Effects of a prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral loading during cycling
Purpose The aim of the current investigation was to utilize a musculoskeletal simulation approach to examine the effects of prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral joint loading during the pedal cycle. Methods Twenty-four (12 male and 12 female) healthy recreational cyclists rode a stationary cy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sport sciences for health 2018-12, Vol.14 (3), p.645-654 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 654 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 645 |
container_title | Sport sciences for health |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Sinclair, Jonathan Butters, Bobbie Brooks, Darrell Stainton, Philip |
description | Purpose
The aim of the current investigation was to utilize a musculoskeletal simulation approach to examine the effects of prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral joint loading during the pedal cycle.
Methods
Twenty-four (12 male and 12 female) healthy recreational cyclists rode a stationary cycle ergometer at fixed cadences of 70, 80 and 90 RPM in two different conditions (brace and no-brace). Patellofemoral loading was explored using a musculoskeletal simulation approach and participants were also asked to subjectively rate their perceived stability and comfort whilst wearing the brace.
Results
The results showed that the integral of the patellofemoral joint stress was significantly lower in the brace condition (male: 70 RPM = 8.89, 80 RPM = 9.76, and 90 RPM = 12.30 KPa/kg s and female: 70 RPM = 11.59, 80 RPM = 13.07 and 90 RPM = 14.14 KPa/kg s) compared to no-brace (male: 70 RPM = 10.23, 80 RPM = 10.96 and 90 RPM = 13.20 and female: 70 RPM = 12.43, 80 RPM = 14.04 and 90 RPM = 15.45 KPa/kg s). In addition, it was also revealed that participants rated that the knee brace significantly improved perceived knee joint stability.
Conclusions
The findings from the current investigation, therefore, indicate that prophylactic knee bracing may have the potential to attenuate the risk from the biomechanical parameters linked to the aetiology of patellofemoral pain in cyclists. Future, longitudinal analyses are required to confirm the efficacy of prophylactic knee braces for the attenuation of patellofemoral pain symptoms in cyclists. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11332-018-0482-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2918609823</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2918609823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274x-827bc3695bf75a3165da501d165eaa26116d3536229af882e080985c39bfdd003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEUDKJgrf4AbwHP0XxssslRSrVCoRc9h2w-tHW7WZMttP_erCt48jQDb2beewPALcH3BOP6IRPCGEWYSIQrSdHxDMyIpBwRyqrzH16hulL4ElzlvMOYC87VDGyWIXg7ZBgDNLBPsf84tcYOWws_O-9hk4zddu8wdrA3g2_bGPw-JtPCNho3TtwhjWBPti14DS6CabO_-cU5eHtavi5WaL15flk8rpGldXVEktaNZULxJtTcMCK4MxwTV4g3hgpChGOcCUqVCVJSjyVWklummuAcxmwO7qbccvLXwedB7-IhdWWlpopIUdSUFRWZVDbFnJMPuk_bvUknTbAee9NTb7r0psfe9LF46OTJ_fiYT3_J_5u-AWeScCI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918609823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of a prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral loading during cycling</title><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Sinclair, Jonathan ; Butters, Bobbie ; Brooks, Darrell ; Stainton, Philip</creator><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Jonathan ; Butters, Bobbie ; Brooks, Darrell ; Stainton, Philip</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The aim of the current investigation was to utilize a musculoskeletal simulation approach to examine the effects of prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral joint loading during the pedal cycle.
Methods
Twenty-four (12 male and 12 female) healthy recreational cyclists rode a stationary cycle ergometer at fixed cadences of 70, 80 and 90 RPM in two different conditions (brace and no-brace). Patellofemoral loading was explored using a musculoskeletal simulation approach and participants were also asked to subjectively rate their perceived stability and comfort whilst wearing the brace.
