Combining UAV thermography, point cloud analysis and machine learning for assessing small‐scale evapotranspiration patterns in a tropical rainforest

Microclimate and vegetation structure control evapotranspiration (ET) from land surfaces at stand and landscape scales. Tropical rainforests are among the most diverse and complex terrestrial ecosystems, harbouring vast plant and animal species throughout their dense multistory canopy. They contribu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecohydrology 2024-01, Vol.17 (1), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Cortés‐Molino, Álvaro, Valdés‐Uribe, Alejandra, Ellsäßer, Florian, Bulusu, Medha, Ahongshangbam, Joyson, Hendrayanto, Hölscher, Dirk, Röll, Alexander
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Ecohydrology
container_volume 17
creator Cortés‐Molino, Álvaro
Valdés‐Uribe, Alejandra
Ellsäßer, Florian
Bulusu, Medha
Ahongshangbam, Joyson
Hendrayanto
Hölscher, Dirk
Röll, Alexander
description Microclimate and vegetation structure control evapotranspiration (ET) from land surfaces at stand and landscape scales. Tropical rainforests are among the most diverse and complex terrestrial ecosystems, harbouring vast plant and animal species throughout their dense multistory canopy. They contribute substantially to global precipitation through their high ET. However, there is little information about ET influences at very small spatial scales under given climatic conditions. In a tropical rainforest on Sumatra, we studied the relationship between pixel‐level ET as derived from high‐resolution (~10 cm), near‐surface thermography from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and canopy structure as derived from red–green–blue (RGB) image and three‐dimensional (3D) point cloud analyses. The 16 derived potential predictors encompassed vegetation height, height variability, vegetation density and reflectance variables. Using regression models, several of the studied variables had a significant linear relationship with ET, but the explained variance was only marginal. However, applying a random forest algorithm including forward feature selection and target oriented cross validation explained substantial parts of the pixel‐level variance in ET (R2 = 0.56–0.65), thus indicating multiple non‐linear relationships with interactions among predictor variables. Therein, green leaf index, leaf area density and vegetation height were often the most important variables for the prediction outcome, but their sequence varied among the four study plots. Overall, combining canopy structure variables derived from RGB photogrammetry explained relatively large parts of spatial ET variations. Our study thus indicates the large potential of combining UAV‐based thermography and photogrammetry techniques with machine learning approaches to better understand ET but also suggests that more work remains to be done in explaining ET patterns at very small spatial scales.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/eco.2604
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2915461615</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2915461615</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2884-2ea1fc6bc69be4fca2c6a0fbcbbac3a2677edf0dbcb157b2fd9c69503f99d8e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhSMEEqUgcQRLbFiQYjuJ2yyrij-pUjeUbTRx7NZVYgdPCsqOI7DigJwEt0XsWM2b0TdvNC-KLhkdMUr5rZJuxAVNj6IByxMR0yznx396kp5GZ4gbSgVLs2QQfc1cUxpr7Iospy-kWyvfuJWHdt3fkNYZ2xFZu21FwELdo8EgKtKAXBurSK3A73e18wQQFeKuwwbq-vvjEyXUiqg3aF3nwWJrPHTGWdJC1ylvkRhLgHTetSagxIOxwUlhdx6daKhRXfzWYbS8v3uePcbzxcPTbDqPJZ9M0pgrYFqKUoq8VKmWwKUAqktZliAT4GI8VpWmVRiwbFxyXeUBzWii87yaqHEyjK4Ovq13r9twuNi4rQ-vYsFzlqWCCZYF6vpASe8QvdJF600Dvi8YLXapFyH1Ypd6QOMD-m5q1f_LFXezxZ7_AfPXiaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2915461615</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combining UAV thermography, point cloud analysis and machine learning for assessing small‐scale evapotranspiration patterns in a tropical rainforest</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Cortés‐Molino, Álvaro ; Valdés‐Uribe, Alejandra ; Ellsäßer, Florian ; Bulusu, Medha ; Ahongshangbam, Joyson ; Hendrayanto ; Hölscher, Dirk ; Röll, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Cortés‐Molino, Álvaro ; Valdés‐Uribe, Alejandra ; Ellsäßer, Florian ; Bulusu, Medha ; Ahongshangbam, Joyson ; Hendrayanto ; Hölscher, Dirk ; Röll, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>Microclimate and vegetation structure control evapotranspiration (ET) from land surfaces at stand and landscape scales. Tropical rainforests are among the most diverse and complex terrestrial ecosystems, harbouring vast plant and animal species throughout their dense multistory canopy. They contribute substantially to global precipitation through their high ET. However, there is little information about ET influences at very small spatial scales under given climatic conditions. In a tropical rainforest on Sumatra, we studied the relationship between pixel‐level ET as derived from high‐resolution (~10 cm), near‐surface thermography from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and canopy structure as derived from red–green–blue (RGB) image and three‐dimensional (3D) point cloud analyses. The 16 derived potential predictors encompassed vegetation height, height variability, vegetation density and reflectance variables. Using regression models, several of the studied variables had a significant linear relationship with ET, but the explained variance was only marginal. However, applying a random forest algorithm including forward feature selection and target oriented cross validation explained substantial parts of the pixel‐level variance in ET (R2 = 0.56–0.65), thus indicating multiple non‐linear relationships with interactions among predictor variables. Therein, green leaf index, leaf area density and vegetation height were often the most important variables for the prediction outcome, but their sequence varied among the four study plots. Overall, combining canopy structure variables derived from RGB photogrammetry explained relatively large parts of spatial ET variations. Our study thus indicates the large potential of combining UAV‐based thermography and photogrammetry techniques with machine learning approaches to better understand ET but also suggests that more work remains to be done in explaining ET patterns at very small spatial scales.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1936-0584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-0592</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eco.2604</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aerial thermography ; Algorithms ; Animal species ; Canopies ; Canopy ; canopy structure ; Climatic conditions ; Density ; Dimensional analysis ; drone ; Evapotranspiration ; Height ; Leaf area ; leaf area density ; Learning algorithms ; Leaves ; Machine learning ; Microclimate ; Photogrammetry ; Pixels ; Plant cover ; Rainforests ; Reflectance ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Sumatra ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Thermography ; Three dimensional models ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Variance ; Vegetation ; vegetation height</subject><ispartof>Ecohydrology, 2024-01, Vol.17 (1), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2884-2ea1fc6bc69be4fca2c6a0fbcbbac3a2677edf0dbcb157b2fd9c69503f99d8e73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9457-4459</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feco.2604$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feco.2604$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cortés‐Molino, Álvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdés‐Uribe, Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellsäßer, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulusu, Medha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahongshangbam, Joyson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendrayanto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hölscher, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Röll, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Combining UAV thermography, point cloud analysis and machine learning for assessing small‐scale evapotranspiration patterns in a tropical rainforest</title><title>Ecohydrology</title><description>Microclimate and vegetation structure control evapotranspiration (ET) from land surfaces at stand and landscape scales. Tropical rainforests are among the most diverse and complex terrestrial ecosystems, harbouring vast plant and animal species throughout their dense multistory canopy. They contribute substantially to global precipitation through their high ET. However, there is little information about ET influences at very small spatial scales under given climatic conditions. In a tropical rainforest on Sumatra, we studied the relationship between pixel‐level ET as derived from high‐resolution (~10 cm), near‐surface thermography from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and canopy structure as derived from red–green–blue (RGB) image and three‐dimensional (3D) point cloud analyses. The 16 derived potential predictors encompassed vegetation height, height variability, vegetation density and reflectance variables. Using regression models, several of the studied variables had a significant linear relationship with ET, but the explained variance was only marginal. However, applying a random forest algorithm including forward feature selection and target oriented cross validation explained substantial parts of the pixel‐level variance in ET (R2 = 0.56–0.65), thus indicating multiple non‐linear relationships with interactions among predictor variables. Therein, green leaf index, leaf area density and vegetation height were often the most important variables for the prediction outcome, but their sequence varied among the four study plots. Overall, combining canopy structure variables derived from RGB photogrammetry explained relatively large parts of spatial ET variations. Our study thus indicates the large potential of combining UAV‐based thermography and photogrammetry techniques with machine learning approaches to better understand ET but also suggests that more work remains to be done in explaining ET patterns at very small spatial scales.</description><subject>Aerial thermography</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animal species</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Canopy</subject><subject>canopy structure</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Dimensional analysis</subject><subject>drone</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Height</subject><subject>Leaf area</subject><subject>leaf area density</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Microclimate</subject><subject>Photogrammetry</subject><subject>Pixels</subject><subject>Plant cover</subject><subject>Rainforests</subject><subject>Reflectance</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Sumatra</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Thermography</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Variance</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>vegetation height</subject><issn>1936-0584</issn><issn>1936-0592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhSMEEqUgcQRLbFiQYjuJ2yyrij-pUjeUbTRx7NZVYgdPCsqOI7DigJwEt0XsWM2b0TdvNC-KLhkdMUr5rZJuxAVNj6IByxMR0yznx396kp5GZ4gbSgVLs2QQfc1cUxpr7Iospy-kWyvfuJWHdt3fkNYZ2xFZu21FwELdo8EgKtKAXBurSK3A73e18wQQFeKuwwbq-vvjEyXUiqg3aF3nwWJrPHTGWdJC1ylvkRhLgHTetSagxIOxwUlhdx6daKhRXfzWYbS8v3uePcbzxcPTbDqPJZ9M0pgrYFqKUoq8VKmWwKUAqktZliAT4GI8VpWmVRiwbFxyXeUBzWii87yaqHEyjK4Ovq13r9twuNi4rQ-vYsFzlqWCCZYF6vpASe8QvdJF600Dvi8YLXapFyH1Ypd6QOMD-m5q1f_LFXezxZ7_AfPXiaw</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Cortés‐Molino, Álvaro</creator><creator>Valdés‐Uribe, Alejandra</creator><creator>Ellsäßer, Florian</creator><creator>Bulusu, Medha</creator><creator>Ahongshangbam, Joyson</creator><creator>Hendrayanto</creator><creator>Hölscher, Dirk</creator><creator>Röll, Alexander</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9457-4459</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Combining UAV thermography, point cloud analysis and machine learning for assessing small‐scale evapotranspiration patterns in a tropical rainforest</title><author>Cortés‐Molino, Álvaro ; Valdés‐Uribe, Alejandra ; Ellsäßer, Florian ; Bulusu, Medha ; Ahongshangbam, Joyson ; Hendrayanto ; Hölscher, Dirk ; Röll, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2884-2ea1fc6bc69be4fca2c6a0fbcbbac3a2677edf0dbcb157b2fd9c69503f99d8e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aerial thermography</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animal species</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Canopy</topic><topic>canopy structure</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Dimensional analysis</topic><topic>drone</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Height</topic><topic>Leaf area</topic><topic>leaf area density</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Microclimate</topic><topic>Photogrammetry</topic><topic>Pixels</topic><topic>Plant cover</topic><topic>Rainforests</topic><topic>Reflectance</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Sumatra</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Thermography</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Variance</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>vegetation height</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cortés‐Molino, Álvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdés‐Uribe, Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellsäßer, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulusu, Medha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahongshangbam, Joyson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendrayanto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hölscher, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Röll, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecohydrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cortés‐Molino, Álvaro</au><au>Valdés‐Uribe, Alejandra</au><au>Ellsäßer, Florian</au><au>Bulusu, Medha</au><au>Ahongshangbam, Joyson</au><au>Hendrayanto</au><au>Hölscher, Dirk</au><au>Röll, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combining UAV thermography, point cloud analysis and machine learning for assessing small‐scale evapotranspiration patterns in a tropical rainforest</atitle><jtitle>Ecohydrology</jtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1936-0584</issn><eissn>1936-0592</eissn><abstract>Microclimate and vegetation structure control evapotranspiration (ET) from land surfaces at stand and landscape scales. Tropical rainforests are among the most diverse and complex terrestrial ecosystems, harbouring vast plant and animal species throughout their dense multistory canopy. They contribute substantially to global precipitation through their high ET. However, there is little information about ET influences at very small spatial scales under given climatic conditions. In a tropical rainforest on Sumatra, we studied the relationship between pixel‐level ET as derived from high‐resolution (~10 cm), near‐surface thermography from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and canopy structure as derived from red–green–blue (RGB) image and three‐dimensional (3D) point cloud analyses. The 16 derived potential predictors encompassed vegetation height, height variability, vegetation density and reflectance variables. Using regression models, several of the studied variables had a significant linear relationship with ET, but the explained variance was only marginal. However, applying a random forest algorithm including forward feature selection and target oriented cross validation explained substantial parts of the pixel‐level variance in ET (R2 = 0.56–0.65), thus indicating multiple non‐linear relationships with interactions among predictor variables. Therein, green leaf index, leaf area density and vegetation height were often the most important variables for the prediction outcome, but their sequence varied among the four study plots. Overall, combining canopy structure variables derived from RGB photogrammetry explained relatively large parts of spatial ET variations. Our study thus indicates the large potential of combining UAV‐based thermography and photogrammetry techniques with machine learning approaches to better understand ET but also suggests that more work remains to be done in explaining ET patterns at very small spatial scales.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/eco.2604</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9457-4459</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1936-0584
ispartof Ecohydrology, 2024-01, Vol.17 (1), p.n/a
issn 1936-0584
1936-0592
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2915461615
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aerial thermography
Algorithms
Animal species
Canopies
Canopy
canopy structure
Climatic conditions
Density
Dimensional analysis
drone
Evapotranspiration
Height
Leaf area
leaf area density
Learning algorithms
Leaves
Machine learning
Microclimate
Photogrammetry
Pixels
Plant cover
Rainforests
Reflectance
Regression analysis
Regression models
Sumatra
Terrestrial ecosystems
Thermography
Three dimensional models
Unmanned aerial vehicles
Variance
Vegetation
vegetation height
title Combining UAV thermography, point cloud analysis and machine learning for assessing small‐scale evapotranspiration patterns in a tropical rainforest
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T03%3A00%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combining%20UAV%20thermography,%20point%20cloud%20analysis%20and%20machine%20learning%20for%20assessing%20small%E2%80%90scale%20evapotranspiration%20patterns%20in%20a%20tropical%20rainforest&rft.jtitle=Ecohydrology&rft.au=Cort%C3%A9s%E2%80%90Molino,%20%C3%81lvaro&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1936-0584&rft.eissn=1936-0592&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eco.2604&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2915461615%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2915461615&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true