Customer relational benefit: A second‐order meta‐analysis and an alternative framework

Previous literature uses first‐order meta‐analyses to overcome the divergent theories about customer relational benefit, which produced mixed results in terms of the associations found. Originally conceptualised as unidimensional, customer relational benefit is an integrative multidimensional concep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of consumer studies 2024-01, Vol.48 (1), p.1-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Vieira, Valter Afonso, Araujo, Clécio Falcão, Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title International journal of consumer studies
container_volume 48
creator Vieira, Valter Afonso
Araujo, Clécio Falcão
Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo
description Previous literature uses first‐order meta‐analyses to overcome the divergent theories about customer relational benefit, which produced mixed results in terms of the associations found. Originally conceptualised as unidimensional, customer relational benefit is an integrative multidimensional concept that includes trust, commitment, loyalty, satisfaction, word of mouth, and other constructs involved in long‐term relational exchanges. The authors conduct a second‐order meta‐analysis on 41 first‐order meta‐analyses on customer relational benefits, generating 3.8 million observations and 3462 independent samples, resulting in an overall generalisation of the relationships between these constructs. We test three theoretical models and propose an alternative rival framework. Main results indicate that the product‐ versus consumer‐related model generates strong variance in loyalty. Second, the cognitive–affective–conative–behavioural model is not superior in terms of explaining and predicting loyalty, but our three‐stage model performs better. Third, the service‐profit chain model is an alternative in terms of generating a sequence of effects (serial perspective). Fourth, our new alternative framework (a three‐stage model based on the temporal sequence of loyalty) works better for explaining some constructs.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ijcs.12987
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2918349750</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2918349750</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3587-6100bbea83646f640aa0f299604a14347d3f2271ed4ca48b10224bf41d933cef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KxDAQx4MouK5efIKAN6Frvtqm3pbix8qCB_XiJaTtBLq2zZp0XfbmI_iMPompFb05MMwM_ObPzB-hU0pmNMRFvSr9jLJMpntoQkVKokRwuv_bM36IjrxfEUITGfMJes43vrctOOyg0X1tO93gAjowdX-J59hDabvq8_3DuipALfQ6DDpQO197rLsqJNZND64L62-AjdMtbK17OUYHRjceTn7qFD1dXz3mt9Hy_maRz5dRyWOZRgklpChAS56IxCSCaE0My7KECE0FF2nFDWMphUqUWsiCEsZEYQStMs5LMHyKzkbdtbOvG_C9WtlNuKbximVUcpGlMQnU-UiVznrvwKi1q1vtdooSNXinBu_Ut3cBxiM8fF_7P1RKQuJw06BHR2RbN7D7R0wt7vKHUfYL-7N9uA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918349750</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Customer relational benefit: A second‐order meta‐analysis and an alternative framework</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Vieira, Valter Afonso ; Araujo, Clécio Falcão ; Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo</creator><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Valter Afonso ; Araujo, Clécio Falcão ; Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo</creatorcontrib><description>Previous literature uses first‐order meta‐analyses to overcome the divergent theories about customer relational benefit, which produced mixed results in terms of the associations found. Originally conceptualised as unidimensional, customer relational benefit is an integrative multidimensional concept that includes trust, commitment, loyalty, satisfaction, word of mouth, and other constructs involved in long‐term relational exchanges. The authors conduct a second‐order meta‐analysis on 41 first‐order meta‐analyses on customer relational benefits, generating 3.8 million observations and 3462 independent samples, resulting in an overall generalisation of the relationships between these constructs. We test three theoretical models and propose an alternative rival framework. Main results indicate that the product‐ versus consumer‐related model generates strong variance in loyalty. Second, the cognitive–affective–conative–behavioural model is not superior in terms of explaining and predicting loyalty, but our three‐stage model performs better. Third, the service‐profit chain model is an alternative in terms of generating a sequence of effects (serial perspective). Fourth, our new alternative framework (a three‐stage model based on the temporal sequence of loyalty) works better for explaining some constructs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-6423</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-6431</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12987</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alternatives ; Cognitive-behavioral factors ; Commitments ; Customer relations ; Customer satisfaction ; effect sizes ; Frame analysis ; Loyalty ; Meta-analysis ; meta‐meta‐analysis ; satisfaction ; second‐order meta‐analysis ; Trust ; Word of mouth advertising</subject><ispartof>International journal of consumer studies, 2024-01, Vol.48 (1), p.1-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3587-6100bbea83646f640aa0f299604a14347d3f2271ed4ca48b10224bf41d933cef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3587-6100bbea83646f640aa0f299604a14347d3f2271ed4ca48b10224bf41d933cef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9493-0644 ; 0000-0002-4129-3343 ; 0000-0002-8753-5184</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fijcs.12987$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fijcs.12987$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Valter Afonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Clécio Falcão</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo</creatorcontrib><title>Customer relational benefit: A second‐order meta‐analysis and an alternative framework</title><title>International journal of consumer studies</title><description>Previous literature uses first‐order meta‐analyses to overcome the divergent theories about customer relational benefit, which produced mixed results in terms of the associations found. Originally conceptualised as unidimensional, customer relational benefit is an integrative multidimensional concept that includes trust, commitment, loyalty, satisfaction, word of mouth, and other constructs involved in long‐term relational exchanges. The authors conduct a second‐order meta‐analysis on 41 first‐order meta‐analyses on customer relational benefits, generating 3.8 million observations and 3462 independent samples, resulting in an overall generalisation of the relationships between these constructs. We test three theoretical models and propose an alternative rival framework. Main results indicate that the product‐ versus consumer‐related model generates strong variance in loyalty. Second, the cognitive–affective–conative–behavioural model is not superior in terms of explaining and predicting loyalty, but our three‐stage model performs better. Third, the service‐profit chain model is an alternative in terms of generating a sequence of effects (serial perspective). Fourth, our new alternative framework (a three‐stage model based on the temporal sequence of loyalty) works better for explaining some constructs.</description><subject>Alternatives</subject><subject>Cognitive-behavioral factors</subject><subject>Commitments</subject><subject>Customer relations</subject><subject>Customer satisfaction</subject><subject>effect sizes</subject><subject>Frame analysis</subject><subject>Loyalty</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>meta‐meta‐analysis</subject><subject>satisfaction</subject><subject>second‐order meta‐analysis</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Word of mouth advertising</subject><issn>1470-6423</issn><issn>1470-6431</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KxDAQx4MouK5efIKAN6Frvtqm3pbix8qCB_XiJaTtBLq2zZp0XfbmI_iMPompFb05MMwM_ObPzB-hU0pmNMRFvSr9jLJMpntoQkVKokRwuv_bM36IjrxfEUITGfMJes43vrctOOyg0X1tO93gAjowdX-J59hDabvq8_3DuipALfQ6DDpQO197rLsqJNZND64L62-AjdMtbK17OUYHRjceTn7qFD1dXz3mt9Hy_maRz5dRyWOZRgklpChAS56IxCSCaE0My7KECE0FF2nFDWMphUqUWsiCEsZEYQStMs5LMHyKzkbdtbOvG_C9WtlNuKbximVUcpGlMQnU-UiVznrvwKi1q1vtdooSNXinBu_Ut3cBxiM8fF_7P1RKQuJw06BHR2RbN7D7R0wt7vKHUfYL-7N9uA</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Vieira, Valter Afonso</creator><creator>Araujo, Clécio Falcão</creator><creator>Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9493-0644</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4129-3343</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8753-5184</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Customer relational benefit: A second‐order meta‐analysis and an alternative framework</title><author>Vieira, Valter Afonso ; Araujo, Clécio Falcão ; Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3587-6100bbea83646f640aa0f299604a14347d3f2271ed4ca48b10224bf41d933cef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Alternatives</topic><topic>Cognitive-behavioral factors</topic><topic>Commitments</topic><topic>Customer relations</topic><topic>Customer satisfaction</topic><topic>effect sizes</topic><topic>Frame analysis</topic><topic>Loyalty</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>meta‐meta‐analysis</topic><topic>satisfaction</topic><topic>second‐order meta‐analysis</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Word of mouth advertising</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Valter Afonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Clécio Falcão</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of consumer studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vieira, Valter Afonso</au><au>Araujo, Clécio Falcão</au><au>Almeida, Marcos Inácio Severo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Customer relational benefit: A second‐order meta‐analysis and an alternative framework</atitle><jtitle>International journal of consumer studies</jtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>1-n/a</pages><issn>1470-6423</issn><eissn>1470-6431</eissn><abstract>Previous literature uses first‐order meta‐analyses to overcome the divergent theories about customer relational benefit, which produced mixed results in terms of the associations found. Originally conceptualised as unidimensional, customer relational benefit is an integrative multidimensional concept that includes trust, commitment, loyalty, satisfaction, word of mouth, and other constructs involved in long‐term relational exchanges. The authors conduct a second‐order meta‐analysis on 41 first‐order meta‐analyses on customer relational benefits, generating 3.8 million observations and 3462 independent samples, resulting in an overall generalisation of the relationships between these constructs. We test three theoretical models and propose an alternative rival framework. Main results indicate that the product‐ versus consumer‐related model generates strong variance in loyalty. Second, the cognitive–affective–conative–behavioural model is not superior in terms of explaining and predicting loyalty, but our three‐stage model performs better. Third, the service‐profit chain model is an alternative in terms of generating a sequence of effects (serial perspective). Fourth, our new alternative framework (a three‐stage model based on the temporal sequence of loyalty) works better for explaining some constructs.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ijcs.12987</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9493-0644</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4129-3343</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8753-5184</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-6423
ispartof International journal of consumer studies, 2024-01, Vol.48 (1), p.1-n/a
issn 1470-6423
1470-6431
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2918349750
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Alternatives
Cognitive-behavioral factors
Commitments
Customer relations
Customer satisfaction
effect sizes
Frame analysis
Loyalty
Meta-analysis
meta‐meta‐analysis
satisfaction
second‐order meta‐analysis
Trust
Word of mouth advertising
title Customer relational benefit: A second‐order meta‐analysis and an alternative framework
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T16%3A28%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Customer%20relational%20benefit:%20A%20second%E2%80%90order%20meta%E2%80%90analysis%20and%20an%20alternative%20framework&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20consumer%20studies&rft.au=Vieira,%20Valter%20Afonso&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=1-n/a&rft.issn=1470-6423&rft.eissn=1470-6431&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijcs.12987&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918349750%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918349750&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true