Hydrologic experiments and modeling of two laboratory bioretention systems under different boundary conditions

Hydrologic performance of bioretention systems is significantly influenced by the media composition and underdrain configuration. This research measured hydrologic performance of column-scale bioretention systems during a synthetic design storm of 25.9 mm, assuming a system area:catchment area ratio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers of environmental science & engineering 2017-08, Vol.11 (4), p.83-92, Article 10
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Ruifen, Fassman-Beck, Elizabeth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 92
container_issue 4
container_start_page 83
container_title Frontiers of environmental science & engineering
container_volume 11
creator Liu, Ruifen
Fassman-Beck, Elizabeth
description Hydrologic performance of bioretention systems is significantly influenced by the media composition and underdrain configuration. This research measured hydrologic performance of column-scale bioretention systems during a synthetic design storm of 25.9 mm, assuming a system area:catchment area ratio of 5%. The laboratory experiments involved two different engineered media and two different drainage configurations. Results show that the two engineered mediawith different sand aggregates were able to retain about 36% of the inflow volume with tree drainage conlaguratlon. However, the medium with marine sand is better at delaying the occurrence of drainage than the one with pumice sand, denoting the better detention ability of the former. For both engineered media, an underdrain configuration with internal water storage (IWS) zone lowered drainage volume and peak drainage rate as well as delayed the occurrence of drainage and peak drainage rate, as compared to a free drainage configuration. The USEPA SWMM v5.1.11 model was applied for the tree drainage configuration case, and there is a reasonable fit between observed and modeled drainag.e-rates when media-specific characteristics are available. For the IWS drainage configuration case, air entrapment was observed to occur in the engineered medium with manne sand. F~lhng ot an IWS zone is most likely to be influenced by many factors, such as the structure of the bioretention system, medium physical and hydraulic properties, and inflow characteristics. More research is needed on the analysis and modeling of hydrologic process in bioretention with IWS drainage configuration.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11783-017-0951-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2918744143</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>672943344</cqvip_id><sourcerecordid>2918744143</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f023bc7ff7950f47e2b78df3281b2141d491f000fb7f31b6931cef1d58ad94603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhRdRsGh_gLeg59VMkm2yRylqhYIXBW9hd5Nst7RJm2zR_nunbKm35pIheW_mzZdld0AfgVL5lACk4jkFmdOygLy4yEYMq5wx-L481RSus3FKS4pHKQGKjzI_25sYVqHtGmJ_NzZ2a-v7RCpvyDoYu-p8S4Ij_U8gq6oOsepD3JO6C9H2qOyCJ2mfertOZOeNjcR0ztmIX6QO-FKhugnedAdpus2uXLVKdny8b7Kv15fP6Syff7y9T5_necNL1ueOMl430jlZFtQJaVktlXGcKagZCDCiBIdbuFo6DvWk5NBYB6ZQlSnFhPKb7GHou4lhu7Op18uwix5HalaCkkKA4KiCQdXEkFK0Tm9wf0ysgeoDWT2Q1UhWH8jqAj1s8CTU-tbG_87nTGowLbp2gXDMJtqUtIsBCdp43np_zLgIvt3iyFPIiWQlbiEE_wNM6ptV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918744143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hydrologic experiments and modeling of two laboratory bioretention systems under different boundary conditions</title><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Liu, Ruifen ; Fassman-Beck, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ruifen ; Fassman-Beck, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Hydrologic performance of bioretention systems is significantly influenced by the media composition and underdrain configuration. This research measured hydrologic performance of column-scale bioretention systems during a synthetic design storm of 25.9 mm, assuming a system area:catchment area ratio of 5%. The laboratory experiments involved two different engineered media and two different drainage configurations. Results show that the two engineered mediawith different sand aggregates were able to retain about 36% of the inflow volume with tree drainage conlaguratlon. However, the medium with marine sand is better at delaying the occurrence of drainage than the one with pumice sand, denoting the better detention ability of the former. For both engineered media, an underdrain configuration with internal water storage (IWS) zone lowered drainage volume and peak drainage rate as well as delayed the occurrence of drainage and peak drainage rate, as compared to a free drainage configuration. The USEPA SWMM v5.1.11 model was applied for the tree drainage configuration case, and there is a reasonable fit between observed and modeled drainag.e-rates when media-specific characteristics are available. For the IWS drainage configuration case, air entrapment was observed to occur in the engineered medium with manne sand. F~lhng ot an IWS zone is most likely to be influenced by many factors, such as the structure of the bioretention system, medium physical and hydraulic properties, and inflow characteristics. More research is needed on the analysis and modeling of hydrologic process in bioretention with IWS drainage configuration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2095-2201</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2095-221X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11783-017-0951-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Beijing: Higher Education Press</publisher><subject>Bioretention ; Boundary conditions ; Catchment areas ; Configurations ; Design storms ; Drainage ; Drainage measurement ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Entrapment ; Environment ; Hydraulic properties ; Hydrologic process ; Inflow ; Internal water ; Low Impact Development and Sponge City ; Media ; Modeling ; Modelling ; Pumice ; Research Article ; Sand ; SWMM ; Underdrain configuration ; Water storage ; 实验室实验 ; 建模分析 ; 排水结构 ; 水文实验 ; 滞留 ; 生物 ; 系统 ; 边界条件</subject><ispartof>Frontiers of environmental science &amp; engineering, 2017-08, Vol.11 (4), p.83-92, Article 10</ispartof><rights>Copyright reserved, 2017, Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg</rights><rights>Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f023bc7ff7950f47e2b78df3281b2141d491f000fb7f31b6931cef1d58ad94603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f023bc7ff7950f47e2b78df3281b2141d491f000fb7f31b6931cef1d58ad94603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/71245X/71245X.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11783-017-0951-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2918744143?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21388,27924,27925,33744,41488,42557,43805,51319,64385,64389,72469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ruifen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fassman-Beck, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Hydrologic experiments and modeling of two laboratory bioretention systems under different boundary conditions</title><title>Frontiers of environmental science &amp; engineering</title><addtitle>Front. Environ. Sci. Eng</addtitle><addtitle>Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China</addtitle><description>Hydrologic performance of bioretention systems is significantly influenced by the media composition and underdrain configuration. This research measured hydrologic performance of column-scale bioretention systems during a synthetic design storm of 25.9 mm, assuming a system area:catchment area ratio of 5%. The laboratory experiments involved two different engineered media and two different drainage configurations. Results show that the two engineered mediawith different sand aggregates were able to retain about 36% of the inflow volume with tree drainage conlaguratlon. However, the medium with marine sand is better at delaying the occurrence of drainage than the one with pumice sand, denoting the better detention ability of the former. For both engineered media, an underdrain configuration with internal water storage (IWS) zone lowered drainage volume and peak drainage rate as well as delayed the occurrence of drainage and peak drainage rate, as compared to a free drainage configuration. The USEPA SWMM v5.1.11 model was applied for the tree drainage configuration case, and there is a reasonable fit between observed and modeled drainag.e-rates when media-specific characteristics are available. For the IWS drainage configuration case, air entrapment was observed to occur in the engineered medium with manne sand. F~lhng ot an IWS zone is most likely to be influenced by many factors, such as the structure of the bioretention system, medium physical and hydraulic properties, and inflow characteristics. More research is needed on the analysis and modeling of hydrologic process in bioretention with IWS drainage configuration.</description><subject>Bioretention</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Catchment areas</subject><subject>Configurations</subject><subject>Design storms</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Drainage measurement</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Entrapment</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Hydraulic properties</subject><subject>Hydrologic process</subject><subject>Inflow</subject><subject>Internal water</subject><subject>Low Impact Development and Sponge City</subject><subject>Media</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Pumice</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>SWMM</subject><subject>Underdrain configuration</subject><subject>Water storage</subject><subject>实验室实验</subject><subject>建模分析</subject><subject>排水结构</subject><subject>水文实验</subject><subject>滞留</subject><subject>生物</subject><subject>系统</subject><subject>边界条件</subject><issn>2095-2201</issn><issn>2095-221X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhRdRsGh_gLeg59VMkm2yRylqhYIXBW9hd5Nst7RJm2zR_nunbKm35pIheW_mzZdld0AfgVL5lACk4jkFmdOygLy4yEYMq5wx-L481RSus3FKS4pHKQGKjzI_25sYVqHtGmJ_NzZ2a-v7RCpvyDoYu-p8S4Ij_U8gq6oOsepD3JO6C9H2qOyCJ2mfertOZOeNjcR0ztmIX6QO-FKhugnedAdpus2uXLVKdny8b7Kv15fP6Syff7y9T5_necNL1ueOMl430jlZFtQJaVktlXGcKagZCDCiBIdbuFo6DvWk5NBYB6ZQlSnFhPKb7GHou4lhu7Op18uwix5HalaCkkKA4KiCQdXEkFK0Tm9wf0ysgeoDWT2Q1UhWH8jqAj1s8CTU-tbG_87nTGowLbp2gXDMJtqUtIsBCdp43np_zLgIvt3iyFPIiWQlbiEE_wNM6ptV</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Liu, Ruifen</creator><creator>Fassman-Beck, Elizabeth</creator><general>Higher Education Press</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W92</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Hydrologic experiments and modeling of two laboratory bioretention systems under different boundary conditions</title><author>Liu, Ruifen ; Fassman-Beck, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-f023bc7ff7950f47e2b78df3281b2141d491f000fb7f31b6931cef1d58ad94603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Bioretention</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Catchment areas</topic><topic>Configurations</topic><topic>Design storms</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Drainage measurement</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Entrapment</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Hydraulic properties</topic><topic>Hydrologic process</topic><topic>Inflow</topic><topic>Internal water</topic><topic>Low Impact Development and Sponge City</topic><topic>Media</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Pumice</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>SWMM</topic><topic>Underdrain configuration</topic><topic>Water storage</topic><topic>实验室实验</topic><topic>建模分析</topic><topic>排水结构</topic><topic>水文实验</topic><topic>滞留</topic><topic>生物</topic><topic>系统</topic><topic>边界条件</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ruifen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fassman-Beck, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-工程技术</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Frontiers of environmental science &amp; engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Ruifen</au><au>Fassman-Beck, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hydrologic experiments and modeling of two laboratory bioretention systems under different boundary conditions</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers of environmental science &amp; engineering</jtitle><stitle>Front. Environ. Sci. Eng</stitle><addtitle>Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>83-92</pages><artnum>10</artnum><issn>2095-2201</issn><eissn>2095-221X</eissn><abstract>Hydrologic performance of bioretention systems is significantly influenced by the media composition and underdrain configuration. This research measured hydrologic performance of column-scale bioretention systems during a synthetic design storm of 25.9 mm, assuming a system area:catchment area ratio of 5%. The laboratory experiments involved two different engineered media and two different drainage configurations. Results show that the two engineered mediawith different sand aggregates were able to retain about 36% of the inflow volume with tree drainage conlaguratlon. However, the medium with marine sand is better at delaying the occurrence of drainage than the one with pumice sand, denoting the better detention ability of the former. For both engineered media, an underdrain configuration with internal water storage (IWS) zone lowered drainage volume and peak drainage rate as well as delayed the occurrence of drainage and peak drainage rate, as compared to a free drainage configuration. The USEPA SWMM v5.1.11 model was applied for the tree drainage configuration case, and there is a reasonable fit between observed and modeled drainag.e-rates when media-specific characteristics are available. For the IWS drainage configuration case, air entrapment was observed to occur in the engineered medium with manne sand. F~lhng ot an IWS zone is most likely to be influenced by many factors, such as the structure of the bioretention system, medium physical and hydraulic properties, and inflow characteristics. More research is needed on the analysis and modeling of hydrologic process in bioretention with IWS drainage configuration.</abstract><cop>Beijing</cop><pub>Higher Education Press</pub><doi>10.1007/s11783-017-0951-5</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2095-2201
ispartof Frontiers of environmental science & engineering, 2017-08, Vol.11 (4), p.83-92, Article 10
issn 2095-2201
2095-221X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2918744143
source ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central
subjects Bioretention
Boundary conditions
Catchment areas
Configurations
Design storms
Drainage
Drainage measurement
Earth and Environmental Science
Entrapment
Environment
Hydraulic properties
Hydrologic process
Inflow
Internal water
Low Impact Development and Sponge City
Media
Modeling
Modelling
Pumice
Research Article
Sand
SWMM
Underdrain configuration
Water storage
实验室实验
建模分析
排水结构
水文实验
滞留
生物
系统
边界条件
title Hydrologic experiments and modeling of two laboratory bioretention systems under different boundary conditions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A51%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hydrologic%20experiments%20and%20modeling%20of%20two%20laboratory%20bioretention%20systems%20under%20different%20boundary%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20of%20environmental%20science%20&%20engineering&rft.au=Liu,%20Ruifen&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=83-92&rft.artnum=10&rft.issn=2095-2201&rft.eissn=2095-221X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11783-017-0951-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918744143%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918744143&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=672943344&rfr_iscdi=true