Space–time home‐range estimates and resource selection for the Critically Endangered Philippine Eagle on Mindanao

Quantifying home‐range size and habitat resource selection are important elements in wildlife ecology and are useful for informing conservation action. Many home‐range estimators and resource selection functions are currently in use. However, both methods are fraught with analytical issues inherent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ibis (London, England) England), 2024-01, Vol.166 (1), p.156-170
Hauptverfasser: Sutton, Luke J., Ibañez, Jayson C., Salvador, Dennis I., Taraya, Rowell L., Opiso, Guiller S., Senarillos, Tristan Luap P., McClure, Christopher J. W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Quantifying home‐range size and habitat resource selection are important elements in wildlife ecology and are useful for informing conservation action. Many home‐range estimators and resource selection functions are currently in use. However, both methods are fraught with analytical issues inherent within autocorrelated movement data from irregular sampling and interpretation of resource selection model parameters to inform conservation management. Here, we apply satellite remote sensing technologies to provide updated estimates of home‐range size and first estimates of fine‐scale resource selection for six adult Philippine Eagles Pithecophaga jefferyi using a space–time autocorrelated kernel density estimate (AKDE) home‐range estimator and non‐parametric resource selection functions. All six adult Eagles showed distinct site fidelity, with continuous range residency between 2 and 18 km, 1 month after tagging. The space–time AKDE home‐range estimators had a median 95% home‐range size = 68 km2 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 62–74 km2, range: 39–161 km2), with the median 50% core range size = 13 km2 (95% CI 11–14 km2, range 9–33 km2). From the resource selection functions, all adult Philippine Eagles used habitat high in photosynthetic leaf and canopy structure but avoided areas of old‐growth biomass and denser areas of vegetation. This is possibly due to foraging forays into secondary forest and fragmented agricultural areas away from nesting sites. For the first time, we determine two important fine‐scale spatial processes for this Critically Endangered raptor that can help in directing conservation management. Rather than employing traditional home‐range estimators and resource selection functions, we recommend that analysts consider space–time approaches and non‐parametric resource selection functions to animal movement data to explore fully space–time and resource selection.
ISSN:0019-1019
1474-919X
DOI:10.1111/ibi.13233