Putin's Matryoshka: A War Reparations Facility for Rebuilding Ukraine

This Article addresses a critical, trillion-dollar question: How do we hold Russia accountable for the reconstruction of Ukraine? The nation has been devastated by Russia's brutal war of aggression, with tens of thousands killed, millions displaced and its economy in shambles. The enormity of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Columbia journal of transnational law 2023-01, Vol.61 (3), p.1
1. Verfasser: Breydo, Lev E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1
container_title The Columbia journal of transnational law
container_volume 61
creator Breydo, Lev E
description This Article addresses a critical, trillion-dollar question: How do we hold Russia accountable for the reconstruction of Ukraine? The nation has been devastated by Russia's brutal war of aggression, with tens of thousands killed, millions displaced and its economy in shambles. The enormity of the problem cannot be overstated. Existing proposals to support Ukraine, including many from prominent scholars, largely focus on seizing Russian assets, particularly central bank reserves "frozen" by sanctions. Such strategies, however, are legally problematic-likely well beyond the scope of Presidential authority-and financially insufficient. Moreover, while prospective new legislation could expand presidential powers, it risks new challenges, including significant constitutional considerations and potential violations of international law-risking adverse implications for U.S. foreign policy, as well as the efficacy of global financial infrastructure. To square this most critical circle, this Article proposes establishing a war reparations facility for Ukraine, modeled on the United Nations Compensation Commission, which paid over $52 billion to 1.5 million victims of Iraq's unlawful 1990 invasion of Kuwait, funded by a levy on Iraqi oil sales. The proposal offers numerous advantages, including bypassing legal issues associated with seizing Russian reserves and-most critically-facilitating direct compensation to individual war victims, similarly funded through a Russian oil sales levy. Though hardly uncomplicated, Russian participation can be incentivized through economic leverage. Due to sanctions, Russian oil trades at a discount, totaling tens of billions annually. As detailed in the Article, that delta can be transposed to fund a reparations facility for Ukraine, in effect collateralized by $325 billion of Russia's "frozen" reserves. Along with an actionable solution-with immediate policy utility-this Article raises significant normative implications, including with respect to critical issues of state responsibility following conflicts. While there is no way for Russia to truly compensate its victims, reparations may provide some modicum of justice and the means to rebuild. It is imperative for policymakers to celeritously implement this critical support for victims of a barbaric war.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2903597971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2903597971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_29035979713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyrsKwjAUgOEgCtbLOwQcnAo5rbWNm0jFRRBRHMtRU01bkprL0LdXwQdw-ofv75EggoSHkMGiTwLGgIXAYxiSkbUVY2yZRWlA8oN3Us0t3aMznbbPGld0TS9o6FG0aNBJrSzd4k020nW01F-4etncpXrQc21QKjEhgxIbK6a_jslsm582u7A1-uWFdUWlvVEfKiLO4oSnPIX4v-sNIdM7sQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2903597971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Putin's Matryoshka: A War Reparations Facility for Rebuilding Ukraine</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Breydo, Lev E</creator><creatorcontrib>Breydo, Lev E</creatorcontrib><description>This Article addresses a critical, trillion-dollar question: How do we hold Russia accountable for the reconstruction of Ukraine? The nation has been devastated by Russia's brutal war of aggression, with tens of thousands killed, millions displaced and its economy in shambles. The enormity of the problem cannot be overstated. Existing proposals to support Ukraine, including many from prominent scholars, largely focus on seizing Russian assets, particularly central bank reserves "frozen" by sanctions. Such strategies, however, are legally problematic-likely well beyond the scope of Presidential authority-and financially insufficient. Moreover, while prospective new legislation could expand presidential powers, it risks new challenges, including significant constitutional considerations and potential violations of international law-risking adverse implications for U.S. foreign policy, as well as the efficacy of global financial infrastructure. To square this most critical circle, this Article proposes establishing a war reparations facility for Ukraine, modeled on the United Nations Compensation Commission, which paid over $52 billion to 1.5 million victims of Iraq's unlawful 1990 invasion of Kuwait, funded by a levy on Iraqi oil sales. The proposal offers numerous advantages, including bypassing legal issues associated with seizing Russian reserves and-most critically-facilitating direct compensation to individual war victims, similarly funded through a Russian oil sales levy. Though hardly uncomplicated, Russian participation can be incentivized through economic leverage. Due to sanctions, Russian oil trades at a discount, totaling tens of billions annually. As detailed in the Article, that delta can be transposed to fund a reparations facility for Ukraine, in effect collateralized by $325 billion of Russia's "frozen" reserves. Along with an actionable solution-with immediate policy utility-this Article raises significant normative implications, including with respect to critical issues of state responsibility following conflicts. While there is no way for Russia to truly compensate its victims, reparations may provide some modicum of justice and the means to rebuild. It is imperative for policymakers to celeritously implement this critical support for victims of a barbaric war.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-1931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2159-1814</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Columbia Law School</publisher><subject>Bank reserves ; Central banks ; Compensation ; Efficacy ; Foreign policy ; Infrastructure ; International law ; Legislation ; Petroleum ; Policy making ; Reparations ; Sales ; Sanctions ; State responsibility ; Unlawful ; Victims ; Violations ; War</subject><ispartof>The Columbia journal of transnational law, 2023-01, Vol.61 (3), p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright Columbia Law School 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Breydo, Lev E</creatorcontrib><title>Putin's Matryoshka: A War Reparations Facility for Rebuilding Ukraine</title><title>The Columbia journal of transnational law</title><description>This Article addresses a critical, trillion-dollar question: How do we hold Russia accountable for the reconstruction of Ukraine? The nation has been devastated by Russia's brutal war of aggression, with tens of thousands killed, millions displaced and its economy in shambles. The enormity of the problem cannot be overstated. Existing proposals to support Ukraine, including many from prominent scholars, largely focus on seizing Russian assets, particularly central bank reserves "frozen" by sanctions. Such strategies, however, are legally problematic-likely well beyond the scope of Presidential authority-and financially insufficient. Moreover, while prospective new legislation could expand presidential powers, it risks new challenges, including significant constitutional considerations and potential violations of international law-risking adverse implications for U.S. foreign policy, as well as the efficacy of global financial infrastructure. To square this most critical circle, this Article proposes establishing a war reparations facility for Ukraine, modeled on the United Nations Compensation Commission, which paid over $52 billion to 1.5 million victims of Iraq's unlawful 1990 invasion of Kuwait, funded by a levy on Iraqi oil sales. The proposal offers numerous advantages, including bypassing legal issues associated with seizing Russian reserves and-most critically-facilitating direct compensation to individual war victims, similarly funded through a Russian oil sales levy. Though hardly uncomplicated, Russian participation can be incentivized through economic leverage. Due to sanctions, Russian oil trades at a discount, totaling tens of billions annually. As detailed in the Article, that delta can be transposed to fund a reparations facility for Ukraine, in effect collateralized by $325 billion of Russia's "frozen" reserves. Along with an actionable solution-with immediate policy utility-this Article raises significant normative implications, including with respect to critical issues of state responsibility following conflicts. While there is no way for Russia to truly compensate its victims, reparations may provide some modicum of justice and the means to rebuild. It is imperative for policymakers to celeritously implement this critical support for victims of a barbaric war.</description><subject>Bank reserves</subject><subject>Central banks</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Reparations</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>State responsibility</subject><subject>Unlawful</subject><subject>Victims</subject><subject>Violations</subject><subject>War</subject><issn>0010-1931</issn><issn>2159-1814</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNyrsKwjAUgOEgCtbLOwQcnAo5rbWNm0jFRRBRHMtRU01bkprL0LdXwQdw-ofv75EggoSHkMGiTwLGgIXAYxiSkbUVY2yZRWlA8oN3Us0t3aMznbbPGld0TS9o6FG0aNBJrSzd4k020nW01F-4etncpXrQc21QKjEhgxIbK6a_jslsm582u7A1-uWFdUWlvVEfKiLO4oSnPIX4v-sNIdM7sQ</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Breydo, Lev E</creator><general>Columbia Law School</general><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Putin's Matryoshka: A War Reparations Facility for Rebuilding Ukraine</title><author>Breydo, Lev E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_29035979713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bank reserves</topic><topic>Central banks</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Reparations</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>State responsibility</topic><topic>Unlawful</topic><topic>Victims</topic><topic>Violations</topic><topic>War</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Breydo, Lev E</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Columbia journal of transnational law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Breydo, Lev E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Putin's Matryoshka: A War Reparations Facility for Rebuilding Ukraine</atitle><jtitle>The Columbia journal of transnational law</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0010-1931</issn><eissn>2159-1814</eissn><abstract>This Article addresses a critical, trillion-dollar question: How do we hold Russia accountable for the reconstruction of Ukraine? The nation has been devastated by Russia's brutal war of aggression, with tens of thousands killed, millions displaced and its economy in shambles. The enormity of the problem cannot be overstated. Existing proposals to support Ukraine, including many from prominent scholars, largely focus on seizing Russian assets, particularly central bank reserves "frozen" by sanctions. Such strategies, however, are legally problematic-likely well beyond the scope of Presidential authority-and financially insufficient. Moreover, while prospective new legislation could expand presidential powers, it risks new challenges, including significant constitutional considerations and potential violations of international law-risking adverse implications for U.S. foreign policy, as well as the efficacy of global financial infrastructure. To square this most critical circle, this Article proposes establishing a war reparations facility for Ukraine, modeled on the United Nations Compensation Commission, which paid over $52 billion to 1.5 million victims of Iraq's unlawful 1990 invasion of Kuwait, funded by a levy on Iraqi oil sales. The proposal offers numerous advantages, including bypassing legal issues associated with seizing Russian reserves and-most critically-facilitating direct compensation to individual war victims, similarly funded through a Russian oil sales levy. Though hardly uncomplicated, Russian participation can be incentivized through economic leverage. Due to sanctions, Russian oil trades at a discount, totaling tens of billions annually. As detailed in the Article, that delta can be transposed to fund a reparations facility for Ukraine, in effect collateralized by $325 billion of Russia's "frozen" reserves. Along with an actionable solution-with immediate policy utility-this Article raises significant normative implications, including with respect to critical issues of state responsibility following conflicts. While there is no way for Russia to truly compensate its victims, reparations may provide some modicum of justice and the means to rebuild. It is imperative for policymakers to celeritously implement this critical support for victims of a barbaric war.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Columbia Law School</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-1931
ispartof The Columbia journal of transnational law, 2023-01, Vol.61 (3), p.1
issn 0010-1931
2159-1814
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2903597971
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Bank reserves
Central banks
Compensation
Efficacy
Foreign policy
Infrastructure
International law
Legislation
Petroleum
Policy making
Reparations
Sales
Sanctions
State responsibility
Unlawful
Victims
Violations
War
title Putin's Matryoshka: A War Reparations Facility for Rebuilding Ukraine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T21%3A56%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Putin's%20Matryoshka:%20A%20War%20Reparations%20Facility%20for%20Rebuilding%20Ukraine&rft.jtitle=The%20Columbia%20journal%20of%20transnational%20law&rft.au=Breydo,%20Lev%20E&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0010-1931&rft.eissn=2159-1814&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2903597971%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2903597971&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true