A preliminary analysis of the costs and benefits of the biological control agent Dactylopius opuntiae on Opuntia stricta in Laikipia County, Kenya
Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw (Cactaceae) is invasive in Laikipia County, Kenya, impacting negatively on biodiversity and livelihoods. To control this invasive plant the biocontrol agent Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) (Hemiptera; Dactylopiidae) ‘stricta’ biotype was released in 2014. A preliminary on...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2020-08, Vol.65 (4), p.515-523 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 523 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 515 |
container_title | BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands) |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Witt, Arne B. R. Nunda, Winnie Makale, Fernadis Reynolds, Kathryn |
description | Opuntia stricta
(Haw.) Haw (Cactaceae) is invasive in Laikipia County, Kenya, impacting negatively on biodiversity and livelihoods. To control this invasive plant the biocontrol agent
Dactylopius opuntiae
(Cockerell) (Hemiptera; Dactylopiidae) ‘stricta’ biotype was released in 2014. A preliminary once-off survey to determine the impact of the cochineal revealed that it had contributed to a significant reduction in the number of cladodes, flowers and fruit of plants with cochineal. Fruits that were produced on plants with the cochineal were also smaller and had fewer seeds. Although still preliminary, an analysis of the costs of implementing this biocontrol programme indicates that it is the most cost-effective management intervention compared to physical and/or chemical control. Although the impact of the cochineal is still fairly localized we are confident that it will establish in much of the invaded range and reduce the impacts of the invasive cactus, consequently improving rangeland condition and livelihoods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10526-020-10018-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2918271460</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2918271460</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-907bb539d5cf14631f4447bc5c677da9761f878040488a81fcde4a0ce21ab4943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OxCAURonRxHH0BVyRuLUKLS10ORl_4ySz0TWhFEbGDlSgyfQ1fGLRGt254nLv-b7FAeAcoyuMEL0OGJV5laEcZemPWbY_ADNc0iJjOWGHaS5YlVWY4GNwEsIWpVBZshn4WMDeq87sjBV-hMKKbgwmQKdhfFVQuhBD2rawUVZpE38vjXGd2xgpugTZ6F0HxUbZCG-EjGPnejMkth9sNEJBZ-F6mmGI3sgooLFwJcyb6dNu6dJtvIRPyo7iFBxp0QV19vPOwcvd7fPyIVut7x-Xi1Umi6qIWY1o05RF3ZZSY1IVWBNCaCNLWVHaippWWDPKEEGEMcGwlq0iAkmVY9GQmhRzcDH19t69DypEvnWDTwICz2vMcppaUaLyiZLeheCV5r03u-SKY8S_3PPJPU_u-bd7vk-hYgqFBNuN8n_V_6Q-AUfFicM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918271460</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A preliminary analysis of the costs and benefits of the biological control agent Dactylopius opuntiae on Opuntia stricta in Laikipia County, Kenya</title><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><creator>Witt, Arne B. R. ; Nunda, Winnie ; Makale, Fernadis ; Reynolds, Kathryn</creator><creatorcontrib>Witt, Arne B. R. ; Nunda, Winnie ; Makale, Fernadis ; Reynolds, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><description>Opuntia stricta
(Haw.) Haw (Cactaceae) is invasive in Laikipia County, Kenya, impacting negatively on biodiversity and livelihoods. To control this invasive plant the biocontrol agent
Dactylopius opuntiae
(Cockerell) (Hemiptera; Dactylopiidae) ‘stricta’ biotype was released in 2014. A preliminary once-off survey to determine the impact of the cochineal revealed that it had contributed to a significant reduction in the number of cladodes, flowers and fruit of plants with cochineal. Fruits that were produced on plants with the cochineal were also smaller and had fewer seeds. Although still preliminary, an analysis of the costs of implementing this biocontrol programme indicates that it is the most cost-effective management intervention compared to physical and/or chemical control. Although the impact of the cochineal is still fairly localized we are confident that it will establish in much of the invaded range and reduce the impacts of the invasive cactus, consequently improving rangeland condition and livelihoods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-6141</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10526-020-10018-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Animal Biochemistry ; Animal Ecology ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biodiversity ; Biological control ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cactus ; Chemical control ; Cost benefit analysis ; Dactylopius opuntiae ; Entomology ; Fruits ; Invasive plants ; Life Sciences ; Livestock ; Opuntia stricta ; Plant Pathology ; Plants (botany) ; Rain ; Rangelands ; Seeds ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2020-08, Vol.65 (4), p.515-523</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-907bb539d5cf14631f4447bc5c677da9761f878040488a81fcde4a0ce21ab4943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-907bb539d5cf14631f4447bc5c677da9761f878040488a81fcde4a0ce21ab4943</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2257-4411</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10526-020-10018-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10526-020-10018-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Witt, Arne B. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunda, Winnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makale, Fernadis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><title>A preliminary analysis of the costs and benefits of the biological control agent Dactylopius opuntiae on Opuntia stricta in Laikipia County, Kenya</title><title>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands)</title><addtitle>BioControl</addtitle><description>Opuntia stricta
(Haw.) Haw (Cactaceae) is invasive in Laikipia County, Kenya, impacting negatively on biodiversity and livelihoods. To control this invasive plant the biocontrol agent
Dactylopius opuntiae
(Cockerell) (Hemiptera; Dactylopiidae) ‘stricta’ biotype was released in 2014. A preliminary once-off survey to determine the impact of the cochineal revealed that it had contributed to a significant reduction in the number of cladodes, flowers and fruit of plants with cochineal. Fruits that were produced on plants with the cochineal were also smaller and had fewer seeds. Although still preliminary, an analysis of the costs of implementing this biocontrol programme indicates that it is the most cost-effective management intervention compared to physical and/or chemical control. Although the impact of the cochineal is still fairly localized we are confident that it will establish in much of the invaded range and reduce the impacts of the invasive cactus, consequently improving rangeland condition and livelihoods.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animal Biochemistry</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cactus</subject><subject>Chemical control</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Dactylopius opuntiae</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Invasive plants</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Opuntia stricta</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rangelands</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>1386-6141</issn><issn>1573-8248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OxCAURonRxHH0BVyRuLUKLS10ORl_4ySz0TWhFEbGDlSgyfQ1fGLRGt254nLv-b7FAeAcoyuMEL0OGJV5laEcZemPWbY_ADNc0iJjOWGHaS5YlVWY4GNwEsIWpVBZshn4WMDeq87sjBV-hMKKbgwmQKdhfFVQuhBD2rawUVZpE38vjXGd2xgpugTZ6F0HxUbZCG-EjGPnejMkth9sNEJBZ-F6mmGI3sgooLFwJcyb6dNu6dJtvIRPyo7iFBxp0QV19vPOwcvd7fPyIVut7x-Xi1Umi6qIWY1o05RF3ZZSY1IVWBNCaCNLWVHaippWWDPKEEGEMcGwlq0iAkmVY9GQmhRzcDH19t69DypEvnWDTwICz2vMcppaUaLyiZLeheCV5r03u-SKY8S_3PPJPU_u-bd7vk-hYgqFBNuN8n_V_6Q-AUfFicM</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Witt, Arne B. R.</creator><creator>Nunda, Winnie</creator><creator>Makale, Fernadis</creator><creator>Reynolds, Kathryn</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2257-4411</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>A preliminary analysis of the costs and benefits of the biological control agent Dactylopius opuntiae on Opuntia stricta in Laikipia County, Kenya</title><author>Witt, Arne B. R. ; Nunda, Winnie ; Makale, Fernadis ; Reynolds, Kathryn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-907bb539d5cf14631f4447bc5c677da9761f878040488a81fcde4a0ce21ab4943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animal Biochemistry</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cactus</topic><topic>Chemical control</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Dactylopius opuntiae</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Invasive plants</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Opuntia stricta</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rangelands</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Witt, Arne B. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunda, Winnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makale, Fernadis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Witt, Arne B. R.</au><au>Nunda, Winnie</au><au>Makale, Fernadis</au><au>Reynolds, Kathryn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A preliminary analysis of the costs and benefits of the biological control agent Dactylopius opuntiae on Opuntia stricta in Laikipia County, Kenya</atitle><jtitle>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands)</jtitle><stitle>BioControl</stitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>515</spage><epage>523</epage><pages>515-523</pages><issn>1386-6141</issn><eissn>1573-8248</eissn><abstract>Opuntia stricta
(Haw.) Haw (Cactaceae) is invasive in Laikipia County, Kenya, impacting negatively on biodiversity and livelihoods. To control this invasive plant the biocontrol agent
Dactylopius opuntiae
(Cockerell) (Hemiptera; Dactylopiidae) ‘stricta’ biotype was released in 2014. A preliminary once-off survey to determine the impact of the cochineal revealed that it had contributed to a significant reduction in the number of cladodes, flowers and fruit of plants with cochineal. Fruits that were produced on plants with the cochineal were also smaller and had fewer seeds. Although still preliminary, an analysis of the costs of implementing this biocontrol programme indicates that it is the most cost-effective management intervention compared to physical and/or chemical control. Although the impact of the cochineal is still fairly localized we are confident that it will establish in much of the invaded range and reduce the impacts of the invasive cactus, consequently improving rangeland condition and livelihoods.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10526-020-10018-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2257-4411</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1386-6141 |
ispartof | BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2020-08, Vol.65 (4), p.515-523 |
issn | 1386-6141 1573-8248 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2918271460 |
source | SpringerNature Complete Journals |
subjects | Agriculture Animal Biochemistry Animal Ecology Behavioral Sciences Biodiversity Biological control Biomedical and Life Sciences Cactus Chemical control Cost benefit analysis Dactylopius opuntiae Entomology Fruits Invasive plants Life Sciences Livestock Opuntia stricta Plant Pathology Plants (botany) Rain Rangelands Seeds Vegetation |
title | A preliminary analysis of the costs and benefits of the biological control agent Dactylopius opuntiae on Opuntia stricta in Laikipia County, Kenya |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A26%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20preliminary%20analysis%20of%20the%20costs%20and%20benefits%20of%20the%20biological%20control%20agent%20Dactylopius%20opuntiae%20on%20Opuntia%20stricta%20in%20Laikipia%20County,%20Kenya&rft.jtitle=BioControl%20(Dordrecht,%20Netherlands)&rft.au=Witt,%20Arne%20B.%20R.&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=515&rft.epage=523&rft.pages=515-523&rft.issn=1386-6141&rft.eissn=1573-8248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10526-020-10018-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918271460%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918271460&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |