Evaluation of acid matrix effects in the determination of major elements in biomass by atomic absorption spectrometry from an environmentally friendly point of view

The estimation of major element content in solid biofuels is required for prediction and prevention of eventual ash-related problems during combustion. These analyses have to be achieved with minimum impact on the environment. The quantitation of Al, Ca, Mg, Na, K, Fe, Si and Mn in biofuels was carr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Accreditation and quality assurance 2015-02, Vol.20 (1), p.67-74
Hauptverfasser: Teixeira, Paula, Calisto, Sandra, Lopes, Helena, Trancoso, Maria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 74
container_issue 1
container_start_page 67
container_title Accreditation and quality assurance
container_volume 20
creator Teixeira, Paula
Calisto, Sandra
Lopes, Helena
Trancoso, Maria
description The estimation of major element content in solid biofuels is required for prediction and prevention of eventual ash-related problems during combustion. These analyses have to be achieved with minimum impact on the environment. The quantitation of Al, Ca, Mg, Na, K, Fe, Si and Mn in biofuels was carried out according to EN 15290 using acid decomposition of solid samples followed by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS). A microwave-assisted acid digestion with a HNO 3 /H 2 O 2 /HF mixture was used, followed by HF complexation using H 3 BO 3 . Due to the presence of tetrafluoroboric acid complex in the digestion solution, matrix effects were noticed during elemental quantification by AAS. Standard addition calibration methods did not compensate for this matrix effect. Matrix effects that constrain an analytical response may be overcome by applying the procedure used for samples to the calibration standards using the same reagents. However, this entails using large amounts of toxic reagents. In this work, the fluoric–boric acid matrix matching was assessed statistically using one-way ANOVA tests. For the seven groups of nitric acid and reagent blank (HNO 3 /H 2 O 2 /HF/H 3 BO 3 ) mixtures used, ranging from 0 to 1 volume ratios, no significant differences were observed for Si, Al, Fe and Mn. The calculated F values were lower than the critical value, F 6,14  = 2.85 ( p  = 0.05). However, for Ca, Mg, Na and K, significant differences were observed. Tenfold dilution was used for samples where the mass fraction exceeded the analytical dynamic range of the AAS instrument. The calibration solutions were prepared using the reagent blanks in the same proportion thus decreasing the amount of acids used. The procedure was validated using SRM 1573a—tomato leaves—purchased from the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Target recoveries of (1 ± 0.1) were achieved.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00769-014-1098-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2918080508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2918080508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4a3d03e602b0d5491a1f2ec6453a286ee5917e57bd262bc1ff3a13fe68065c543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kb1u3DAQhInAAXK--AHSEUgtZ1cU9VMah4sdwICbpCYoaenwIJEKybvk3scPGsky7MrN7mLxzUwxjH1BuEaA6lucR9lkgEWG0NRZ_YFtsBB5BhKrC7aBpmgyrCr5iV3GeABAWaPYsKf9SQ9Hnax33BuuO9vzUadg_3EyhroUuXU8_SbeU6IwWvfKjvrgA6eBRnIr1lo_6hh5e-Y6-dF2XLfRh-lZEafZLfiRUjhzMx9cO07uZIN3i4MehuVvyfXzMXnr0pJysvT3M_to9BDp6mVv2a_v-5-7u-z-4fbH7uY-6wSWKSu06EFQCXkLvSwa1Ghy6spCCp3XJZFssCJZtX1e5m2HxgiNwlBZQyk7WYgt-7r6TsH_OVJM6uCPwc2RKm-whhok1DOFK9UFH2Mgo6ZgRx3OCkEtZai1DDWXoZYy1KLJV02cWfdI4c35fdF_fIGQvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918080508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of acid matrix effects in the determination of major elements in biomass by atomic absorption spectrometry from an environmentally friendly point of view</title><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Teixeira, Paula ; Calisto, Sandra ; Lopes, Helena ; Trancoso, Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Paula ; Calisto, Sandra ; Lopes, Helena ; Trancoso, Maria</creatorcontrib><description>The estimation of major element content in solid biofuels is required for prediction and prevention of eventual ash-related problems during combustion. These analyses have to be achieved with minimum impact on the environment. The quantitation of Al, Ca, Mg, Na, K, Fe, Si and Mn in biofuels was carried out according to EN 15290 using acid decomposition of solid samples followed by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS). A microwave-assisted acid digestion with a HNO 3 /H 2 O 2 /HF mixture was used, followed by HF complexation using H 3 BO 3 . Due to the presence of tetrafluoroboric acid complex in the digestion solution, matrix effects were noticed during elemental quantification by AAS. Standard addition calibration methods did not compensate for this matrix effect. Matrix effects that constrain an analytical response may be overcome by applying the procedure used for samples to the calibration standards using the same reagents. However, this entails using large amounts of toxic reagents. In this work, the fluoric–boric acid matrix matching was assessed statistically using one-way ANOVA tests. For the seven groups of nitric acid and reagent blank (HNO 3 /H 2 O 2 /HF/H 3 BO 3 ) mixtures used, ranging from 0 to 1 volume ratios, no significant differences were observed for Si, Al, Fe and Mn. The calculated F values were lower than the critical value, F 6,14  = 2.85 ( p  = 0.05). However, for Ca, Mg, Na and K, significant differences were observed. Tenfold dilution was used for samples where the mass fraction exceeded the analytical dynamic range of the AAS instrument. The calibration solutions were prepared using the reagent blanks in the same proportion thus decreasing the amount of acids used. The procedure was validated using SRM 1573a—tomato leaves—purchased from the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Target recoveries of (1 ± 0.1) were achieved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0949-1775</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00769-014-1098-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Absorption spectroscopy ; Acid digestion ; Acids ; Aluminum ; Analytical Chemistry ; Atomic absorption analysis ; Biochemistry ; Biodiesel fuels ; Biofuels ; Biomass ; Calcium ; Calibration ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Commercial Law ; Decomposition ; Dilution ; Ecotoxicology ; Fluorides ; Fluoroboric acid ; Food Science ; Hydrogen peroxide ; Iron ; Magnesium ; Manganese ; Marketing ; Mixtures ; Nitric acid ; Practitioner's Report ; Quality control ; Quality standards ; Reagents ; Reference materials ; Silicon ; Spectrometry ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Accreditation and quality assurance, 2015-02, Vol.20 (1), p.67-74</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4a3d03e602b0d5491a1f2ec6453a286ee5917e57bd262bc1ff3a13fe68065c543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4a3d03e602b0d5491a1f2ec6453a286ee5917e57bd262bc1ff3a13fe68065c543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00769-014-1098-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2918080508?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21368,21369,27903,27904,33509,33723,41467,42536,43638,43784,51298,64362,64366,72216</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calisto, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trancoso, Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of acid matrix effects in the determination of major elements in biomass by atomic absorption spectrometry from an environmentally friendly point of view</title><title>Accreditation and quality assurance</title><addtitle>Accred Qual Assur</addtitle><description>The estimation of major element content in solid biofuels is required for prediction and prevention of eventual ash-related problems during combustion. These analyses have to be achieved with minimum impact on the environment. The quantitation of Al, Ca, Mg, Na, K, Fe, Si and Mn in biofuels was carried out according to EN 15290 using acid decomposition of solid samples followed by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS). A microwave-assisted acid digestion with a HNO 3 /H 2 O 2 /HF mixture was used, followed by HF complexation using H 3 BO 3 . Due to the presence of tetrafluoroboric acid complex in the digestion solution, matrix effects were noticed during elemental quantification by AAS. Standard addition calibration methods did not compensate for this matrix effect. Matrix effects that constrain an analytical response may be overcome by applying the procedure used for samples to the calibration standards using the same reagents. However, this entails using large amounts of toxic reagents. In this work, the fluoric–boric acid matrix matching was assessed statistically using one-way ANOVA tests. For the seven groups of nitric acid and reagent blank (HNO 3 /H 2 O 2 /HF/H 3 BO 3 ) mixtures used, ranging from 0 to 1 volume ratios, no significant differences were observed for Si, Al, Fe and Mn. The calculated F values were lower than the critical value, F 6,14  = 2.85 ( p  = 0.05). However, for Ca, Mg, Na and K, significant differences were observed. Tenfold dilution was used for samples where the mass fraction exceeded the analytical dynamic range of the AAS instrument. The calibration solutions were prepared using the reagent blanks in the same proportion thus decreasing the amount of acids used. The procedure was validated using SRM 1573a—tomato leaves—purchased from the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Target recoveries of (1 ± 0.1) were achieved.</description><subject>Absorption spectroscopy</subject><subject>Acid digestion</subject><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Atomic absorption analysis</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biodiesel fuels</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Commercial Law</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Dilution</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Fluorides</subject><subject>Fluoroboric acid</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Hydrogen peroxide</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Magnesium</subject><subject>Manganese</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Mixtures</subject><subject>Nitric acid</subject><subject>Practitioner's Report</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Quality standards</subject><subject>Reagents</subject><subject>Reference materials</subject><subject>Silicon</subject><subject>Spectrometry</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0949-1775</issn><issn>1432-0517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kb1u3DAQhInAAXK--AHSEUgtZ1cU9VMah4sdwICbpCYoaenwIJEKybvk3scPGsky7MrN7mLxzUwxjH1BuEaA6lucR9lkgEWG0NRZ_YFtsBB5BhKrC7aBpmgyrCr5iV3GeABAWaPYsKf9SQ9Hnax33BuuO9vzUadg_3EyhroUuXU8_SbeU6IwWvfKjvrgA6eBRnIr1lo_6hh5e-Y6-dF2XLfRh-lZEafZLfiRUjhzMx9cO07uZIN3i4MehuVvyfXzMXnr0pJysvT3M_to9BDp6mVv2a_v-5-7u-z-4fbH7uY-6wSWKSu06EFQCXkLvSwa1Ghy6spCCp3XJZFssCJZtX1e5m2HxgiNwlBZQyk7WYgt-7r6TsH_OVJM6uCPwc2RKm-whhok1DOFK9UFH2Mgo6ZgRx3OCkEtZai1DDWXoZYy1KLJV02cWfdI4c35fdF_fIGQvg</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Teixeira, Paula</creator><creator>Calisto, Sandra</creator><creator>Lopes, Helena</creator><creator>Trancoso, Maria</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Evaluation of acid matrix effects in the determination of major elements in biomass by atomic absorption spectrometry from an environmentally friendly point of view</title><author>Teixeira, Paula ; Calisto, Sandra ; Lopes, Helena ; Trancoso, Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4a3d03e602b0d5491a1f2ec6453a286ee5917e57bd262bc1ff3a13fe68065c543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Absorption spectroscopy</topic><topic>Acid digestion</topic><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Atomic absorption analysis</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biodiesel fuels</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Commercial Law</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Dilution</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Fluorides</topic><topic>Fluoroboric acid</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Hydrogen peroxide</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Magnesium</topic><topic>Manganese</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Mixtures</topic><topic>Nitric acid</topic><topic>Practitioner's Report</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Quality standards</topic><topic>Reagents</topic><topic>Reference materials</topic><topic>Silicon</topic><topic>Spectrometry</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calisto, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trancoso, Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Accreditation and quality assurance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teixeira, Paula</au><au>Calisto, Sandra</au><au>Lopes, Helena</au><au>Trancoso, Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of acid matrix effects in the determination of major elements in biomass by atomic absorption spectrometry from an environmentally friendly point of view</atitle><jtitle>Accreditation and quality assurance</jtitle><stitle>Accred Qual Assur</stitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>67-74</pages><issn>0949-1775</issn><eissn>1432-0517</eissn><abstract>The estimation of major element content in solid biofuels is required for prediction and prevention of eventual ash-related problems during combustion. These analyses have to be achieved with minimum impact on the environment. The quantitation of Al, Ca, Mg, Na, K, Fe, Si and Mn in biofuels was carried out according to EN 15290 using acid decomposition of solid samples followed by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS). A microwave-assisted acid digestion with a HNO 3 /H 2 O 2 /HF mixture was used, followed by HF complexation using H 3 BO 3 . Due to the presence of tetrafluoroboric acid complex in the digestion solution, matrix effects were noticed during elemental quantification by AAS. Standard addition calibration methods did not compensate for this matrix effect. Matrix effects that constrain an analytical response may be overcome by applying the procedure used for samples to the calibration standards using the same reagents. However, this entails using large amounts of toxic reagents. In this work, the fluoric–boric acid matrix matching was assessed statistically using one-way ANOVA tests. For the seven groups of nitric acid and reagent blank (HNO 3 /H 2 O 2 /HF/H 3 BO 3 ) mixtures used, ranging from 0 to 1 volume ratios, no significant differences were observed for Si, Al, Fe and Mn. The calculated F values were lower than the critical value, F 6,14  = 2.85 ( p  = 0.05). However, for Ca, Mg, Na and K, significant differences were observed. Tenfold dilution was used for samples where the mass fraction exceeded the analytical dynamic range of the AAS instrument. The calibration solutions were prepared using the reagent blanks in the same proportion thus decreasing the amount of acids used. The procedure was validated using SRM 1573a—tomato leaves—purchased from the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Target recoveries of (1 ± 0.1) were achieved.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00769-014-1098-8</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0949-1775
ispartof Accreditation and quality assurance, 2015-02, Vol.20 (1), p.67-74
issn 0949-1775
1432-0517
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2918080508
source ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); SpringerLink Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central
subjects Absorption spectroscopy
Acid digestion
Acids
Aluminum
Analytical Chemistry
Atomic absorption analysis
Biochemistry
Biodiesel fuels
Biofuels
Biomass
Calcium
Calibration
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Commercial Law
Decomposition
Dilution
Ecotoxicology
Fluorides
Fluoroboric acid
Food Science
Hydrogen peroxide
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Marketing
Mixtures
Nitric acid
Practitioner's Report
Quality control
Quality standards
Reagents
Reference materials
Silicon
Spectrometry
Variance analysis
title Evaluation of acid matrix effects in the determination of major elements in biomass by atomic absorption spectrometry from an environmentally friendly point of view
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T08%3A25%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20acid%20matrix%20effects%20in%20the%20determination%20of%20major%20elements%20in%20biomass%20by%20atomic%20absorption%20spectrometry%20from%20an%20environmentally%20friendly%20point%20of%20view&rft.jtitle=Accreditation%20and%20quality%20assurance&rft.au=Teixeira,%20Paula&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=67-74&rft.issn=0949-1775&rft.eissn=1432-0517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00769-014-1098-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918080508%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918080508&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true