Bacterial communities in predatory mites are associated with species and diet types
The symbiotic bacterial communities of phytophagous arthropods are affected by host species and feeding habits, but such effects have been poorly studied in natural enemies. Here, we investigated the entire bacterial microbiome of two species of predatory mites, Neoseiulus californicus and Neoseiulu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2021-12, Vol.66 (6), p.803-811 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 811 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 803 |
| container_title | BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands) |
| container_volume | 66 |
| creator | Yan, Jingyi Zhang, Bo Li, Guiting Xu, Xuenong |
| description | The symbiotic bacterial communities of phytophagous arthropods are affected by host species and feeding habits, but such effects have been poorly studied in natural enemies. Here, we investigated the entire bacterial microbiome of two species of predatory mites,
Neoseiulus californicus
and
Neoseiulus barkeri
, feeding on three types of diets (artificial diet, pollen and their natural prey, the spider mite
Tetranychus urticae
) by high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. We found that the bacterial diversity of predatory mites feeding on artificial diet was significantly different from pollen and spider mite feeding groups in both
N. californicus
and
N. barkeri
, while bacterial diversity also differed strikingly between the two species even when feeding on the same artificial diet. This finding suggests that the bacterial community of predatory mites is determined by both species and diet
.
Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria were the two dominant bacterial classes in both predatory mite species, except for
N. californicus
feeding on artificial diet. The bacterium
Bosea sp.
was detected in all samples as the core microbial species in predatory mites. Additionally, we discuss whether Bradyrhizobiaceae and Rhodobacteraceae bacteria could be used as probiotics in the artificial diet of
N. californicus
for better mass rearing. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10526-021-10112-8 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2918230290</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2918230290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c4abe2147a26defb2d9cad47c5bbd008a882d67877a4f47a131bd21b378bf05d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKBDEQRYMoOD5-wFXAdTSVdHfSSx18wYALdR3yas0w_TDJIPP3ZmzBnasqinNvwUHoAugVUCquE9CaNYQyIEABGJEHaAG14ESySh6WncuGNFDBMTpJaU1LqK7lAr3capt9DHqD7dj32yHk4BMOA56idzqPcYf7kMtJR491SqMNOnuHv0L-wGnydo_rwWEXfMZ5N_l0ho46vUn-_Heeorf7u9flI1k9Pzwtb1bEcmgzsZU2nkElNGuc7wxzrdWuErY2xlEqtZTMNUIKoauuUMDBOAaGC2k6Wjt-ii7n3imOn1ufslqP2ziUl4q1IBmnrKWFYjNl45hS9J2aYuh13Cmgai9PzfJUkad-5ClZQnwOpQIP7z7-Vf-T-gaWNXLv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918230290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bacterial communities in predatory mites are associated with species and diet types</title><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Yan, Jingyi ; Zhang, Bo ; Li, Guiting ; Xu, Xuenong</creator><creatorcontrib>Yan, Jingyi ; Zhang, Bo ; Li, Guiting ; Xu, Xuenong</creatorcontrib><description>The symbiotic bacterial communities of phytophagous arthropods are affected by host species and feeding habits, but such effects have been poorly studied in natural enemies. Here, we investigated the entire bacterial microbiome of two species of predatory mites,
Neoseiulus californicus
and
Neoseiulus barkeri
, feeding on three types of diets (artificial diet, pollen and their natural prey, the spider mite
Tetranychus urticae
) by high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. We found that the bacterial diversity of predatory mites feeding on artificial diet was significantly different from pollen and spider mite feeding groups in both
N. californicus
and
N. barkeri
, while bacterial diversity also differed strikingly between the two species even when feeding on the same artificial diet. This finding suggests that the bacterial community of predatory mites is determined by both species and diet
.
Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria were the two dominant bacterial classes in both predatory mite species, except for
N. californicus
feeding on artificial diet. The bacterium
Bosea sp.
was detected in all samples as the core microbial species in predatory mites. Additionally, we discuss whether Bradyrhizobiaceae and Rhodobacteraceae bacteria could be used as probiotics in the artificial diet of
N. californicus
for better mass rearing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-6141</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10526-021-10112-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Animal Biochemistry ; Animal Ecology ; Arthropods ; Artificial diets ; Bacteria ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Diet ; DNA polymerase ; Entomology ; Feeding ; Flowers & plants ; Life Sciences ; Mass rearing ; Microbiomes ; Microbiota ; Microorganisms ; Mites ; Natural enemies ; Next-generation sequencing ; Plant Pathology ; Pollen ; Prey ; Probiotics ; rRNA 16S ; Species ; Taxonomy ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2021-12, Vol.66 (6), p.803-811</ispartof><rights>International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2021</rights><rights>International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c4abe2147a26defb2d9cad47c5bbd008a882d67877a4f47a131bd21b378bf05d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c4abe2147a26defb2d9cad47c5bbd008a882d67877a4f47a131bd21b378bf05d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10526-021-10112-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10526-021-10112-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yan, Jingyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Guiting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xuenong</creatorcontrib><title>Bacterial communities in predatory mites are associated with species and diet types</title><title>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands)</title><addtitle>BioControl</addtitle><description>The symbiotic bacterial communities of phytophagous arthropods are affected by host species and feeding habits, but such effects have been poorly studied in natural enemies. Here, we investigated the entire bacterial microbiome of two species of predatory mites,
Neoseiulus californicus
and
Neoseiulus barkeri
, feeding on three types of diets (artificial diet, pollen and their natural prey, the spider mite
Tetranychus urticae
) by high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. We found that the bacterial diversity of predatory mites feeding on artificial diet was significantly different from pollen and spider mite feeding groups in both
N. californicus
and
N. barkeri
, while bacterial diversity also differed strikingly between the two species even when feeding on the same artificial diet. This finding suggests that the bacterial community of predatory mites is determined by both species and diet
.
Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria were the two dominant bacterial classes in both predatory mite species, except for
N. californicus
feeding on artificial diet. The bacterium
Bosea sp.
was detected in all samples as the core microbial species in predatory mites. Additionally, we discuss whether Bradyrhizobiaceae and Rhodobacteraceae bacteria could be used as probiotics in the artificial diet of
N. californicus
for better mass rearing.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animal Biochemistry</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Artificial diets</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>DNA polymerase</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mass rearing</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Mites</subject><subject>Natural enemies</subject><subject>Next-generation sequencing</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1386-6141</issn><issn>1573-8248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKBDEQRYMoOD5-wFXAdTSVdHfSSx18wYALdR3yas0w_TDJIPP3ZmzBnasqinNvwUHoAugVUCquE9CaNYQyIEABGJEHaAG14ESySh6WncuGNFDBMTpJaU1LqK7lAr3capt9DHqD7dj32yHk4BMOA56idzqPcYf7kMtJR491SqMNOnuHv0L-wGnydo_rwWEXfMZ5N_l0ho46vUn-_Heeorf7u9flI1k9Pzwtb1bEcmgzsZU2nkElNGuc7wxzrdWuErY2xlEqtZTMNUIKoauuUMDBOAaGC2k6Wjt-ii7n3imOn1ufslqP2ziUl4q1IBmnrKWFYjNl45hS9J2aYuh13Cmgai9PzfJUkad-5ClZQnwOpQIP7z7-Vf-T-gaWNXLv</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Yan, Jingyi</creator><creator>Zhang, Bo</creator><creator>Li, Guiting</creator><creator>Xu, Xuenong</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Bacterial communities in predatory mites are associated with species and diet types</title><author>Yan, Jingyi ; Zhang, Bo ; Li, Guiting ; Xu, Xuenong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c4abe2147a26defb2d9cad47c5bbd008a882d67877a4f47a131bd21b378bf05d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animal Biochemistry</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Artificial diets</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>DNA polymerase</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mass rearing</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Mites</topic><topic>Natural enemies</topic><topic>Next-generation sequencing</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yan, Jingyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Guiting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xuenong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yan, Jingyi</au><au>Zhang, Bo</au><au>Li, Guiting</au><au>Xu, Xuenong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bacterial communities in predatory mites are associated with species and diet types</atitle><jtitle>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands)</jtitle><stitle>BioControl</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>803</spage><epage>811</epage><pages>803-811</pages><issn>1386-6141</issn><eissn>1573-8248</eissn><abstract>The symbiotic bacterial communities of phytophagous arthropods are affected by host species and feeding habits, but such effects have been poorly studied in natural enemies. Here, we investigated the entire bacterial microbiome of two species of predatory mites,
Neoseiulus californicus
and
Neoseiulus barkeri
, feeding on three types of diets (artificial diet, pollen and their natural prey, the spider mite
Tetranychus urticae
) by high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. We found that the bacterial diversity of predatory mites feeding on artificial diet was significantly different from pollen and spider mite feeding groups in both
N. californicus
and
N. barkeri
, while bacterial diversity also differed strikingly between the two species even when feeding on the same artificial diet. This finding suggests that the bacterial community of predatory mites is determined by both species and diet
.
Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria were the two dominant bacterial classes in both predatory mite species, except for
N. californicus
feeding on artificial diet. The bacterium
Bosea sp.
was detected in all samples as the core microbial species in predatory mites. Additionally, we discuss whether Bradyrhizobiaceae and Rhodobacteraceae bacteria could be used as probiotics in the artificial diet of
N. californicus
for better mass rearing.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10526-021-10112-8</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1386-6141 |
| ispartof | BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2021-12, Vol.66 (6), p.803-811 |
| issn | 1386-6141 1573-8248 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2918230290 |
| source | SpringerLink (Online service) |
| subjects | Agriculture Animal Biochemistry Animal Ecology Arthropods Artificial diets Bacteria Behavioral Sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Diet DNA polymerase Entomology Feeding Flowers & plants Life Sciences Mass rearing Microbiomes Microbiota Microorganisms Mites Natural enemies Next-generation sequencing Plant Pathology Pollen Prey Probiotics rRNA 16S Species Taxonomy Variance analysis |
| title | Bacterial communities in predatory mites are associated with species and diet types |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A56%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bacterial%20communities%20in%20predatory%20mites%20are%20associated%20with%20species%20and%20diet%20types&rft.jtitle=BioControl%20(Dordrecht,%20Netherlands)&rft.au=Yan,%20Jingyi&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=803&rft.epage=811&rft.pages=803-811&rft.issn=1386-6141&rft.eissn=1573-8248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10526-021-10112-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918230290%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918230290&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |