Shapelet-Based Sensor Fault Detection and Human-Centered Explanations in Industrial Control System

With the development of information and communication technology, industrial control systems (ICSs) that operate in closed environments are now operating in smart environments, and external threats are increasing. To predict failure and respond to threats, anomaly detection and fault detection using...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE access 2023, Vol.11, p.138033-138051
Hauptverfasser: Lim, Suengbum, Kim, Jingang, Lee, Taejin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 138051
container_issue
container_start_page 138033
container_title IEEE access
container_volume 11
creator Lim, Suengbum
Kim, Jingang
Lee, Taejin
description With the development of information and communication technology, industrial control systems (ICSs) that operate in closed environments are now operating in smart environments, and external threats are increasing. To predict failure and respond to threats, anomaly detection and fault detection using artificial intelligence (AI) are being introduced, but the issue of the reliability of AI prediction is emerging. For anomaly detection, the operator must check thousands of sensors. In addition, practical operational constraints exist because AI predictions are not always accurate. This study proposes shapelet-based anomaly detection and automatic fault sensor description technology to overcome these limitations. Through intuitive abnormality detection and interpretation based on these representative patterns, when an abnormal situation occurs, operators can immediately intuitively determine which sensor causes the problem and how much the sensor differs from the pattern. This was verified with the HIL-based Augmented ICS Security Dataset (HAI) and Secure Water Treatment (SWaT) dataset, which is widely used in the ICS field. In the case of the HAI Dataset, 95.12% of the failed sensors were analyzed by extracting and inspecting only 4% of the total sensors. In the case of the SWaT Dataset, only 7% of the sensors were extracted and inspected, confirming that 84% of the failed sensors could be analyzed. We expect that intuitive explanations and anomaly detection will enable more effective technological operations in industrial environments.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3339500
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2902117591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10343097</ieee_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e4d497bff00b4c6da25123a49b027d77</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2902117591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-a2dede67eccc0b84b86fec3d76ce865fade57ce384a17da7cc00e06f2b4121d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUU2L2zAQNWUXuqT5Be1B0LNTfdmyj1s32Q0EevD2LMbSuHVwpFSSYfPv16lD2bnM8Oa9NwMvyz4zumGM1t8em2bbthtOudgIIeqC0g_ZA2dlnYtClHfv5o_ZOsYjnauaoUI9ZF37B844Ysq_Q0RLWnTRB7KDaUzkByY0afCOgLPkeTqByxt0CcPM3L6eR3BwXUcyOLJ3doopDDCSxrsU_EjaS0x4-pTd9zBGXN_6Kvu12740z_nh59O-eTzkRjCZcuAWLZYKjTG0q2RXlT0aYVVpsCqLHiwWyqCoJDBlQc0sirTseScZZ7YSq2y_-FoPR30OwwnCRXsY9D_Ah98aQhrMiBqllbXq-p7STprSAi8YFyDrjnJllZq9vi5e5-D_ThiTPvopuPl9zWvKGVNFzWaWWFgm-BgD9v-vMqqv2eglG33NRt-ymVVfFtWAiO8UQgpaK_EGVEaMBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2902117591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shapelet-Based Sensor Fault Detection and Human-Centered Explanations in Industrial Control System</title><source>IEEE Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Lim, Suengbum ; Kim, Jingang ; Lee, Taejin</creator><creatorcontrib>Lim, Suengbum ; Kim, Jingang ; Lee, Taejin</creatorcontrib><description>With the development of information and communication technology, industrial control systems (ICSs) that operate in closed environments are now operating in smart environments, and external threats are increasing. To predict failure and respond to threats, anomaly detection and fault detection using artificial intelligence (AI) are being introduced, but the issue of the reliability of AI prediction is emerging. For anomaly detection, the operator must check thousands of sensors. In addition, practical operational constraints exist because AI predictions are not always accurate. This study proposes shapelet-based anomaly detection and automatic fault sensor description technology to overcome these limitations. Through intuitive abnormality detection and interpretation based on these representative patterns, when an abnormal situation occurs, operators can immediately intuitively determine which sensor causes the problem and how much the sensor differs from the pattern. This was verified with the HIL-based Augmented ICS Security Dataset (HAI) and Secure Water Treatment (SWaT) dataset, which is widely used in the ICS field. In the case of the HAI Dataset, 95.12% of the failed sensors were analyzed by extracting and inspecting only 4% of the total sensors. In the case of the SWaT Dataset, only 7% of the sensors were extracted and inspected, confirming that 84% of the failed sensors could be analyzed. We expect that intuitive explanations and anomaly detection will enable more effective technological operations in industrial environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3339500</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IAECCG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Anomalies ; Anomaly detection ; Artificial intelligence ; Control systems ; Data models ; Datasets ; effective operation ; efficient explanations ; Fault detection ; fault sensor ; Feature extraction ; Industrial electronics ; Mathematical models ; Predictive models ; Sensors ; shapelet ; Time series analysis ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>IEEE access, 2023, Vol.11, p.138033-138051</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-a2dede67eccc0b84b86fec3d76ce865fade57ce384a17da7cc00e06f2b4121d83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3078-3459 ; 0000-0002-8808-3693</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10343097$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,4010,27610,27900,27901,27902,54908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lim, Suengbum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jingang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Taejin</creatorcontrib><title>Shapelet-Based Sensor Fault Detection and Human-Centered Explanations in Industrial Control System</title><title>IEEE access</title><addtitle>Access</addtitle><description>With the development of information and communication technology, industrial control systems (ICSs) that operate in closed environments are now operating in smart environments, and external threats are increasing. To predict failure and respond to threats, anomaly detection and fault detection using artificial intelligence (AI) are being introduced, but the issue of the reliability of AI prediction is emerging. For anomaly detection, the operator must check thousands of sensors. In addition, practical operational constraints exist because AI predictions are not always accurate. This study proposes shapelet-based anomaly detection and automatic fault sensor description technology to overcome these limitations. Through intuitive abnormality detection and interpretation based on these representative patterns, when an abnormal situation occurs, operators can immediately intuitively determine which sensor causes the problem and how much the sensor differs from the pattern. This was verified with the HIL-based Augmented ICS Security Dataset (HAI) and Secure Water Treatment (SWaT) dataset, which is widely used in the ICS field. In the case of the HAI Dataset, 95.12% of the failed sensors were analyzed by extracting and inspecting only 4% of the total sensors. In the case of the SWaT Dataset, only 7% of the sensors were extracted and inspected, confirming that 84% of the failed sensors could be analyzed. We expect that intuitive explanations and anomaly detection will enable more effective technological operations in industrial environments.</description><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Anomaly detection</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Data models</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>effective operation</subject><subject>efficient explanations</subject><subject>Fault detection</subject><subject>fault sensor</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Industrial electronics</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Predictive models</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>shapelet</subject><subject>Time series analysis</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>2169-3536</issn><issn>2169-3536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUU2L2zAQNWUXuqT5Be1B0LNTfdmyj1s32Q0EevD2LMbSuHVwpFSSYfPv16lD2bnM8Oa9NwMvyz4zumGM1t8em2bbthtOudgIIeqC0g_ZA2dlnYtClHfv5o_ZOsYjnauaoUI9ZF37B844Ysq_Q0RLWnTRB7KDaUzkByY0afCOgLPkeTqByxt0CcPM3L6eR3BwXUcyOLJ3doopDDCSxrsU_EjaS0x4-pTd9zBGXN_6Kvu12740z_nh59O-eTzkRjCZcuAWLZYKjTG0q2RXlT0aYVVpsCqLHiwWyqCoJDBlQc0sirTseScZZ7YSq2y_-FoPR30OwwnCRXsY9D_Ah98aQhrMiBqllbXq-p7STprSAi8YFyDrjnJllZq9vi5e5-D_ThiTPvopuPl9zWvKGVNFzWaWWFgm-BgD9v-vMqqv2eglG33NRt-ymVVfFtWAiO8UQgpaK_EGVEaMBQ</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Lim, Suengbum</creator><creator>Kim, Jingang</creator><creator>Lee, Taejin</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3078-3459</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8808-3693</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Shapelet-Based Sensor Fault Detection and Human-Centered Explanations in Industrial Control System</title><author>Lim, Suengbum ; Kim, Jingang ; Lee, Taejin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-a2dede67eccc0b84b86fec3d76ce865fade57ce384a17da7cc00e06f2b4121d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Anomaly detection</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Data models</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>effective operation</topic><topic>efficient explanations</topic><topic>Fault detection</topic><topic>fault sensor</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Industrial electronics</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Predictive models</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>shapelet</topic><topic>Time series analysis</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lim, Suengbum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jingang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Taejin</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lim, Suengbum</au><au>Kim, Jingang</au><au>Lee, Taejin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shapelet-Based Sensor Fault Detection and Human-Centered Explanations in Industrial Control System</atitle><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle><stitle>Access</stitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>138033</spage><epage>138051</epage><pages>138033-138051</pages><issn>2169-3536</issn><eissn>2169-3536</eissn><coden>IAECCG</coden><abstract>With the development of information and communication technology, industrial control systems (ICSs) that operate in closed environments are now operating in smart environments, and external threats are increasing. To predict failure and respond to threats, anomaly detection and fault detection using artificial intelligence (AI) are being introduced, but the issue of the reliability of AI prediction is emerging. For anomaly detection, the operator must check thousands of sensors. In addition, practical operational constraints exist because AI predictions are not always accurate. This study proposes shapelet-based anomaly detection and automatic fault sensor description technology to overcome these limitations. Through intuitive abnormality detection and interpretation based on these representative patterns, when an abnormal situation occurs, operators can immediately intuitively determine which sensor causes the problem and how much the sensor differs from the pattern. This was verified with the HIL-based Augmented ICS Security Dataset (HAI) and Secure Water Treatment (SWaT) dataset, which is widely used in the ICS field. In the case of the HAI Dataset, 95.12% of the failed sensors were analyzed by extracting and inspecting only 4% of the total sensors. In the case of the SWaT Dataset, only 7% of the sensors were extracted and inspected, confirming that 84% of the failed sensors could be analyzed. We expect that intuitive explanations and anomaly detection will enable more effective technological operations in industrial environments.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3339500</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3078-3459</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8808-3693</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-3536
ispartof IEEE access, 2023, Vol.11, p.138033-138051
issn 2169-3536
2169-3536
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2902117591
source IEEE Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Anomalies
Anomaly detection
Artificial intelligence
Control systems
Data models
Datasets
effective operation
efficient explanations
Fault detection
fault sensor
Feature extraction
Industrial electronics
Mathematical models
Predictive models
Sensors
shapelet
Time series analysis
Water treatment
title Shapelet-Based Sensor Fault Detection and Human-Centered Explanations in Industrial Control System
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T20%3A03%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shapelet-Based%20Sensor%20Fault%20Detection%20and%20Human-Centered%20Explanations%20in%20Industrial%20Control%20System&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20access&rft.au=Lim,%20Suengbum&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=138033&rft.epage=138051&rft.pages=138033-138051&rft.issn=2169-3536&rft.eissn=2169-3536&rft.coden=IAECCG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3339500&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2902117591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2902117591&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10343097&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_e4d497bff00b4c6da25123a49b027d77&rfr_iscdi=true