HYDROLOGIC VARIABILITY AND THE APPLICATION OF INDEX OF BIOTIC INTEGRITY METRICS TO WETLANDS: A GREAT LAKES EVALUATION
Interest by land-management and regulatory agencies in using biological indicators to detect wetland degradation, coupled with ongoing use of this approach to assess water quality in streams, led to the desire to develop and evaluate an Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) for wetlands that could be used...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.) N.C.), 2002-09, Vol.22 (3), p.588-615 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 615 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 588 |
container_title | Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.) |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Wilcox, Douglas A. Meeker, James E. Hudson, Patrick L. Armitage, Brian J. Black, M. Glen Uzarski, Donald G. |
description | Interest by land-management and regulatory agencies in using biological indicators to detect wetland degradation, coupled with ongoing use of this approach to assess water quality in streams, led to the desire to develop and evaluate an Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) for wetlands that could be used to categorize the level of degradation. We undertook this challenge with data from coastal wetlands of the Great Lakes, which have been degraded by a variety of human disturbances. We studied six barrier beach wetlands in western Lake Superior, six drowned-river-mouth wetlands along the eastern shore of Lake Michigan, and six open shoreline wetlands in Saginaw Bay of Lake Huron. Plant, fish, and invertebrate communities were sampled in each wetland. The resulting data were assessed in various forms against gradients of human disturbance to identify potential metrics that could be used in IBI development. Our results suggested that the metrics proposed as potential components of an IBI for barrier beach wetlands of Lake Superior held promise. The metrics for Lake Michigan drowned-river-mouth wetlands were inconsistent in identifying gradients of disturbance; those for Lake Huron open embayment wetlands were yet more inconsistent. Despite the potential displayed by the Lake Superior results within the year sampled, we concluded that an IBI for use in Great Lakes wetlands would not be valid unless separate scoring ranges were derived for each of several sequences of water-level histories. Variability in lake levels from year to year can produce variability in data and affect the reproducibility of data collected, primarily due to extreme changes in plant communities and the faunal habitat they provide. Substantially different results could be obtained in the same wetland in different years as a result of the response to lake-level change, with no change in the level of human disturbance. Additional problems included limited numbers of comparable sites, potential lack of undisturbed reference sites, and variable effects of different disturbance types. We also evaluated our conclusions with respect to hydrologic variability and other major natural disturbances affecting wetlands in other regions. We concluded that after segregation of wetland types by geographic, geomorphic, and hydrologic features, a functional IBI may be possible for wetlands with relatively stable hydrology. However, an IBI for wetlands with unpredictable yet recurring influences of climate-induc |
doi_str_mv | 10.1672/0277-5212(2002)022[0588:HVATAO]2.0.CO;2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2919735163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2919735163</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b374t-525c00ce0717054f6294a16ba2f5a2e4118880580a3668d89e62d23fd729f87a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkNFOwjAUhhujiYi-QxNv9AJoz7Z2w6s6CjRORkZBiTHNgC2BKMMNLnx7OzA-gBfN6UnO__X0Q6hDSZsyDh0CnLc8oHAHhMA9AXgjnu93hzOhRfwObdIO4wc4Qw0auE6LgcvOUeMvdYmuqmpDCGUAtIEOw3kviaN4oEI8E4kSjypSeo7FqIf1UGIxHkcqFFrFIxz3sRr15Gt9eVSxthE10nKQ1IFnqRMVTrCO8YvUkc1PuljgQSKFxpF4khMsZyKaHlHX6CJPP6rs5rc20bQvdThsHRcRUWvhcHdv9_WWhCwzwiknnpszCNyUskUKuZdC5lLq-779PEkdxvyVH2QMVuDkKw5B7vPUaaLbE3dXFl-HrNqbTXEot_ZJAwENuONR5tipwWlqWRZVVWa52ZXrz7T8NpSY2rmp7Znanqmd29Ye69ycnBvbmdAWS5In0mJdFNvs35wfw-CA3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919735163</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HYDROLOGIC VARIABILITY AND THE APPLICATION OF INDEX OF BIOTIC INTEGRITY METRICS TO WETLANDS: A GREAT LAKES EVALUATION</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Wilcox, Douglas A. ; Meeker, James E. ; Hudson, Patrick L. ; Armitage, Brian J. ; Black, M. Glen ; Uzarski, Donald G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilcox, Douglas A. ; Meeker, James E. ; Hudson, Patrick L. ; Armitage, Brian J. ; Black, M. Glen ; Uzarski, Donald G.</creatorcontrib><description>Interest by land-management and regulatory agencies in using biological indicators to detect wetland degradation, coupled with ongoing use of this approach to assess water quality in streams, led to the desire to develop and evaluate an Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) for wetlands that could be used to categorize the level of degradation. We undertook this challenge with data from coastal wetlands of the Great Lakes, which have been degraded by a variety of human disturbances. We studied six barrier beach wetlands in western Lake Superior, six drowned-river-mouth wetlands along the eastern shore of Lake Michigan, and six open shoreline wetlands in Saginaw Bay of Lake Huron. Plant, fish, and invertebrate communities were sampled in each wetland. The resulting data were assessed in various forms against gradients of human disturbance to identify potential metrics that could be used in IBI development. Our results suggested that the metrics proposed as potential components of an IBI for barrier beach wetlands of Lake Superior held promise. The metrics for Lake Michigan drowned-river-mouth wetlands were inconsistent in identifying gradients of disturbance; those for Lake Huron open embayment wetlands were yet more inconsistent. Despite the potential displayed by the Lake Superior results within the year sampled, we concluded that an IBI for use in Great Lakes wetlands would not be valid unless separate scoring ranges were derived for each of several sequences of water-level histories. Variability in lake levels from year to year can produce variability in data and affect the reproducibility of data collected, primarily due to extreme changes in plant communities and the faunal habitat they provide. Substantially different results could be obtained in the same wetland in different years as a result of the response to lake-level change, with no change in the level of human disturbance. Additional problems included limited numbers of comparable sites, potential lack of undisturbed reference sites, and variable effects of different disturbance types. We also evaluated our conclusions with respect to hydrologic variability and other major natural disturbances affecting wetlands in other regions. We concluded that after segregation of wetland types by geographic, geomorphic, and hydrologic features, a functional IBI may be possible for wetlands with relatively stable hydrology. However, an IBI for wetlands with unpredictable yet recurring influences of climate-induced, long-term high water periods, droughts, or drought-related fires or weather-related catastrophic floods or high winds (hurricanes) would also require differing scales of measurement for years that differ in the length of time since the last major natural disturbance. A site-specific, detailed ecological analysis of biological indicators may indeed be of value in determining the quality or status of wetlands, but we recommend that IBI scores not be used unless the scoring ranges are calibrated for the specific hydrologic history pre-dating any sampling year.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-5212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-6246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2002)022[0588:HVATAO]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Barrier beaches ; Beaches ; Bioindicators ; Biological analysis ; biological indicators ; Degradation ; Disturbances ; Drought ; Environmental degradation ; Evaluation ; fish ; Geomorphology ; Great Lakes ; human disturbance ; Human impact ; Hurricanes ; hydrologic variability ; Hydrology ; Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) ; Indicator organisms ; Indicators ; Integrity ; invertebrates ; Lake Michigan ; Lake Superior ; Lakes ; Natural disturbance ; Plant communities ; plants ; Quality assessment ; Rivers ; Streams ; Variability ; Water levels ; Water quality ; Water quality assessments ; water-level fluctuations ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2002-09, Vol.22 (3), p.588-615</ispartof><rights>The Society of Wetland Scientists</rights><rights>Society of Wetland Scientists 2002.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b374t-525c00ce0717054f6294a16ba2f5a2e4118880580a3668d89e62d23fd729f87a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b374t-525c00ce0717054f6294a16ba2f5a2e4118880580a3668d89e62d23fd729f87a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1672/0277-5212(2002)022[0588:HVATAO]2.0.CO;2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2919735163?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21367,26955,27901,27902,33721,43781,52338</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilcox, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meeker, James E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, Patrick L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armitage, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, M. Glen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzarski, Donald G.</creatorcontrib><title>HYDROLOGIC VARIABILITY AND THE APPLICATION OF INDEX OF BIOTIC INTEGRITY METRICS TO WETLANDS: A GREAT LAKES EVALUATION</title><title>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</title><description>Interest by land-management and regulatory agencies in using biological indicators to detect wetland degradation, coupled with ongoing use of this approach to assess water quality in streams, led to the desire to develop and evaluate an Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) for wetlands that could be used to categorize the level of degradation. We undertook this challenge with data from coastal wetlands of the Great Lakes, which have been degraded by a variety of human disturbances. We studied six barrier beach wetlands in western Lake Superior, six drowned-river-mouth wetlands along the eastern shore of Lake Michigan, and six open shoreline wetlands in Saginaw Bay of Lake Huron. Plant, fish, and invertebrate communities were sampled in each wetland. The resulting data were assessed in various forms against gradients of human disturbance to identify potential metrics that could be used in IBI development. Our results suggested that the metrics proposed as potential components of an IBI for barrier beach wetlands of Lake Superior held promise. The metrics for Lake Michigan drowned-river-mouth wetlands were inconsistent in identifying gradients of disturbance; those for Lake Huron open embayment wetlands were yet more inconsistent. Despite the potential displayed by the Lake Superior results within the year sampled, we concluded that an IBI for use in Great Lakes wetlands would not be valid unless separate scoring ranges were derived for each of several sequences of water-level histories. Variability in lake levels from year to year can produce variability in data and affect the reproducibility of data collected, primarily due to extreme changes in plant communities and the faunal habitat they provide. Substantially different results could be obtained in the same wetland in different years as a result of the response to lake-level change, with no change in the level of human disturbance. Additional problems included limited numbers of comparable sites, potential lack of undisturbed reference sites, and variable effects of different disturbance types. We also evaluated our conclusions with respect to hydrologic variability and other major natural disturbances affecting wetlands in other regions. We concluded that after segregation of wetland types by geographic, geomorphic, and hydrologic features, a functional IBI may be possible for wetlands with relatively stable hydrology. However, an IBI for wetlands with unpredictable yet recurring influences of climate-induced, long-term high water periods, droughts, or drought-related fires or weather-related catastrophic floods or high winds (hurricanes) would also require differing scales of measurement for years that differ in the length of time since the last major natural disturbance. A site-specific, detailed ecological analysis of biological indicators may indeed be of value in determining the quality or status of wetlands, but we recommend that IBI scores not be used unless the scoring ranges are calibrated for the specific hydrologic history pre-dating any sampling year.</description><subject>Barrier beaches</subject><subject>Beaches</subject><subject>Bioindicators</subject><subject>Biological analysis</subject><subject>biological indicators</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Disturbances</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>fish</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Great Lakes</subject><subject>human disturbance</subject><subject>Human impact</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>hydrologic variability</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI)</subject><subject>Indicator organisms</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Integrity</subject><subject>invertebrates</subject><subject>Lake Michigan</subject><subject>Lake Superior</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Natural disturbance</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>plants</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Water levels</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water quality assessments</subject><subject>water-level fluctuations</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0277-5212</issn><issn>1943-6246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkNFOwjAUhhujiYi-QxNv9AJoz7Z2w6s6CjRORkZBiTHNgC2BKMMNLnx7OzA-gBfN6UnO__X0Q6hDSZsyDh0CnLc8oHAHhMA9AXgjnu93hzOhRfwObdIO4wc4Qw0auE6LgcvOUeMvdYmuqmpDCGUAtIEOw3kviaN4oEI8E4kSjypSeo7FqIf1UGIxHkcqFFrFIxz3sRr15Gt9eVSxthE10nKQ1IFnqRMVTrCO8YvUkc1PuljgQSKFxpF4khMsZyKaHlHX6CJPP6rs5rc20bQvdThsHRcRUWvhcHdv9_WWhCwzwiknnpszCNyUskUKuZdC5lLq-779PEkdxvyVH2QMVuDkKw5B7vPUaaLbE3dXFl-HrNqbTXEot_ZJAwENuONR5tipwWlqWRZVVWa52ZXrz7T8NpSY2rmp7Znanqmd29Ye69ycnBvbmdAWS5In0mJdFNvs35wfw-CA3Q</recordid><startdate>200209</startdate><enddate>200209</enddate><creator>Wilcox, Douglas A.</creator><creator>Meeker, James E.</creator><creator>Hudson, Patrick L.</creator><creator>Armitage, Brian J.</creator><creator>Black, M. Glen</creator><creator>Uzarski, Donald G.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200209</creationdate><title>HYDROLOGIC VARIABILITY AND THE APPLICATION OF INDEX OF BIOTIC INTEGRITY METRICS TO WETLANDS: A GREAT LAKES EVALUATION</title><author>Wilcox, Douglas A. ; Meeker, James E. ; Hudson, Patrick L. ; Armitage, Brian J. ; Black, M. Glen ; Uzarski, Donald G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b374t-525c00ce0717054f6294a16ba2f5a2e4118880580a3668d89e62d23fd729f87a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Barrier beaches</topic><topic>Beaches</topic><topic>Bioindicators</topic><topic>Biological analysis</topic><topic>biological indicators</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Disturbances</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>fish</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Great Lakes</topic><topic>human disturbance</topic><topic>Human impact</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>hydrologic variability</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI)</topic><topic>Indicator organisms</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Integrity</topic><topic>invertebrates</topic><topic>Lake Michigan</topic><topic>Lake Superior</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Natural disturbance</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>plants</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Water levels</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water quality assessments</topic><topic>water-level fluctuations</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilcox, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meeker, James E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, Patrick L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armitage, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, M. Glen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzarski, Donald G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilcox, Douglas A.</au><au>Meeker, James E.</au><au>Hudson, Patrick L.</au><au>Armitage, Brian J.</au><au>Black, M. Glen</au><au>Uzarski, Donald G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HYDROLOGIC VARIABILITY AND THE APPLICATION OF INDEX OF BIOTIC INTEGRITY METRICS TO WETLANDS: A GREAT LAKES EVALUATION</atitle><jtitle>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</jtitle><date>2002-09</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>588</spage><epage>615</epage><pages>588-615</pages><issn>0277-5212</issn><eissn>1943-6246</eissn><abstract>Interest by land-management and regulatory agencies in using biological indicators to detect wetland degradation, coupled with ongoing use of this approach to assess water quality in streams, led to the desire to develop and evaluate an Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) for wetlands that could be used to categorize the level of degradation. We undertook this challenge with data from coastal wetlands of the Great Lakes, which have been degraded by a variety of human disturbances. We studied six barrier beach wetlands in western Lake Superior, six drowned-river-mouth wetlands along the eastern shore of Lake Michigan, and six open shoreline wetlands in Saginaw Bay of Lake Huron. Plant, fish, and invertebrate communities were sampled in each wetland. The resulting data were assessed in various forms against gradients of human disturbance to identify potential metrics that could be used in IBI development. Our results suggested that the metrics proposed as potential components of an IBI for barrier beach wetlands of Lake Superior held promise. The metrics for Lake Michigan drowned-river-mouth wetlands were inconsistent in identifying gradients of disturbance; those for Lake Huron open embayment wetlands were yet more inconsistent. Despite the potential displayed by the Lake Superior results within the year sampled, we concluded that an IBI for use in Great Lakes wetlands would not be valid unless separate scoring ranges were derived for each of several sequences of water-level histories. Variability in lake levels from year to year can produce variability in data and affect the reproducibility of data collected, primarily due to extreme changes in plant communities and the faunal habitat they provide. Substantially different results could be obtained in the same wetland in different years as a result of the response to lake-level change, with no change in the level of human disturbance. Additional problems included limited numbers of comparable sites, potential lack of undisturbed reference sites, and variable effects of different disturbance types. We also evaluated our conclusions with respect to hydrologic variability and other major natural disturbances affecting wetlands in other regions. We concluded that after segregation of wetland types by geographic, geomorphic, and hydrologic features, a functional IBI may be possible for wetlands with relatively stable hydrology. However, an IBI for wetlands with unpredictable yet recurring influences of climate-induced, long-term high water periods, droughts, or drought-related fires or weather-related catastrophic floods or high winds (hurricanes) would also require differing scales of measurement for years that differ in the length of time since the last major natural disturbance. A site-specific, detailed ecological analysis of biological indicators may indeed be of value in determining the quality or status of wetlands, but we recommend that IBI scores not be used unless the scoring ranges are calibrated for the specific hydrologic history pre-dating any sampling year.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1672/0277-5212(2002)022[0588:HVATAO]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-5212 |
ispartof | Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2002-09, Vol.22 (3), p.588-615 |
issn | 0277-5212 1943-6246 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2919735163 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; BioOne Complete; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Barrier beaches Beaches Bioindicators Biological analysis biological indicators Degradation Disturbances Drought Environmental degradation Evaluation fish Geomorphology Great Lakes human disturbance Human impact Hurricanes hydrologic variability Hydrology Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) Indicator organisms Indicators Integrity invertebrates Lake Michigan Lake Superior Lakes Natural disturbance Plant communities plants Quality assessment Rivers Streams Variability Water levels Water quality Water quality assessments water-level fluctuations Wetlands |
title | HYDROLOGIC VARIABILITY AND THE APPLICATION OF INDEX OF BIOTIC INTEGRITY METRICS TO WETLANDS: A GREAT LAKES EVALUATION |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T11%3A00%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HYDROLOGIC%20VARIABILITY%20AND%20THE%20APPLICATION%20OF%20INDEX%20OF%20BIOTIC%20INTEGRITY%20METRICS%20TO%20WETLANDS:%20A%20GREAT%20LAKES%20EVALUATION&rft.jtitle=Wetlands%20(Wilmington,%20N.C.)&rft.au=Wilcox,%20Douglas%20A.&rft.date=2002-09&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=588&rft.epage=615&rft.pages=588-615&rft.issn=0277-5212&rft.eissn=1943-6246&rft_id=info:doi/10.1672/0277-5212(2002)022%5B0588:HVATAO%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2919735163%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919735163&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |