Effects of a prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral loading during cycling

Purpose The aim of the current investigation was to utilize a musculoskeletal simulation approach to examine the effects of prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral joint loading during the pedal cycle. Methods Twenty-four (12 male and 12 female) healthy recreational cyclists rode a stationary cy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sport sciences for health 2018-12, Vol.14 (3), p.645-654
Hauptverfasser: Sinclair, Jonathan, Butters, Bobbie, Brooks, Darrell, Stainton, Philip
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 654
container_issue 3
container_start_page 645
container_title Sport sciences for health
container_volume 14
creator Sinclair, Jonathan
Butters, Bobbie
Brooks, Darrell
Stainton, Philip
description Purpose The aim of the current investigation was to utilize a musculoskeletal simulation approach to examine the effects of prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral joint loading during the pedal cycle. Methods Twenty-four (12 male and 12 female) healthy recreational cyclists rode a stationary cycle ergometer at fixed cadences of 70, 80 and 90 RPM in two different conditions (brace and no-brace). Patellofemoral loading was explored using a musculoskeletal simulation approach and participants were also asked to subjectively rate their perceived stability and comfort whilst wearing the brace. Results The results showed that the integral of the patellofemoral joint stress was significantly lower in the brace condition (male: 70 RPM = 8.89, 80 RPM = 9.76, and 90 RPM = 12.30 KPa/kg s and female: 70 RPM = 11.59, 80 RPM = 13.07 and 90 RPM = 14.14 KPa/kg s) compared to no-brace (male: 70 RPM = 10.23, 80 RPM = 10.96 and 90 RPM = 13.20 and female: 70 RPM = 12.43, 80 RPM = 14.04 and 90 RPM = 15.45 KPa/kg s). In addition, it was also revealed that participants rated that the knee brace significantly improved perceived knee joint stability. Conclusions The findings from the current investigation, therefore, indicate that prophylactic knee bracing may have the potential to attenuate the risk from the biomechanical parameters linked to the aetiology of patellofemoral pain in cyclists. Future, longitudinal analyses are required to confirm the efficacy of prophylactic knee braces for the attenuation of patellofemoral pain symptoms in cyclists.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11332-018-0482-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2918609823</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2918609823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274x-827bc3695bf75a3165da501d165eaa26116d3536229af882e080985c39bfdd003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEUDKJgrf4AbwHP0XxssslRSrVCoRc9h2w-tHW7WZMttP_erCt48jQDb2beewPALcH3BOP6IRPCGEWYSIQrSdHxDMyIpBwRyqrzH16hulL4ElzlvMOYC87VDGyWIXg7ZBgDNLBPsf84tcYOWws_O-9hk4zddu8wdrA3g2_bGPw-JtPCNho3TtwhjWBPti14DS6CabO_-cU5eHtavi5WaL15flk8rpGldXVEktaNZULxJtTcMCK4MxwTV4g3hgpChGOcCUqVCVJSjyVWklummuAcxmwO7qbccvLXwedB7-IhdWWlpopIUdSUFRWZVDbFnJMPuk_bvUknTbAee9NTb7r0psfe9LF46OTJ_fiYT3_J_5u-AWeScCI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918609823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of a prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral loading during cycling</title><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Sinclair, Jonathan ; Butters, Bobbie ; Brooks, Darrell ; Stainton, Philip</creator><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Jonathan ; Butters, Bobbie ; Brooks, Darrell ; Stainton, Philip</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The aim of the current investigation was to utilize a musculoskeletal simulation approach to examine the effects of prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral joint loading during the pedal cycle. Methods Twenty-four (12 male and 12 female) healthy recreational cyclists rode a stationary cycle ergometer at fixed cadences of 70, 80 and 90 RPM in two different conditions (brace and no-brace). Patellofemoral loading was explored using a musculoskeletal simulation approach and participants were also asked to subjectively rate their perceived stability and comfort whilst wearing the brace. Results The results showed that the integral of the patellofemoral joint stress was significantly lower in the brace condition (male: 70 RPM = 8.89, 80 RPM = 9.76, and 90 RPM = 12.30 KPa/kg s and female: 70 RPM = 11.59, 80 RPM = 13.07 and 90 RPM = 14.14 KPa/kg s) compared to no-brace (male: 70 RPM = 10.23, 80 RPM = 10.96 and 90 RPM = 13.20 and female: 70 RPM = 12.43, 80 RPM = 14.04 and 90 RPM = 15.45 KPa/kg s). In addition, it was also revealed that participants rated that the knee brace significantly improved