esg2go: A Method to Reduce Bias, Improve Coherence, and Increase Practicality of ESG Rating and Reporting
Rating agencies that assess a company’s environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) impact have been subject to public and academic scrutiny due to divergent and often biased rating outcomes. Concurrently, an evolving regulatory environment mandates publicly listed companies to report on E...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2023-12, Vol.15 (24), p.16872 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 24 |
container_start_page | 16872 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Cakir, Isa Aerni, Philipp Bergman, Manfred Max Cakir, Benjamin |
description | Rating agencies that assess a company’s environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) impact have been subject to public and academic scrutiny due to divergent and often biased rating outcomes. Concurrently, an evolving regulatory environment mandates publicly listed companies to report on ESG and climate emissions, taking into account supply chain risks as well. As a result, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are increasingly asked as suppliers to present a credible sustainability certificate. The esg2go rating and reporting system aims at improving the credibility and practicality of corporate sustainability assessment. It was jointly developed with its users and relevant stakeholders and is based on a calibrated benchmarking system from verifiable data. The rating method enables the measurement and comparison of sector- and firm size-specific sustainability performance. Its underlying adaptive parametrization is derived from a coherent and pragmatic definition of SME sustainability as the ‘ability to co-exist’. Our data analyses indicate that our scoring function is able to minimize bias and deliver a fair comparability between SMEs. We conclude that esg2go represents a pragmatic and innovative approach to enhance the fairness and accuracy of corporate sustainability assessment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su152416872 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2904938243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A779344306</galeid><sourcerecordid>A779344306</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-482f0110f9462520dcdeea5eb10442baa2336607c1fd9112d8410e7bf7b813553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtPAjEQgDdGEwly8g808WRksa99eUOCSILRgJ43pTtdSmCLbdfIv7eIB5k5zCPfvDJRdE3wgLEC37uWJJSTNM_oWdShOCMxwQk-_-dfRj3n1jgIY6QgaSfS4Gpamwc0RC_gV6ZC3qA5VK0E9KiF66PpdmfNF6CRWYGFRkIfiaZC00ZaEA7QmxXSayk22u-RUWi8mKC58Lqpf7k57Iw9RFfRhRIbB70_240-nsbvo-d49jqZjoazWNKk8DHPqcKEYFXwlCYUV7ICEAksCeacLoWgjKUpziRRVUEIrXJOMGRLlS1zwpKEdaObY9-w9mcLzpdr09omjCxpgXnBcspZoAZHqhYbKHWjjA93BK1gq6VpQOmQH2ZZwThnOA0FtycFgfHw7WvROldOF_NT9u7ISmucs6DKndVbYfclweXhV-W_X7EfnG6Cpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2904938243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>esg2go: A Method to Reduce Bias, Improve Coherence, and Increase Practicality of ESG Rating and Reporting</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Cakir, Isa ; Aerni, Philipp ; Bergman, Manfred Max ; Cakir, Benjamin</creator><creatorcontrib>Cakir, Isa ; Aerni, Philipp ; Bergman, Manfred Max ; Cakir, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><description>Rating agencies that assess a company’s environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) impact have been subject to public and academic scrutiny due to divergent and often biased rating outcomes. Concurrently, an evolving regulatory environment mandates publicly listed companies to report on ESG and climate emissions, taking into account supply chain risks as well. As a result, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are increasingly asked as suppliers to present a credible sustainability certificate. The esg2go rating and reporting system aims at improving the credibility and practicality of corporate sustainability assessment. It was jointly developed with its users and relevant stakeholders and is based on a calibrated benchmarking system from verifiable data. The rating method enables the measurement and comparison of sector- and firm size-specific sustainability performance. Its underlying adaptive parametrization is derived from a coherent and pragmatic definition of SME sustainability as the ‘ability to co-exist’. Our data analyses indicate that our scoring function is able to minimize bias and deliver a fair comparability between SMEs. We conclude that esg2go represents a pragmatic and innovative approach to enhance the fairness and accuracy of corporate sustainability assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su152416872</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Corporate governance ; Credit risk ; Disclosure ; Due diligence ; EU directives ; False information ; Human rights ; Information management ; International Financial Reporting Standards ; International organizations ; Logistics ; Materiality ; Methods ; Rating agencies (Securities) ; Ratings & rankings ; Small and medium sized companies ; Society ; Statistics ; Supply chains ; Sustainability reporting ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2023-12, Vol.15 (24), p.16872</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-482f0110f9462520dcdeea5eb10442baa2336607c1fd9112d8410e7bf7b813553</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2898-3136 ; 0000-0002-4059-5833</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cakir, Isa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aerni, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Manfred Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakir, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><title>esg2go: A Method to Reduce Bias, Improve Coherence, and Increase Practicality of ESG Rating and Reporting</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Rating agencies that assess a company’s environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) impact have been subject to public and academic scrutiny due to divergent and often biased rating outcomes. Concurrently, an evolving regulatory environment mandates publicly listed companies to report on ESG and climate emissions, taking into account supply chain risks as well. As a result, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are increasingly asked as suppliers to present a credible sustainability certificate. The esg2go rating and reporting system aims at improving the credibility and practicality of corporate sustainability assessment. It was jointly developed with its users and relevant stakeholders and is based on a calibrated benchmarking system from verifiable data. The rating method enables the measurement and comparison of sector- and firm size-specific sustainability performance. Its underlying adaptive parametrization is derived from a coherent and pragmatic definition of SME sustainability as the ‘ability to co-exist’. Our data analyses indicate that our scoring function is able to minimize bias and deliver a fair comparability between SMEs. We conclude that esg2go represents a pragmatic and innovative approach to enhance the fairness and accuracy of corporate sustainability assessment.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Corporate governance</subject><subject>Credit risk</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Due diligence</subject><subject>EU directives</subject><subject>False information</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>International Financial Reporting Standards</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Materiality</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Rating agencies (Securities)</subject><subject>Ratings & rankings</subject><subject>Small and medium sized companies</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Sustainability reporting</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUtPAjEQgDdGEwly8g808WRksa99eUOCSILRgJ43pTtdSmCLbdfIv7eIB5k5zCPfvDJRdE3wgLEC37uWJJSTNM_oWdShOCMxwQk-_-dfRj3n1jgIY6QgaSfS4Gpamwc0RC_gV6ZC3qA5VK0E9KiF66PpdmfNF6CRWYGFRkIfiaZC00ZaEA7QmxXSayk22u-RUWi8mKC58Lqpf7k57Iw9RFfRhRIbB70_240-nsbvo-d49jqZjoazWNKk8DHPqcKEYFXwlCYUV7ICEAksCeacLoWgjKUpziRRVUEIrXJOMGRLlS1zwpKEdaObY9-w9mcLzpdr09omjCxpgXnBcspZoAZHqhYbKHWjjA93BK1gq6VpQOmQH2ZZwThnOA0FtycFgfHw7WvROldOF_NT9u7ISmucs6DKndVbYfclweXhV-W_X7EfnG6Cpg</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Cakir, Isa</creator><creator>Aerni, Philipp</creator><creator>Bergman, Manfred Max</creator><creator>Cakir, Benjamin</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2898-3136</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4059-5833</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>esg2go: A Method to Reduce Bias, Improve Coherence, and Increase Practicality of ESG Rating and Reporting</title><author>Cakir, Isa ; Aerni, Philipp ; Bergman, Manfred Max ; Cakir, Benjamin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-482f0110f9462520dcdeea5eb10442baa2336607c1fd9112d8410e7bf7b813553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Corporate governance</topic><topic>Credit risk</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Due diligence</topic><topic>EU directives</topic><topic>False information</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>International Financial Reporting Standards</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Materiality</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Rating agencies (Securities)</topic><topic>Ratings & rankings</topic><topic>Small and medium sized companies</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Sustainability reporting</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cakir, Isa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aerni, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Manfred Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakir, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cakir, Isa</au><au>Aerni, Philipp</au><au>Bergman, Manfred Max</au><au>Cakir, Benjamin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>esg2go: A Method to Reduce Bias, Improve Coherence, and Increase Practicality of ESG Rating and Reporting</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>16872</spage><pages>16872-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Rating agencies that assess a company’s environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) impact have been subject to public and academic scrutiny due to divergent and often biased rating outcomes. Concurrently, an evolving regulatory environment mandates publicly listed companies to report on ESG and climate emissions, taking into account supply chain risks as well. As a result, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are increasingly asked as suppliers to present a credible sustainability certificate. The esg2go rating and reporting system aims at improving the credibility and practicality of corporate sustainability assessment. It was jointly developed with its users and relevant stakeholders and is based on a calibrated benchmarking system from verifiable data. The rating method enables the measurement and comparison of sector- and firm size-specific sustainability performance. Its underlying adaptive parametrization is derived from a coherent and pragmatic definition of SME sustainability as the ‘ability to co-exist’. Our data analyses indicate that our scoring function is able to minimize bias and deliver a fair comparability between SMEs. We conclude that esg2go represents a pragmatic and innovative approach to enhance the fairness and accuracy of corporate sustainability assessment.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su152416872</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2898-3136</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4059-5833</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2023-12, Vol.15 (24), p.16872 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2904938243 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Corporate governance Credit risk Disclosure Due diligence EU directives False information Human rights Information management International Financial Reporting Standards International organizations Logistics Materiality Methods Rating agencies (Securities) Ratings & rankings Small and medium sized companies Society Statistics Supply chains Sustainability reporting Sustainable development |
title | esg2go: A Method to Reduce Bias, Improve Coherence, and Increase Practicality of ESG Rating and Reporting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T10%3A47%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=esg2go:%20A%20Method%20to%20Reduce%20Bias,%20Improve%20Coherence,%20and%20Increase%20Practicality%20of%20ESG%20Rating%20and%20Reporting&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Cakir,%20Isa&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=16872&rft.pages=16872-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su152416872&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA779344306%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2904938243&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A779344306&rfr_iscdi=true |