Why Do Poor People Not Take up Benefits? Evidence from the Barcelona’s B-MINCOME Experiment
Non-take-up, i.e. individuals not applying for a benefit they are eligible for, is a widespread problem limiting the reach of welfare and protection systems. This paper seeks to understand it by means of a theoretical framework comprising two levels of analysis: the claimants’ individual characteris...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of social policy 2024-01, Vol.53 (1), p.167-188 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 188 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 167 |
| container_title | Journal of social policy |
| container_volume | 53 |
| creator | LAÍN, BRU JULIÀ, ALBERT |
| description | Non-take-up, i.e. individuals not applying for a benefit they are eligible for, is a widespread problem limiting the reach of welfare and protection systems. This paper seeks to understand it by means of a theoretical framework comprising two levels of analysis: the claimants’ individual characteristics in relation to the information barriers they face, and the administrative logic and functioning regarding the communications strategy used by public institutions. To test the hypotheses of these two levels of analysis, the paper analyses the B-MINCOME pilot scheme, a cash transfer programme implemented in the city of Barcelona between 2017 and 2019. Findings indicate that, although claimants’ characteristics may play a significant role, the administrative functioning and the communications strategy are fundamental in determining take-up rates. The conclusions briefly address some of the technical and moral concerns raised by non-take-up. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0047279422000575 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2900431142</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0047279422000575</cupid><sourcerecordid>2900431142</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d129a1a390e431760f471899da48e028e6e21459b7f2f91cb56cef7fe55261663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaWWAdsx7HjFaIlQKX-SRSxQpGbjGlKG6d2iuiOa3A9TkKqVmKBWM3ife_NzEPonJJLSqi8eiSESyYVZ4wQEsnoALUoFyqQMQsPUWsrB1v9GJ14P28YweOohV6eZxt8a_HYWofHYKsF4KGt8US_AV5XuAMlmKL21zh5L3IoM8DG2SWuZ4A72mWwsKX-_vzyuBMMesPuaJDg5KMCVyyhrE_RkdELD2f72UZPd8mk-xD0R_e97k0_yEJB6iCnTGmqQ0WAh1QKYriksVK55jEQFoMARnmkptIwo2g2jUQGRhqIIiaoEGEbXexyK2dXa_B1OrdrVzYrU6aa10NKOWsouqMyZ713YNKqOVO7TUpJum0x_dNi4wn3Hr2cuiJ_hd_o_10_r-Bx2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2900431142</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why Do Poor People Not Take up Benefits? Evidence from the Barcelona’s B-MINCOME Experiment</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>LAÍN, BRU ; JULIÀ, ALBERT</creator><creatorcontrib>LAÍN, BRU ; JULIÀ, ALBERT</creatorcontrib><description>Non-take-up, i.e. individuals not applying for a benefit they are eligible for, is a widespread problem limiting the reach of welfare and protection systems. This paper seeks to understand it by means of a theoretical framework comprising two levels of analysis: the claimants’ individual characteristics in relation to the information barriers they face, and the administrative logic and functioning regarding the communications strategy used by public institutions. To test the hypotheses of these two levels of analysis, the paper analyses the B-MINCOME pilot scheme, a cash transfer programme implemented in the city of Barcelona between 2017 and 2019. Findings indicate that, although claimants’ characteristics may play a significant role, the administrative functioning and the communications strategy are fundamental in determining take-up rates. The conclusions briefly address some of the technical and moral concerns raised by non-take-up.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0047279422000575</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Antipoverty programs ; Claimants ; Communication strategies ; Costs ; Expected utility ; Homeless people ; Households ; Hypotheses ; Low income groups ; Management ; Opportunity costs ; Social policy ; Sociodemographics ; Stigma ; Welfare</subject><ispartof>Journal of social policy, 2024-01, Vol.53 (1), p.167-188</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d129a1a390e431760f471899da48e028e6e21459b7f2f91cb56cef7fe55261663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d129a1a390e431760f471899da48e028e6e21459b7f2f91cb56cef7fe55261663</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3576-226X ; 0000-0002-7523-6275</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0047279422000575/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,12825,12826,27323,27845,27903,27904,30978,33753,55607</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>LAÍN, BRU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JULIÀ, ALBERT</creatorcontrib><title>Why Do Poor People Not Take up Benefits? Evidence from the Barcelona’s B-MINCOME Experiment</title><title>Journal of social policy</title><addtitle>J. Soc. Pol</addtitle><description>Non-take-up, i.e. individuals not applying for a benefit they are eligible for, is a widespread problem limiting the reach of welfare and protection systems. This paper seeks to understand it by means of a theoretical framework comprising two levels of analysis: the claimants’ individual characteristics in relation to the information barriers they face, and the administrative logic and functioning regarding the communications strategy used by public institutions. To test the hypotheses of these two levels of analysis, the paper analyses the B-MINCOME pilot scheme, a cash transfer programme implemented in the city of Barcelona between 2017 and 2019. Findings indicate that, although claimants’ characteristics may play a significant role, the administrative functioning and the communications strategy are fundamental in determining take-up rates. The conclusions briefly address some of the technical and moral concerns raised by non-take-up.</description><subject>Antipoverty programs</subject><subject>Claimants</subject><subject>Communication strategies</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Expected utility</subject><subject>Homeless people</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Opportunity costs</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Stigma</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><issn>0047-2794</issn><issn>1469-7823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaWWAdsx7HjFaIlQKX-SRSxQpGbjGlKG6d2iuiOa3A9TkKqVmKBWM3ife_NzEPonJJLSqi8eiSESyYVZ4wQEsnoALUoFyqQMQsPUWsrB1v9GJ14P28YweOohV6eZxt8a_HYWofHYKsF4KGt8US_AV5XuAMlmKL21zh5L3IoM8DG2SWuZ4A72mWwsKX-_vzyuBMMesPuaJDg5KMCVyyhrE_RkdELD2f72UZPd8mk-xD0R_e97k0_yEJB6iCnTGmqQ0WAh1QKYriksVK55jEQFoMARnmkptIwo2g2jUQGRhqIIiaoEGEbXexyK2dXa_B1OrdrVzYrU6aa10NKOWsouqMyZ713YNKqOVO7TUpJum0x_dNi4wn3Hr2cuiJ_hd_o_10_r-Bx2Q</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>LAÍN, BRU</creator><creator>JULIÀ, ALBERT</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BF</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0Q</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3576-226X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7523-6275</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Why Do Poor People Not Take up Benefits? Evidence from the Barcelona’s B-MINCOME Experiment</title><author>LAÍN, BRU ; JULIÀ, ALBERT</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-d129a1a390e431760f471899da48e028e6e21459b7f2f91cb56cef7fe55261663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Antipoverty programs</topic><topic>Claimants</topic><topic>Communication strategies</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Expected utility</topic><topic>Homeless people</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Opportunity costs</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Stigma</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LAÍN, BRU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JULIÀ, ALBERT</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>European Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>European Business Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of social policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LAÍN, BRU</au><au>JULIÀ, ALBERT</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why Do Poor People Not Take up Benefits? Evidence from the Barcelona’s B-MINCOME Experiment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of social policy</jtitle><addtitle>J. Soc. Pol</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>167-188</pages><issn>0047-2794</issn><eissn>1469-7823</eissn><abstract>Non-take-up, i.e. individuals not applying for a benefit they are eligible for, is a widespread problem limiting the reach of welfare and protection systems. This paper seeks to understand it by means of a theoretical framework comprising two levels of analysis: the claimants’ individual characteristics in relation to the information barriers they face, and the administrative logic and functioning regarding the communications strategy used by public institutions. To test the hypotheses of these two levels of analysis, the paper analyses the B-MINCOME pilot scheme, a cash transfer programme implemented in the city of Barcelona between 2017 and 2019. Findings indicate that, although claimants’ characteristics may play a significant role, the administrative functioning and the communications strategy are fundamental in determining take-up rates. The conclusions briefly address some of the technical and moral concerns raised by non-take-up.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0047279422000575</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3576-226X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7523-6275</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0047-2794 |
| ispartof | Journal of social policy, 2024-01, Vol.53 (1), p.167-188 |
| issn | 0047-2794 1469-7823 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2900431142 |
| source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Antipoverty programs Claimants Communication strategies Costs Expected utility Homeless people Households Hypotheses Low income groups Management Opportunity costs Social policy Sociodemographics Stigma Welfare |
| title | Why Do Poor People Not Take up Benefits? Evidence from the Barcelona’s B-MINCOME Experiment |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T01%3A12%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20Do%20Poor%20People%20Not%20Take%20up%20Benefits?%20Evidence%20from%20the%20Barcelona%E2%80%99s%20B-MINCOME%20Experiment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20social%20policy&rft.au=LA%C3%8DN,%20BRU&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=167-188&rft.issn=0047-2794&rft.eissn=1469-7823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0047279422000575&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2900431142%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2900431142&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0047279422000575&rfr_iscdi=true |