SELECTIVITY FOR ZOOPLANKTON PREY BY FATHEAD MINNOWS AND BROOK STICKLEBACKS

Wetlands in the Prairie Pothole Region of North America are harsh environments for fish, and only two planktivorous species are common in these ecosystems: fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) and brook sticklebacks (Culaea inconstans). Given their similarities, competition between these species ma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.) N.C.), 2003-06, Vol.23 (2), p.416-422
Hauptverfasser: Laurich, Leah M., Zimmer, Kyle D., Butler, Malcolm G., Hanson, Mark A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 422
container_issue 2
container_start_page 416
container_title Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)
container_volume 23
creator Laurich, Leah M.
Zimmer, Kyle D.
Butler, Malcolm G.
Hanson, Mark A.
description Wetlands in the Prairie Pothole Region of North America are harsh environments for fish, and only two planktivorous species are common in these ecosystems: fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) and brook sticklebacks (Culaea inconstans). Given their similarities, competition between these species may be high, especially for food resources. We assessed potential competition between fathead minnows and brook sticklebacks, as well as their influence on zooplankton communities, by measuring their selectivity for zooplankton prey in controlled laboratory experiments. Minnows and sticklebacks of varying size were placed in aquaria with mixed zooplankton assemblages to assess selectivity for copepod and Daphnia prey. Sticklebacks of all sizes showed strong selectivity for Daphnia, while minnows were less selective, and prey selectivity varied with fish size. Selectivity of prey was not related to relative prey abundance for either minnows or sticklebacks. Although minnows were less selective, their mass-specific consumption rates were significantly lower than consumption rates for sticklebacks. Our results indicated that effects of predation on zooplankton may differ between these two fish species, with minnows potentially affecting greater numbers of taxa. Additionally, generalist feeding on zooplankton prey by fathead minnows may be advantageous in habitats with low Daphnia densities, as is common in prairie wetlands with dense fish populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1672/16-20
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2919478596</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2919478596</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b275t-971e0c29a3fbf441569ea9392030e37ca16c94eafb5a6a73f756dde830250ad33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFFPgzAUhRujiXPuPzQxPqLtLW3XR8aYQ5AugJr5QgqUZIuOCduD_17MjG--3JPcfDkn5yA0oeSOCgn3VDhAztCIKpc5AlxxjkYEpHQ4ULhEV32_JYQKADpCj1kQB34evoT5Gi90it-0XsVeEuU6was0WOPZ8PfyZeDN8VOYJPo1w14yx7NU6whneehHcTDz_Ci7RheNee_t5FfH6HkR5P7SifVD6HuxU4LkB0dJakkFyrCmbFyXcqGsUUwBYcQyWRkqKuVa05TcCCNZI7moaztlBDgxNWNjdHPy3Xft59H2h2LbHrvdEFmAGjrLKVdioG5PVNW1fd_Zpth3mw_TfRWUFD8zDacYMv_cyk3b7uw_1DeE2ly6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919478596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SELECTIVITY FOR ZOOPLANKTON PREY BY FATHEAD MINNOWS AND BROOK STICKLEBACKS</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Laurich, Leah M. ; Zimmer, Kyle D. ; Butler, Malcolm G. ; Hanson, Mark A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Laurich, Leah M. ; Zimmer, Kyle D. ; Butler, Malcolm G. ; Hanson, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><description>Wetlands in the Prairie Pothole Region of North America are harsh environments for fish, and only two planktivorous species are common in these ecosystems: fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) and brook sticklebacks (Culaea inconstans). Given their similarities, competition between these species may be high, especially for food resources. We assessed potential competition between fathead minnows and brook sticklebacks, as well as their influence on zooplankton communities, by measuring their selectivity for zooplankton prey in controlled laboratory experiments. Minnows and sticklebacks of varying size were placed in aquaria with mixed zooplankton assemblages to assess selectivity for copepod and Daphnia prey. Sticklebacks of all sizes showed strong selectivity for Daphnia, while minnows were less selective, and prey selectivity varied with fish size. Selectivity of prey was not related to relative prey abundance for either minnows or sticklebacks. Although minnows were less selective, their mass-specific consumption rates were significantly lower than consumption rates for sticklebacks. Our results indicated that effects of predation on zooplankton may differ between these two fish species, with minnows potentially affecting greater numbers of taxa. Additionally, generalist feeding on zooplankton prey by fathead minnows may be advantageous in habitats with low Daphnia densities, as is common in prairie wetlands with dense fish populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-5212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-6246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1672/16-20</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Aquariums ; brook sticklebacks ; consumption rates ; Daphnia ; Fish ; Fish populations ; Food resources ; Harsh environments ; Plankton ; Potholes ; prairie wetlands ; Predation ; Prey ; Selectivity ; size-selective predation ; Wetlands ; Zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2003-06, Vol.23 (2), p.416-422</ispartof><rights>The Society of Wetland Scientists</rights><rights>Society of Wetland Scientists 2003.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b275t-971e0c29a3fbf441569ea9392030e37ca16c94eafb5a6a73f756dde830250ad33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b275t-971e0c29a3fbf441569ea9392030e37ca16c94eafb5a6a73f756dde830250ad33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1672/16-20$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2919478596?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21367,26955,27901,27902,33721,43781,52338</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laurich, Leah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Kyle D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Malcolm G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><title>SELECTIVITY FOR ZOOPLANKTON PREY BY FATHEAD MINNOWS AND BROOK STICKLEBACKS</title><title>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</title><description>Wetlands in the Prairie Pothole Region of North America are harsh environments for fish, and only two planktivorous species are common in these ecosystems: fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) and brook sticklebacks (Culaea inconstans). Given their similarities, competition between these species may be high, especially for food resources. We assessed potential competition between fathead minnows and brook sticklebacks, as well as their influence on zooplankton communities, by measuring their selectivity for zooplankton prey in controlled laboratory experiments. Minnows and sticklebacks of varying size were placed in aquaria with mixed zooplankton assemblages to assess selectivity for copepod and Daphnia prey. Sticklebacks of all sizes showed strong selectivity for Daphnia, while minnows were less selective, and prey selectivity varied with fish size. Selectivity of prey was not related to relative prey abundance for either minnows or sticklebacks. Although minnows were less selective, their mass-specific consumption rates were significantly lower than consumption rates for sticklebacks. Our results indicated that effects of predation on zooplankton may differ between these two fish species, with minnows potentially affecting greater numbers of taxa. Additionally, generalist feeding on zooplankton prey by fathead minnows may be advantageous in habitats with low Daphnia densities, as is common in prairie wetlands with dense fish populations.</description><subject>Aquariums</subject><subject>brook sticklebacks</subject><subject>consumption rates</subject><subject>Daphnia</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish populations</subject><subject>Food resources</subject><subject>Harsh environments</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Potholes</subject><subject>prairie wetlands</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Selectivity</subject><subject>size-selective predation</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><issn>0277-5212</issn><issn>1943-6246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFFPgzAUhRujiXPuPzQxPqLtLW3XR8aYQ5AugJr5QgqUZIuOCduD_17MjG--3JPcfDkn5yA0oeSOCgn3VDhAztCIKpc5AlxxjkYEpHQ4ULhEV32_JYQKADpCj1kQB34evoT5Gi90it-0XsVeEuU6was0WOPZ8PfyZeDN8VOYJPo1w14yx7NU6whneehHcTDz_Ci7RheNee_t5FfH6HkR5P7SifVD6HuxU4LkB0dJakkFyrCmbFyXcqGsUUwBYcQyWRkqKuVa05TcCCNZI7moaztlBDgxNWNjdHPy3Xft59H2h2LbHrvdEFmAGjrLKVdioG5PVNW1fd_Zpth3mw_TfRWUFD8zDacYMv_cyk3b7uw_1DeE2ly6</recordid><startdate>20030601</startdate><enddate>20030601</enddate><creator>Laurich, Leah M.</creator><creator>Zimmer, Kyle D.</creator><creator>Butler, Malcolm G.</creator><creator>Hanson, Mark A.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030601</creationdate><title>SELECTIVITY FOR ZOOPLANKTON PREY BY FATHEAD MINNOWS AND BROOK STICKLEBACKS</title><author>Laurich, Leah M. ; Zimmer, Kyle D. ; Butler, Malcolm G. ; Hanson, Mark A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b275t-971e0c29a3fbf441569ea9392030e37ca16c94eafb5a6a73f756dde830250ad33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aquariums</topic><topic>brook sticklebacks</topic><topic>consumption rates</topic><topic>Daphnia</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish populations</topic><topic>Food resources</topic><topic>Harsh environments</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Potholes</topic><topic>prairie wetlands</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Selectivity</topic><topic>size-selective predation</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laurich, Leah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Kyle D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Malcolm G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laurich, Leah M.</au><au>Zimmer, Kyle D.</au><au>Butler, Malcolm G.</au><au>Hanson, Mark A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SELECTIVITY FOR ZOOPLANKTON PREY BY FATHEAD MINNOWS AND BROOK STICKLEBACKS</atitle><jtitle>Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)</jtitle><date>2003-06-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>416</spage><epage>422</epage><pages>416-422</pages><issn>0277-5212</issn><eissn>1943-6246</eissn><abstract>Wetlands in the Prairie Pothole Region of North America are harsh environments for fish, and only two planktivorous species are common in these ecosystems: fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) and brook sticklebacks (Culaea inconstans). Given their similarities, competition between these species may be high, especially for food resources. We assessed potential competition between fathead minnows and brook sticklebacks, as well as their influence on zooplankton communities, by measuring their selectivity for zooplankton prey in controlled laboratory experiments. Minnows and sticklebacks of varying size were placed in aquaria with mixed zooplankton assemblages to assess selectivity for copepod and Daphnia prey. Sticklebacks of all sizes showed strong selectivity for Daphnia, while minnows were less selective, and prey selectivity varied with fish size. Selectivity of prey was not related to relative prey abundance for either minnows or sticklebacks. Although minnows were less selective, their mass-specific consumption rates were significantly lower than consumption rates for sticklebacks. Our results indicated that effects of predation on zooplankton may differ between these two fish species, with minnows potentially affecting greater numbers of taxa. Additionally, generalist feeding on zooplankton prey by fathead minnows may be advantageous in habitats with low Daphnia densities, as is common in prairie wetlands with dense fish populations.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1672/16-20</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-5212
ispartof Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2003-06, Vol.23 (2), p.416-422
issn 0277-5212
1943-6246
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2919478596
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; BioOne Complete; ProQuest Central
subjects Aquariums
brook sticklebacks
consumption rates
Daphnia
Fish
Fish populations
Food resources
Harsh environments
Plankton
Potholes
prairie wetlands
Predation
Prey
Selectivity
size-selective predation
Wetlands
Zooplankton
title SELECTIVITY FOR ZOOPLANKTON PREY BY FATHEAD MINNOWS AND BROOK STICKLEBACKS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T19%3A43%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SELECTIVITY%20FOR%20ZOOPLANKTON%20PREY%20BY%20FATHEAD%20MINNOWS%20AND%20BROOK%20STICKLEBACKS&rft.jtitle=Wetlands%20(Wilmington,%20N.C.)&rft.au=Laurich,%20Leah%20M.&rft.date=2003-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=416&rft.epage=422&rft.pages=416-422&rft.issn=0277-5212&rft.eissn=1943-6246&rft_id=info:doi/10.1672/16-20&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2919478596%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919478596&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true