by capturing green turtles and evaluating their physical body condition as well as assessing seagrass cover.
Despite having similar genetic compositions, the Kudat Mainland aggregation had significantly higher body size (curved carapace length: 61.7 ± 14.5 cm, body weight: 30.0 ± 22.2 kg), Fulton's body condition index (BCI: 1.49 ± 0.13), barnacle (Chelonibia testudinaria) occurrence (78.8%) and barnacle abundance (5.46 ± 9.90 barnacles/turtle) than the Balambangan Island aggregation (curved carapace length: 51.6 ± 8.1 cm, body weight: 17.3 ± 7.7 kg, BCI: 1.40 ± 0.09, barnacle occurrence: 31.0%, barnacle abundance: 0.50 ± 0.92 barnacles/turtle). The differences in BCI between the nearby aggregations could not be attributed to size and barnacle occurrence differences, suggesting the foraging habitat is the primary factor affecting the body condition of green turtles.
Seagrass cover at Kudat Mainland was only slightly higher than at Balambangan Island. These findings suggest that the body condition of green turtles is potentially sensitive to the quality of foraging habitats such as nutrients and water quality.
It is crucial to monitor the health of foraging habitats and their impact on the body condition of turtles. It is recommended that habitat‐turtle dynamics are given conservation priority, in parallel to water quality monitoring – with action taken to reduce pollution if necessary. A holistic approach to turtle conservation is therefore required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-7613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aqc.4038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Aggregation ; Anthropogenic factors ; Aquatic reptiles ; barnacle ; Body condition ; body condition index ; Body size ; Body weight ; Carapace ; Chelonia mydas ; Cirripedia ; Coastal ecology ; Conservation ; Ecological aggregations ; Foraging ; Foraging habitats ; Habitats ; Human influences ; Man-induced effects ; Marine crustaceans ; natal origin ; Nutrients ; Pollution control ; Pollution monitoring ; Reptiles & amphibians ; Sea grasses ; sea turtle ; seagrass ; Small mammals ; South‐East Asia ; Turtles ; Water monitoring ; Water quality ; Water quality management ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Aquatic conservation, 2024-01, Vol.34 (1), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-1faf46b43cfc350e31f93a2dfd4ef4b873289c309d7fedf10ad18ba86a3a70d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-1faf46b43cfc350e31f93a2dfd4ef4b873289c309d7fedf10ad18ba86a3a70d83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0232-2180 ; 0000-0002-6995-7973</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Faqc.4038$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Faqc.4038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nishizawa, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joseph, Juanita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolis, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isnain, Irwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muin, Hussien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johari, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Ejria</creatorcontrib><title>Variations in body condition of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in two nearby foraging grounds indicate their sensitivity to foraging habitats</title><title>Aquatic conservation</title><description>Coastal seagrass habitats are critical foraging grounds for endangered green turtles (Chelonia mydas). However, these habitats are vulnerable to anthropogenic effects, potentially leading to their degradation with consequent impacts on the health status of foraging green turtles.
Two foraging habitats of green turtles in Tun Mustapha Park, Sabah, Malaysia were surveyed: Kudat Mainland and Balambangan Island, by capturing green turtles and evaluating their physical body condition as well as assessing seagrass cover.
Despite having similar genetic compositions, the Kudat Mainland aggregation had significantly higher body size (curved carapace length: 61.7 ± 14.5 cm, body weight: 30.0 ± 22.2 kg), Fulton's body condition index (BCI: 1.49 ± 0.13), barnacle (Chelonibia testudinaria) occurrence (78.8%) and barnacle abundance (5.46 ± 9.90 barnacles/turtle) than the Balambangan Island aggregation (curved carapace length: 51.6 ± 8.1 cm, body weight: 17.3 ± 7.7 kg, BCI: 1.40 ± 0.09, barnacle occurrence: 31.0%, barnacle abundance: 0.50 ± 0.92 barnacles/turtle). The differences in BCI between the nearby aggregations could not be attributed to size and barnacle occurrence differences, suggesting the foraging habitat is the primary factor affecting the body condition of green turtles.
Seagrass cover at Kudat Mainland was only slightly higher than at Balambangan Island. These findings suggest that the body condition of green turtles is potentially sensitive to the quality of foraging habitats such as nutrients and water quality.
It is crucial to monitor the health of foraging habitats and their impact on the body condition of turtles. It is recommended that habitat‐turtle dynamics are given conservation priority, in parallel to water quality monitoring – with action taken to reduce pollution if necessary. A holistic approach to turtle conservation is therefore required.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Aggregation</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aquatic reptiles</subject><subject>barnacle</subject><subject>Body condition</subject><subject>body condition index</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Carapace</subject><subject>Chelonia mydas</subject><subject>Cirripedia</subject><subject>Coastal ecology</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Ecological aggregations</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Foraging habitats</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Man-induced effects</subject><subject>Marine crustaceans</subject><subject>natal origin</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Pollution monitoring</subject><subject>Reptiles & amphibians</subject><subject>Sea grasses</subject><subject>sea turtle</subject><subject>seagrass</subject><subject>Small mammals</subject><subject>South‐East Asia</subject><subject>Turtles</subject><subject>Water monitoring</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water quality management</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1052-7613</issn><issn>1099-0755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKfgTwh4My86k6ZfuRzFLxiIoN6W0ybZMrpkS1JHf4T_2dYJXnl1DofnfQ88CF1TMqeExHewb-YJYcUJmlDCeUTyND0d9zSO8oyyc3Th_YYQwjOaTdDXBzgNQVvjsTa4tqLHjTVCjydsFV45KQ0OnQut9HhWrmVrjQa87QX42zETDhYbCa7usbIOVtqshpTtjBgrhW4gSBzWUjvspfFD86cOPQ72D19DrQMEf4nOFLReXv3OKXp_uH8rn6Lly-NzuVhGTcxZEVEFKsnqhDWqYSmRjCrOIBZKJFIldZGzuOANI1zkSgpFCQha1FBkwCAnomBTdHPs3Tm776QP1cZ2zgwvq5hTXpAsJSM1O1KNs947qaqd01twfUVJNcquBtnVKHtAoyN60K3s_-WqxWv5w38D6WiDjA</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Nishizawa, Hideaki</creator><creator>Joseph, Juanita</creator><creator>Jolis, Gavin</creator><creator>Isnain, Irwan</creator><creator>Muin, Hussien</creator><creator>Johari, Sofia</creator><creator>Saleh, Ejria</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0232-2180</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6995-7973</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Variations in body condition of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in two nearby foraging grounds indicate their sensitivity to foraging habitats</title><author>Nishizawa, Hideaki ; Joseph, Juanita ; Jolis, Gavin ; Isnain, Irwan ; Muin, Hussien ; Johari, Sofia ; Saleh, Ejria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-1faf46b43cfc350e31f93a2dfd4ef4b873289c309d7fedf10ad18ba86a3a70d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Aggregation</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aquatic reptiles</topic><topic>barnacle</topic><topic>Body condition</topic><topic>body condition index</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Carapace</topic><topic>Chelonia mydas</topic><topic>Cirripedia</topic><topic>Coastal ecology</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Ecological aggregations</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Foraging habitats</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Man-induced effects</topic><topic>Marine crustaceans</topic><topic>natal origin</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Pollution monitoring</topic><topic>Reptiles & amphibians</topic><topic>Sea grasses</topic><topic>sea turtle</topic><topic>seagrass</topic><topic>Small mammals</topic><topic>South‐East Asia</topic><topic>Turtles</topic><topic>Water monitoring</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water quality management</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nishizawa, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joseph, Juanita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolis, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isnain, Irwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muin, Hussien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johari, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Ejria</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquatic conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nishizawa, Hideaki</au><au>Joseph, Juanita</au><au>Jolis, Gavin</au><au>Isnain, Irwan</au><au>Muin, Hussien</au><au>Johari, Sofia</au><au>Saleh, Ejria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variations in body condition of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in two nearby foraging grounds indicate their sensitivity to foraging habitats</atitle><jtitle>Aquatic conservation</jtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1052-7613</issn><eissn>1099-0755</eissn><abstract>Coastal seagrass habitats are critical foraging grounds for endangered green turtles (Chelonia mydas). However, these habitats are vulnerable to anthropogenic effects, potentially leading to their degradation with consequent impacts on the health status of foraging green turtles.
Two foraging habitats of green turtles in Tun Mustapha Park, Sabah, Malaysia were surveyed: Kudat Mainland and Balambangan Island, by capturing green turtles and evaluating their physical body condition as well as assessing seagrass cover.
Despite having similar genetic compositions, the Kudat Mainland aggregation had significantly higher body size (curved carapace length: 61.7 ± 14.5 cm, body weight: 30.0 ± 22.2 kg), Fulton's body condition index (BCI: 1.49 ± 0.13), barnacle (Chelonibia testudinaria) occurrence (78.8%) and barnacle abundance (5.46 ± 9.90 barnacles/turtle) than the Balambangan Island aggregation (curved carapace length: 51.6 ± 8.1 cm, body weight: 17.3 ± 7.7 kg, BCI: 1.40 ± 0.09, barnacle occurrence: 31.0%, barnacle abundance: 0.50 ± 0.92 barnacles/turtle). The differences in BCI between the nearby aggregations could not be attributed to size and barnacle occurrence differences, suggesting the foraging habitat is the primary factor affecting the body condition of green turtles.
Seagrass cover at Kudat Mainland was only slightly higher than at Balambangan Island. These findings suggest that the body condition of green turtles is potentially sensitive to the quality of foraging habitats such as nutrients and water quality.
It is crucial to monitor the health of foraging habitats and their impact on the body condition of turtles. It is recommended that habitat‐turtle dynamics are given conservation priority, in parallel to water quality monitoring – with action taken to reduce pollution if necessary. A holistic approach to turtle conservation is therefore required.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/aqc.4038</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0232-2180</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6995-7973</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1052-7613 |
ispartof | Aquatic conservation, 2024-01, Vol.34 (1), p.n/a |
issn | 1052-7613 1099-0755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2919806508 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Abundance Aggregation Anthropogenic factors Aquatic reptiles barnacle Body condition body condition index Body size Body weight Carapace Chelonia mydas Cirripedia Coastal ecology Conservation Ecological aggregations Foraging Foraging habitats Habitats Human influences Man-induced effects Marine crustaceans natal origin Nutrients Pollution control Pollution monitoring Reptiles & amphibians Sea grasses sea turtle seagrass Small mammals South‐East Asia Turtles Water monitoring Water quality Water quality management Wildlife conservation |
title | Variations in body condition of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in two nearby foraging grounds indicate their sensitivity to foraging habitats |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T21%3A20%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variations%20in%20body%20condition%20of%20green%20turtles%20(Chelonia%20mydas)%20in%20two%20nearby%20foraging%20grounds%20indicate%20their%20sensitivity%20to%20foraging%20habitats&rft.jtitle=Aquatic%20conservation&rft.au=Nishizawa,%20Hideaki&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1052-7613&rft.eissn=1099-0755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aqc.4038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2919806508%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919806508&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |