Drainage Ditches Contribute Considerably to the CH4 Budget of a Drained and a Rewetted Temperate Fen
Small water bodies including drainage ditches can be hotspots for methane (CH 4 ) emissions from peatlands. We assessed the CH 4 emissions of a drained and a rewetted temperate fen including emissions of managed and unmanaged drainage ditches over the course of 2.5 years, covering three vegetation p...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.) N.C.), 2021-08, Vol.41 (6), p.71-71, Article 71 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 71 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 71 |
| container_title | Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.) |
| container_volume | 41 |
| creator | Köhn, Daniel Welpelo, Carla Günther, Anke Jurasinski, Gerald |
| description | Small water bodies including drainage ditches can be hotspots for methane (CH
4
) emissions from peatlands. We assessed the CH
4
emissions of a drained and a rewetted temperate fen including emissions of managed and unmanaged drainage ditches over the course of 2.5 years, covering three vegetation periods. Ditch CH
4
emissions in the rewetted fen were significantly higher than in the drained fen. In the rewetted fen ditches contributed up to 91% of the annual CH
4
budget, despite covering only 1.5% of the area. In the drained fen CH
4
emissions were solely made up of ditch emissions. When including CH
4
uptake by the peat soil, the CH
4
balance of the drained fen was neutral. Dissolved organic carbon concentrations likely had an enhancing effect on CH
4
emissions while nitrate and sulfate in the ditch water seem to have had an inhibitory effect. Air and water temperature controlled seasonal variability of ebullitive as well as diffusive CH
4
emissions. Ebullition contributed less than 10% to the overall CH
4
budget in the ditches. Drainage ditches represent a hotspot of CH
4
emissions and need therefore be taken into account when assessing the success of rewetting projects of peatlands. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13157-021-01465-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2919739237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2636425336</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-dabdf0e541be2028be782cdb7a796c72fadb004486f337d9d4d46ad9937338c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_wFXAjZvRvCZpllqtFQqC1HXITO60U6YzNckg_femHUFw4eJyH5zvcDkIXVNyRwlR94FymquMMJoRKmSe7U_QiGrBM8mEPEUjwpTKckbZOboIYUMIlYzREXJP3tatXQF-qmO5hoCnXRt9XfQRDmOoHXhbNHscOxzX6TYX-LF3K4i4q7DFRx4ctm0q_A5fEGNal7DdJTCZzKC9RGeVbQJc_fQx-pg9L6fzbPH28jp9WGQl1zJmzhauIpALWgAjbFKAmrDSFcoqLUvFKusKQoSYyIpz5bQTTkjrtOaK80kp-BjdDr473332EKLZ1qGEprEtdH0wTHIpWM65TNKbP9JN1_s2fWeYplpxzZLrGLFBVfouBA-V2fl6a_3eUGIOwZsheJOCN8fgzT5BfIBCErcr8L_W_1DfY6-Faw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919739237</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Drainage Ditches Contribute Considerably to the CH4 Budget of a Drained and a Rewetted Temperate Fen</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Köhn, Daniel ; Welpelo, Carla ; Günther, Anke ; Jurasinski, Gerald</creator><creatorcontrib>Köhn, Daniel ; Welpelo, Carla ; Günther, Anke ; Jurasinski, Gerald</creatorcontrib><description>Small water bodies including drainage ditches can be hotspots for methane (CH
4
) emissions from peatlands. We assessed the CH
4
emissions of a drained and a rewetted temperate fen including emissions of managed and unmanaged drainage ditches over the course of 2.5 years, covering three vegetation periods. Ditch CH
4
emissions in the rewetted fen were significantly higher than in the drained fen. In the rewetted fen ditches contributed up to 91% of the annual CH
4
budget, despite covering only 1.5% of the area. In the drained fen CH
4
emissions were solely made up of ditch emissions. When including CH
4
uptake by the peat soil, the CH
4
balance of the drained fen was neutral. Dissolved organic carbon concentrations likely had an enhancing effect on CH
4
emissions while nitrate and sulfate in the ditch water seem to have had an inhibitory effect. Air and water temperature controlled seasonal variability of ebullitive as well as diffusive CH
4
emissions. Ebullition contributed less than 10% to the overall CH
4
budget in the ditches. Drainage ditches represent a hotspot of CH
4
emissions and need therefore be taken into account when assessing the success of rewetting projects of peatlands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-5212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-6246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13157-021-01465-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>air ; Air temperature ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Budgets ; Carbon ; Coastal Sciences ; Dissolved organic carbon ; Ditches ; Drainage ; Drainage ditches ; Ecology ; Emissions ; Environmental Management ; Eutrophication ; Fens ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Grasslands ; Hydrogeology ; Landscape Ecology ; Life Sciences ; Methane ; nitrates ; Peat ; Peat soils ; Peatlands ; seasonal variation ; Seasonal variations ; sulfates ; Temperature control ; Vegetation ; Water temperature</subject><ispartof>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2021-08, Vol.41 (6), p.71-71, Article 71</ispartof><rights>Society of Wetland Scientists 2021</rights><rights>Society of Wetland Scientists 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-dabdf0e541be2028be782cdb7a796c72fadb004486f337d9d4d46ad9937338c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-dabdf0e541be2028be782cdb7a796c72fadb004486f337d9d4d46ad9937338c43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5435-8831</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13157-021-01465-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2919739237?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21369,27903,27904,33723,33724,41467,42536,43784,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Köhn, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welpelo, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Günther, Anke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurasinski, Gerald</creatorcontrib><title>Drainage Ditches Contribute Considerably to the CH4 Budget of a Drained and a Rewetted Temperate Fen</title><title>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</title><addtitle>Wetlands</addtitle><description>Small water bodies including drainage ditches can be hotspots for methane (CH
4
) emissions from peatlands. We assessed the CH
4
emissions of a drained and a rewetted temperate fen including emissions of managed and unmanaged drainage ditches over the course of 2.5 years, covering three vegetation periods. Ditch CH
4
emissions in the rewetted fen were significantly higher than in the drained fen. In the rewetted fen ditches contributed up to 91% of the annual CH
4
budget, despite covering only 1.5% of the area. In the drained fen CH
4
emissions were solely made up of ditch emissions. When including CH
4
uptake by the peat soil, the CH
4
balance of the drained fen was neutral. Dissolved organic carbon concentrations likely had an enhancing effect on CH
4
emissions while nitrate and sulfate in the ditch water seem to have had an inhibitory effect. Air and water temperature controlled seasonal variability of ebullitive as well as diffusive CH
4
emissions. Ebullition contributed less than 10% to the overall CH
4
budget in the ditches. Drainage ditches represent a hotspot of CH
4
emissions and need therefore be taken into account when assessing the success of rewetting projects of peatlands.</description><subject>air</subject><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Coastal Sciences</subject><subject>Dissolved organic carbon</subject><subject>Ditches</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Drainage ditches</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Fens</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Landscape Ecology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>nitrates</subject><subject>Peat</subject><subject>Peat soils</subject><subject>Peatlands</subject><subject>seasonal variation</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>sulfates</subject><subject>Temperature control</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Water temperature</subject><issn>0277-5212</issn><issn>1943-6246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_wFXAjZvRvCZpllqtFQqC1HXITO60U6YzNckg_femHUFw4eJyH5zvcDkIXVNyRwlR94FymquMMJoRKmSe7U_QiGrBM8mEPEUjwpTKckbZOboIYUMIlYzREXJP3tatXQF-qmO5hoCnXRt9XfQRDmOoHXhbNHscOxzX6TYX-LF3K4i4q7DFRx4ctm0q_A5fEGNal7DdJTCZzKC9RGeVbQJc_fQx-pg9L6fzbPH28jp9WGQl1zJmzhauIpALWgAjbFKAmrDSFcoqLUvFKusKQoSYyIpz5bQTTkjrtOaK80kp-BjdDr473332EKLZ1qGEprEtdH0wTHIpWM65TNKbP9JN1_s2fWeYplpxzZLrGLFBVfouBA-V2fl6a_3eUGIOwZsheJOCN8fgzT5BfIBCErcr8L_W_1DfY6-Faw</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Köhn, Daniel</creator><creator>Welpelo, Carla</creator><creator>Günther, Anke</creator><creator>Jurasinski, Gerald</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5435-8831</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Drainage Ditches Contribute Considerably to the CH4 Budget of a Drained and