ELECTORAL MAINTENANCE

According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the right to vote is fundamental because it is preservative cf all rights, and yet in many cases legal protections for the right to vote fall short cfprotections for the other rights that voting is meant to preserve. Rede fining the right to vote cannot solve thi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Boston University law review 2023-12, Vol.103 (7), p.2199-2213
1. Verfasser: Spencer, Douglas M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2213
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2199
container_title Boston University law review
container_volume 103
creator Spencer, Douglas M
description According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the right to vote is fundamental because it is preservative cf all rights, and yet in many cases legal protections for the right to vote fall short cfprotections for the other rights that voting is meant to preserve. Rede fining the right to vote cannot solve this problem alone. Election administration has at least as much consequence on the right to vote as any particular definition or legal theory. In Democracy's Bureaucracy, Michael Morse draws our attention to one cf the most important yet understudied issues cfelection administration: voter list maintenance. In addition to his descriptive account cf the novel way states have cooperated to perform list maintenance, Morse's analysis provides a window into three pathologies cf America's election administration more generally. First, the mechanics cf elections directly implicate the fundamental right to vote, raising questions cf how stringently these procedures should be evaluated by courts. Second, political interference in the administration cf elections can flip representative government on its head by insulating elected Officials from political accountability and making elections less secure. Finally, several challenges related to the administration cf elections are rooted in our electoral system that narrowly links geography and political representation. Relaxing this link may foster a more erfective, responsible, and inclusive system cf government.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2916711074</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2916711074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-60a66f57032fea366b3f345175e81223ea39db84d7b037c54eda12d1de6477903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjU0LgkAUAPdQkH0cuwedhff27e7To8j2AWYQdg5t14NEWub_T6jTwBxmJiIAABNGoHgm5n3fACBIzYFY28ymxfmSZJtTcswLmyd5apdiWpeP3q_-XIjrzhbpIczO-2OaZGGHSJ_QQGlMrRlI1r4kYyqqSWlk7SOUkkYXuypSjisgvmvlXYnSofNGMcdAC7H9dbt3-xp8_7k17fB-jsubjNEwIrCiLytwMWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2916711074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ELECTORAL MAINTENANCE</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Spencer, Douglas M</creator><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Douglas M</creatorcontrib><description>According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the right to vote is fundamental because it is preservative cf all rights, and yet in many cases legal protections for the right to vote fall short cfprotections for the other rights that voting is meant to preserve. Rede fining the right to vote cannot solve this problem alone. Election administration has at least as much consequence on the right to vote as any particular definition or legal theory. In Democracy's Bureaucracy, Michael Morse draws our attention to one cf the most important yet understudied issues cfelection administration: voter list maintenance. In addition to his descriptive account cf the novel way states have cooperated to perform list maintenance, Morse's analysis provides a window into three pathologies cf America's election administration more generally. First, the mechanics cf elections directly implicate the fundamental right to vote, raising questions cf how stringently these procedures should be evaluated by courts. Second, political interference in the administration cf elections can flip representative government on its head by insulating elected Officials from political accountability and making elections less secure. Finally, several challenges related to the administration cf elections are rooted in our electoral system that narrowly links geography and political representation. Relaxing this link may foster a more erfective, responsible, and inclusive system cf government.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8047</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Boston University School of Law</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Bureaucracy ; Congressional elections ; Constitution-US ; Democracy ; Election law ; Elections ; Electoral systems ; Equal rights ; Jurisprudence ; Management ; Mechanics ; Political representation ; Politics ; Public officials ; Supreme courts ; Voter registration ; Voting machines ; Voting rights</subject><ispartof>Boston University law review, 2023-12, Vol.103 (7), p.2199-2213</ispartof><rights>Copyright Boston University School of Law Dec 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12824</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Douglas M</creatorcontrib><title>ELECTORAL MAINTENANCE</title><title>Boston University law review</title><description>According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the right to vote is fundamental because it is preservative cf all rights, and yet in many cases legal protections for the right to vote fall short cfprotections for the other rights that voting is meant to preserve. Rede fining the right to vote cannot solve this problem alone. Election administration has at least as much consequence on the right to vote as any particular definition or legal theory. In Democracy's Bureaucracy, Michael Morse draws our attention to one cf the most important yet understudied issues cfelection administration: voter list maintenance. In addition to his descriptive account cf the novel way states have cooperated to perform list maintenance, Morse's analysis provides a window into three pathologies cf America's election administration more generally. First, the mechanics cf elections directly implicate the fundamental right to vote, raising questions cf how stringently these procedures should be evaluated by courts. Second, political interference in the administration cf elections can flip representative government on its head by insulating elected Officials from political accountability and making elections less secure. Finally, several challenges related to the administration cf elections are rooted in our electoral system that narrowly links geography and political representation. Relaxing this link may foster a more erfective, responsible, and inclusive system cf government.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Bureaucracy</subject><subject>Congressional elections</subject><subject>Constitution-US</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Election law</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral systems</subject><subject>Equal rights</subject><subject>Jurisprudence</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>Political representation</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public officials</subject><subject>Supreme courts</subject><subject>Voter registration</subject><subject>Voting machines</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><issn>0006-8047</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotjU0LgkAUAPdQkH0cuwedhff27e7To8j2AWYQdg5t14NEWub_T6jTwBxmJiIAABNGoHgm5n3fACBIzYFY28ymxfmSZJtTcswLmyd5apdiWpeP3q_-XIjrzhbpIczO-2OaZGGHSJ_QQGlMrRlI1r4kYyqqSWlk7SOUkkYXuypSjisgvmvlXYnSofNGMcdAC7H9dbt3-xp8_7k17fB-jsubjNEwIrCiLytwMWA</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Spencer, Douglas M</creator><general>Boston University School of Law</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>ELECTORAL MAINTENANCE</title><author>Spencer, Douglas M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-60a66f57032fea366b3f345175e81223ea39db84d7b037c54eda12d1de6477903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Bureaucracy</topic><topic>Congressional elections</topic><topic>Constitution-US</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Election law</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral systems</topic><topic>Equal rights</topic><topic>Jurisprudence</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>Political representation</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public officials</topic><topic>Supreme courts</topic><topic>Voter registration</topic><topic>Voting machines</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Douglas M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Boston University law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spencer, Douglas M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ELECTORAL MAINTENANCE</atitle><jtitle>Boston University law review</jtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2199</spage><epage>2213</epage><pages>2199-2213</pages><issn>0006-8047</issn><abstract>According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the right to vote is fundamental because it is preservative cf all rights, and yet in many cases legal protections for the right to vote fall short cfprotections for the other rights that voting is meant to preserve. Rede fining the right to vote cannot solve this problem alone. Election administration has at least as much consequence on the right to vote as any particular definition or legal theory. In Democracy's Bureaucracy, Michael Morse draws our attention to one cf the most important yet understudied issues cfelection administration: voter list maintenance. In addition to his descriptive account cf the novel way states have cooperated to perform list maintenance, Morse's analysis provides a window into three pathologies cf America's election administration more generally. First, the mechanics cf elections directly implicate the fundamental right to vote, raising questions cf how stringently these procedures should be evaluated by courts. Second, political interference in the administration cf elections can flip representative government on its head by insulating elected Officials from political accountability and making elections less secure. Finally, several challenges related to the administration cf elections are rooted in our electoral system that narrowly links geography and political representation. Relaxing this link may foster a more erfective, responsible, and inclusive system cf government.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Boston University School of Law</pub><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-8047
ispartof Boston University law review, 2023-12, Vol.103 (7), p.2199-2213
issn 0006-8047
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2916711074
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accountability
Bureaucracy
Congressional elections
Constitution-US
Democracy
Election law
Elections
Electoral systems
Equal rights
Jurisprudence
Management
Mechanics
Political representation
Politics
Public officials
Supreme courts
Voter registration
Voting machines
Voting rights
title ELECTORAL MAINTENANCE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T05%3A04%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ELECTORAL%20MAINTENANCE&rft.jtitle=Boston%20University%20law%20review&rft.au=Spencer,%20Douglas%20M&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2199&rft.epage=2213&rft.pages=2199-2213&rft.issn=0006-8047&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2916711074%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2916711074&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true