Language-responsive support for multiplicative thinking as unitizing: results of an intervention study in the second grade

Multiplicative thinking involves the ability to coordinate bundled units on a more abstract level than additive thinking and implies the identification of the different meanings of the multiplier and the multiplicand. The transition from additive to multiplicative thinking, however, constitutes an o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ZDM 2021-05, Vol.53 (2), p.263-275
Hauptverfasser: Götze, Daniela, Baiker, Annica
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 275
container_issue 2
container_start_page 263
container_title ZDM
container_volume 53
creator Götze, Daniela
Baiker, Annica
description Multiplicative thinking involves the ability to coordinate bundled units on a more abstract level than additive thinking and implies the identification of the different meanings of the multiplier and the multiplicand. The transition from additive to multiplicative thinking, however, constitutes an obstacle for many children. Specific formulations that are typically used in classroom discourse for talking about multiplicative tasks and situations (e.g., ‘3 times 4’ or ‘3 lots of 4’) might inhibit meaning-making processes because they do not address the idea of unitizing. A language-responsive introduction to multiplication that addresses the core idea of unitizing and that uses phrases such as ‘3 times 4 means you have 3 fours’ may help to overcome these problems. In the study presented in this paper, three second grade primary school teachers joined a teacher program to introduce multiplication in their classes ( n  = 66) by addressing meaning-making phrases. Another 58 second graders taught by teachers without this teacher program served as the control group. A specially developed multiplication test gave insight into the children’s understanding of multiplication as unitizing immediately after the intervention (posttest) and nearly three months later (follow-up test). We found significant differences between the intervention and control groups in the multiplication posttest. These differences could be underlined in the follow-up test. Our results indicate that a language-responsive teaching intervention that focuses on meaning-making processes can lead to long-term insights and help to develop multiplicative thinking as unitizing.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11858-020-01206-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2918757751</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1295876</ericid><sourcerecordid>2918757751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-77fcaae62f8c235045dcb15bdec57b95349ca0f3e9ebeac15d6f83a29ffc41563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlKBDEYhBtRcH0BQQh4bs0y6XS8ibgy4EXPIZP-00bHpE3Swvj0ZmyXm6csVV8VVFUdEnxCMBaniZCWtzWmuMaE4qYmG9UOaRtWS4Fnmz_3RuLtajelZ4xp0zC5U33Mte9H3UMdIQ3BJ_cOKI3DEGJGNkT0Oi6zG5bO6LyW8pPzL873SCc0epfdR3mcoQIXX0LBIu2R8xniO_jsgkcpj92qfBW0JIMJvkN91B3sV1tWLxMcfJ971ePV5cPFTT2_v769OJ_XhrU810JYozU01LaGMo5nvDMLwhcdGC4WkrOZNBpbBhIWoA3hXWNbpqm01swIb9hedTzlDjG8jZCyeg5j9KVSUUlawYXgpLjo5DIxpBTBqiG6Vx1XimC13lhNG6uysfraWK2howmC6MwvcHlHqOStWFezSU9F8z3Ev-p_Uj8BKEiMZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918757751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Language-responsive support for multiplicative thinking as unitizing: results of an intervention study in the second grade</title><source>ProQuest Central Essentials</source><source>ProQuest Central Student</source><source>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</source><source>Springer journals</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Götze, Daniela ; Baiker, Annica</creator><creatorcontrib>Götze, Daniela ; Baiker, Annica</creatorcontrib><description>Multiplicative thinking involves the ability to coordinate bundled units on a more abstract level than additive thinking and implies the identification of the different meanings of the multiplier and the multiplicand. The transition from additive to multiplicative thinking, however, constitutes an obstacle for many children. Specific formulations that are typically used in classroom discourse for talking about multiplicative tasks and situations (e.g., ‘3 times 4’ or ‘3 lots of 4’) might inhibit meaning-making processes because they do not address the idea of unitizing. A language-responsive introduction to multiplication that addresses the core idea of unitizing and that uses phrases such as ‘3 times 4 means you have 3 fours’ may help to overcome these problems. In the study presented in this paper, three second grade primary school teachers joined a teacher program to introduce multiplication in their classes ( n  = 66) by addressing meaning-making phrases. Another 58 second graders taught by teachers without this teacher program served as the control group. A specially developed multiplication test gave insight into the children’s understanding of multiplication as unitizing immediately after the intervention (posttest) and nearly three months later (follow-up test). We found significant differences between the intervention and control groups in the multiplication posttest. These differences could be underlined in the follow-up test. Our results indicate that a language-responsive teaching intervention that focuses on meaning-making processes can lead to long-term insights and help to develop multiplicative thinking as unitizing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-9690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-9704</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11858-020-01206-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Classroom Communication ; Cognitive Processes ; Control Groups ; Education ; Elementary School Mathematics ; Elementary School Students ; Fractions ; Grade 2 ; Grade 5 ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Intervention ; Language ; Language Usage ; Learning ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Education ; Mathematics Instruction ; Multiplication ; Original Paper ; Students ; Teachers</subject><ispartof>ZDM, 2021-05, Vol.53 (2), p.263-275</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-77fcaae62f8c235045dcb15bdec57b95349ca0f3e9ebeac15d6f83a29ffc41563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-77fcaae62f8c235045dcb15bdec57b95349ca0f3e9ebeac15d6f83a29ffc41563</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2826-3684</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11858-020-01206-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2918757751?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21388,21389,21390,21391,23256,27924,27925,33530,33703,33744,34005,34314,41488,42557,43659,43787,43805,43953,44067,51319,64385,64389,72341</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1295876$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Götze, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baiker, Annica</creatorcontrib><title>Language-responsive support for multiplicative thinking as unitizing: results of an intervention study in the second grade</title><title>ZDM</title><addtitle>ZDM Mathematics Education</addtitle><description>Multiplicative thinking involves the ability to coordinate bundled units on a more abstract level than additive thinking and implies the identification of the different meanings of the multiplier and the multiplicand. The transition from additive to multiplicative thinking, however, constitutes an obstacle for many children. Specific formulations that are typically used in classroom discourse for talking about multiplicative tasks and situations (e.g., ‘3 times 4’ or ‘3 lots of 4’) might inhibit meaning-making processes because they do not address the idea of unitizing. A language-responsive introduction to multiplication that addresses the core idea of unitizing and that uses phrases such as ‘3 times 4 means you have 3 fours’ may help to overcome these problems. In the study presented in this paper, three second grade primary school teachers joined a teacher program to introduce multiplication in their classes ( n  = 66) by addressing meaning-making phrases. Another 58 second graders taught by teachers without this teacher program served as the control group. A specially developed multiplication test gave insight into the children’s understanding of multiplication as unitizing immediately after the intervention (posttest) and nearly three months later (follow-up test). We found significant differences between the intervention and control groups in the multiplication posttest. These differences could be underlined in the follow-up test. Our results indicate that a language-responsive teaching intervention that focuses on meaning-making processes can lead to long-term insights and help to develop multiplicative thinking as unitizing.</description><subject>Classroom Communication</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Elementary School Mathematics</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Fractions</subject><subject>Grade 2</subject><subject>Grade 5</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Usage</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Multiplication</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><issn>1863-9690</issn><issn>1863-9704</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMlKBDEYhBtRcH0BQQh4bs0y6XS8ibgy4EXPIZP-00bHpE3Swvj0ZmyXm6csVV8VVFUdEnxCMBaniZCWtzWmuMaE4qYmG9UOaRtWS4Fnmz_3RuLtajelZ4xp0zC5U33Mte9H3UMdIQ3BJ_cOKI3DEGJGNkT0Oi6zG5bO6LyW8pPzL873SCc0epfdR3mcoQIXX0LBIu2R8xniO_jsgkcpj92qfBW0JIMJvkN91B3sV1tWLxMcfJ971ePV5cPFTT2_v769OJ_XhrU810JYozU01LaGMo5nvDMLwhcdGC4WkrOZNBpbBhIWoA3hXWNbpqm01swIb9hedTzlDjG8jZCyeg5j9KVSUUlawYXgpLjo5DIxpBTBqiG6Vx1XimC13lhNG6uysfraWK2howmC6MwvcHlHqOStWFezSU9F8z3Ev-p_Uj8BKEiMZg</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Götze, Daniela</creator><creator>Baiker, Annica</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-3684</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Language-responsive support for multiplicative thinking as unitizing: results of an intervention study in the second grade</title><author>Götze, Daniela ; Baiker, Annica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-77fcaae62f8c235045dcb15bdec57b95349ca0f3e9ebeac15d6f83a29ffc41563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Classroom Communication</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Elementary School Mathematics</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Fractions</topic><topic>Grade 2</topic><topic>Grade 5</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Usage</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Multiplication</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Götze, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baiker, Annica</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>ZDM</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Götze, Daniela</au><au>Baiker, Annica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1295876</ericid><atitle>Language-responsive support for multiplicative thinking as unitizing: results of an intervention study in the second grade</atitle><jtitle>ZDM</jtitle><stitle>ZDM Mathematics Education</stitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>263-275</pages><issn>1863-9690</issn><eissn>1863-9704</eissn><abstract>Multiplicative thinking involves the ability to coordinate bundled units on a more abstract level than additive thinking and implies the identification of the different meanings of the multiplier and the multiplicand. The transition from additive to multiplicative thinking, however, constitutes an obstacle for many children. Specific formulations that are typically used in classroom discourse for talking about multiplicative tasks and situations (e.g., ‘3 times 4’ or ‘3 lots of 4’) might inhibit meaning-making processes because they do not address the idea of unitizing. A language-responsive introduction to multiplication that addresses the core idea of unitizing and that uses phrases such as ‘3 times 4 means you have 3 fours’ may help to overcome these problems. In the study presented in this paper, three second grade primary school teachers joined a teacher program to introduce multiplication in their classes ( n  = 66) by addressing meaning-making phrases. Another 58 second graders taught by teachers without this teacher program served as the control group. A specially developed multiplication test gave insight into the children’s understanding of multiplication as unitizing immediately after the intervention (posttest) and nearly three months later (follow-up test). We found significant differences between the intervention and control groups in the multiplication posttest. These differences could be underlined in the follow-up test. Our results indicate that a language-responsive teaching intervention that focuses on meaning-making processes can lead to long-term insights and help to develop multiplicative thinking as unitizing.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11858-020-01206-1</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-3684</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1863-9690
ispartof ZDM, 2021-05, Vol.53 (2), p.263-275
issn 1863-9690
1863-9704
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2918757751
source ProQuest Central Essentials; ProQuest Central Student; AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central; Springer journals; ProQuest Central (Alumni); ProQuest Central
subjects Classroom Communication
Cognitive Processes
Control Groups
Education
Elementary School Mathematics
Elementary School Students
Fractions
Grade 2
Grade 5
Instructional Effectiveness
Intervention
Language
Language Usage
Learning
Mathematics
Mathematics Education
Mathematics Instruction
Multiplication
Original Paper
Students
Teachers
title Language-responsive support for multiplicative thinking as unitizing: results of an intervention study in the second grade
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A57%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Language-responsive%20support%20for%20multiplicative%20thinking%20as%20unitizing:%20results%20of%20an%20intervention%20study%20in%20the%20second%20grade&rft.jtitle=ZDM&rft.au=G%C3%B6tze,%20Daniela&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=263-275&rft.issn=1863-9690&rft.eissn=1863-9704&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11858-020-01206-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918757751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918757751&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1295876&rfr_iscdi=true