Robotic partial nephrectomy: our first 30 consecutive cases

We present our initial outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) at our centre. All data were collected prospectively. The transperitoneal approach was used in all our cases. The clinical parameters recorded include warm ischemia time (WIT), clampless procedures, estimate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of robotic surgery 2014-12, Vol.8 (4), p.337-341
Hauptverfasser: Abroaf, Ahmed, Vasdev, Nikhil, Mohan, S. Gowrie, Adshead, J. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 341
container_issue 4
container_start_page 337
container_title Journal of robotic surgery
container_volume 8
creator Abroaf, Ahmed
Vasdev, Nikhil
Mohan, S. Gowrie
Adshead, J. M.
description We present our initial outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) at our centre. All data were collected prospectively. The transperitoneal approach was used in all our cases. The clinical parameters recorded include warm ischemia time (WIT), clampless procedures, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of stay (LOS) and oncological outcomes including positive surgical margins (PSM). The Clavien−Dindo system was used for grading complications. Thirty patients with a mean age of 56.7 years (ranging between 25 and 81 years) underwent RPN between January 2010 and November 2013. The mean tumour size was 2.48 cm (range, 1.3−5.5 cm) of which 54 % were right renal tumours ( n  = 16) and 46 % ( n  = 14) were left renal tumours. The mean operative time was 217.5 min (170−260 min) and the mean console time was 164.3 min (120−210 min). The mean EBL was 140.2 ml (10−1,500 ml) and the mean WIT was 16.1 min (0−34 min). Ten percent of patients ( n  = 3) underwent clampless RPN and no postoperative transfusion was required. The mean LOS was 4 days (3−9) and only one patient (3 %) had positive surgical margins (PSM). The incidence of major complications was 3 % (one patient) who had a DVT following surgery (3 %). Our preliminary results show that RALPN is a safe technique with minimal complications. Longer follow-up and larger patient numbers are required to validate these results further.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11701-014-0476-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2918715097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2918715097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8f76c2adea57a420c11c4dc346a08de93009e9f0cc5cd4bc3f058435ef4920973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9WZJm1SPcniFywIoueQnSbaZbepSVd2_71dKnryNHN4n3eGh7FzhEsEUFcJUQFmgDIDqcpse8AmqEuR5bLCw99di2N2ktISoFCFwAm7eQmL0DfEOxv7xq5467qP6KgP6901D5vIfRNTzwVwCm1ytOmbL8fJJpdO2ZG3q-TOfuaUvd3fvc4es_nzw9Psdp6RELrPtFcl5bZ2tlBW5kCIJGsSsrSga1cJgMpVHogKquWChIdCS1E4L6scKiWm7GLs7WL43LjUm-XwWDucNHmFWmExpnBMUQwpRedNF5u1jTuDYPaOzOjIDI7M3pHZDkw-MmnItu8u_jX_D30DryhpUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918715097</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robotic partial nephrectomy: our first 30 consecutive cases</title><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Abroaf, Ahmed ; Vasdev, Nikhil ; Mohan, S. Gowrie ; Adshead, J. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abroaf, Ahmed ; Vasdev, Nikhil ; Mohan, S. Gowrie ; Adshead, J. M.</creatorcontrib><description>We present our initial outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) at our centre. All data were collected prospectively. The transperitoneal approach was used in all our cases. The clinical parameters recorded include warm ischemia time (WIT), clampless procedures, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of stay (LOS) and oncological outcomes including positive surgical margins (PSM). The Clavien−Dindo system was used for grading complications. Thirty patients with a mean age of 56.7 years (ranging between 25 and 81 years) underwent RPN between January 2010 and November 2013. The mean tumour size was 2.48 cm (range, 1.3−5.5 cm) of which 54 % were right renal tumours ( n  = 16) and 46 % ( n  = 14) were left renal tumours. The mean operative time was 217.5 min (170−260 min) and the mean console time was 164.3 min (120−210 min). The mean EBL was 140.2 ml (10−1,500 ml) and the mean WIT was 16.1 min (0−34 min). Ten percent of patients ( n  = 3) underwent clampless RPN and no postoperative transfusion was required. The mean LOS was 4 days (3−9) and only one patient (3 %) had positive surgical margins (PSM). The incidence of major complications was 3 % (one patient) who had a DVT following surgery (3 %). Our preliminary results show that RALPN is a safe technique with minimal complications. Longer follow-up and larger patient numbers are required to validate these results further.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-2483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11701-014-0476-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; FDA approval ; Histology ; Ischemia ; Laparoscopy ; Length of stay ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Minimally Invasive Surgery ; Original Article ; Patients ; Robotics ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Sutures ; Tumors ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Journal of robotic surgery, 2014-12, Vol.8 (4), p.337-341</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London 2014</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag London 2014.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8f76c2adea57a420c11c4dc346a08de93009e9f0cc5cd4bc3f058435ef4920973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11701-014-0476-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2918715097?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21371,21372,27907,27908,33513,33727,41471,42540,43642,43788,51302,64366,64370,72220</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abroaf, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasdev, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohan, S. Gowrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adshead, J. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Robotic partial nephrectomy: our first 30 consecutive cases</title><title>Journal of robotic surgery</title><addtitle>J Robotic Surg</addtitle><description>We present our initial outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) at our centre. All data were collected prospectively. The transperitoneal approach was used in all our cases. The clinical parameters recorded include warm ischemia time (WIT), clampless procedures, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of stay (LOS) and oncological outcomes including positive surgical margins (PSM). The Clavien−Dindo system was used for grading complications. Thirty patients with a mean age of 56.7 years (ranging between 25 and 81 years) underwent RPN between January 2010 and November 2013. The mean tumour size was 2.48 cm (range, 1.3−5.5 cm) of which 54 % were right renal tumours ( n  = 16) and 46 % ( n  = 14) were left renal tumours. The mean operative time was 217.5 min (170−260 min) and the mean console time was 164.3 min (120−210 min). The mean EBL was 140.2 ml (10−1,500 ml) and the mean WIT was 16.1 min (0−34 min). Ten percent of patients ( n  = 3) underwent clampless RPN and no postoperative transfusion was required. The mean LOS was 4 days (3−9) and only one patient (3 %) had positive surgical margins (PSM). The incidence of major complications was 3 % (one patient) who had a DVT following surgery (3 %). Our preliminary results show that RALPN is a safe technique with minimal complications. Longer follow-up and larger patient numbers are required to validate these results further.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Length of stay</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1863-2483</issn><issn>1863-2491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9WZJm1SPcniFywIoueQnSbaZbepSVd2_71dKnryNHN4n3eGh7FzhEsEUFcJUQFmgDIDqcpse8AmqEuR5bLCw99di2N2ktISoFCFwAm7eQmL0DfEOxv7xq5467qP6KgP6901D5vIfRNTzwVwCm1ytOmbL8fJJpdO2ZG3q-TOfuaUvd3fvc4es_nzw9Psdp6RELrPtFcl5bZ2tlBW5kCIJGsSsrSga1cJgMpVHogKquWChIdCS1E4L6scKiWm7GLs7WL43LjUm-XwWDucNHmFWmExpnBMUQwpRedNF5u1jTuDYPaOzOjIDI7M3pHZDkw-MmnItu8u_jX_D30DryhpUg</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Abroaf, Ahmed</creator><creator>Vasdev, Nikhil</creator><creator>Mohan, S. Gowrie</creator><creator>Adshead, J. M.</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Robotic partial nephrectomy: our first 30 consecutive cases</title><author>Abroaf, Ahmed ; Vasdev, Nikhil ; Mohan, S. Gowrie ; Adshead, J. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-8f76c2adea57a420c11c4dc346a08de93009e9f0cc5cd4bc3f058435ef4920973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Length of stay</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abroaf, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasdev, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohan, S. Gowrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adshead, J. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Journal of robotic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abroaf, Ahmed</au><au>Vasdev, Nikhil</au><au>Mohan, S. Gowrie</au><au>Adshead, J. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robotic partial nephrectomy: our first 30 consecutive cases</atitle><jtitle>Journal of robotic surgery</jtitle><stitle>J Robotic Surg</stitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>341</epage><pages>337-341</pages><issn>1863-2483</issn><eissn>1863-2491</eissn><abstract>We present our initial outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) at our centre. All data were collected prospectively. The transperitoneal approach was used in all our cases. The clinical parameters recorded include warm ischemia time (WIT), clampless procedures, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of stay (LOS) and oncological outcomes including positive surgical margins (PSM). The Clavien−Dindo system was used for grading complications. Thirty patients with a mean age of 56.7 years (ranging between 25 and 81 years) underwent RPN between January 2010 and November 2013. The mean tumour size was 2.48 cm (range, 1.3−5.5 cm) of which 54 % were right renal tumours ( n  = 16) and 46 % ( n  = 14) were left renal tumours. The mean operative time was 217.5 min (170−260 min) and the mean console time was 164.3 min (120−210 min). The mean EBL was 140.2 ml (10−1,500 ml) and the mean WIT was 16.1 min (0−34 min). Ten percent of patients ( n  = 3) underwent clampless RPN and no postoperative transfusion was required. The mean LOS was 4 days (3−9) and only one patient (3 %) had positive surgical margins (PSM). The incidence of major complications was 3 % (one patient) who had a DVT following surgery (3 %). Our preliminary results show that RALPN is a safe technique with minimal complications. Longer follow-up and larger patient numbers are required to validate these results further.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s11701-014-0476-x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1863-2483
ispartof Journal of robotic surgery, 2014-12, Vol.8 (4), p.337-341
issn 1863-2483
1863-2491
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2918715097
source ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); SpringerLink Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central
subjects Abdomen
FDA approval
Histology
Ischemia
Laparoscopy
Length of stay
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Original Article
Patients
Robotics
Surgeons
Surgery
Sutures
Tumors
Urology
title Robotic partial nephrectomy: our first 30 consecutive cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T02%3A55%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic%20partial%20nephrectomy:%20our%20first%2030%20consecutive%20cases&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20robotic%20surgery&rft.au=Abroaf,%20Ahmed&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=341&rft.pages=337-341&rft.issn=1863-2483&rft.eissn=1863-2491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11701-014-0476-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918715097%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918715097&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true