Combining UAV thermography, point cloud analysis and machine learning for assessing small‐scale evapotranspiration patterns in a tropical rainforest
Microclimate and vegetation structure control evapotranspiration (ET) from land surfaces at stand and landscape scales. Tropical rainforests are among the most diverse and complex terrestrial ecosystems, harbouring vast plant and animal species throughout their dense multistory canopy. They contribu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecohydrology 2024-01, Vol.17 (1), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Ecohydrology |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Cortés‐Molino, Álvaro Valdés‐Uribe, Alejandra Ellsäßer, Florian Bulusu, Medha Ahongshangbam, Joyson Hendrayanto Hölscher, Dirk Röll, Alexander |
description | Microclimate and vegetation structure control evapotranspiration (ET) from land surfaces at stand and landscape scales. Tropical rainforests are among the most diverse and complex terrestrial ecosystems, harbouring vast plant and animal species throughout their dense multistory canopy. They contribute substantially to global precipitation through their high ET. However, there is little information about ET influences at very small spatial scales under given climatic conditions. In a tropical rainforest on Sumatra, we studied the relationship between pixel‐level ET as derived from high‐resolution (~10 cm), near‐surface thermography from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and canopy structure as derived from red–green–blue (RGB) image and three‐dimensional (3D) point cloud analyses. The 16 derived potential predictors encompassed vegetation height, height variability, vegetation density and reflectance variables. Using regression models, several of the studied variables had a significant linear relationship with ET, but the explained variance was only marginal. However, applying a random forest algorithm including forward feature selection and target oriented cross validation explained substantial parts of the pixel‐level variance in ET (R2 = 0.56–0.65), thus indicating multiple non‐linear relationships with interactions among predictor variables. Therein, green leaf index, leaf area density and vegetation height were often the most important variables for the prediction outcome, but their sequence varied among the four study plots. Overall, combining canopy structure variables derived from RGB photogrammetry explained relatively large parts of spatial ET variations. Our study thus indicates the large potential of combining UAV‐based thermography and photogrammetry techniques with machine learning approaches to better understand ET but also suggests that more work remains to be done in explaining ET patterns at very small spatial scales. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/eco.2604 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2915461615</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2915461615</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2884-2ea1fc6bc69be4fca2c6a0fbcbbac3a2677edf0dbcb157b2fd9c69503f99d8e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhSMEEqUgcQRLbFiQYjuJ2yyrij-pUjeUbTRx7NZVYgdPCsqOI7DigJwEt0XsWM2b0TdvNC-KLhkdMUr5rZJuxAVNj6IByxMR0yznx396kp5GZ4gbSgVLs2QQfc1cUxpr7Iospy-kWyvfuJWHdt3fkNYZ2xFZu21FwELdo8EgKtKAXBurSK3A73e18wQQFeKuwwbq-vvjEyXUiqg3aF3nwWJrPHTGWdJC1ylvkRhLgHTetSagxIOxwUlhdx6daKhRXfzWYbS8v3uePcbzxcPTbDqPJZ9M0pgrYFqKUoq8VKmWwKUAqktZliAT4GI8VpWmVRiwbFxyXeUBzWii87yaqHEyjK4Ovq13r9twuNi4rQ-vYsFzlqWCCZYF6vpASe8QvdJF600Dvi8YLXapFyH1Ypd6QOMD-m5q1f_LFXezxZ7_AfPXiaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2915461615</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combining UAV thermography, point cloud analysis and machine learning for assessing small‐scale evapotranspiration patterns in a tropical rainforest</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Cortés‐Molino, Álvaro ; Valdés‐Uribe, Alejandra ; Ellsäßer, Florian ; Bulusu, Medha ; Ahongshangbam, Joyson ; Hendrayanto ; Hölscher, Dirk ; Röll, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Cortés‐Molino, Álvaro ; Valdés‐Uribe, Alejandra ; Ellsäßer, Florian ; Bulusu, Medha ; Ahongshangbam, Joyson ; Hendrayanto ; Hölscher, Dirk ; Röll, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>Microclimate and vegetation structure control evapotranspiration (ET) from land surfaces at stand and landscape scales. Tropical rainforests are among the most diverse and complex terrestrial ecosystems, harbouring vast plant and animal species throughout their dense multistory canopy. They contribute substantially to global precipitation through their high ET. However, there is little information about ET influences at very small spatial scales under given climatic conditions. In a tropical rainforest on Sumatra, we studied the relationship between pixel‐level ET as derived from high‐resolution (~10 cm), near‐surface thermography from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and canopy structure as derived from red–green–blue (RGB) image and three‐dimensional (3D) point cloud analyses. The 16 derived potential predictors encompassed vegetation height, height variability, vegetation density and reflectance variables. Using regression models, several of the studied variables had a significant linear relationship with ET, but the explained variance was only marginal. However, applying a random forest algorithm including forward feature selection and target oriented cross validation explained substantial parts of the pixel‐level variance in ET (R2 = 0.56–0.65), thus indicating multiple non‐linear relationships with interactions among predictor variables. Therein, green leaf index, leaf area density and vegetation height were often the most important variables for the prediction outcome, but their sequence varied among the four study plots. Overall, combining canopy structure variables derived from RGB photogrammetry explained relatively large parts of spatial ET variations. Our study thus indicates the large potential of combining UAV‐based thermography and photogrammetry techniques with machine learning approaches to better understand ET but also suggests that more work remains to be done in explaining ET patterns at very small spatial scales.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1936-0584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-0592</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eco.2604</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aerial thermography ; Algorithms ; Animal species ; Canopies ; Canopy ; canopy structure ; Climatic conditions ; Density ; Dimensional analysis ; drone ; Evapotranspiration ; Height ; Leaf area ; leaf area density ; Learning algorithms ; Leaves ; Machine learning ; Microclimate ; Photogrammetry ; Pixels ; Plant cover ; Rainforests ; Reflectance ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Sumatra ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Thermography ; Three dimensional models ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Variance ; Vegetation ; vegetation height</subject><ispartof>Ecohydrology, 2024-01, Vol.17 (1), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2884-2ea1fc6bc69be4fca2c6a0fbcbbac3a2677edf0dbcb157b2fd9c69503f99d8e73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9457-4459</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feco.2604$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feco.2604$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cortés‐Molino, Álvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdés‐Uribe, Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellsäßer, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulusu, Medha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahongshangbam, Joyson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendrayanto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hölscher, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Röll, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Combining UAV thermography, point cloud analysis and machine learning for assessing small‐scale evapotranspiration patterns in a tropical rainforest</title><title>Ecohydrology</title><description>Microclimate and vegetation structure control evapotranspiration (ET) from land surfaces at stand and landscape scales. Tropical rainforests are among the most diverse and complex terrestrial ecosystems, harbouring vast plant and animal species throughout their dense multistory canopy. They contribute substantially to global precipitation through their high ET. However, there is little information about ET influences at very small spatial scales under given climatic conditions. In a tropical rainforest on Sumatra, we studied the relationship between pixel‐level ET as derived from high‐resolution (~10 cm), near‐surface thermography from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and canopy structure as derived from red–green–blue (RGB) image and three‐dimensional (3D) point cloud analyses. The 16 derived potential predictors encompassed vegetation height, height variability, vegetation density and reflectance variables. Using regression models, several of the studied variables had a significant linear relationship with ET, but the explained variance was only marginal. However, applying a random forest algorithm including forward feature selection and target oriented cross validation explained substantial parts of the pixel‐level variance in ET (R2 = 0.56–0.65), thus indicating multiple non‐linear relationships with interactions among predictor variables. Therein, green leaf index, leaf area density and vegetation height were often the most important variables for the prediction outcome, but their sequence varied among the four study plots. Overall, combining canopy structure variables derived from RGB photogrammetry explained relatively large parts of spatial ET variations. Our study thus indicates the large potential of combining UAV‐based thermography and photogrammetry techniques with machine learning approaches to better understand ET but also suggests that more work remains to be done in explaining ET patterns at very small spatial scales.</description><subject>Aerial thermography</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animal species</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Canopy</subject><subject>canopy structure</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Dimensional analysis</subject><subject>drone</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Height</subject><subject>Leaf area</subject><subject>leaf area density</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Microclimate</subject><subject>Photogrammetry</subject><subject>Pixels</subject><subject>Plant cover</subject><subject>Rainforests</subject><subject>Reflectance</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Sumatra</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Thermography</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Variance</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>vegetation height</subject><issn>1936-0584</issn><issn>1936-0592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhSMEEqUgcQRLbFiQYjuJ2yyrij-pUjeUbTRx7NZVYgdPCsqOI7DigJwEt0XsWM2b0TdvNC-KLhkdMUr5rZJuxAVNj6IByxMR0yznx396kp5GZ4gbSgVLs2QQfc1cUxpr7Iospy-kWyvfuJWHdt3fkNYZ2xFZu21FwELdo8EgKtKAXBurSK3A73e18wQQFeKuwwbq-vvjEyXUiqg3aF3nwWJrPHTGWdJC1ylvkRhLgHTetSagxIOxwUlhdx6daKhRXfzWYbS8v3uePcbzxcPTbDqPJZ9M0pgrYFqKUoq8VKmWwKUAqktZliAT4GI8VpWmVRiwbFxyXeUBzWii87yaqHEyjK4Ovq13r9twuNi4rQ-vYsFzlqWCCZYF6vpASe8QvdJF600Dvi8YLXapFyH1Ypd6QOMD-m5q1f_LFXezxZ7_AfPXiaw</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Cortés‐Molino, Álvaro</creator><creator>Valdés‐Uribe, Alejandra</creator><creator>Ellsäßer, Florian</creator><creator>Bulusu, Medha</creator><creator>Ahongshangbam, Joyson</creator><creator>Hendrayanto</creator><creator>Hölscher, Dirk</creator><creator>Röll, Alexander</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9457-4459</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Combining UAV thermography, point cloud analysis and machine learning for assessing small‐scale evapotranspiration patterns in a tropical rainforest</title><author>Cortés‐Molino, Álvaro ; Valdés‐Uribe, Alejandra ; Ellsäßer, Florian ; Bulusu, Medha ; Ahongshangbam, Joyson ; Hendrayanto ; Hölscher, Dirk ; Röll, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2884-2ea1fc6bc69be4fca2c6a0fbcbbac3a2677edf0dbcb157b2fd9c69503f99d8e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aerial thermography</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animal species</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Canopy</topic><topic>canopy structure</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Dimensional analysis</topic><topic>drone</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Height</topic><topic>Leaf area</topic><topic>leaf area density</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Microclimate</topic><topic>Photogrammetry</topic><topic>Pixels</topic><topic>Plant cover</topic><topic>Rainforests</topic><topic>Reflectance</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Sumatra</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Thermography</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Variance</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>vegetation height</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cortés‐Molino, Álvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdés‐Uribe, Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellsäßer, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulusu, Medha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahongshangbam, Joyson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendrayanto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hölscher, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Röll, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecohydrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cortés‐Molino, Álvaro</au><au>Valdés‐Uribe, Alejandra</au><au>Ellsäßer, Florian</au><au>Bulusu, Medha</au><au>Ahongshangbam, Joyson</au><au>Hendrayanto</au><au>Hölscher, Dirk</au><au>Röll, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combining UAV thermography, point cloud analysis and machine learning for assessing small‐scale evapotranspiration patterns in a tropical rainforest</atitle><jtitle>Ecohydrology</jtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1936-0584</issn><eissn>1936-0592</eissn><abstract>Microclimate and vegetation structure control evapotranspiration (ET) from land surfaces at stand and landscape scales. Tropical rainforests are among the most diverse and complex terrestrial ecosystems, harbouring vast plant and animal species throughout their dense multistory canopy. They contribute substantially to global precipitation through their high ET. However, there is little information about ET influences at very small spatial scales under given climatic conditions. In a tropical rainforest on Sumatra, we studied the relationship between pixel‐level ET as derived from high‐resolution (~10 cm), near‐surface thermography from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and canopy structure as derived from red–green–blue (RGB) image and three‐dimensional (3D) point cloud analyses. The 16 derived potential predictors encompassed vegetation height, height variability, vegetation density and reflectance variables. Using regression models, several of the studied variables had a significant linear relationship with ET, but the explained variance was only marginal. However, applying a random forest algorithm including forward feature selection and target oriented cross validation explained substantial parts of the pixel‐level variance in ET (R2 = 0.56–0.65), thus indicating multiple non‐linear relationships with interactions among predictor variables. Therein, green leaf index, leaf area density and vegetation height were often the most important variables for the prediction outcome, but their sequence varied among the four study plots. Overall, combining canopy structure variables derived from RGB photogrammetry explained relatively large parts of spatial ET variations. Our study thus indicates the large potential of combining UAV‐based thermography and photogrammetry techniques with machine learning approaches to better understand ET but also suggests that more work remains to be done in explaining ET patterns at very small spatial scales.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/eco.2604</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9457-4459</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1936-0584 |
ispartof | Ecohydrology, 2024-01, Vol.17 (1), p.n/a |
issn | 1936-0584 1936-0592 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2915461615 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aerial thermography Algorithms Animal species Canopies Canopy canopy structure Climatic conditions Density Dimensional analysis drone Evapotranspiration Height Leaf area leaf area density Learning algorithms Leaves Machine learning Microclimate Photogrammetry Pixels Plant cover Rainforests Reflectance Regression analysis Regression models Sumatra Terrestrial ecosystems Thermography Three dimensional models Unmanned aerial vehicles Variance Vegetation vegetation height |
title | Combining UAV thermography, point cloud analysis and machine learning for assessing small‐scale evapotranspiration patterns in a tropical rainforest |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T03%3A00%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combining%20UAV%20thermography,%20point%20cloud%20analysis%20and%20machine%20learning%20for%20assessing%20small%E2%80%90scale%20evapotranspiration%20patterns%20in%20a%20tropical%20rainforest&rft.jtitle=Ecohydrology&rft.au=Cort%C3%A9s%E2%80%90Molino,%20%C3%81lvaro&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1936-0584&rft.eissn=1936-0592&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eco.2604&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2915461615%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2915461615&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |