A model based material removal simulation for vacuum suction blasting of composites
Automated scarfing of carbon reinforced plastic (CFRP) layers is on its way to support commercial aircraft repair. In the industry, still, the manual scarfing operation is the qualified method. However, automated techniques as milling, laser removal and water jet cutting are in development and showe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Discover Applied Sciences 2024-01, Vol.6 (1), p.23, Article 23 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 23 |
container_title | Discover Applied Sciences |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Brieskorn, L. Hintze, W. Doddagopenahallli Rajanna, S. |
description | Automated scarfing of carbon reinforced plastic (CFRP) layers is on its way to support commercial aircraft repair. In the industry, still, the manual scarfing operation is the qualified method. However, automated techniques as milling, laser removal and water jet cutting are in development and showed already good results. Another promising method is vacuum suction blasting (VSB) that was until now in particular used for the roughening of surfaces before adhesive bonding. To find the right adjustment for the parameters many experiments would be necessary accordingly to different CFRP parts with changing layer thicknesses. Simulation is a way to avoid this and to predict the removal result and the settings for the machining parameters. The VSB model uses a pixel method dividing the simulated part surface into smaller volume elements. Experimental data of VSB static blasting spots are the basic for the source matrix. The simulation feeds the matrix with the blasted depth and removal volume for different blasting times. A shifting of columns of the source matrix in the blasting movement direction simulates the movement of the blasting nozzle on the work piece surface. With this, the model can also predict the nozzle feed to remove exactly one complete layer for each scarfing step. In addition, it visualizes the seamless overlapping distance between two blasted tracks. With further adjustments, the model will predict the dynamic removal for varying input parameters such as negative pressure and nozzle distance or blasting agent.
Article Highlights
Simulated removal prediction by kinematic geometric model of abrasive blasting on CFRP.
Modelled feed parameter for removal with vacuum suction blasting of layer-by-layer removal.
Predicted and experimentally validated overlapping distance of two line blastings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s42452-024-05642-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2917423299</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2917423299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-8c597e06f5ddda5b9986c18f1c7ee30eac1d015ae9b1bd9a6a17a09323cb76783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAUxIMouKz7BTwFPEdfkiZpjsviP1jwoJ5DmqZLl6ZZk3bBb2_dCnryNMNjZh78ELqmcEsB1F0uWCEYAVYQELJgRJ6hBQcoiGaSnv_xl2iV8x4AOAelhF6g1zUOsfYdrmz2NQ528Km1HU4-xOOkuQ1jZ4c29riJCR-tG8eA8-hOp6qzeWj7HY4NdjEcYm4Hn6_QRWO77Fc_ukTvD_dvmyeyfXl83qy3xHHJB1I6oZUH2Yi6rq2otC6lo2VDnfKeg7eO1kCF9bqiVa2ttFRZ0JxxVympSr5EN_PuIcWP0efB7OOY-umlYZqqgnGm9ZRic8qlmHPyjTmkNtj0aSiYb35m5mcmfubEz8ipxOdSnsL9zqff6X9aX2rFc60</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2917423299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A model based material removal simulation for vacuum suction blasting of composites</title><source>SpringerOpen</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Brieskorn, L. ; Hintze, W. ; Doddagopenahallli Rajanna, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brieskorn, L. ; Hintze, W. ; Doddagopenahallli Rajanna, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Automated scarfing of carbon reinforced plastic (CFRP) layers is on its way to support commercial aircraft repair. In the industry, still, the manual scarfing operation is the qualified method. However, automated techniques as milling, laser removal and water jet cutting are in development and showed already good results. Another promising method is vacuum suction blasting (VSB) that was until now in particular used for the roughening of surfaces before adhesive bonding. To find the right adjustment for the parameters many experiments would be necessary accordingly to different CFRP parts with changing layer thicknesses. Simulation is a way to avoid this and to predict the removal result and the settings for the machining parameters. The VSB model uses a pixel method dividing the simulated part surface into smaller volume elements. Experimental data of VSB static blasting spots are the basic for the source matrix. The simulation feeds the matrix with the blasted depth and removal volume for different blasting times. A shifting of columns of the source matrix in the blasting movement direction simulates the movement of the blasting nozzle on the work piece surface. With this, the model can also predict the nozzle feed to remove exactly one complete layer for each scarfing step. In addition, it visualizes the seamless overlapping distance between two blasted tracks. With further adjustments, the model will predict the dynamic removal for varying input parameters such as negative pressure and nozzle distance or blasting agent.
Article Highlights
Simulated removal prediction by kinematic geometric model of abrasive blasting on CFRP.
Modelled feed parameter for removal with vacuum suction blasting of layer-by-layer removal.
Predicted and experimentally validated overlapping distance of two line blastings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 3004-9261</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2523-3963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 3004-9261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2523-3971</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s42452-024-05642-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Ablation ; Abrasive blasting ; Adhesive bonding ; Applied and Technical Physics ; Automation ; Carbon fiber reinforced plastics ; Chemistry/Food Science ; Columns (structural) ; Commercial aircraft ; Earth Sciences ; Engineering ; Environment ; Finite volume method ; Hydraulic jet cutting ; Kinematics ; Lasers ; Materials Science ; Mathematical models ; Milling (machining) ; Nozzles ; Process controls ; Process parameters ; Roughening ; Scarfing ; Simulation ; Suction ; Thickness ; Vacuum ; Velocity ; Workpieces</subject><ispartof>Discover Applied Sciences, 2024-01, Vol.6 (1), p.23, Article 23</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-8c597e06f5ddda5b9986c18f1c7ee30eac1d015ae9b1bd9a6a17a09323cb76783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-8c597e06f5ddda5b9986c18f1c7ee30eac1d015ae9b1bd9a6a17a09323cb76783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brieskorn, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hintze, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doddagopenahallli Rajanna, S.</creatorcontrib><title>A model based material removal simulation for vacuum suction blasting of composites</title><title>Discover Applied Sciences</title><addtitle>Discov Appl Sci</addtitle><description>Automated scarfing of carbon reinforced plastic (CFRP) layers is on its way to support commercial aircraft repair. In the industry, still, the manual scarfing operation is the qualified method. However, automated techniques as milling, laser removal and water jet cutting are in development and showed already good results. Another promising method is vacuum suction blasting (VSB) that was until now in particular used for the roughening of surfaces before adhesive bonding. To find the right adjustment for the parameters many experiments would be necessary accordingly to different CFRP parts with changing layer thicknesses. Simulation is a way to avoid this and to predict the removal result and the settings for the machining parameters. The VSB model uses a pixel method dividing the simulated part surface into smaller volume elements. Experimental data of VSB static blasting spots are the basic for the source matrix. The simulation feeds the matrix with the blasted depth and removal volume for different blasting times. A shifting of columns of the source matrix in the blasting movement direction simulates the movement of the blasting nozzle on the work piece surface. With this, the model can also predict the nozzle feed to remove exactly one complete layer for each scarfing step. In addition, it visualizes the seamless overlapping distance between two blasted tracks. With further adjustments, the model will predict the dynamic removal for varying input parameters such as negative pressure and nozzle distance or blasting agent.
Article Highlights
Simulated removal prediction by kinematic geometric model of abrasive blasting on CFRP.
Modelled feed parameter for removal with vacuum suction blasting of layer-by-layer removal.
Predicted and experimentally validated overlapping distance of two line blastings.</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>Abrasive blasting</subject><subject>Adhesive bonding</subject><subject>Applied and Technical Physics</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Carbon fiber reinforced plastics</subject><subject>Chemistry/Food Science</subject><subject>Columns (structural)</subject><subject>Commercial aircraft</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Finite volume method</subject><subject>Hydraulic jet cutting</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Milling (machining)</subject><subject>Nozzles</subject><subject>Process controls</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Roughening</subject><subject>Scarfing</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Suction</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><subject>Vacuum</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Workpieces</subject><issn>3004-9261</issn><issn>2523-3963</issn><issn>3004-9261</issn><issn>2523-3971</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAUxIMouKz7BTwFPEdfkiZpjsviP1jwoJ5DmqZLl6ZZk3bBb2_dCnryNMNjZh78ELqmcEsB1F0uWCEYAVYQELJgRJ6hBQcoiGaSnv_xl2iV8x4AOAelhF6g1zUOsfYdrmz2NQ528Km1HU4-xOOkuQ1jZ4c29riJCR-tG8eA8-hOp6qzeWj7HY4NdjEcYm4Hn6_QRWO77Fc_ukTvD_dvmyeyfXl83qy3xHHJB1I6oZUH2Yi6rq2otC6lo2VDnfKeg7eO1kCF9bqiVa2ttFRZ0JxxVympSr5EN_PuIcWP0efB7OOY-umlYZqqgnGm9ZRic8qlmHPyjTmkNtj0aSiYb35m5mcmfubEz8ipxOdSnsL9zqff6X9aX2rFc60</recordid><startdate>20240122</startdate><enddate>20240122</enddate><creator>Brieskorn, L.</creator><creator>Hintze, W.</creator><creator>Doddagopenahallli Rajanna, S.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240122</creationdate><title>A model based material removal simulation for vacuum suction blasting of composites</title><author>Brieskorn, L. ; Hintze, W. ; Doddagopenahallli Rajanna, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-8c597e06f5ddda5b9986c18f1c7ee30eac1d015ae9b1bd9a6a17a09323cb76783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>Abrasive blasting</topic><topic>Adhesive bonding</topic><topic>Applied and Technical Physics</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Carbon fiber reinforced plastics</topic><topic>Chemistry/Food Science</topic><topic>Columns (structural)</topic><topic>Commercial aircraft</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Finite volume method</topic><topic>Hydraulic jet cutting</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Milling (machining)</topic><topic>Nozzles</topic><topic>Process controls</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Roughening</topic><topic>Scarfing</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Suction</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><topic>Vacuum</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Workpieces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brieskorn, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hintze, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doddagopenahallli Rajanna, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Discover Applied Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brieskorn, L.</au><au>Hintze, W.</au><au>Doddagopenahallli Rajanna, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A model based material removal simulation for vacuum suction blasting of composites</atitle><jtitle>Discover Applied Sciences</jtitle><stitle>Discov Appl Sci</stitle><date>2024-01-22</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><pages>23-</pages><artnum>23</artnum><issn>3004-9261</issn><issn>2523-3963</issn><eissn>3004-9261</eissn><eissn>2523-3971</eissn><abstract>Automated scarfing of carbon reinforced plastic (CFRP) layers is on its way to support commercial aircraft repair. In the industry, still, the manual scarfing operation is the qualified method. However, automated techniques as milling, laser removal and water jet cutting are in development and showed already good results. Another promising method is vacuum suction blasting (VSB) that was until now in particular used for the roughening of surfaces before adhesive bonding. To find the right adjustment for the parameters many experiments would be necessary accordingly to different CFRP parts with changing layer thicknesses. Simulation is a way to avoid this and to predict the removal result and the settings for the machining parameters. The VSB model uses a pixel method dividing the simulated part surface into smaller volume elements. Experimental data of VSB static blasting spots are the basic for the source matrix. The simulation feeds the matrix with the blasted depth and removal volume for different blasting times. A shifting of columns of the source matrix in the blasting movement direction simulates the movement of the blasting nozzle on the work piece surface. With this, the model can also predict the nozzle feed to remove exactly one complete layer for each scarfing step. In addition, it visualizes the seamless overlapping distance between two blasted tracks. With further adjustments, the model will predict the dynamic removal for varying input parameters such as negative pressure and nozzle distance or blasting agent.
Article Highlights
Simulated removal prediction by kinematic geometric model of abrasive blasting on CFRP.
Modelled feed parameter for removal with vacuum suction blasting of layer-by-layer removal.
Predicted and experimentally validated overlapping distance of two line blastings.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s42452-024-05642-6</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 3004-9261 |
ispartof | Discover Applied Sciences, 2024-01, Vol.6 (1), p.23, Article 23 |
issn | 3004-9261 2523-3963 3004-9261 2523-3971 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2917423299 |
source | SpringerOpen; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Ablation Abrasive blasting Adhesive bonding Applied and Technical Physics Automation Carbon fiber reinforced plastics Chemistry/Food Science Columns (structural) Commercial aircraft Earth Sciences Engineering Environment Finite volume method Hydraulic jet cutting Kinematics Lasers Materials Science Mathematical models Milling (machining) Nozzles Process controls Process parameters Roughening Scarfing Simulation Suction Thickness Vacuum Velocity Workpieces |
title | A model based material removal simulation for vacuum suction blasting of composites |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T20%3A16%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20model%20based%20material%20removal%20simulation%20for%20vacuum%20suction%20blasting%20of%20composites&rft.jtitle=Discover%20Applied%20Sciences&rft.au=Brieskorn,%20L.&rft.date=2024-01-22&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.pages=23-&rft.artnum=23&rft.issn=3004-9261&rft.eissn=3004-9261&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s42452-024-05642-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2917423299%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2917423299&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |