Customer relational benefit: A second‐order meta‐analysis and an alternative framework
Previous literature uses first‐order meta‐analyses to overcome the divergent theories about customer relational benefit, which produced mixed results in terms of the associations found. Originally conceptualised as unidimensional, customer relational benefit is an integrative multidimensional concep...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of consumer studies 2024-01, Vol.48 (1), p.1-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | International journal of consumer studies |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Vieira, Valter Afonso Araujo, Clécio Falcão Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo |
description | Previous literature uses first‐order meta‐analyses to overcome the divergent theories about customer relational benefit, which produced mixed results in terms of the associations found. Originally conceptualised as unidimensional, customer relational benefit is an integrative multidimensional concept that includes trust, commitment, loyalty, satisfaction, word of mouth, and other constructs involved in long‐term relational exchanges. The authors conduct a second‐order meta‐analysis on 41 first‐order meta‐analyses on customer relational benefits, generating 3.8 million observations and 3462 independent samples, resulting in an overall generalisation of the relationships between these constructs. We test three theoretical models and propose an alternative rival framework. Main results indicate that the product‐ versus consumer‐related model generates strong variance in loyalty. Second, the cognitive–affective–conative–behavioural model is not superior in terms of explaining and predicting loyalty, but our three‐stage model performs better. Third, the service‐profit chain model is an alternative in terms of generating a sequence of effects (serial perspective). Fourth, our new alternative framework (a three‐stage model based on the temporal sequence of loyalty) works better for explaining some constructs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ijcs.12987 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2918349750</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2918349750</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3587-6100bbea83646f640aa0f299604a14347d3f2271ed4ca48b10224bf41d933cef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KxDAQx4MouK5efIKAN6Frvtqm3pbix8qCB_XiJaTtBLq2zZp0XfbmI_iMPompFb05MMwM_ObPzB-hU0pmNMRFvSr9jLJMpntoQkVKokRwuv_bM36IjrxfEUITGfMJes43vrctOOyg0X1tO93gAjowdX-J59hDabvq8_3DuipALfQ6DDpQO197rLsqJNZND64L62-AjdMtbK17OUYHRjceTn7qFD1dXz3mt9Hy_maRz5dRyWOZRgklpChAS56IxCSCaE0My7KECE0FF2nFDWMphUqUWsiCEsZEYQStMs5LMHyKzkbdtbOvG_C9WtlNuKbximVUcpGlMQnU-UiVznrvwKi1q1vtdooSNXinBu_Ut3cBxiM8fF_7P1RKQuJw06BHR2RbN7D7R0wt7vKHUfYL-7N9uA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918349750</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Customer relational benefit: A second‐order meta‐analysis and an alternative framework</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Vieira, Valter Afonso ; Araujo, Clécio Falcão ; Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo</creator><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Valter Afonso ; Araujo, Clécio Falcão ; Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo</creatorcontrib><description>Previous literature uses first‐order meta‐analyses to overcome the divergent theories about customer relational benefit, which produced mixed results in terms of the associations found. Originally conceptualised as unidimensional, customer relational benefit is an integrative multidimensional concept that includes trust, commitment, loyalty, satisfaction, word of mouth, and other constructs involved in long‐term relational exchanges. The authors conduct a second‐order meta‐analysis on 41 first‐order meta‐analyses on customer relational benefits, generating 3.8 million observations and 3462 independent samples, resulting in an overall generalisation of the relationships between these constructs. We test three theoretical models and propose an alternative rival framework. Main results indicate that the product‐ versus consumer‐related model generates strong variance in loyalty. Second, the cognitive–affective–conative–behavioural model is not superior in terms of explaining and predicting loyalty, but our three‐stage model performs better. Third, the service‐profit chain model is an alternative in terms of generating a sequence of effects (serial perspective). Fourth, our new alternative framework (a three‐stage model based on the temporal sequence of loyalty) works better for explaining some constructs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-6423</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-6431</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12987</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alternatives ; Cognitive-behavioral factors ; Commitments ; Customer relations ; Customer satisfaction ; effect sizes ; Frame analysis ; Loyalty ; Meta-analysis ; meta‐meta‐analysis ; satisfaction ; second‐order meta‐analysis ; Trust ; Word of mouth advertising</subject><ispartof>International journal of consumer studies, 2024-01, Vol.48 (1), p.1-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3587-6100bbea83646f640aa0f299604a14347d3f2271ed4ca48b10224bf41d933cef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3587-6100bbea83646f640aa0f299604a14347d3f2271ed4ca48b10224bf41d933cef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9493-0644 ; 0000-0002-4129-3343 ; 0000-0002-8753-5184</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fijcs.12987$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fijcs.12987$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Valter Afonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Clécio Falcão</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo</creatorcontrib><title>Customer relational benefit: A second‐order meta‐analysis and an alternative framework</title><title>International journal of consumer studies</title><description>Previous literature uses first‐order meta‐analyses to overcome the divergent theories about customer relational benefit, which produced mixed results in terms of the associations found. Originally conceptualised as unidimensional, customer relational benefit is an integrative multidimensional concept that includes trust, commitment, loyalty, satisfaction, word of mouth, and other constructs involved in long‐term relational exchanges. The authors conduct a second‐order meta‐analysis on 41 first‐order meta‐analyses on customer relational benefits, generating 3.8 million observations and 3462 independent samples, resulting in an overall generalisation of the relationships between these constructs. We test three theoretical models and propose an alternative rival framework. Main results indicate that the product‐ versus consumer‐related model generates strong variance in loyalty. Second, the cognitive–affective–conative–behavioural model is not superior in terms of explaining and predicting loyalty, but our three‐stage model performs better. Third, the service‐profit chain model is an alternative in terms of generating a sequence of effects (serial perspective). Fourth, our new alternative framework (a three‐stage model based on the temporal sequence of loyalty) works better for explaining some constructs.</description><subject>Alternatives</subject><subject>Cognitive-behavioral factors</subject><subject>Commitments</subject><subject>Customer relations</subject><subject>Customer satisfaction</subject><subject>effect sizes</subject><subject>Frame analysis</subject><subject>Loyalty</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>meta‐meta‐analysis</subject><subject>satisfaction</subject><subject>second‐order meta‐analysis</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Word of mouth advertising</subject><issn>1470-6423</issn><issn>1470-6431</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KxDAQx4MouK5efIKAN6Frvtqm3pbix8qCB_XiJaTtBLq2zZp0XfbmI_iMPompFb05MMwM_ObPzB-hU0pmNMRFvSr9jLJMpntoQkVKokRwuv_bM36IjrxfEUITGfMJes43vrctOOyg0X1tO93gAjowdX-J59hDabvq8_3DuipALfQ6DDpQO197rLsqJNZND64L62-AjdMtbK17OUYHRjceTn7qFD1dXz3mt9Hy_maRz5dRyWOZRgklpChAS56IxCSCaE0My7KECE0FF2nFDWMphUqUWsiCEsZEYQStMs5LMHyKzkbdtbOvG_C9WtlNuKbximVUcpGlMQnU-UiVznrvwKi1q1vtdooSNXinBu_Ut3cBxiM8fF_7P1RKQuJw06BHR2RbN7D7R0wt7vKHUfYL-7N9uA</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Vieira, Valter Afonso</creator><creator>Araujo, Clécio Falcão</creator><creator>Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9493-0644</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4129-3343</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8753-5184</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Customer relational benefit: A second‐order meta‐analysis and an alternative framework</title><author>Vieira, Valter Afonso ; Araujo, Clécio Falcão ; Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3587-6100bbea83646f640aa0f299604a14347d3f2271ed4ca48b10224bf41d933cef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Alternatives</topic><topic>Cognitive-behavioral factors</topic><topic>Commitments</topic><topic>Customer relations</topic><topic>Customer satisfaction</topic><topic>effect sizes</topic><topic>Frame analysis</topic><topic>Loyalty</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>meta‐meta‐analysis</topic><topic>satisfaction</topic><topic>second‐order meta‐analysis</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Word of mouth advertising</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Valter Afonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Clécio Falcão</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of consumer studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vieira, Valter Afonso</au><au>Araujo, Clécio Falcão</au><au>Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Customer relational benefit: A second‐order meta‐analysis and an alternative framework</atitle><jtitle>International journal of consumer studies</jtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>1-n/a</pages><issn>1470-6423</issn><eissn>1470-6431</eissn><abstract>Previous literature uses first‐order meta‐analyses to overcome the divergent theories about customer relational benefit, which produced mixed results in terms of the associations found. Originally conceptualised as unidimensional, customer relational benefit is an integrative multidimensional concept that includes trust, commitment, loyalty, satisfaction, word of mouth, and other constructs involved in long‐term relational exchanges. The authors conduct a second‐order meta‐analysis on 41 first‐order meta‐analyses on customer relational benefits, generating 3.8 million observations and 3462 independent samples, resulting in an overall generalisation of the relationships between these constructs. We test three theoretical models and propose an alternative rival framework. Main results indicate that the product‐ versus consumer‐related model generates strong variance in loyalty. Second, the cognitive–affective–conative–behavioural model is not superior in terms of explaining and predicting loyalty, but our three‐stage model performs better. Third, the service‐profit chain model is an alternative in terms of generating a sequence of effects (serial perspective). Fourth, our new alternative framework (a three‐stage model based on the temporal sequence of loyalty) works better for explaining some constructs.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ijcs.12987</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9493-0644</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4129-3343</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8753-5184</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-6423 |
ispartof | International journal of consumer studies, 2024-01, Vol.48 (1), p.1-n/a |
issn | 1470-6423 1470-6431 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2918349750 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Alternatives Cognitive-behavioral factors Commitments Customer relations Customer satisfaction effect sizes Frame analysis Loyalty Meta-analysis meta‐meta‐analysis satisfaction second‐order meta‐analysis Trust Word of mouth advertising |
title | Customer relational benefit: A second‐order meta‐analysis and an alternative framework |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T16%3A28%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Customer%20relational%20benefit:%20A%20second%E2%80%90order%20meta%E2%80%90analysis%20and%20an%20alternative%20framework&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20consumer%20studies&rft.au=Vieira,%20Valter%20Afonso&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=1-n/a&rft.issn=1470-6423&rft.eissn=1470-6431&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijcs.12987&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918349750%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918349750&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |