ELECTORAL MAINTENANCE
According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the right to vote is fundamental because it is preservative cf all rights, and yet in many cases legal protections for the right to vote fall short cfprotections for the other rights that voting is meant to preserve. Rede fining the right to vote cannot solve thi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Boston University law review 2023-12, Vol.103 (7), p.2199-2213 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2213 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 2199 |
container_title | Boston University law review |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Spencer, Douglas M |
description | According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the right to vote is fundamental because it is preservative cf all rights, and yet in many cases legal protections for the right to vote fall short cfprotections for the other rights that voting is meant to preserve. Rede fining the right to vote cannot solve this problem alone. Election administration has at least as much consequence on the right to vote as any particular definition or legal theory. In Democracy's Bureaucracy, Michael Morse draws our attention to one cf the most important yet understudied issues cfelection administration: voter list maintenance. In addition to his descriptive account cf the novel way states have cooperated to perform list maintenance, Morse's analysis provides a window into three pathologies cf America's election administration more generally. First, the mechanics cf elections directly implicate the fundamental right to vote, raising questions cf how stringently these procedures should be evaluated by courts. Second, political interference in the administration cf elections can flip representative government on its head by insulating elected Officials from political accountability and making elections less secure. Finally, several challenges related to the administration cf elections are rooted in our electoral system that narrowly links geography and political representation. Relaxing this link may foster a more erfective, responsible, and inclusive system cf government. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2916711074</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2916711074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-60a66f57032fea366b3f345175e81223ea39db84d7b037c54eda12d1de6477903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjU0LgkAUAPdQkH0cuwedhff27e7To8j2AWYQdg5t14NEWub_T6jTwBxmJiIAABNGoHgm5n3fACBIzYFY28ymxfmSZJtTcswLmyd5apdiWpeP3q_-XIjrzhbpIczO-2OaZGGHSJ_QQGlMrRlI1r4kYyqqSWlk7SOUkkYXuypSjisgvmvlXYnSofNGMcdAC7H9dbt3-xp8_7k17fB-jsubjNEwIrCiLytwMWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2916711074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ELECTORAL MAINTENANCE</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Spencer, Douglas M</creator><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Douglas M</creatorcontrib><description>According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the right to vote is fundamental because it is preservative cf all rights, and yet in many cases legal protections for the right to vote fall short cfprotections for the other rights that voting is meant to preserve. Rede fining the right to vote cannot solve this problem alone. Election administration has at least as much consequence on the right to vote as any particular definition or legal theory. In Democracy's Bureaucracy, Michael Morse draws our attention to one cf the most important yet understudied issues cfelection administration: voter list maintenance. In addition to his descriptive account cf the novel way states have cooperated to perform list maintenance, Morse's analysis provides a window into three pathologies cf America's election administration more generally. First, the mechanics cf elections directly implicate the fundamental right to vote, raising questions cf how stringently these procedures should be evaluated by courts. Second, political interference in the administration cf elections can flip representative government on its head by insulating elected Officials from political accountability and making elections less secure. Finally, several challenges related to the administration cf elections are rooted in our electoral system that narrowly links geography and political representation. Relaxing this link may foster a more erfective, responsible, and inclusive system cf government.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8047</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Boston University School of Law</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Bureaucracy ; Congressional elections ; Constitution-US ; Democracy ; Election law ; Elections ; Electoral systems ; Equal rights ; Jurisprudence ; Management ; Mechanics ; Political representation ; Politics ; Public officials ; Supreme courts ; Voter registration ; Voting machines ; Voting rights</subject><ispartof>Boston University law review, 2023-12, Vol.103 (7), p.2199-2213</ispartof><rights>Copyright Boston University School of Law Dec 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12824</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Douglas M</creatorcontrib><title>ELECTORAL MAINTENANCE</title><title>Boston University law review</title><description>According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the right to vote is fundamental because it is preservative cf all rights, and yet in many cases legal protections for the right to vote fall short cfprotections for the other rights that voting is meant to preserve. Rede fining the right to vote cannot solve this problem alone. Election administration has at least as much consequence on the right to vote as any particular definition or legal theory. In Democracy's Bureaucracy, Michael Morse draws our attention to one cf the most important yet understudied issues cfelection administration: voter list maintenance. In addition to his descriptive account cf the novel way states have cooperated to perform list maintenance, Morse's analysis provides a window into three pathologies cf America's election administration more generally. First, the mechanics cf elections directly implicate the fundamental right to vote, raising questions cf how stringently these procedures should be evaluated by courts. Second, political interference in the administration cf elections can flip representative government on its head by insulating elected Officials from political accountability and making elections less secure. Finally, several challenges related to the administration cf elections are rooted in our electoral system that narrowly links geography and political representation. Relaxing this link may foster a more erfective, responsible, and inclusive system cf government.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Bureaucracy</subject><subject>Congressional elections</subject><subject>Constitution-US</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Election law</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral systems</subject><subject>Equal rights</subject><subject>Jurisprudence</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>Political representation</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public officials</subject><subject>Supreme courts</subject><subject>Voter registration</subject><subject>Voting machines</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><issn>0006-8047</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotjU0LgkAUAPdQkH0cuwedhff27e7To8j2AWYQdg5t14NEWub_T6jTwBxmJiIAABNGoHgm5n3fACBIzYFY28ymxfmSZJtTcswLmyd5apdiWpeP3q_-XIjrzhbpIczO-2OaZGGHSJ_QQGlMrRlI1r4kYyqqSWlk7SOUkkYXuypSjisgvmvlXYnSofNGMcdAC7H9dbt3-xp8_7k17fB-jsubjNEwIrCiLytwMWA</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Spencer, Douglas M</creator><general>Boston University School of Law</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>ELECTORAL MAINTENANCE</title><author>Spencer, Douglas M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-60a66f57032fea366b3f345175e81223ea39db84d7b037c54eda12d1de6477903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Bureaucracy</topic><topic>Congressional elections</topic><topic>Constitution-US</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Election law</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral systems</topic><topic>Equal rights</topic><topic>Jurisprudence</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>Political representation</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public officials</topic><topic>Supreme courts</topic><topic>Voter registration</topic><topic>Voting machines</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Douglas M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Boston University law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spencer, Douglas M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ELECTORAL MAINTENANCE</atitle><jtitle>Boston University law review</jtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2199</spage><epage>2213</epage><pages>2199-2213</pages><issn>0006-8047</issn><abstract>According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the right to vote is fundamental because it is preservative cf all rights, and yet in many cases legal protections for the right to vote fall short cfprotections for the other rights that voting is meant to preserve. Rede fining the right to vote cannot solve this problem alone. Election administration has at least as much consequence on the right to vote as any particular definition or legal theory. In Democracy's Bureaucracy, Michael Morse draws our attention to one cf the most important yet understudied issues cfelection administration: voter list maintenance. In addition to his descriptive account cf the novel way states have cooperated to perform list maintenance, Morse's analysis provides a window into three pathologies cf America's election administration more generally. First, the mechanics cf elections directly implicate the fundamental right to vote, raising questions cf how stringently these procedures should be evaluated by courts. Second, political interference in the administration cf elections can flip representative government on its head by insulating elected Officials from political accountability and making elections less secure. Finally, several challenges related to the administration cf elections are rooted in our electoral system that narrowly links geography and political representation. Relaxing this link may foster a more erfective, responsible, and inclusive system cf government.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Boston University School of Law</pub><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-8047 |
ispartof | Boston University law review, 2023-12, Vol.103 (7), p.2199-2213 |
issn | 0006-8047 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2916711074 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Accountability Bureaucracy Congressional elections Constitution-US Democracy Election law Elections Electoral systems Equal rights Jurisprudence Management Mechanics Political representation Politics Public officials Supreme courts Voter registration Voting machines Voting rights |
title | ELECTORAL MAINTENANCE |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T05%3A04%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ELECTORAL%20MAINTENANCE&rft.jtitle=Boston%20University%20law%20review&rft.au=Spencer,%20Douglas%20M&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2199&rft.epage=2213&rft.pages=2199-2213&rft.issn=0006-8047&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2916711074%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2916711074&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |