Effect of Cementation Technique on Retention of All Ceramic Crowns Cemented to Zirconia and Titanium Implant Abutments: A Comparative in Vitro Study

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the retention of lithium disilicate crowns cemented by resin cement on zirconia and titanium implant abutments coated with glycerin and eugenol. Materials and Methods: Forty implant analogs were embedded in forty blocks of epoxy resin. Twenty implant a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NeuroQuantology 2022-05, Vol.20 (5), p.911-917
Hauptverfasser: Ahmed, Mohamed T., Mohsen, Cherif A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 917
container_issue 5
container_start_page 911
container_title NeuroQuantology
container_volume 20
creator Ahmed, Mohamed T.
Mohsen, Cherif A.
description Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the retention of lithium disilicate crowns cemented by resin cement on zirconia and titanium implant abutments coated with glycerin and eugenol. Materials and Methods: Forty implant analogs were embedded in forty blocks of epoxy resin. Twenty implant analogs received a zirconia implant abutment to which 20 IPS e.max press crowns were cemented. The other twenty implant analogs received a titanium implant abutment to which 20 IPS e.max press crowns were cemented. According to the cementation technique, the samples were subdivided into two groups, 10 samples each. In Gp A, zirconia implant abutments’ surfaces were coated with a single coat of eugenol before cementing crowns with the permanent resin luting cement. In Gp B, same as in Gp B with replacement of eugenol with single coat of glycerin. In Gp C, Titanium implant abutments’ surfaces were coated with a single coat of eugenol before cementing crowns with the permanent resin luting cement. In Gp D, same as in Gp C with replacement of eugenol with single coat of glycerin. Each sample was subjected to a pull-out test. Loads required to remove the crowns were recorded, and mean values for each group determined. Data were statistically analyzed. Results: The mean values ±SD of loads at failure (n -10) for each group were as follows in Newton (N): Group(A) 141.9±17.9, Group(B) 134±14.5, Group(C) 140.5±17, Group(D) 143.6±12.4. All groups showed statistically insignificant difference in retention (p
doi_str_mv 10.14704/nq.2022.20.5.NQ22342
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2900739249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2900739249</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c749-ad97345af0e4ff352c3166003c279b540a9ca6fc3b09fdb0fcf4f345b52dc46f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1KAzEQxxdRsFYfQQh4bp3Nxy7xVpaqhaKoiwcvIZtNMKWbtNms0vfwgU1tD17m8zczzD_LrnOY5rQEeuu2UwwYJzNl06cXjAnFJ9koJ0AmLGdw-i8-zy76fgXASuDFKPuZG6NVRN6gSnfaRRmtd6jW6tPZ7aBRSl51TI19OVGz9TqRQXZWoSr4b9cfB3WLokcfNijvrETStai2UTo7dGjRbdbSRTRrhrhn-zs0Q5XvNjKke18aWYfebQwevcWh3V1mZ0aue3119OOsvp_X1eNk-fywqGbLiSopn8iWl4QyaUBTYwjDiuRFAUAULnnDKEiuZGEUaYCbtgGjDDVpoGG4VbQwZJzdHNZugk-v9lGs_BBcuigwBygJx5Qnih0oFXzfB23EJthOhp3IQfzpL9xW7PVPRjBx1J_8AhbCe2Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2900739249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Cementation Technique on Retention of All Ceramic Crowns Cemented to Zirconia and Titanium Implant Abutments: A Comparative in Vitro Study</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Ahmed, Mohamed T. ; Mohsen, Cherif A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Mohamed T. ; Mohsen, Cherif A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the retention of lithium disilicate crowns cemented by resin cement on zirconia and titanium implant abutments coated with glycerin and eugenol. Materials and Methods: Forty implant analogs were embedded in forty blocks of epoxy resin. Twenty implant analogs received a zirconia implant abutment to which 20 IPS e.max press crowns were cemented. The other twenty implant analogs received a titanium implant abutment to which 20 IPS e.max press crowns were cemented. According to the cementation technique, the samples were subdivided into two groups, 10 samples each. In Gp A, zirconia implant abutments’ surfaces were coated with a single coat of eugenol before cementing crowns with the permanent resin luting cement. In Gp B, same as in Gp B with replacement of eugenol with single coat of glycerin. In Gp C, Titanium implant abutments’ surfaces were coated with a single coat of eugenol before cementing crowns with the permanent resin luting cement. In Gp D, same as in Gp C with replacement of eugenol with single coat of glycerin. Each sample was subjected to a pull-out test. Loads required to remove the crowns were recorded, and mean values for each group determined. Data were statistically analyzed. Results: The mean values ±SD of loads at failure (n -10) for each group were as follows in Newton (N): Group(A) 141.9±17.9, Group(B) 134±14.5, Group(C) 140.5±17, Group(D) 143.6±12.4. All groups showed statistically insignificant difference in retention (p&lt;0.05). Conclusions: There was no significant difference between eugenol and glycerin coated zirconia implant abutments in retention of lithium disilicate crowns. There was no significant difference between eugenol and glycerin coated titanium implant abutments in retention of lithium disilicate crowns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1303-5150</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1303-5150</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14704/nq.2022.20.5.NQ22342</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bornova Izmir: NeuroQuantology</publisher><subject>Analogs ; Cement ; Conflicts of interest ; Dentistry ; Edentulous ; Epoxy resins ; Lithium ; Prostheses ; Prosthodontics ; Retention ; Stress concentration ; Titanium ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Zirconium dioxide</subject><ispartof>NeuroQuantology, 2022-05, Vol.20 (5), p.911-917</ispartof><rights>Copyright NeuroQuantology 2022</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Mohamed T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohsen, Cherif A.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Cementation Technique on Retention of All Ceramic Crowns Cemented to Zirconia and Titanium Implant Abutments: A Comparative in Vitro Study</title><title>NeuroQuantology</title><description>Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the retention of lithium disilicate crowns cemented by resin cement on zirconia and titanium implant abutments coated with glycerin and eugenol. Materials and Methods: Forty implant analogs were embedded in forty blocks of epoxy resin. Twenty implant analogs received a zirconia implant abutment to which 20 IPS e.max press crowns were cemented. The other twenty implant analogs received a titanium implant abutment to which 20 IPS e.max press crowns were cemented. According to the cementation technique, the samples were subdivided into two groups, 10 samples each. In Gp A, zirconia implant abutments’ surfaces were coated with a single coat of eugenol before cementing crowns with the permanent resin luting cement. In Gp B, same as in Gp B with replacement of eugenol with single coat of glycerin. In Gp C, Titanium implant abutments’ surfaces were coated with a single coat of eugenol before cementing crowns with the permanent resin luting cement. In Gp D, same as in Gp C with replacement of eugenol with single coat of glycerin. Each sample was subjected to a pull-out test. Loads required to remove the crowns were recorded, and mean values for each group determined. Data were statistically analyzed. Results: The mean values ±SD of loads at failure (n -10) for each group were as follows in Newton (N): Group(A) 141.9±17.9, Group(B) 134±14.5, Group(C) 140.5±17, Group(D) 143.6±12.4. All groups showed statistically insignificant difference in retention (p&lt;0.05). Conclusions: There was no significant difference between eugenol and glycerin coated zirconia implant abutments in retention of lithium disilicate crowns. There was no significant difference between eugenol and glycerin coated titanium implant abutments in retention of lithium disilicate crowns.</description><subject>Analogs</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Edentulous</subject><subject>Epoxy resins</subject><subject>Lithium</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Prosthodontics</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Stress concentration</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Zirconium dioxide</subject><issn>1303-5150</issn><issn>1303-5150</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1KAzEQxxdRsFYfQQh4bp3Nxy7xVpaqhaKoiwcvIZtNMKWbtNms0vfwgU1tD17m8zczzD_LrnOY5rQEeuu2UwwYJzNl06cXjAnFJ9koJ0AmLGdw-i8-zy76fgXASuDFKPuZG6NVRN6gSnfaRRmtd6jW6tPZ7aBRSl51TI19OVGz9TqRQXZWoSr4b9cfB3WLokcfNijvrETStai2UTo7dGjRbdbSRTRrhrhn-zs0Q5XvNjKke18aWYfebQwevcWh3V1mZ0aue3119OOsvp_X1eNk-fywqGbLiSopn8iWl4QyaUBTYwjDiuRFAUAULnnDKEiuZGEUaYCbtgGjDDVpoGG4VbQwZJzdHNZugk-v9lGs_BBcuigwBygJx5Qnih0oFXzfB23EJthOhp3IQfzpL9xW7PVPRjBx1J_8AhbCe2Y</recordid><startdate>20220510</startdate><enddate>20220510</enddate><creator>Ahmed, Mohamed T.</creator><creator>Mohsen, Cherif A.</creator><general>NeuroQuantology</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220510</creationdate><title>Effect of Cementation Technique on Retention of All Ceramic Crowns Cemented to Zirconia and Titanium Implant Abutments: A Comparative in Vitro Study</title><author>Ahmed, Mohamed T. ; Mohsen, Cherif A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c749-ad97345af0e4ff352c3166003c279b540a9ca6fc3b09fdb0fcf4f345b52dc46f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analogs</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Edentulous</topic><topic>Epoxy resins</topic><topic>Lithium</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Prosthodontics</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Stress concentration</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Zirconium dioxide</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Mohamed T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohsen, Cherif A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>NeuroQuantology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahmed, Mohamed T.</au><au>Mohsen, Cherif A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Cementation Technique on Retention of All Ceramic Crowns Cemented to Zirconia and Titanium Implant Abutments: A Comparative in Vitro Study</atitle><jtitle>NeuroQuantology</jtitle><date>2022-05-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>911</spage><epage>917</epage><pages>911-917</pages><issn>1303-5150</issn><eissn>1303-5150</eissn><abstract>Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the retention of lithium disilicate crowns cemented by resin cement on zirconia and titanium implant abutments coated with glycerin and eugenol. Materials and Methods: Forty implant analogs were embedded in forty blocks of epoxy resin. Twenty implant analogs received a zirconia implant abutment to which 20 IPS e.max press crowns were cemented. The other twenty implant analogs received a titanium implant abutment to which 20 IPS e.max press crowns were cemented. According to the cementation technique, the samples were subdivided into two groups, 10 samples each. In Gp A, zirconia implant abutments’ surfaces were coated with a single coat of eugenol before cementing crowns with the permanent resin luting cement. In Gp B, same as in Gp B with replacement of eugenol with single coat of glycerin. In Gp C, Titanium implant abutments’ surfaces were coated with a single coat of eugenol before cementing crowns with the permanent resin luting cement. In Gp D, same as in Gp C with replacement of eugenol with single coat of glycerin. Each sample was subjected to a pull-out test. Loads required to remove the crowns were recorded, and mean values for each group determined. Data were statistically analyzed. Results: The mean values ±SD of loads at failure (n -10) for each group were as follows in Newton (N): Group(A) 141.9±17.9, Group(B) 134±14.5, Group(C) 140.5±17, Group(D) 143.6±12.4. All groups showed statistically insignificant difference in retention (p&lt;0.05). Conclusions: There was no significant difference between eugenol and glycerin coated zirconia implant abutments in retention of lithium disilicate crowns. There was no significant difference between eugenol and glycerin coated titanium implant abutments in retention of lithium disilicate crowns.</abstract><cop>Bornova Izmir</cop><pub>NeuroQuantology</pub><doi>10.14704/nq.2022.20.5.NQ22342</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1303-5150
ispartof NeuroQuantology, 2022-05, Vol.20 (5), p.911-917
issn 1303-5150
1303-5150
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2900739249
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Analogs
Cement
Conflicts of interest
Dentistry
Edentulous
Epoxy resins
Lithium
Prostheses
Prosthodontics
Retention
Stress concentration
Titanium
Transplants & implants
Zirconium dioxide
title Effect of Cementation Technique on Retention of All Ceramic Crowns Cemented to Zirconia and Titanium Implant Abutments: A Comparative in Vitro Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T05%3A05%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Cementation%20Technique%20on%20Retention%20of%20All%20Ceramic%20Crowns%20Cemented%20to%20Zirconia%20and%20Titanium%20Implant%20Abutments:%20A%20Comparative%20in%20Vitro%20Study&rft.jtitle=NeuroQuantology&rft.au=Ahmed,%20Mohamed%20T.&rft.date=2022-05-10&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=911&rft.epage=917&rft.pages=911-917&rft.issn=1303-5150&rft.eissn=1303-5150&rft_id=info:doi/10.14704/nq.2022.20.5.NQ22342&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2900739249%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2900739249&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true