Characterisation of Conventional 87Sr/86Sr Isotope Ratios in Cement, Limestone and Slate Reference Materials Based on an Interlaboratory Comparison Study
An interlaboratory comparison (ILC) was organised to characterise 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios in geological and industrial reference materials by applying the so‐called conventional method for determining 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios. Four cements (VDZ 100a, VDZ 200a, VDZ 300a, IAG OPC‐1), one limestone (I...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Geostandards and geoanalytical research 2023-12, Vol.47 (4), p.821-840 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 840 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 821 |
| container_title | Geostandards and geoanalytical research |
| container_volume | 47 |
| creator | Kazlagić, Anera Rosner, Martin Cipriani, Anna Frick, Daniel A. Glodny, Johannes Hoffmann, Elis J. Hora, John M. Irrgeher, Johanna Lugli, Federico Magna, Tomas Meisel, Thomas C. Meixner, Anette Possolo, Antonio Pramann, Axel Pribil, Michael J. Prohaska, Thomas Retzmann, Anika Rienitz, Olaf Rutherford, Daniel Paula‐Santos, Gustavo M. Tatzel, Michael Widhalm, Sara Willbold, Matthias Zuliani, Tea Vogl, Jochen |
| description | An interlaboratory comparison (ILC) was organised to characterise 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios in geological and industrial reference materials by applying the so‐called conventional method for determining 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios. Four cements (VDZ 100a, VDZ 200a, VDZ 300a, IAG OPC‐1), one limestone (IAG CGL ML‐3) and one slate (IAG OU‐6) reference materials were selected, covering a wide range of naturally occurring Sr isotopic signatures. Thirteen laboratories received aliquots of these six reference materials together with a detailed technical protocol. The consensus values for the six reference materials and their associated measurement uncertainties were obtained by applying a Gaussian, linear mixed effects model fitted to all the measurement results. By combining the consensus values and their uncertainties with an uncertainty contribution for potential heterogeneity, reference values ranging from 0.708134 mol mol‐1 to 0.729778 mol mol‐1 were obtained with relative expanded uncertainties of ≤ 0.007 %. This study represents an ILC on conventional 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios, within which metrological principles were considered and the compatibility of measurement results obtained by MC‐ICP‐MS and by MC‐TIMS is demonstrated. The materials characterised in this study can be used as reference materials for validation and quality control purposes and to estimate measurement uncertainties in conventional 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratio measurement.
Key Points
Interlaboratory comparison of 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios in geological and industrial reference materials.
Metrological principles were considered and relative measurement uncertainties of < 0.007 % were achieved.
Compatibility of MC-TIMS and MC-ICP-MS was demonstrated. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ggr.12517 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2901391778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2901391778</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1887-7d43d03cb51411ad57aa77518a9bf0462ecb9e985823456193899beeb27f58e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkFFPgzAQx4nRxDl98Bs08VU2CpS2j0p0LpkxGZr4Rg44Jgu02DINH8Vva3H25a7X3931__e8axosqDvL3c4saMgoP_FmlDPqy0C8n7o8iaQfx0KcexfW7oOAxZLRmfeTfoCBckDTWBgarYiuSarVF6rpBi0RPDNLkWSGrK0edI9kO4GWNIqk2DnulmyaDu2gFRJQFclaGByFNRpUJZJnmMZDa8k9WKyIWwKKrJWrtlBoA4M2o1va9eB-4V6z4VCNl95Z7Xrw6j_OvbfHh9f0yd-8rNbp3cbvqRDc51UcVUFUFozGlELFOAB3wgXIog7iJMSykCgFE2EUs4TKSEhZIBYhr5lAGs29m-Pc3ujPg5OR7_XBOOU2D2VAI0k5F45aHqnvpsUx703TgRlzGuST7bmzPf-zPV-ttn9J9AuVpHih</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2901391778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterisation of Conventional 87Sr/86Sr Isotope Ratios in Cement, Limestone and Slate Reference Materials Based on an Interlaboratory Comparison Study</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kazlagić, Anera ; Rosner, Martin ; Cipriani, Anna ; Frick, Daniel A. ; Glodny, Johannes ; Hoffmann, Elis J. ; Hora, John M. ; Irrgeher, Johanna ; Lugli, Federico ; Magna, Tomas ; Meisel, Thomas C. ; Meixner, Anette ; Possolo, Antonio ; Pramann, Axel ; Pribil, Michael J. ; Prohaska, Thomas ; Retzmann, Anika ; Rienitz, Olaf ; Rutherford, Daniel ; Paula‐Santos, Gustavo M. ; Tatzel, Michael ; Widhalm, Sara ; Willbold, Matthias ; Zuliani, Tea ; Vogl, Jochen</creator><creatorcontrib>Kazlagić, Anera ; Rosner, Martin ; Cipriani, Anna ; Frick, Daniel A. ; Glodny, Johannes ; Hoffmann, Elis J. ; Hora, John M. ; Irrgeher, Johanna ; Lugli, Federico ; Magna, Tomas ; Meisel, Thomas C. ; Meixner, Anette ; Possolo, Antonio ; Pramann, Axel ; Pribil, Michael J. ; Prohaska, Thomas ; Retzmann, Anika ; Rienitz, Olaf ; Rutherford, Daniel ; Paula‐Santos, Gustavo M. ; Tatzel, Michael ; Widhalm, Sara ; Willbold, Matthias ; Zuliani, Tea ; Vogl, Jochen</creatorcontrib><description>An interlaboratory comparison (ILC) was organised to characterise 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios in geological and industrial reference materials by applying the so‐called conventional method for determining 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios. Four cements (VDZ 100a, VDZ 200a, VDZ 300a, IAG OPC‐1), one limestone (IAG CGL ML‐3) and one slate (IAG OU‐6) reference materials were selected, covering a wide range of naturally occurring Sr isotopic signatures. Thirteen laboratories received aliquots of these six reference materials together with a detailed technical protocol. The consensus values for the six reference materials and their associated measurement uncertainties were obtained by applying a Gaussian, linear mixed effects model fitted to all the measurement results. By combining the consensus values and their uncertainties with an uncertainty contribution for potential heterogeneity, reference values ranging from 0.708134 mol mol‐1 to 0.729778 mol mol‐1 were obtained with relative expanded uncertainties of ≤ 0.007 %. This study represents an ILC on conventional 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios, within which metrological principles were considered and the compatibility of measurement results obtained by MC‐ICP‐MS and by MC‐TIMS is demonstrated. The materials characterised in this study can be used as reference materials for validation and quality control purposes and to estimate measurement uncertainties in conventional 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratio measurement.
Key Points
Interlaboratory comparison of 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios in geological and industrial reference materials.
Metrological principles were considered and relative measurement uncertainties of < 0.007 % were achieved.
Compatibility of MC-TIMS and MC-ICP-MS was demonstrated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1639-4488</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-908X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ggr.12517</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>cement ; conventional method ; geological material ; Heterogeneity ; interlaboratory comparison ; isotope ratios ; Isotopes ; Limestone ; MC‐ICP‐MS ; MC‐TIMS ; measurement uncertainty ; Quality control ; Ratios ; Reference materials ; Sr isotope analysis ; Stone ; Strontium isotopes</subject><ispartof>Geostandards and geoanalytical research, 2023-12, Vol.47 (4), p.821-840</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Association of Geoanalysts.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-2178-2470 ; 0000-0002-0104-748X ; 0000-0002-8691-4190 ; 0000-0002-5087-5812 ; 0000-0002-0208-5453 ; 0000-0001-5572-3212</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fggr.12517$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fggr.12517$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kazlagić, Anera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosner, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cipriani, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frick, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glodny, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Elis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hora, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irrgeher, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lugli, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magna, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meisel, Thomas C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meixner, Anette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Possolo, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pramann, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pribil, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prohaska, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retzmann, Anika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rienitz, Olaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherford, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paula‐Santos, Gustavo M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatzel, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widhalm, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willbold, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuliani, Tea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogl, Jochen</creatorcontrib><title>Characterisation of Conventional 87Sr/86Sr Isotope Ratios in Cement, Limestone and Slate Reference Materials Based on an Interlaboratory Comparison Study</title><title>Geostandards and geoanalytical research</title><description>An interlaboratory comparison (ILC) was organised to characterise 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios in geological and industrial reference materials by applying the so‐called conventional method for determining 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios. Four cements (VDZ 100a, VDZ 200a, VDZ 300a, IAG OPC‐1), one limestone (IAG CGL ML‐3) and one slate (IAG OU‐6) reference materials were selected, covering a wide range of naturally occurring Sr isotopic signatures. Thirteen laboratories received aliquots of these six reference materials together with a detailed technical protocol. The consensus values for the six reference materials and their associated measurement uncertainties were obtained by applying a Gaussian, linear mixed effects model fitted to all the measurement results. By combining the consensus values and their uncertainties with an uncertainty contribution for potential heterogeneity, reference values ranging from 0.708134 mol mol‐1 to 0.729778 mol mol‐1 were obtained with relative expanded uncertainties of ≤ 0.007 %. This study represents an ILC on conventional 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios, within which metrological principles were considered and the compatibility of measurement results obtained by MC‐ICP‐MS and by MC‐TIMS is demonstrated. The materials characterised in this study can be used as reference materials for validation and quality control purposes and to estimate measurement uncertainties in conventional 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratio measurement.
Key Points
Interlaboratory comparison of 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios in geological and industrial reference materials.
Metrological principles were considered and relative measurement uncertainties of < 0.007 % were achieved.
Compatibility of MC-TIMS and MC-ICP-MS was demonstrated.</description><subject>cement</subject><subject>conventional method</subject><subject>geological material</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>interlaboratory comparison</subject><subject>isotope ratios</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Limestone</subject><subject>MC‐ICP‐MS</subject><subject>MC‐TIMS</subject><subject>measurement uncertainty</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Reference materials</subject><subject>Sr isotope analysis</subject><subject>Stone</subject><subject>Strontium isotopes</subject><issn>1639-4488</issn><issn>1751-908X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNotkFFPgzAQx4nRxDl98Bs08VU2CpS2j0p0LpkxGZr4Rg44Jgu02DINH8Vva3H25a7X3931__e8axosqDvL3c4saMgoP_FmlDPqy0C8n7o8iaQfx0KcexfW7oOAxZLRmfeTfoCBckDTWBgarYiuSarVF6rpBi0RPDNLkWSGrK0edI9kO4GWNIqk2DnulmyaDu2gFRJQFclaGByFNRpUJZJnmMZDa8k9WKyIWwKKrJWrtlBoA4M2o1va9eB-4V6z4VCNl95Z7Xrw6j_OvbfHh9f0yd-8rNbp3cbvqRDc51UcVUFUFozGlELFOAB3wgXIog7iJMSykCgFE2EUs4TKSEhZIBYhr5lAGs29m-Pc3ujPg5OR7_XBOOU2D2VAI0k5F45aHqnvpsUx703TgRlzGuST7bmzPf-zPV-ttn9J9AuVpHih</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Kazlagić, Anera</creator><creator>Rosner, Martin</creator><creator>Cipriani, Anna</creator><creator>Frick, Daniel A.</creator><creator>Glodny, Johannes</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Elis J.</creator><creator>Hora, John M.</creator><creator>Irrgeher, Johanna</creator><creator>Lugli, Federico</creator><creator>Magna, Tomas</creator><creator>Meisel, Thomas C.</creator><creator>Meixner, Anette</creator><creator>Possolo, Antonio</creator><creator>Pramann, Axel</creator><creator>Pribil, Michael J.</creator><creator>Prohaska, Thomas</creator><creator>Retzmann, Anika</creator><creator>Rienitz, Olaf</creator><creator>Rutherford, Daniel</creator><creator>Paula‐Santos, Gustavo M.</creator><creator>Tatzel, Michael</creator><creator>Widhalm, Sara</creator><creator>Willbold, Matthias</creator><creator>Zuliani, Tea</creator><creator>Vogl, Jochen</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2178-2470</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0104-748X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8691-4190</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5087-5812</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0208-5453</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5572-3212</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Characterisation of Conventional 87Sr/86Sr Isotope Ratios in Cement, Limestone and Slate Reference Materials Based on an Interlaboratory Comparison Study</title><author>Kazlagić, Anera ; Rosner, Martin ; Cipriani, Anna ; Frick, Daniel A. ; Glodny, Johannes ; Hoffmann, Elis J. ; Hora, John M. ; Irrgeher, Johanna ; Lugli, Federico ; Magna, Tomas ; Meisel, Thomas C. ; Meixner, Anette ; Possolo, Antonio ; Pramann, Axel ; Pribil, Michael J. ; Prohaska, Thomas ; Retzmann, Anika ; Rienitz, Olaf ; Rutherford, Daniel ; Paula‐Santos, Gustavo M. ; Tatzel, Michael ; Widhalm, Sara ; Willbold, Matthias ; Zuliani, Tea ; Vogl, Jochen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1887-7d43d03cb51411ad57aa77518a9bf0462ecb9e985823456193899beeb27f58e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>cement</topic><topic>conventional method</topic><topic>geological material</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>interlaboratory comparison</topic><topic>isotope ratios</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Limestone</topic><topic>MC‐ICP‐MS</topic><topic>MC‐TIMS</topic><topic>measurement uncertainty</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Reference materials</topic><topic>Sr isotope analysis</topic><topic>Stone</topic><topic>Strontium isotopes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kazlagić, Anera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosner, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cipriani, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frick, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glodny, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Elis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hora, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irrgeher, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lugli, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magna, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meisel, Thomas C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meixner, Anette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Possolo, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pramann, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pribil, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prohaska, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retzmann, Anika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rienitz, Olaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherford, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paula‐Santos, Gustavo M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatzel, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widhalm, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willbold, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuliani, Tea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogl, Jochen</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Geostandards and geoanalytical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kazlagić, Anera</au><au>Rosner, Martin</au><au>Cipriani, Anna</au><au>Frick, Daniel A.</au><au>Glodny, Johannes</au><au>Hoffmann, Elis J.</au><au>Hora, John M.</au><au>Irrgeher, Johanna</au><au>Lugli, Federico</au><au>Magna, Tomas</au><au>Meisel, Thomas C.</au><au>Meixner, Anette</au><au>Possolo, Antonio</au><au>Pramann, Axel</au><au>Pribil, Michael J.</au><au>Prohaska, Thomas</au><au>Retzmann, Anika</au><au>Rienitz, Olaf</au><au>Rutherford, Daniel</au><au>Paula‐Santos, Gustavo M.</au><au>Tatzel, Michael</au><au>Widhalm, Sara</au><au>Willbold, Matthias</au><au>Zuliani, Tea</au><au>Vogl, Jochen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterisation of Conventional 87Sr/86Sr Isotope Ratios in Cement, Limestone and Slate Reference Materials Based on an Interlaboratory Comparison Study</atitle><jtitle>Geostandards and geoanalytical research</jtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>821</spage><epage>840</epage><pages>821-840</pages><issn>1639-4488</issn><eissn>1751-908X</eissn><abstract>An interlaboratory comparison (ILC) was organised to characterise 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios in geological and industrial reference materials by applying the so‐called conventional method for determining 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios. Four cements (VDZ 100a, VDZ 200a, VDZ 300a, IAG OPC‐1), one limestone (IAG CGL ML‐3) and one slate (IAG OU‐6) reference materials were selected, covering a wide range of naturally occurring Sr isotopic signatures. Thirteen laboratories received aliquots of these six reference materials together with a detailed technical protocol. The consensus values for the six reference materials and their associated measurement uncertainties were obtained by applying a Gaussian, linear mixed effects model fitted to all the measurement results. By combining the consensus values and their uncertainties with an uncertainty contribution for potential heterogeneity, reference values ranging from 0.708134 mol mol‐1 to 0.729778 mol mol‐1 were obtained with relative expanded uncertainties of ≤ 0.007 %. This study represents an ILC on conventional 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios, within which metrological principles were considered and the compatibility of measurement results obtained by MC‐ICP‐MS and by MC‐TIMS is demonstrated. The materials characterised in this study can be used as reference materials for validation and quality control purposes and to estimate measurement uncertainties in conventional 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratio measurement.
Key Points
Interlaboratory comparison of 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios in geological and industrial reference materials.
Metrological principles were considered and relative measurement uncertainties of < 0.007 % were achieved.
Compatibility of MC-TIMS and MC-ICP-MS was demonstrated.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ggr.12517</doi><tpages>840</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2178-2470</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0104-748X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8691-4190</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5087-5812</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0208-5453</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5572-3212</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1639-4488 |
| ispartof | Geostandards and geoanalytical research, 2023-12, Vol.47 (4), p.821-840 |
| issn | 1639-4488 1751-908X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2901391778 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | cement conventional method geological material Heterogeneity interlaboratory comparison isotope ratios Isotopes Limestone MC‐ICP‐MS MC‐TIMS measurement uncertainty Quality control Ratios Reference materials Sr isotope analysis Stone Strontium isotopes |
| title | Characterisation of Conventional 87Sr/86Sr Isotope Ratios in Cement, Limestone and Slate Reference Materials Based on an Interlaboratory Comparison Study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T01%3A37%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterisation%20of%20Conventional%2087Sr/86Sr%20Isotope%20Ratios%20in%20Cement,%20Limestone%20and%20Slate%20Reference%20Materials%20Based%20on%20an%20Interlaboratory%20Comparison%20Study&rft.jtitle=Geostandards%20and%20geoanalytical%20research&rft.au=Kazlagi%C4%87,%20Anera&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=821&rft.epage=840&rft.pages=821-840&rft.issn=1639-4488&rft.eissn=1751-908X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ggr.12517&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2901391778%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2901391778&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |