Comparative Analysis of the Stress–Strain State of a Lightweight 3D-Printed Shoulder Implant
The use of 3D printing in orthopedics has several advantages, one of which is a reduction of the implant weight due to the use of honeycomb structures. In this work, a technique for making a 3D-printed shoulder implant lighter without compromising its rigidity and strength is suggested. Comparative...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Biomedical engineering 2022-09, Vol.56 (3), p.194-197 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 197 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 194 |
| container_title | Biomedical engineering |
| container_volume | 56 |
| creator | Sinegub, A. V. Suvorov, V. A. Gavrilov, D. V. Bahrami, M. R. |
| description | The use of 3D printing in orthopedics has several advantages, one of which is a reduction of the implant weight due to the use of honeycomb structures. In this work, a technique for making a 3D-printed shoulder implant lighter without compromising its rigidity and strength is suggested. Comparative analysis of the stress–strain state of a shoulder implant has been carried out for two modifications of the implant: solid and honeycomb (lightweight). The first (solid single-piece) implant has been manufactured using conventional technologies; the second (lightweight honeycomb), by 3D printing. The honeycomb implant has been shown to exhibit the same strength as its solid counterpart, which makes it safe for orthopedic use. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10527-022-10196-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2918230701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A722452431</galeid><sourcerecordid>A722452431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f7b2001f27dd9e3088f3603505a9b93d10e0b7dc81e38dbc3afcc33d30faadae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kduKUzEUhoMoWEdfwKsNXnmxx5Ws2U32ZamnQkGxemtIk5U2wz7UJFXnznfwDX2SyZ4KQ0EkkKzD9wd-fsaec7jkAPJV4tAIWYMQNQfezmv-gM14I7FWopk_ZDMAmNeIrXrMnqR0XdpGKTFjX5djfzDR5PCdqsVgupsUUjX6Ku-p2uRIKf359bsUJgylN5mmpanWYbfPP2i6K3xdf4xhyOSqzX48do5iteoPnRnyU_bImy7Rs7_vBfvy9s3n5ft6_eHdarlY1xYlz7WXWwHAvZDOtYSglMc5YAONabctOg4EW-ms4oTKbS0aby2iQ_DGOEN4wV6c_j3E8duRUtbX4zEWO0mLliuBIIHfUzvTkQ6DH4sv24dk9UIKcdWIK5yoy39Q5Tjqgx0H8qHMzwQvzwSFyfQz78wxJb3afDpnxYm1cUwpkteHGHoTbzQHPUWpT1HqEqW-i1JPIjyJUoGHHcV7d_9R3QLyl5_4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918230701</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Analysis of the Stress–Strain State of a Lightweight 3D-Printed Shoulder Implant</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Sinegub, A. V. ; Suvorov, V. A. ; Gavrilov, D. V. ; Bahrami, M. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sinegub, A. V. ; Suvorov, V. A. ; Gavrilov, D. V. ; Bahrami, M. R.</creatorcontrib><description>The use of 3D printing in orthopedics has several advantages, one of which is a reduction of the implant weight due to the use of honeycomb structures. In this work, a technique for making a 3D-printed shoulder implant lighter without compromising its rigidity and strength is suggested. Comparative analysis of the stress–strain state of a shoulder implant has been carried out for two modifications of the implant: solid and honeycomb (lightweight). The first (solid single-piece) implant has been manufactured using conventional technologies; the second (lightweight honeycomb), by 3D printing. The honeycomb implant has been shown to exhibit the same strength as its solid counterpart, which makes it safe for orthopedic use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3398</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10527-022-10196-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>3-D printers ; 3D printing ; Analysis ; Biomaterials ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Comparative analysis ; Design ; Engineering ; Honeycomb structures ; Joint surgery ; Lightweight ; Mechanical properties ; Orthopedics ; Prostheses ; Shoulder ; Strain ; Three dimensional printing ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>Biomedical engineering, 2022-09, Vol.56 (3), p.194-197</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f7b2001f27dd9e3088f3603505a9b93d10e0b7dc81e38dbc3afcc33d30faadae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10527-022-10196-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10527-022-10196-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sinegub, A. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suvorov, V. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavrilov, D. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahrami, M. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Analysis of the Stress–Strain State of a Lightweight 3D-Printed Shoulder Implant</title><title>Biomedical engineering</title><addtitle>Biomed Eng</addtitle><description>The use of 3D printing in orthopedics has several advantages, one of which is a reduction of the implant weight due to the use of honeycomb structures. In this work, a technique for making a 3D-printed shoulder implant lighter without compromising its rigidity and strength is suggested. Comparative analysis of the stress–strain state of a shoulder implant has been carried out for two modifications of the implant: solid and honeycomb (lightweight). The first (solid single-piece) implant has been manufactured using conventional technologies; the second (lightweight honeycomb), by 3D printing. The honeycomb implant has been shown to exhibit the same strength as its solid counterpart, which makes it safe for orthopedic use.</description><subject>3-D printers</subject><subject>3D printing</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biomaterials</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Honeycomb structures</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Lightweight</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Strain</subject><subject>Three dimensional printing</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>0006-3398</issn><issn>1573-8256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kduKUzEUhoMoWEdfwKsNXnmxx5Ws2U32ZamnQkGxemtIk5U2wz7UJFXnznfwDX2SyZ4KQ0EkkKzD9wd-fsaec7jkAPJV4tAIWYMQNQfezmv-gM14I7FWopk_ZDMAmNeIrXrMnqR0XdpGKTFjX5djfzDR5PCdqsVgupsUUjX6Ku-p2uRIKf359bsUJgylN5mmpanWYbfPP2i6K3xdf4xhyOSqzX48do5iteoPnRnyU_bImy7Rs7_vBfvy9s3n5ft6_eHdarlY1xYlz7WXWwHAvZDOtYSglMc5YAONabctOg4EW-ms4oTKbS0aby2iQ_DGOEN4wV6c_j3E8duRUtbX4zEWO0mLliuBIIHfUzvTkQ6DH4sv24dk9UIKcdWIK5yoy39Q5Tjqgx0H8qHMzwQvzwSFyfQz78wxJb3afDpnxYm1cUwpkteHGHoTbzQHPUWpT1HqEqW-i1JPIjyJUoGHHcV7d_9R3QLyl5_4</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Sinegub, A. V.</creator><creator>Suvorov, V. A.</creator><creator>Gavrilov, D. V.</creator><creator>Bahrami, M. R.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Comparative Analysis of the Stress–Strain State of a Lightweight 3D-Printed Shoulder Implant</title><author>Sinegub, A. V. ; Suvorov, V. A. ; Gavrilov, D. V. ; Bahrami, M. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f7b2001f27dd9e3088f3603505a9b93d10e0b7dc81e38dbc3afcc33d30faadae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>3-D printers</topic><topic>3D printing</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biomaterials</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Honeycomb structures</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Lightweight</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Strain</topic><topic>Three dimensional printing</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sinegub, A. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suvorov, V. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavrilov, D. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahrami, M. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Biomedical engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sinegub, A. V.</au><au>Suvorov, V. A.</au><au>Gavrilov, D. V.</au><au>Bahrami, M. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Analysis of the Stress–Strain State of a Lightweight 3D-Printed Shoulder Implant</atitle><jtitle>Biomedical engineering</jtitle><stitle>Biomed Eng</stitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>194</spage><epage>197</epage><pages>194-197</pages><issn>0006-3398</issn><eissn>1573-8256</eissn><abstract>The use of 3D printing in orthopedics has several advantages, one of which is a reduction of the implant weight due to the use of honeycomb structures. In this work, a technique for making a 3D-printed shoulder implant lighter without compromising its rigidity and strength is suggested. Comparative analysis of the stress–strain state of a shoulder implant has been carried out for two modifications of the implant: solid and honeycomb (lightweight). The first (solid single-piece) implant has been manufactured using conventional technologies; the second (lightweight honeycomb), by 3D printing. The honeycomb implant has been shown to exhibit the same strength as its solid counterpart, which makes it safe for orthopedic use.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10527-022-10196-1</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0006-3398 |
| ispartof | Biomedical engineering, 2022-09, Vol.56 (3), p.194-197 |
| issn | 0006-3398 1573-8256 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2918230701 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | 3-D printers 3D printing Analysis Biomaterials Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Comparative analysis Design Engineering Honeycomb structures Joint surgery Lightweight Mechanical properties Orthopedics Prostheses Shoulder Strain Three dimensional printing Transplants & implants |
| title | Comparative Analysis of the Stress–Strain State of a Lightweight 3D-Printed Shoulder Implant |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T02%3A15%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Stress%E2%80%93Strain%20State%20of%20a%20Lightweight%203D-Printed%20Shoulder%20Implant&rft.jtitle=Biomedical%20engineering&rft.au=Sinegub,%20A.%20V.&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=194&rft.epage=197&rft.pages=194-197&rft.issn=0006-3398&rft.eissn=1573-8256&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10527-022-10196-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA722452431%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918230701&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A722452431&rfr_iscdi=true |