A novel nested design approach for estimation of uncertainty arising from sampling in feed

Uncertainty arising from sampling is nowadays a controversial issue, if it is necessary to be taken into account in total uncertainty. As in the quantification of analysis uncertainty, there are two principal approaches in order to estimate uncertainty of sampling: the bottom-up and the top-down app...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Accreditation and quality assurance 2020-12, Vol.25 (5-6), p.329-333
Hauptverfasser: Kostakis, Marios, Kritikou, Evangelia, Koupa, Anastasia, Thomaidis, Nikolaos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 333
container_issue 5-6
container_start_page 329
container_title Accreditation and quality assurance
container_volume 25
creator Kostakis, Marios
Kritikou, Evangelia
Koupa, Anastasia
Thomaidis, Nikolaos
description Uncertainty arising from sampling is nowadays a controversial issue, if it is necessary to be taken into account in total uncertainty. As in the quantification of analysis uncertainty, there are two principal approaches in order to estimate uncertainty of sampling: the bottom-up and the top-down approach. A novel top-down approach for sampling uncertainty is proposed in this study using nested analysis of variance (ANOVA). Determination of the oxytetracycline (OTC) content in feed was utilized for estimating uncertainty arising from sampling using the new approach. The advantage of nested ANOVA is that the effect of every factor on the total uncertainty can be calculated. In the present study, factors such as physical preparation of sample, lots of production and particle diameter were examined in the experimental design. It was found that the effect of different lots had the highest uncertainty among the factors. Finally, the results of nested ANOVA were compared with the uncertainty calculated using other top-down approaches. Classical ANOVA and robust ANOVA (RANOVA) did not show significant differences in their results. On the other hand, nested ANOVA estimated higher uncertainty of sampling in comparison with the other approaches.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00769-020-01443-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2917939006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2917939006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-fa3c2a436e09c1df040a73d60445c54b98574e01c7142ddc9584349057c1e3a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4BTwHP0cnXpjmWolYoeNGLlxCzSd3SJmuyFfrvTV3Bm5cZhnnvzZuH0DWFWwqg7kotjSbAgAAVghN1giZUcEZAUnWKJqCFJlQpeY4uStkAUDmjfILe5jimL7_F0ZfBt7j1pVtHbPs-J-s-cEgZ1023s0OXIk4B76PzebBdHA7Y5q50cY1DTjtc7K7fHqcu4uB9e4nOgt0Wf_Xbp-j14f5lsSSr58enxXxFHJfNQILljlnBGw_a0TaAAKt424AQ0knxrmdSCQ_UKSpY2zotZ4ILDVI56rllfIpuRt1q-XNfzZpN2udYTxqmqdJcAzQVxUaUy6mU7IPpc_0qHwwFc8zQjBmamqH5ydCoSuIjqVRwXPv8J_0P6xv_DXPv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2917939006</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A novel nested design approach for estimation of uncertainty arising from sampling in feed</title><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Kostakis, Marios ; Kritikou, Evangelia ; Koupa, Anastasia ; Thomaidis, Nikolaos</creator><creatorcontrib>Kostakis, Marios ; Kritikou, Evangelia ; Koupa, Anastasia ; Thomaidis, Nikolaos</creatorcontrib><description>Uncertainty arising from sampling is nowadays a controversial issue, if it is necessary to be taken into account in total uncertainty. As in the quantification of analysis uncertainty, there are two principal approaches in order to estimate uncertainty of sampling: the bottom-up and the top-down approach. A novel top-down approach for sampling uncertainty is proposed in this study using nested analysis of variance (ANOVA). Determination of the oxytetracycline (OTC) content in feed was utilized for estimating uncertainty arising from sampling using the new approach. The advantage of nested ANOVA is that the effect of every factor on the total uncertainty can be calculated. In the present study, factors such as physical preparation of sample, lots of production and particle diameter were examined in the experimental design. It was found that the effect of different lots had the highest uncertainty among the factors. Finally, the results of nested ANOVA were compared with the uncertainty calculated using other top-down approaches. Classical ANOVA and robust ANOVA (RANOVA) did not show significant differences in their results. On the other hand, nested ANOVA estimated higher uncertainty of sampling in comparison with the other approaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0949-1775</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00769-020-01443-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Analytical Chemistry ; Biochemistry ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Chromatography ; Commercial Law ; Design of experiments ; Ecotoxicology ; Estimation ; Food Science ; General Paper ; Marketing ; Mathematical analysis ; Oxytetracycline ; Particle size ; Sampling ; Uncertainty analysis ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Accreditation and quality assurance, 2020-12, Vol.25 (5-6), p.329-333</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-fa3c2a436e09c1df040a73d60445c54b98574e01c7142ddc9584349057c1e3a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-fa3c2a436e09c1df040a73d60445c54b98574e01c7142ddc9584349057c1e3a23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7775-4634</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00769-020-01443-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2917939006?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21387,21388,27923,27924,33529,33743,41487,42556,43658,43804,51318,64384,64388,72240</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kostakis, Marios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kritikou, Evangelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koupa, Anastasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomaidis, Nikolaos</creatorcontrib><title>A novel nested design approach for estimation of uncertainty arising from sampling in feed</title><title>Accreditation and quality assurance</title><addtitle>Accred Qual Assur</addtitle><description>Uncertainty arising from sampling is nowadays a controversial issue, if it is necessary to be taken into account in total uncertainty. As in the quantification of analysis uncertainty, there are two principal approaches in order to estimate uncertainty of sampling: the bottom-up and the top-down approach. A novel top-down approach for sampling uncertainty is proposed in this study using nested analysis of variance (ANOVA). Determination of the oxytetracycline (OTC) content in feed was utilized for estimating uncertainty arising from sampling using the new approach. The advantage of nested ANOVA is that the effect of every factor on the total uncertainty can be calculated. In the present study, factors such as physical preparation of sample, lots of production and particle diameter were examined in the experimental design. It was found that the effect of different lots had the highest uncertainty among the factors. Finally, the results of nested ANOVA were compared with the uncertainty calculated using other top-down approaches. Classical ANOVA and robust ANOVA (RANOVA) did not show significant differences in their results. On the other hand, nested ANOVA estimated higher uncertainty of sampling in comparison with the other approaches.</description><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Commercial Law</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>General Paper</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Oxytetracycline</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Uncertainty analysis</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0949-1775</issn><issn>1432-0517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4BTwHP0cnXpjmWolYoeNGLlxCzSd3SJmuyFfrvTV3Bm5cZhnnvzZuH0DWFWwqg7kotjSbAgAAVghN1giZUcEZAUnWKJqCFJlQpeY4uStkAUDmjfILe5jimL7_F0ZfBt7j1pVtHbPs-J-s-cEgZ1023s0OXIk4B76PzebBdHA7Y5q50cY1DTjtc7K7fHqcu4uB9e4nOgt0Wf_Xbp-j14f5lsSSr58enxXxFHJfNQILljlnBGw_a0TaAAKt424AQ0knxrmdSCQ_UKSpY2zotZ4ILDVI56rllfIpuRt1q-XNfzZpN2udYTxqmqdJcAzQVxUaUy6mU7IPpc_0qHwwFc8zQjBmamqH5ydCoSuIjqVRwXPv8J_0P6xv_DXPv</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Kostakis, Marios</creator><creator>Kritikou, Evangelia</creator><creator>Koupa, Anastasia</creator><creator>Thomaidis, Nikolaos</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7775-4634</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>A novel nested design approach for estimation of uncertainty arising from sampling in feed</title><author>Kostakis, Marios ; Kritikou, Evangelia ; Koupa, Anastasia ; Thomaidis, Nikolaos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-fa3c2a436e09c1df040a73d60445c54b98574e01c7142ddc9584349057c1e3a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Commercial Law</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>General Paper</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Oxytetracycline</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Uncertainty analysis</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kostakis, Marios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kritikou, Evangelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koupa, Anastasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomaidis, Nikolaos</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Accreditation and quality assurance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kostakis, Marios</au><au>Kritikou, Evangelia</au><au>Koupa, Anastasia</au><au>Thomaidis, Nikolaos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A novel nested design approach for estimation of uncertainty arising from sampling in feed</atitle><jtitle>Accreditation and quality assurance</jtitle><stitle>Accred Qual Assur</stitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>329</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>329-333</pages><issn>0949-1775</issn><eissn>1432-0517</eissn><abstract>Uncertainty arising from sampling is nowadays a controversial issue, if it is necessary to be taken into account in total uncertainty. As in the quantification of analysis uncertainty, there are two principal approaches in order to estimate uncertainty of sampling: the bottom-up and the top-down approach. A novel top-down approach for sampling uncertainty is proposed in this study using nested analysis of variance (ANOVA). Determination of the oxytetracycline (OTC) content in feed was utilized for estimating uncertainty arising from sampling using the new approach. The advantage of nested ANOVA is that the effect of every factor on the total uncertainty can be calculated. In the present study, factors such as physical preparation of sample, lots of production and particle diameter were examined in the experimental design. It was found that the effect of different lots had the highest uncertainty among the factors. Finally, the results of nested ANOVA were compared with the uncertainty calculated using other top-down approaches. Classical ANOVA and robust ANOVA (RANOVA) did not show significant differences in their results. On the other hand, nested ANOVA estimated higher uncertainty of sampling in comparison with the other approaches.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00769-020-01443-7</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7775-4634</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0949-1775
ispartof Accreditation and quality assurance, 2020-12, Vol.25 (5-6), p.329-333
issn 0949-1775
1432-0517
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2917939006
source ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central
subjects Analytical Chemistry
Biochemistry
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Chromatography
Commercial Law
Design of experiments
Ecotoxicology
Estimation
Food Science
General Paper
Marketing
Mathematical analysis
Oxytetracycline
Particle size
Sampling
Uncertainty analysis
Variance analysis
title A novel nested design approach for estimation of uncertainty arising from sampling in feed
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T19%3A23%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20novel%20nested%20design%20approach%20for%20estimation%20of%20uncertainty%20arising%20from%20sampling%20in%20feed&rft.jtitle=Accreditation%20and%20quality%20assurance&rft.au=Kostakis,%20Marios&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=329&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=329-333&rft.issn=0949-1775&rft.eissn=1432-0517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00769-020-01443-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2917939006%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2917939006&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true