Investing in the Teacher Workforce: Experimental Evidence on Teachers’ Preferences
Inadequate compensation is often viewed as the root of teacher workforce challenges despite teacher reports that working conditions matter more. Using an original discrete choice experiment with a national sample of 1,030 U.S. teachers, we found that support staff—special education specialists, coun...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American educational research journal 2024-02, Vol.61 (1), p.108-144 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 144 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 108 |
container_title | American educational research journal |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Lovison, Virginia S. Hyunjung Mo, Cecilia |
description | Inadequate compensation is often viewed as the root of teacher workforce challenges despite teacher reports that working conditions matter more. Using an original discrete choice experiment with a national sample of 1,030 U.S. teachers, we found that support staff—special education specialists, counselors, and nurses—play an essential role in shaping teachers’ employment preferences. Teachers value access to these support staff more than they value a 10% increase to their own salary. We also assessed teachers’ preferences regarding childcare subsidies and find that teachers treat a 10% salary increase and a childcare benefit of similar value as near perfect substitutes. To test the durability of these findings, we replicated our study 2 years later and found nearly identical results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3102/00028312231208956 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2911092693</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.3102_00028312231208956</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2911092693</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-532f442a13396fefc8c4f462e0c04c937c94eec79a8095bff81b0b74fa849c583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ULtOAzEQtBBIhMAH0FmivrBr-y42HYoCRIoERRDlyTHrPAh3wb5E0PEb_B5fgk8BUSCK1RY7MzszjJ0i9CSCOAcAoSUKkQa0yYs91kEj8wwBcZ912nvWAg7ZUYxLABRGY4dNRtWWYrOoZnxR8WZOfELWzSnwhzo8-To4uuDD1zWFxTNVjV3x4XbxSJUjXlc_2Pj5_sHvAnkK7SUeswNvV5FOvneX3V8NJ4ObbHx7PRpcjjOXjDRZLoVXSliU0hSevNNOeVUIAgfKGdl3RhG5vrEaTD71XuMUpn3lrVbG5Vp22dlOdx3ql02KUS7rTajSy1IYRDCiMDKhcIdyoY4xuSzXKYwNbyVC2ZZX_ikvcXo7TrQz-lX9n_AFIMdu4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2911092693</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investing in the Teacher Workforce: Experimental Evidence on Teachers’ Preferences</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Lovison, Virginia S. ; Hyunjung Mo, Cecilia</creator><creatorcontrib>Lovison, Virginia S. ; Hyunjung Mo, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><description>Inadequate compensation is often viewed as the root of teacher workforce challenges despite teacher reports that working conditions matter more. Using an original discrete choice experiment with a national sample of 1,030 U.S. teachers, we found that support staff—special education specialists, counselors, and nurses—play an essential role in shaping teachers’ employment preferences. Teachers value access to these support staff more than they value a 10% increase to their own salary. We also assessed teachers’ preferences regarding childcare subsidies and find that teachers treat a 10% salary increase and a childcare benefit of similar value as near perfect substitutes. To test the durability of these findings, we replicated our study 2 years later and found nearly identical results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8312</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-1011</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3102/00028312231208956</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Labor market ; Teacher attitudes ; Wages & salaries</subject><ispartof>American educational research journal, 2024-02, Vol.61 (1), p.108-144</ispartof><rights>2023 AERA</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-532f442a13396fefc8c4f462e0c04c937c94eec79a8095bff81b0b74fa849c583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-532f442a13396fefc8c4f462e0c04c937c94eec79a8095bff81b0b74fa849c583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3102/00028312231208956$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/00028312231208956$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lovison, Virginia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyunjung Mo, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><title>Investing in the Teacher Workforce: Experimental Evidence on Teachers’ Preferences</title><title>American educational research journal</title><description>Inadequate compensation is often viewed as the root of teacher workforce challenges despite teacher reports that working conditions matter more. Using an original discrete choice experiment with a national sample of 1,030 U.S. teachers, we found that support staff—special education specialists, counselors, and nurses—play an essential role in shaping teachers’ employment preferences. Teachers value access to these support staff more than they value a 10% increase to their own salary. We also assessed teachers’ preferences regarding childcare subsidies and find that teachers treat a 10% salary increase and a childcare benefit of similar value as near perfect substitutes. To test the durability of these findings, we replicated our study 2 years later and found nearly identical results.</description><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Teacher attitudes</subject><subject>Wages & salaries</subject><issn>0002-8312</issn><issn>1935-1011</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1ULtOAzEQtBBIhMAH0FmivrBr-y42HYoCRIoERRDlyTHrPAh3wb5E0PEb_B5fgk8BUSCK1RY7MzszjJ0i9CSCOAcAoSUKkQa0yYs91kEj8wwBcZ912nvWAg7ZUYxLABRGY4dNRtWWYrOoZnxR8WZOfELWzSnwhzo8-To4uuDD1zWFxTNVjV3x4XbxSJUjXlc_2Pj5_sHvAnkK7SUeswNvV5FOvneX3V8NJ4ObbHx7PRpcjjOXjDRZLoVXSliU0hSevNNOeVUIAgfKGdl3RhG5vrEaTD71XuMUpn3lrVbG5Vp22dlOdx3ql02KUS7rTajSy1IYRDCiMDKhcIdyoY4xuSzXKYwNbyVC2ZZX_ikvcXo7TrQz-lX9n_AFIMdu4g</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Lovison, Virginia S.</creator><creator>Hyunjung Mo, Cecilia</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>American Educational Research Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>Investing in the Teacher Workforce: Experimental Evidence on Teachers’ Preferences</title><author>Lovison, Virginia S. ; Hyunjung Mo, Cecilia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-532f442a13396fefc8c4f462e0c04c937c94eec79a8095bff81b0b74fa849c583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Teacher attitudes</topic><topic>Wages & salaries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lovison, Virginia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyunjung Mo, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>American educational research journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lovison, Virginia S.</au><au>Hyunjung Mo, Cecilia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investing in the Teacher Workforce: Experimental Evidence on Teachers’ Preferences</atitle><jtitle>American educational research journal</jtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>108</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>108-144</pages><issn>0002-8312</issn><eissn>1935-1011</eissn><abstract>Inadequate compensation is often viewed as the root of teacher workforce challenges despite teacher reports that working conditions matter more. Using an original discrete choice experiment with a national sample of 1,030 U.S. teachers, we found that support staff—special education specialists, counselors, and nurses—play an essential role in shaping teachers’ employment preferences. Teachers value access to these support staff more than they value a 10% increase to their own salary. We also assessed teachers’ preferences regarding childcare subsidies and find that teachers treat a 10% salary increase and a childcare benefit of similar value as near perfect substitutes. To test the durability of these findings, we replicated our study 2 years later and found nearly identical results.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.3102/00028312231208956</doi><tpages>37</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8312 |
ispartof | American educational research journal, 2024-02, Vol.61 (1), p.108-144 |
issn | 0002-8312 1935-1011 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2911092693 |
source | Access via SAGE |
subjects | Labor market Teacher attitudes Wages & salaries |
title | Investing in the Teacher Workforce: Experimental Evidence on Teachers’ Preferences |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A10%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investing%20in%20the%20Teacher%20Workforce:%20Experimental%20Evidence%20on%20Teachers%E2%80%99%20Preferences&rft.jtitle=American%20educational%20research%20journal&rft.au=Lovison,%20Virginia%20S.&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=108&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=108-144&rft.issn=0002-8312&rft.eissn=1935-1011&rft_id=info:doi/10.3102/00028312231208956&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2911092693%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2911092693&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.3102_00028312231208956&rfr_iscdi=true |