Results
The results showed that the integral of the patellofemoral joint stress was significantly lower in the brace condition (male: 70 RPM = 8.89, 80 RPM = 9.76, and 90 RPM = 12.30 KPa/kg s and female: 70 RPM = 11.59, 80 RPM = 13.07 and 90 RPM = 14.14 KPa/kg s) compared to no-brace (male: 70 RPM = 10.23, 80 RPM = 10.96 and 90 RPM = 13.20 and female: 70 RPM = 12.43, 80 RPM = 14.04 and 90 RPM = 15.45 KPa/kg s). In addition, it was also revealed that participants rated that the knee brace significantly improved perceived knee joint stability.
Conclusions
The findings from the current investigation, therefore, indicate that prophylactic knee bracing may have the potential to attenuate the risk from the biomechanical parameters linked to the aetiology of patellofemoral pain in cyclists. Future, longitudinal analyses are required to confirm the efficacy of prophylactic knee braces for the attenuation of patellofemoral pain symptoms in cyclists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1824-7490</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1825-1234</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11332-018-0482-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Milan: Springer Milan</publisher><subject>Bicycling ; Biomechanics ; Data collection ; Etiology ; Human Physiology ; Kinematics ; Knee ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Metabolic Diseases ; Original Article ; Orthopedic apparatus ; Pain ; Proprioception ; Range of motion ; Simulation ; Sports Medicine</subject><ispartof>Sport sciences for health, 2018-12, Vol.14 (3), p.645-654</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature 2018.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274x-827bc3695bf75a3165da501d165eaa26116d3536229af882e080985c39bfdd003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274x-827bc3695bf75a3165da501d165eaa26116d3536229af882e080985c39bfdd003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2231-3732</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11332-018-0482-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2918609823?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21369,21370,27905,27906,33511,33725,41469,42538,43640,43786,51300,64364,64368,72218</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butters, Bobbie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Darrell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stainton, Philip</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of a prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral loading during cycling</title><title>Sport sciences for health</title><addtitle>Sport Sci Health</addtitle><description>Purpose
The aim of the current investigation was to utilize a musculoskeletal simulation approach to examine the effects of prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral joint loading during the pedal cycle.
Methods
Twenty-four (12 male and 12 female) healthy recreational cyclists rode a stationary cycle ergometer at fixed cadences of 70, 80 and 90 RPM in two different conditions (brace and no-brace). Patellofemoral loading was explored using a musculoskeletal simulation approach and participants were also asked to subjectively rate their perceived stability and comfort whilst wearing the brace.
Results
The results showed that the integral of the patellofemoral joint stress was significantly lower in the brace condition (male: 70 RPM = 8.89, 80 RPM = 9.76, and 90 RPM = 12.30 KPa/kg s and female: 70 RPM = 11.59, 80 RPM = 13.07 and 90 RPM = 14.14 KPa/kg s) compared to no-brace (male: 70 RPM = 10.23, 80 RPM = 10.96 and 90 RPM = 13.20 and female: 70 RPM = 12.43, 80 RPM = 14.04 and 90 RPM = 15.45 KPa/kg s). In addition, it was also revealed that participants rated that the knee brace significantly improved perceived knee joint stability.
Conclusions
The findings from the current investigation, therefore, indicate that prophylactic knee bracing may have the potential to attenuate the risk from the biomechanical parameters linked to the aetiology of patellofemoral pain in cyclists. Future, longitudinal analyses are required to confirm the efficacy of prophylactic knee braces for the attenuation of patellofemoral pain symptoms in cyclists.</description><subject>Bicycling</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Etiology</subject><subject>Human Physiology</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Metabolic Diseases</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthopedic apparatus</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Proprioception</subject><subject>Range of motion</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Sports Medicine</subject><issn>1824-7490</issn><issn>1825-1234</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEUDKJgrf4AbwHP0XxssslRSrVCoRc9h2w-tHW7WZMttP_erCt48jQDb2beewPALcH3BOP6IRPCGEWYSIQrSdHxDMyIpBwRyqrzH16hulL4ElzlvMOYC87VDGyWIXg7ZBgDNLBPsf84tcYOWws_O-9hk4zddu8wdrA3g2_bGPw-JtPCNho3TtwhjWBPti14DS6CabO_-cU5eHtavi5WaL15flk8rpGldXVEktaNZULxJtTcMCK4MxwTV4g3hgpChGOcCUqVCVJSjyVWklummuAcxmwO7qbccvLXwedB7-IhdWWlpopIUdSUFRWZVDbFnJMPuk_bvUknTbAee9NTb7r0psfe9LF46OTJ_fiYT3_J_5u-AWeScCI</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Sinclair, Jonathan</creator><creator>Butters, Bobbie</creator><creator>Brooks, Darrell</creator><creator>Stainton, Philip</creator><general>Springer Milan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2231-3732</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Effects of a prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral loading during cycling</title><author>Sinclair, Jonathan ; Butters, Bobbie ; Brooks, Darrell ; Stainton, Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274x-827bc3695bf75a3165da501d165eaa26116d3536229af882e080985c39bfdd003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bicycling</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Etiology</topic><topic>Human Physiology</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Metabolic Diseases</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthopedic apparatus</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Proprioception</topic><topic>Range of motion</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Sports Medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butters, Bobbie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Darrell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stainton, Philip</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sport sciences for health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sinclair, Jonathan</au><au>Butters, Bobbie</au><au>Brooks, Darrell</au><au>Stainton, Philip</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of a prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral loading during cycling</atitle><jtitle>Sport sciences for health</jtitle><stitle>Sport Sci Health</stitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>645</spage><epage>654</epage><pages>645-654</pages><issn>1824-7490</issn><eissn>1825-1234</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The aim of the current investigation was to utilize a musculoskeletal simulation approach to examine the effects of prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral joint loading during the pedal cycle.
Methods
Twenty-four (12 male and 12 female) healthy recreational cyclists rode a stationary cycle ergometer at fixed cadences of 70, 80 and 90 RPM in two different conditions (brace and no-brace). Patellofemoral loading was explored using a musculoskeletal simulation approach and participants were also asked to subjectively rate their perceived stability and comfort whilst wearing the brace.
Results
The results showed that the integral of the patellofemoral joint stress was significantly lower in the brace condition (male: 70 RPM = 8.89, 80 RPM = 9.76, and 90 RPM = 12.30 KPa/kg s and female: 70 RPM = 11.59, 80 RPM = 13.07 and 90 RPM = 14.14 KPa/kg s) compared to no-brace (male: 70 RPM = 10.23, 80 RPM = 10.96 and 90 RPM = 13.20 and female: 70 RPM = 12.43, 80 RPM = 14.04 and 90 RPM = 15.45 KPa/kg s). In addition, it was also revealed that participants rated that the knee brace significantly improved perceived knee joint stability.
Conclusions
The findings from the current investigation, therefore, indicate that prophylactic knee bracing may have the potential to attenuate the risk from the biomechanical parameters linked to the aetiology of patellofemoral pain in cyclists. Future, longitudinal analyses are required to confirm the efficacy of prophylactic knee braces for the attenuation of patellofemoral pain symptoms in cyclists.</abstract><cop>Milan</cop><pub>Springer Milan</pub><doi>10.1007/s11332-018-0482-x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2231-3732</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1824-7490 |
ispartof | Sport sciences for health, 2018-12, Vol.14 (3), p.645-654 |
issn | 1824-7490 1825-1234 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2918609823 |
source | ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); SpringerLink Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Bicycling Biomechanics Data collection Etiology Human Physiology Kinematics Knee Medicine Medicine & Public Health Metabolic Diseases Original Article Orthopedic apparatus Pain Proprioception Range of motion Simulation Sports Medicine |
title | Effects of a prophylactic knee bracing on patellofemoral loading during cycling |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T14%3A37%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20a%20prophylactic%20knee%20bracing%20on%20patellofemoral%20loading%20during%20cycling&rft.jtitle=Sport%20sciences%20for%20health&rft.au=Sinclair,%20Jonathan&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=645&rft.epage=654&rft.pages=645-654&rft.issn=1824-7490&rft.eissn=1825-1234&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11332-018-0482-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918609823%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918609823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |