Surgical site infiltration using ketamine versus bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following appendicectomy
Background Appendicectomy is the standard surgery to remove an inflamed appendix and prevent peritonitis and other serious complication of a perforated appendix. Relieving post appendicectomy pain can help in early mobility and rehabilitation. The study compares the efficacy of using ketamine versus...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Research and Opinion in Anesthesia & Intensive Care 2023-10, Vol.10 (4), p.287-295 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 295 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 287 |
container_title | Research and Opinion in Anesthesia & Intensive Care |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Elrahman, Ahmed E Refaie, Bahaa Ali, Gehad Abdelfattah, Khaled A |
description | Background Appendicectomy is the standard surgery to remove an inflamed appendix and prevent peritonitis and other serious complication of a perforated appendix. Relieving post appendicectomy pain can help in early mobility and rehabilitation. The study compares the efficacy of using ketamine versus bupivacaine for surgical site infiltration for postoperative analgesia following appendicectomy. Methods We enrolled 60 patients aged between 14 and 50 with ASA status class I and II undergoing uncomplicated appendicectomy under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups where group 1 received surgical site infiltration using plain bupivacaine at the end of the operation while group 2 received surgical site infiltration using ketamine. The visual analog scale (VAS) was estimated at zero, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. The time until the first need for analgesia and the overall analgesic consumption were recorded in both groups. Any adverse effects in the recovery room were recorded. Postoperative hemodynamics were also recorded every 2 h for up to 24 h. Results The VAS score at 1, 2, 6, and 12 h was significantly lower in the ketamine group than in the bupivacaine group (P < 0.001). The time until the first need for analgesia was significantly prolonged in the ketamine group than in the bupivacaine group (P value < 0.001). The total ketorolac and morphine consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the ketamine group than in the bupivacaine group (P value < 0.001). Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) occurred in five (16.667%) patients in the bupivacaine group and in six (20%) patients in the ketamine group. Conclusions Surgical site infiltration using either ketamine or bupivacaine can be used safely and efficiently to control acute postoperative pain and decrease the total consumption of systemic analgesics; however, ketamine infiltration seems superior in this field. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/roaic.roaic_21_23 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2915503161</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A779581895</galeid><sourcerecordid>A779581895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1681-7eb78f23a5beccdbf1a2fd48df1e6eda9095e9aa5a491f7a1b327a8dd0900b273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUV1r3DAQFKWBhEt-QN4Mgb7dRSudztZjCP0IBPLQ5lms5dVFF9lyJPtK_n3tXmguUBa0izQzaGcYuwS-WgOX1ymit6u_pxFghPzEzoRUm6UGIT__m0Gdsoucd5xzoZXUlTpjLz_HtPUWQ5H9QIXvnA9DwsHHrhiz77bFMw3Y-o6KPaU85qIee79Hi_OVi6noYx5iTzNnTwV2GLaUPU5vIcTfswL2PXWNt2SH2L6esxOHIdPFW1-wx29ff93-WN4_fL-7vblfWthUsCypLisnJKqarG1qByhcs64aB7ShBjXXijSiwrUGVyLUUpRYNQ3XnNeilAt2ddDtU3wZKQ9mF8c0fS8boUEpLmED76gtBjLT-nHa3rY-W3NTllpVUE1WLdjqP6ipGmq9jR1NrtFHwpcjwhNhGJ5yDOPsa_4IhAPQpphzImf65FtMrwa4mcM1h1iPwpV_AGwYnPM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2915503161</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical site infiltration using ketamine versus bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following appendicectomy</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Elrahman, Ahmed E ; Refaie, Bahaa ; Ali, Gehad ; Abdelfattah, Khaled A</creator><creatorcontrib>Elrahman, Ahmed E ; Refaie, Bahaa ; Ali, Gehad ; Abdelfattah, Khaled A</creatorcontrib><description>Background Appendicectomy is the standard surgery to remove an inflamed appendix and prevent peritonitis and other serious complication of a perforated appendix. Relieving post appendicectomy pain can help in early mobility and rehabilitation. The study compares the efficacy of using ketamine versus bupivacaine for surgical site infiltration for postoperative analgesia following appendicectomy. Methods We enrolled 60 patients aged between 14 and 50 with ASA status class I and II undergoing uncomplicated appendicectomy under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups where group 1 received surgical site infiltration using plain bupivacaine at the end of the operation while group 2 received surgical site infiltration using ketamine. The visual analog scale (VAS) was estimated at zero, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. The time until the first need for analgesia and the overall analgesic consumption were recorded in both groups. Any adverse effects in the recovery room were recorded. Postoperative hemodynamics were also recorded every 2 h for up to 24 h. Results The VAS score at 1, 2, 6, and 12 h was significantly lower in the ketamine group than in the bupivacaine group (P < 0.001). The time until the first need for analgesia was significantly prolonged in the ketamine group than in the bupivacaine group (P value < 0.001). The total ketorolac and morphine consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the ketamine group than in the bupivacaine group (P value < 0.001). Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) occurred in five (16.667%) patients in the bupivacaine group and in six (20%) patients in the ketamine group. Conclusions Surgical site infiltration using either ketamine or bupivacaine can be used safely and efficiently to control acute postoperative pain and decrease the total consumption of systemic analgesics; however, ketamine infiltration seems superior in this field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2356-9115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2356-9123</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/roaic.roaic_21_23</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mumbai: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Analgesics ; Anesthesia ; Appendectomy ; Bupivacaine ; Care and treatment ; Dexmedetomidine ; General anesthesia ; Ketamine ; Neurophysiology ; Pain ; Pain management ; Postoperative period ; Rehabilitation ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes</subject><ispartof>Research and Opinion in Anesthesia & Intensive Care, 2023-10, Vol.10 (4), p.287-295</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1681-7eb78f23a5beccdbf1a2fd48df1e6eda9095e9aa5a491f7a1b327a8dd0900b273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elrahman, Ahmed E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Refaie, Bahaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Gehad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelfattah, Khaled A</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical site infiltration using ketamine versus bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following appendicectomy</title><title>Research and Opinion in Anesthesia & Intensive Care</title><description>Background Appendicectomy is the standard surgery to remove an inflamed appendix and prevent peritonitis and other serious complication of a perforated appendix. Relieving post appendicectomy pain can help in early mobility and rehabilitation. The study compares the efficacy of using ketamine versus bupivacaine for surgical site infiltration for postoperative analgesia following appendicectomy. Methods We enrolled 60 patients aged between 14 and 50 with ASA status class I and II undergoing uncomplicated appendicectomy under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups where group 1 received surgical site infiltration using plain bupivacaine at the end of the operation while group 2 received surgical site infiltration using ketamine. The visual analog scale (VAS) was estimated at zero, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. The time until the first need for analgesia and the overall analgesic consumption were recorded in both groups. Any adverse effects in the recovery room were recorded. Postoperative hemodynamics were also recorded every 2 h for up to 24 h. Results The VAS score at 1, 2, 6, and 12 h was significantly lower in the ketamine group than in the bupivacaine group (P < 0.001). The time until the first need for analgesia was significantly prolonged in the ketamine group than in the bupivacaine group (P value < 0.001). The total ketorolac and morphine consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the ketamine group than in the bupivacaine group (P value < 0.001). Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) occurred in five (16.667%) patients in the bupivacaine group and in six (20%) patients in the ketamine group. Conclusions Surgical site infiltration using either ketamine or bupivacaine can be used safely and efficiently to control acute postoperative pain and decrease the total consumption of systemic analgesics; however, ketamine infiltration seems superior in this field.</description><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Appendectomy</subject><subject>Bupivacaine</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Dexmedetomidine</subject><subject>General anesthesia</subject><subject>Ketamine</subject><subject>Neurophysiology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Postoperative period</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><issn>2356-9115</issn><issn>2356-9123</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptUV1r3DAQFKWBhEt-QN4Mgb7dRSudztZjCP0IBPLQ5lms5dVFF9lyJPtK_n3tXmguUBa0izQzaGcYuwS-WgOX1ymit6u_pxFghPzEzoRUm6UGIT__m0Gdsoucd5xzoZXUlTpjLz_HtPUWQ5H9QIXvnA9DwsHHrhiz77bFMw3Y-o6KPaU85qIee79Hi_OVi6noYx5iTzNnTwV2GLaUPU5vIcTfswL2PXWNt2SH2L6esxOHIdPFW1-wx29ff93-WN4_fL-7vblfWthUsCypLisnJKqarG1qByhcs64aB7ShBjXXijSiwrUGVyLUUpRYNQ3XnNeilAt2ddDtU3wZKQ9mF8c0fS8boUEpLmED76gtBjLT-nHa3rY-W3NTllpVUE1WLdjqP6ipGmq9jR1NrtFHwpcjwhNhGJ5yDOPsa_4IhAPQpphzImf65FtMrwa4mcM1h1iPwpV_AGwYnPM</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Elrahman, Ahmed E</creator><creator>Refaie, Bahaa</creator><creator>Ali, Gehad</creator><creator>Abdelfattah, Khaled A</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Surgical site infiltration using ketamine versus bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following appendicectomy</title><author>Elrahman, Ahmed E ; Refaie, Bahaa ; Ali, Gehad ; Abdelfattah, Khaled A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1681-7eb78f23a5beccdbf1a2fd48df1e6eda9095e9aa5a491f7a1b327a8dd0900b273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Appendectomy</topic><topic>Bupivacaine</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Dexmedetomidine</topic><topic>General anesthesia</topic><topic>Ketamine</topic><topic>Neurophysiology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Postoperative period</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elrahman, Ahmed E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Refaie, Bahaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Gehad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelfattah, Khaled A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Research and Opinion in Anesthesia & Intensive Care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elrahman, Ahmed E</au><au>Refaie, Bahaa</au><au>Ali, Gehad</au><au>Abdelfattah, Khaled A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical site infiltration using ketamine versus bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following appendicectomy</atitle><jtitle>Research and Opinion in Anesthesia & Intensive Care</jtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>287</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>287-295</pages><issn>2356-9115</issn><eissn>2356-9123</eissn><abstract>Background Appendicectomy is the standard surgery to remove an inflamed appendix and prevent peritonitis and other serious complication of a perforated appendix. Relieving post appendicectomy pain can help in early mobility and rehabilitation. The study compares the efficacy of using ketamine versus bupivacaine for surgical site infiltration for postoperative analgesia following appendicectomy. Methods We enrolled 60 patients aged between 14 and 50 with ASA status class I and II undergoing uncomplicated appendicectomy under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups where group 1 received surgical site infiltration using plain bupivacaine at the end of the operation while group 2 received surgical site infiltration using ketamine. The visual analog scale (VAS) was estimated at zero, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. The time until the first need for analgesia and the overall analgesic consumption were recorded in both groups. Any adverse effects in the recovery room were recorded. Postoperative hemodynamics were also recorded every 2 h for up to 24 h. Results The VAS score at 1, 2, 6, and 12 h was significantly lower in the ketamine group than in the bupivacaine group (P < 0.001). The time until the first need for analgesia was significantly prolonged in the ketamine group than in the bupivacaine group (P value < 0.001). The total ketorolac and morphine consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the ketamine group than in the bupivacaine group (P value < 0.001). Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) occurred in five (16.667%) patients in the bupivacaine group and in six (20%) patients in the ketamine group. Conclusions Surgical site infiltration using either ketamine or bupivacaine can be used safely and efficiently to control acute postoperative pain and decrease the total consumption of systemic analgesics; however, ketamine infiltration seems superior in this field.</abstract><cop>Mumbai</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4103/roaic.roaic_21_23</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2356-9115 |
ispartof | Research and Opinion in Anesthesia & Intensive Care, 2023-10, Vol.10 (4), p.287-295 |
issn | 2356-9115 2356-9123 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2915503161 |
source | Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Analgesics Anesthesia Appendectomy Bupivacaine Care and treatment Dexmedetomidine General anesthesia Ketamine Neurophysiology Pain Pain management Postoperative period Rehabilitation Surgery Surgical outcomes |
title | Surgical site infiltration using ketamine versus bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following appendicectomy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T07%3A22%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20site%20infiltration%20using%20ketamine%20versus%20bupivacaine%20for%20postoperative%20analgesia%20following%20appendicectomy&rft.jtitle=Research%20and%20Opinion%20in%20Anesthesia%20&%20Intensive%20Care&rft.au=Elrahman,%20Ahmed%20E&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=287&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=287-295&rft.issn=2356-9115&rft.eissn=2356-9123&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/roaic.roaic_21_23&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA779581895%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2915503161&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A779581895&rfr_iscdi=true |