Suspected cancer (red flag) referrals: A review of our experience in Northern Ireland

Aim Head and neck cancer continues to represent a significant source of morbidity and mortality for patients. Alongside prevention, early recognition is key to improving patient outcomes. We aim to present our experience of suspected cancer referrals to the oral surgery/oral medicine units within a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral surgery 2024-02, Vol.17 (1), p.11-15
Hauptverfasser: Causey, Christine, Marley, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 15
container_issue 1
container_start_page 11
container_title Oral surgery
container_volume 17
creator Causey, Christine
Marley, John
description Aim Head and neck cancer continues to represent a significant source of morbidity and mortality for patients. Alongside prevention, early recognition is key to improving patient outcomes. We aim to present our experience of suspected cancer referrals to the oral surgery/oral medicine units within a dental hospital in Northern Ireland in terms of patient demographic, referral quality, and referral outcome. Materials and Methods Patients who were referred to the oral surgery or oral medicine departments within the Queen's University Belfast Dental hospital between January and September 2018, and placed on the suspected cancer (Red Flag) pathway, had their records reviewed. Data was extracted by 2 calibrated dentists using predetermined data extraction forms. Results Overall, 377 patient referrals were identified with the majority coming from dentists (GDPs) and general practitioners (GMPs). GMP referrals were commonly via the e‐referral system (97%), and GDP via post or email (97%). E‐referrals underwent triage faster than other referral methods. Of the original referrals, 62% remained on the red flag pathway following consultant triage, and all were allocated appointments within 2 weeks. Ulcers, swellings, and white patches were the most referred lesions with just 5.5% of referrals including clinical photographs. Overall, positive predictive value (PPV) was 5.3% (8% for GDPs and 3% for GMPs). Conclusion Our department successfully met the 2‐week target in all cases. PPV does however remain low, but within recognised guidance limits, and could potentially be improved by further education of referrers and/or inclusion of a clinical photo at the time of referral.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ors.12832
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2913734859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2913734859</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2072-491c4e3b208b5247b79d5441e754e95c08ef14b4e6292184c9d974db3265cb193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYP_oMFL_aQdnezm2S9leJHoViwFrwtyWaiKTGJs421_96tEW_OZWbgeefjJeSSszH3MWnQjblIQnFEBjxWIhAyeTn-q2N-Ss6c2zAWCa6iAVmvOteC3UJObVpbQHqNvi6q9HVEEQpATCt3Q6e--SxhR5uCNh1S-GoBS_AKWtb0scHtG2BN5whVWufn5KTwMrj4zUOyvrt9nj0Ei-X9fDZdBFawWARScyshzARLMuWPy2KdKyk5xEqCVpYlUHCZSYiEFjyRVuc6lnkWikjZjOtwSK76uS02Hx24rdn442q_0gjNwziUiTpQo56y2DjnnzItlu8p7g1n5uCa8a6ZH9c8O-nZXVnB_n_QLJ9WveIbYz1sug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2913734859</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Suspected cancer (red flag) referrals: A review of our experience in Northern Ireland</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Causey, Christine ; Marley, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Causey, Christine ; Marley, John</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Head and neck cancer continues to represent a significant source of morbidity and mortality for patients. Alongside prevention, early recognition is key to improving patient outcomes. We aim to present our experience of suspected cancer referrals to the oral surgery/oral medicine units within a dental hospital in Northern Ireland in terms of patient demographic, referral quality, and referral outcome. Materials and Methods Patients who were referred to the oral surgery or oral medicine departments within the Queen's University Belfast Dental hospital between January and September 2018, and placed on the suspected cancer (Red Flag) pathway, had their records reviewed. Data was extracted by 2 calibrated dentists using predetermined data extraction forms. Results Overall, 377 patient referrals were identified with the majority coming from dentists (GDPs) and general practitioners (GMPs). GMP referrals were commonly via the e‐referral system (97%), and GDP via post or email (97%). E‐referrals underwent triage faster than other referral methods. Of the original referrals, 62% remained on the red flag pathway following consultant triage, and all were allocated appointments within 2 weeks. Ulcers, swellings, and white patches were the most referred lesions with just 5.5% of referrals including clinical photographs. Overall, positive predictive value (PPV) was 5.3% (8% for GDPs and 3% for GMPs). Conclusion Our department successfully met the 2‐week target in all cases. PPV does however remain low, but within recognised guidance limits, and could potentially be improved by further education of referrers and/or inclusion of a clinical photo at the time of referral.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-2471</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-248X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ors.12832</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Edinburgh: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Dentists ; Head &amp; neck cancer ; Maxillofacial surgery ; Morbidity ; Oral cancer ; Patients ; referrals ; Surgery ; suspected cancer ; Ulcers</subject><ispartof>Oral surgery, 2024-02, Vol.17 (1), p.11-15</ispartof><rights>2023 British Association of Oral Surgeons and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The British Association of Oral Surgeons and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2072-491c4e3b208b5247b79d5441e754e95c08ef14b4e6292184c9d974db3265cb193</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0588-2754</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fors.12832$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fors.12832$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Causey, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marley, John</creatorcontrib><title>Suspected cancer (red flag) referrals: A review of our experience in Northern Ireland</title><title>Oral surgery</title><description>Aim Head and neck cancer continues to represent a significant source of morbidity and mortality for patients. Alongside prevention, early recognition is key to improving patient outcomes. We aim to present our experience of suspected cancer referrals to the oral surgery/oral medicine units within a dental hospital in Northern Ireland in terms of patient demographic, referral quality, and referral outcome. Materials and Methods Patients who were referred to the oral surgery or oral medicine departments within the Queen's University Belfast Dental hospital between January and September 2018, and placed on the suspected cancer (Red Flag) pathway, had their records reviewed. Data was extracted by 2 calibrated dentists using predetermined data extraction forms. Results Overall, 377 patient referrals were identified with the majority coming from dentists (GDPs) and general practitioners (GMPs). GMP referrals were commonly via the e‐referral system (97%), and GDP via post or email (97%). E‐referrals underwent triage faster than other referral methods. Of the original referrals, 62% remained on the red flag pathway following consultant triage, and all were allocated appointments within 2 weeks. Ulcers, swellings, and white patches were the most referred lesions with just 5.5% of referrals including clinical photographs. Overall, positive predictive value (PPV) was 5.3% (8% for GDPs and 3% for GMPs). Conclusion Our department successfully met the 2‐week target in all cases. PPV does however remain low, but within recognised guidance limits, and could potentially be improved by further education of referrers and/or inclusion of a clinical photo at the time of referral.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Dentists</subject><subject>Head &amp; neck cancer</subject><subject>Maxillofacial surgery</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Oral cancer</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>referrals</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>suspected cancer</subject><subject>Ulcers</subject><issn>1752-2471</issn><issn>1752-248X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFYP_oMFL_aQdnezm2S9leJHoViwFrwtyWaiKTGJs421_96tEW_OZWbgeefjJeSSszH3MWnQjblIQnFEBjxWIhAyeTn-q2N-Ss6c2zAWCa6iAVmvOteC3UJObVpbQHqNvi6q9HVEEQpATCt3Q6e--SxhR5uCNh1S-GoBS_AKWtb0scHtG2BN5whVWufn5KTwMrj4zUOyvrt9nj0Ei-X9fDZdBFawWARScyshzARLMuWPy2KdKyk5xEqCVpYlUHCZSYiEFjyRVuc6lnkWikjZjOtwSK76uS02Hx24rdn442q_0gjNwziUiTpQo56y2DjnnzItlu8p7g1n5uCa8a6ZH9c8O-nZXVnB_n_QLJ9WveIbYz1sug</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Causey, Christine</creator><creator>Marley, John</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0588-2754</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>Suspected cancer (red flag) referrals: A review of our experience in Northern Ireland</title><author>Causey, Christine ; Marley, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2072-491c4e3b208b5247b79d5441e754e95c08ef14b4e6292184c9d974db3265cb193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Dentists</topic><topic>Head &amp; neck cancer</topic><topic>Maxillofacial surgery</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Oral cancer</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>referrals</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>suspected cancer</topic><topic>Ulcers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Causey, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marley, John</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Oral surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Causey, Christine</au><au>Marley, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Suspected cancer (red flag) referrals: A review of our experience in Northern Ireland</atitle><jtitle>Oral surgery</jtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>11-15</pages><issn>1752-2471</issn><eissn>1752-248X</eissn><abstract>Aim Head and neck cancer continues to represent a significant source of morbidity and mortality for patients. Alongside prevention, early recognition is key to improving patient outcomes. We aim to present our experience of suspected cancer referrals to the oral surgery/oral medicine units within a dental hospital in Northern Ireland in terms of patient demographic, referral quality, and referral outcome. Materials and Methods Patients who were referred to the oral surgery or oral medicine departments within the Queen's University Belfast Dental hospital between January and September 2018, and placed on the suspected cancer (Red Flag) pathway, had their records reviewed. Data was extracted by 2 calibrated dentists using predetermined data extraction forms. Results Overall, 377 patient referrals were identified with the majority coming from dentists (GDPs) and general practitioners (GMPs). GMP referrals were commonly via the e‐referral system (97%), and GDP via post or email (97%). E‐referrals underwent triage faster than other referral methods. Of the original referrals, 62% remained on the red flag pathway following consultant triage, and all were allocated appointments within 2 weeks. Ulcers, swellings, and white patches were the most referred lesions with just 5.5% of referrals including clinical photographs. Overall, positive predictive value (PPV) was 5.3% (8% for GDPs and 3% for GMPs). Conclusion Our department successfully met the 2‐week target in all cases. PPV does however remain low, but within recognised guidance limits, and could potentially be improved by further education of referrers and/or inclusion of a clinical photo at the time of referral.</abstract><cop>Edinburgh</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ors.12832</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0588-2754</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1752-2471
ispartof Oral surgery, 2024-02, Vol.17 (1), p.11-15
issn 1752-2471
1752-248X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2913734859
source Wiley Journals
subjects Cancer
Dentists
Head & neck cancer
Maxillofacial surgery
Morbidity
Oral cancer
Patients
referrals
Surgery
suspected cancer
Ulcers
title Suspected cancer (red flag) referrals: A review of our experience in Northern Ireland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A51%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Suspected%20cancer%20(red%20flag)%20referrals:%20A%20review%20of%20our%20experience%20in%20Northern%20Ireland&rft.jtitle=Oral%20surgery&rft.au=Causey,%20Christine&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=11-15&rft.issn=1752-2471&rft.eissn=1752-248X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ors.12832&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2913734859%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2913734859&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true