perceived knee joint stability. Conclusions The findings from the current investigation, therefore, indicate that prophylactic knee bracing may have the potential to attenuate the risk from the biomechanical parameters linked to the aetiology of patellofemoral pain in cyclists. Future, longitudinal analyses are required to confirm the efficacy of prophylactic knee braces for the attenuation of patellofemoral pain symptoms in cyclists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1824-7490</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1825-1234</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11332-018-0482-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Milan: Springer Milan</publisher><subject>Bicycling ; Biomechanics ; Data collection ; Etiology ; Human Physiology ; Kinematics ; Knee ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metabolic Diseases ; Original Article ; Orthopedic apparatus ; Pain ; Proprioception ; Range of motion ; Simulation ; Sports Medicine</subject><ispartof>Sport sciences for health, 2018-12, Vol.14 (3), p.645-654</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature 2018.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274x-827bc3695bf75a3165da501d165eaa26116d3536229af882e080985c39bfdd003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274x-827bc3695bf75a3165da501d165eaa26116d3536229af882e080985c39bfdd003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2231-3732</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11332-018-0482-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2918609823?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21369,21370,27905,27906,33511,33725,41469,42538,43640,43786,51300,64364,64368,72218</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butters, Bobbie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Darrell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stainton, Philip</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of a prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral loading during cycling</title><title>Sport sciences for health</title><addtitle>Sport Sci Health</addtitle><description>Purpose The aim of the current investigation was to utilize a musculoskeletal simulation approach to examine the effects of prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral joint loading during the pedal cycle. Methods Twenty-four (12 male and 12 female) healthy recreational cyclists rode a stationary cycle ergometer at fixed cadences of 70, 80 and 90 RPM in two different conditions (brace and no-brace). Patellofemoral loading was explored using a musculoskeletal simulation approach and participants were also asked to subjectively rate their perceived stability and comfort whilst wearing the brace. Results The results showed that the integral of the patellofemoral joint stress was significantly lower in the brace condition (male: 70 RPM = 8.89, 80 RPM = 9.76, and 90 RPM = 12.30 KPa/kg s and female: 70 RPM = 11.59, 80 RPM = 13.07 and 90 RPM = 14.14 KPa/kg s) compared to no-brace (male: 70 RPM = 10.23, 80 RPM = 10.96 and 90 RPM = 13.20 and female: 70 RPM = 12.43, 80 RPM = 14.04 and 90 RPM = 15.45 KPa/kg s). In addition, it was also revealed that participants rated that the knee brace significantly improved perceived knee joint stability. Conclusions The findings from the current investigation, therefore, indicate that prophylactic knee bracing may have the potential to attenuate the risk from the biomechanical parameters linked to the aetiology of patellofemoral pain in cyclists. Future, longitudinal analyses are required to confirm the efficacy of prophylactic knee braces for the attenuation of patellofemoral pain symptoms in cyclists.</description><subject>Bicycling</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Etiology</subject><subject>Human Physiology</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metabolic Diseases</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthopedic apparatus</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Proprioception</subject><subject>Range of motion</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Sports Medicine</subject><issn>1824-7490</issn><issn>1825-1234</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEUDKJgrf4AbwHP0XxssslRSrVCoRc9h2w-tHW7WZMttP_erCt48jQDb2beewPALcH3BOP6IRPCGEWYSIQrSdHxDMyIpBwRyqrzH16hulL4ElzlvMOYC87VDGyWIXg7ZBgDNLBPsf84tcYOWws_O-9hk4zddu8wdrA3g2_bGPw-JtPCNho3TtwhjWBPti14DS6CabO_-cU5eHtavi5WaL15flk8rpGldXVEktaNZULxJtTcMCK4MxwTV4g3hgpChGOcCUqVCVJSjyVWklummuAcxmwO7qbccvLXwedB7-IhdWWlpopIUdSUFRWZVDbFnJMPuk_bvUknTbAee9NTb7r0psfe9LF46OTJ_fiYT3_J_5u-AWeScCI</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Sinclair, Jonathan</creator><creator>Butters, Bobbie</creator><creator>Brooks, Darrell</creator><creator>Stainton, Philip</creator><general>Springer Milan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2231-3732</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Effects of a prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral loading during cycling</title><author>Sinclair, Jonathan ; Butters, Bobbie ; Brooks, Darrell ; Stainton, Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274x-827bc3695bf75a3165da501d165eaa26116d3536229af882e080985c39bfdd003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bicycling</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Etiology</topic><topic>Human Physiology</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metabolic Diseases</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthopedic apparatus</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Proprioception</topic><topic>Range of motion</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Sports Medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butters, Bobbie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Darrell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stainton, Philip</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sport sciences for health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sinclair, Jonathan</au><au>Butters, Bobbie</au><au>Brooks, Darrell</au><au>Stainton, Philip</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of a prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral loading during cycling</atitle><jtitle>Sport sciences for health</jtitle><stitle>Sport Sci Health</stitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>645</spage><epage>654</epage><pages>645-654</pages><issn>1824-7490</issn><eissn>1825-1234</eissn><abstract>Purpose The aim of the current investigation was to utilize a musculoskeletal simulation approach to examine the effects of prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral joint loading during the pedal cycle. Methods Twenty-four (12 male and 12 female) healthy recreational cyclists rode a stationary cycle ergometer at fixed cadences of 70, 80 and 90 RPM in two different conditions (brace and no-brace). Patellofemoral loading was explored using a musculoskeletal simulation approach and participants were also asked to subjectively rate their perceived stability and comfort whilst wearing the brace. Results The results showed that the integral of the patellofemoral joint stress was significantly lower in the brace condition (male: 70 RPM = 8.89, 80 RPM = 9.76, and 90 RPM = 12.30 KPa/kg s and female: 70 RPM = 11.59, 80 RPM = 13.07 and 90 RPM = 14.14 KPa/kg s) compared to no-brace (male: 70 RPM = 10.23, 80 RPM = 10.96 and 90 RPM = 13.20 and female: 70 RPM = 12.43, 80 RPM = 14.04 and 90 RPM = 15.45 KPa/kg s). In addition, it was also revealed that participants rated that the knee brace significantly improved perceived knee joint stability. Conclusions The findings from the current investigation, therefore, indicate that prophylactic knee bracing may have the potential to attenuate the risk from the biomechanical parameters linked to the aetiology of patellofemoral pain in cyclists. Future, longitudinal analyses are required to confirm the efficacy of prophylactic knee braces for the attenuation of patellofemoral pain symptoms in cyclists.</abstract><cop>Milan</cop><pub>Springer Milan</pub><doi>10.1007/s11332-018-0482-x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2231-3732</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1824-7490
ispartof Sport sciences for health, 2018-12, Vol.14 (3), p.645-654
issn 1824-7490
1825-1234
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2918609823
source ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); SpringerLink Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central
subjects Bicycling
Biomechanics
Data collection
Etiology
Human Physiology
Kinematics
Knee
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metabolic Diseases
Original Article
Orthopedic apparatus
Pain
Proprioception
Range of motion
Simulation
Sports Medicine
title Effects of a prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral loading during cycling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T14%3A37%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20a%20prophylactic%20knee%20bracing%20on%20patellofemoral%20loading%20during%20cycling&rft.jtitle=Sport%20sciences%20for%20health&rft.au=Sinclair,%20Jonathan&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=645&rft.epage=654&rft.pages=645-654&rft.issn=1824-7490&rft.eissn=1825-1234&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11332-018-0482-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918609823%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918609823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true