Generic dimensions of teaching quality: the German framework of Three Basic Dimensions
In this paper, we argue that classroom management, student support, and cognitive activation are generic aspects of classroom teaching, forming Three Basic Dimensions of teaching quality. The conceptual framework was developed in research on mathematics instruction but it is supposed to generalize a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | ZDM 2018-06, Vol.50 (3), p.407-426 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 426 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 407 |
| container_title | ZDM |
| container_volume | 50 |
| creator | Praetorius, Anna-Katharina Klieme, Eckhard Herbert, Benjamin Pinger, Petra |
| description | In this paper, we argue that classroom management, student support, and cognitive activation are generic aspects of classroom teaching, forming Three Basic Dimensions of teaching quality. The conceptual framework was developed in research on mathematics instruction but it is supposed to generalize across subjects. It is based on general theories of schooling and teaching as well as established theories and research traditions from educational psychology. Although used frequently in German-speaking countries, no comprehensive overview of the theoretical foundation as well as the existing evidence regarding the framework, including its strengths and weaknesses, exists so far. The present paper therefore presents first an overview of the theoretical rationale of the framework. Second, it gives an overview of differences and commonalities in the operationalizations of the Three Basic Dimensions in different studies, including a comprehensive set of sub-dimensions. Third, evidence on the reliability and validity of the dimensions is reviewed, with good results for reliability and mixed results for predictive validity. Fourth, an analysis of three mathematics lessons using observer ratings illustrates how the framework of the Three Basic Dimensions can be used for investigating instructional quality. Finally, strengths and limitations of the framework for capturing instructional quality are discussed and we elaborate on the framework's potential for further development. (DIPF/Orig.). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11858-018-0918-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2918756723</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1181279</ericid><sourcerecordid>2918756723</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-e9d1fcb62891062ca34cfeeaf0b9c9694934db3c593aab6ce1b997c1351764bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYx4MoOKcfQEQIeK7mrWnjTeecysDL9BrS9OnWubZb0iH79qZU5k4ekjzwf3nCD6FLSm4pIcmdpzSN04jQcFS4xBEa0FTySCVEHB_Mp-jM-yUhTEquBuhzAjW40uK8rKD2ZVN73BS4BWMXZT3Hm61Zle3uHrcLwBNwlalx4UwF34376pyzhQPAj8aHjqd9xzk6KczKw8XvO0Qfz-PZ6CWavk9eRw_TyAoi2whUTgubSZYqSiSzhgtbAJiCZMoqqYTiIs-4jRU3JpMWaKZUYimPaSJFlvMhuul7167ZbMG3etlsXR1WahYwJLFMGA8u2rusa7x3UOi1KyvjdpoS3eHTPT4d8OkOnxYhc91nOjp7__gtGClLVNBZr_ug1XNwf5v_K73qQ3m5PvgEjZmMBf8BaByFIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918756723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Generic dimensions of teaching quality: the German framework of Three Basic Dimensions</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Praetorius, Anna-Katharina ; Klieme, Eckhard ; Herbert, Benjamin ; Pinger, Petra</creator><creatorcontrib>Praetorius, Anna-Katharina ; Klieme, Eckhard ; Herbert, Benjamin ; Pinger, Petra</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we argue that classroom management, student support, and cognitive activation are generic aspects of classroom teaching, forming Three Basic Dimensions of teaching quality. The conceptual framework was developed in research on mathematics instruction but it is supposed to generalize across subjects. It is based on general theories of schooling and teaching as well as established theories and research traditions from educational psychology. Although used frequently in German-speaking countries, no comprehensive overview of the theoretical foundation as well as the existing evidence regarding the framework, including its strengths and weaknesses, exists so far. The present paper therefore presents first an overview of the theoretical rationale of the framework. Second, it gives an overview of differences and commonalities in the operationalizations of the Three Basic Dimensions in different studies, including a comprehensive set of sub-dimensions. Third, evidence on the reliability and validity of the dimensions is reviewed, with good results for reliability and mixed results for predictive validity. Fourth, an analysis of three mathematics lessons using observer ratings illustrates how the framework of the Three Basic Dimensions can be used for investigating instructional quality. Finally, strengths and limitations of the framework for capturing instructional quality are discussed and we elaborate on the framework's potential for further development. (DIPF/Orig.).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-9704</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1863-9690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-9704</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11858-018-0918-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aktives Lernen ; Classroom Communication ; Classroom management ; Classroom Techniques ; Classrooms ; Education ; Educational Environment ; Educational Objectives ; Educational Psychology ; Educational Quality ; Educational Research ; Educational Theories ; Empirische Forschung ; Foreign Countries ; Klassenführung ; Kognitives Lernen ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Lehrer ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Education ; Mathematics Instruction ; Mathematikunterricht ; Motivation ; Original Article ; Outcomes of Education ; Predictive Validity ; Qualität ; Reliability ; Reliabilität ; Schuljahr 08 ; Schüler ; Student Behavior ; Student Needs ; Students ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Unterrichtsbeobachtung ; Unterrichtsklima ; Unterrichtsstörung ; Validität ; Videoaufzeichnung</subject><ispartof>ZDM, 2018-06, Vol.50 (3), p.407-426</ispartof><rights>FIZ Karlsruhe 2018. corrected publication 2023</rights><rights>FIZ Karlsruhe 2018. corrected publication 2023.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-e9d1fcb62891062ca34cfeeaf0b9c9694934db3c593aab6ce1b997c1351764bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-e9d1fcb62891062ca34cfeeaf0b9c9694934db3c593aab6ce1b997c1351764bd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7581-367X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11858-018-0918-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2918756723?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21369,27903,27904,33723,41467,42536,43784,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=1152654$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1181279$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Praetorius, Anna-Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klieme, Eckhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinger, Petra</creatorcontrib><title>Generic dimensions of teaching quality: the German framework of Three Basic Dimensions</title><title>ZDM</title><addtitle>ZDM Mathematics Education</addtitle><description>In this paper, we argue that classroom management, student support, and cognitive activation are generic aspects of classroom teaching, forming Three Basic Dimensions of teaching quality. The conceptual framework was developed in research on mathematics instruction but it is supposed to generalize across subjects. It is based on general theories of schooling and teaching as well as established theories and research traditions from educational psychology. Although used frequently in German-speaking countries, no comprehensive overview of the theoretical foundation as well as the existing evidence regarding the framework, including its strengths and weaknesses, exists so far. The present paper therefore presents first an overview of the theoretical rationale of the framework. Second, it gives an overview of differences and commonalities in the operationalizations of the Three Basic Dimensions in different studies, including a comprehensive set of sub-dimensions. Third, evidence on the reliability and validity of the dimensions is reviewed, with good results for reliability and mixed results for predictive validity. Fourth, an analysis of three mathematics lessons using observer ratings illustrates how the framework of the Three Basic Dimensions can be used for investigating instructional quality. Finally, strengths and limitations of the framework for capturing instructional quality are discussed and we elaborate on the framework's potential for further development. (DIPF/Orig.).</description><subject>Aktives Lernen</subject><subject>Classroom Communication</subject><subject>Classroom management</subject><subject>Classroom Techniques</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Objectives</subject><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Educational Theories</subject><subject>Empirische Forschung</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Klassenführung</subject><subject>Kognitives Lernen</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Lehrer</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Mathematikunterricht</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Predictive Validity</subject><subject>Qualität</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reliabilität</subject><subject>Schuljahr 08</subject><subject>Schüler</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><subject>Student Needs</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Unterrichtsbeobachtung</subject><subject>Unterrichtsklima</subject><subject>Unterrichtsstörung</subject><subject>Validität</subject><subject>Videoaufzeichnung</subject><issn>1863-9704</issn><issn>1863-9690</issn><issn>1863-9704</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYx4MoOKcfQEQIeK7mrWnjTeecysDL9BrS9OnWubZb0iH79qZU5k4ekjzwf3nCD6FLSm4pIcmdpzSN04jQcFS4xBEa0FTySCVEHB_Mp-jM-yUhTEquBuhzAjW40uK8rKD2ZVN73BS4BWMXZT3Hm61Zle3uHrcLwBNwlalx4UwF34376pyzhQPAj8aHjqd9xzk6KczKw8XvO0Qfz-PZ6CWavk9eRw_TyAoi2whUTgubSZYqSiSzhgtbAJiCZMoqqYTiIs-4jRU3JpMWaKZUYimPaSJFlvMhuul7167ZbMG3etlsXR1WahYwJLFMGA8u2rusa7x3UOi1KyvjdpoS3eHTPT4d8OkOnxYhc91nOjp7__gtGClLVNBZr_ug1XNwf5v_K73qQ3m5PvgEjZmMBf8BaByFIQ</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Praetorius, Anna-Katharina</creator><creator>Klieme, Eckhard</creator><creator>Herbert, Benjamin</creator><creator>Pinger, Petra</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7581-367X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Generic dimensions of teaching quality: the German framework of Three Basic Dimensions</title><author>Praetorius, Anna-Katharina ; Klieme, Eckhard ; Herbert, Benjamin ; Pinger, Petra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-e9d1fcb62891062ca34cfeeaf0b9c9694934db3c593aab6ce1b997c1351764bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aktives Lernen</topic><topic>Classroom Communication</topic><topic>Classroom management</topic><topic>Classroom Techniques</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Objectives</topic><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Educational Theories</topic><topic>Empirische Forschung</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Klassenführung</topic><topic>Kognitives Lernen</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Lehrer</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Mathematikunterricht</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Predictive Validity</topic><topic>Qualität</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reliabilität</topic><topic>Schuljahr 08</topic><topic>Schüler</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><topic>Student Needs</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Unterrichtsbeobachtung</topic><topic>Unterrichtsklima</topic><topic>Unterrichtsstörung</topic><topic>Validität</topic><topic>Videoaufzeichnung</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Praetorius, Anna-Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klieme, Eckhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinger, Petra</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>ZDM</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Praetorius, Anna-Katharina</au><au>Klieme, Eckhard</au><au>Herbert, Benjamin</au><au>Pinger, Petra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1181279</ericid><atitle>Generic dimensions of teaching quality: the German framework of Three Basic Dimensions</atitle><jtitle>ZDM</jtitle><stitle>ZDM Mathematics Education</stitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>407</spage><epage>426</epage><pages>407-426</pages><issn>1863-9704</issn><issn>1863-9690</issn><eissn>1863-9704</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we argue that classroom management, student support, and cognitive activation are generic aspects of classroom teaching, forming Three Basic Dimensions of teaching quality. The conceptual framework was developed in research on mathematics instruction but it is supposed to generalize across subjects. It is based on general theories of schooling and teaching as well as established theories and research traditions from educational psychology. Although used frequently in German-speaking countries, no comprehensive overview of the theoretical foundation as well as the existing evidence regarding the framework, including its strengths and weaknesses, exists so far. The present paper therefore presents first an overview of the theoretical rationale of the framework. Second, it gives an overview of differences and commonalities in the operationalizations of the Three Basic Dimensions in different studies, including a comprehensive set of sub-dimensions. Third, evidence on the reliability and validity of the dimensions is reviewed, with good results for reliability and mixed results for predictive validity. Fourth, an analysis of three mathematics lessons using observer ratings illustrates how the framework of the Three Basic Dimensions can be used for investigating instructional quality. Finally, strengths and limitations of the framework for capturing instructional quality are discussed and we elaborate on the framework's potential for further development. (DIPF/Orig.).</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11858-018-0918-4</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7581-367X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1863-9704 |
| ispartof | ZDM, 2018-06, Vol.50 (3), p.407-426 |
| issn | 1863-9704 1863-9690 1863-9704 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2918756723 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central |
| subjects | Aktives Lernen Classroom Communication Classroom management Classroom Techniques Classrooms Education Educational Environment Educational Objectives Educational Psychology Educational Quality Educational Research Educational Theories Empirische Forschung Foreign Countries Klassenführung Kognitives Lernen Learning Learning Processes Lehrer Mathematical analysis Mathematics Mathematics Education Mathematics Instruction Mathematikunterricht Motivation Original Article Outcomes of Education Predictive Validity Qualität Reliability Reliabilität Schuljahr 08 Schüler Student Behavior Student Needs Students Teachers Teaching Teaching Methods Unterrichtsbeobachtung Unterrichtsklima Unterrichtsstörung Validität Videoaufzeichnung |
| title | Generic dimensions of teaching quality: the German framework of Three Basic Dimensions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T03%3A49%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Generic%20dimensions%20of%20teaching%20quality:%20the%20German%20framework%20of%20Three%20Basic%20Dimensions&rft.jtitle=ZDM&rft.au=Praetorius,%20Anna-Katharina&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=407&rft.epage=426&rft.pages=407-426&rft.issn=1863-9704&rft.eissn=1863-9704&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11858-018-0918-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918756723%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918756723&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1181279&rfr_iscdi=true |