a Rewetted Temperate Fen</title><author>Köhn, Daniel ; Welpelo, Carla ; Günther, Anke ; Jurasinski, Gerald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-dabdf0e541be2028be782cdb7a796c72fadb004486f337d9d4d46ad9937338c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>air</topic><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Coastal Sciences</topic><topic>Dissolved organic carbon</topic><topic>Ditches</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Drainage ditches</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Fens</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Landscape Ecology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>nitrates</topic><topic>Peat</topic><topic>Peat soils</topic><topic>Peatlands</topic><topic>seasonal variation</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>sulfates</topic><topic>Temperature control</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Water temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Köhn, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welpelo, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Günther, Anke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurasinski, Gerald</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Köhn, Daniel</au><au>Welpelo, Carla</au><au>Günther, Anke</au><au>Jurasinski, Gerald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Drainage Ditches Contribute Considerably to the CH4 Budget of a Drained and a Rewetted Temperate Fen</atitle><jtitle>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</jtitle><stitle>Wetlands</stitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>71-71</pages><artnum>71</artnum><issn>0277-5212</issn><eissn>1943-6246</eissn><abstract>Small water bodies including drainage ditches can be hotspots for methane (CH
4
) emissions from peatlands. We assessed the CH
4
emissions of a drained and a rewetted temperate fen including emissions of managed and unmanaged drainage ditches over the course of 2.5 years, covering three vegetation periods. Ditch CH
4
emissions in the rewetted fen were significantly higher than in the drained fen. In the rewetted fen ditches contributed up to 91% of the annual CH
4
budget, despite covering only 1.5% of the area. In the drained fen CH
4
emissions were solely made up of ditch emissions. When including CH
4
uptake by the peat soil, the CH
4
balance of the drained fen was neutral. Dissolved organic carbon concentrations likely had an enhancing effect on CH
4
emissions while nitrate and sulfate in the ditch water seem to have had an inhibitory effect. Air and water temperature controlled seasonal variability of ebullitive as well as diffusive CH
4
emissions. Ebullition contributed less than 10% to the overall CH
4
budget in the ditches. Drainage ditches represent a hotspot of CH
4
emissions and need therefore be taken into account when assessing the success of rewetting projects of peatlands.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s13157-021-01465-y</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5435-8831</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0277-5212 |
| ispartof | Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2021-08, Vol.41 (6), p.71-71, Article 71 |
| issn | 0277-5212 1943-6246 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2919739237 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central |
| subjects | air Air temperature Biomass Biomedical and Life Sciences Budgets Carbon Coastal Sciences Dissolved organic carbon Ditches Drainage Drainage ditches Ecology Emissions Environmental Management Eutrophication Fens Freshwater & Marine Ecology Grasslands Hydrogeology Landscape Ecology Life Sciences Methane nitrates Peat Peat soils Peatlands seasonal variation Seasonal variations sulfates Temperature control Vegetation Water temperature |
| title | Drainage Ditches Contribute Considerably to the CH4 Budget of a Drained and a Rewetted Temperate Fen |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T01%3A53%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Drainage%20Ditches%20Contribute%20Considerably%20to%20the%20CH4%20Budget%20of%20a%20Drained%20and%20a%20Rewetted%20Temperate%20Fen&rft.jtitle=Wetlands%20(Wilmington,%20N.C.)&rft.au=K%C3%B6hn,%20Daniel&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=71-71&rft.artnum=71&rft.issn=0277-5212&rft.eissn=1943-6246&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13157-021-01465-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2636425336%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919739237&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |