Will the ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon exist across China in the future?
The uneven changes in potential evapotranspiration (PET) in response to temperature rise are called the ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon, which is expected to intensify further under a warming climate. In this paper, we explored the spatial–temporal changes in the future ‘evapotranspiration p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of climatology 2023-12, Vol.43 (15), p.7132-7151 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7151 |
---|---|
container_issue | 15 |
container_start_page | 7132 |
container_title | International journal of climatology |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Li, Zhenjie Su, Buda Gao, Miaoni Tao, Hui Jiang, Shan Gong, Yu Wang, Yanjun Zhou, Jian Jiang, Tong |
description | The uneven changes in potential evapotranspiration (PET) in response to temperature rise are called the ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon, which is expected to intensify further under a warming climate. In this paper, we explored the spatial–temporal changes in the future ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon over China and its 10 major river sub‐regions under different climate change scenarios. Thus, this paper uses four global climate model outputs under seven shared socioeconomic pathway‐based scenarios (SSP1‐1.9, SSP1‐2.6, SSP2‐4.5, SSP3‐7.0, SSP4‐3.4, SSP4‐6.0 and SSP5‐8.5) from the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Considering the latest IPCC's 6th Assessment Report (AR6), this research emphasizes the 2021–2040 (near‐term), 2041–2060 (mid‐term) and 2081–2100 (long‐term) periods to anticipate the ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon. In this study, PET is estimated based on the modified Penman–Monteith (P‐M) method (considering CO2). Furthermore, the paradox phenomenon in this study is defined considering two pivotal conditions: the surface temperature increases but the evaporation decreases (Type I), and the temperature decreases but the evaporation still tends to increase (Type II). The results show that there were only Type I ‘evapotranspiration paradoxes’ that existed in the historical period, which were dominant especially before the 1990s. Nearly 50% of the areas experienced the Type I ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon that occurred during 1975–1994 and 1995–2014. Spatially, it covered 100% of the area of the Southeast River (SER) and the Liaohe River (LR) during 1975–1994 and the area of the SER, the HAR, the HHR and the LR during 1995–2014. In the future, the interdecadal growth rate of PET in China is projected to be the highest under the SSP5‐8.5 and the lowest under the SSP3‐7.0 with spatial variation. Importantly, the largest areas of approximately 36% and 45% with the Type I phenomenon are inclined to occur under the SSP1‐1.9 and SSP4‐6.0, respectively, over the long‐term period (2081–2100). The area with the Type I phenomenon will be less than 20% in the near‐term, and it is less than 12% in the mid‐term period. For the Type II evapotranspiration paradox, the uppermost 45% of the area is expected to experience the Type II phenomenon under SSP1‐1.9 during the mid‐term period, while it is 30% under SSP1‐2.6 during the long‐term period. However, this study's findings provide the scientific ba |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/joc.8256 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2900030237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2900030237</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2546-25d3cbc6e4138fdf6ca0d2ed0a59dd4bb1f326547b49d38af2d55082b44130763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqUgcQRLbNikjB0nsVcIRfyqEht-lpETO6qr1A52Au2ux4Dr9SSkLVsWo9l87828h9A5gQkBoFdzV004TdIDNCIgsgiA80M0Ai5ExBnhx-gkhDkACEHSEXp7N02Du5nGm_W3_pSt67y0oTVedsZZ3EovlVtu1j-4nWnrFsNYrJcmdFhW3oWA85mxEhu7c6n7rvf6-hQd1bIJ-uxvj9Hr3e1L_hBNn-8f85tpVNGEpRFNVFyVVaoZiXmt6rSSoKhWIBOhFCtLUsc0TVhWMqFiLmuqkgQ4LdkggCyNx-hi79t699Hr0BVz13s7nCyoGELGQONsoC731O5hr-ui9WYh_aogUGxbG1RVsW1tQKM9-mUavfqXK56e8x3_C55NcCE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2900030237</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Will the ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon exist across China in the future?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Li, Zhenjie ; Su, Buda ; Gao, Miaoni ; Tao, Hui ; Jiang, Shan ; Gong, Yu ; Wang, Yanjun ; Zhou, Jian ; Jiang, Tong</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhenjie ; Su, Buda ; Gao, Miaoni ; Tao, Hui ; Jiang, Shan ; Gong, Yu ; Wang, Yanjun ; Zhou, Jian ; Jiang, Tong</creatorcontrib><description>The uneven changes in potential evapotranspiration (PET) in response to temperature rise are called the ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon, which is expected to intensify further under a warming climate. In this paper, we explored the spatial–temporal changes in the future ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon over China and its 10 major river sub‐regions under different climate change scenarios. Thus, this paper uses four global climate model outputs under seven shared socioeconomic pathway‐based scenarios (SSP1‐1.9, SSP1‐2.6, SSP2‐4.5, SSP3‐7.0, SSP4‐3.4, SSP4‐6.0 and SSP5‐8.5) from the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Considering the latest IPCC's 6th Assessment Report (AR6), this research emphasizes the 2021–2040 (near‐term), 2041–2060 (mid‐term) and 2081–2100 (long‐term) periods to anticipate the ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon. In this study, PET is estimated based on the modified Penman–Monteith (P‐M) method (considering CO2). Furthermore, the paradox phenomenon in this study is defined considering two pivotal conditions: the surface temperature increases but the evaporation decreases (Type I), and the temperature decreases but the evaporation still tends to increase (Type II). The results show that there were only Type I ‘evapotranspiration paradoxes’ that existed in the historical period, which were dominant especially before the 1990s. Nearly 50% of the areas experienced the Type I ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon that occurred during 1975–1994 and 1995–2014. Spatially, it covered 100% of the area of the Southeast River (SER) and the Liaohe River (LR) during 1975–1994 and the area of the SER, the HAR, the HHR and the LR during 1995–2014. In the future, the interdecadal growth rate of PET in China is projected to be the highest under the SSP5‐8.5 and the lowest under the SSP3‐7.0 with spatial variation. Importantly, the largest areas of approximately 36% and 45% with the Type I phenomenon are inclined to occur under the SSP1‐1.9 and SSP4‐6.0, respectively, over the long‐term period (2081–2100). The area with the Type I phenomenon will be less than 20% in the near‐term, and it is less than 12% in the mid‐term period. For the Type II evapotranspiration paradox, the uppermost 45% of the area is expected to experience the Type II phenomenon under SSP1‐1.9 during the mid‐term period, while it is 30% under SSP1‐2.6 during the long‐term period. However, this study's findings provide the scientific basis for formulating adaptation and mitigation strategies to combat ‘evapotranspiration paradox’‐related extremes at regional scales.
The ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ term is demarcated Type I and Type II on the grid scale. Only the Type I was found to occur during historical period. The area of the evapotranspiration paradox will expand under low radiative forcing SSPs but nearly disappear under high radiative forcing in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-8418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0088</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/joc.8256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; China ; Climate change ; Climate change scenarios ; Climate models ; CMIP6 ; Evaporation ; Evapotranspiration ; evapotranspiration paradox ; Global climate ; Global climate models ; Global warming ; Growth rate ; Intercomparison ; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ; Mitigation ; Paradoxes ; Potential evapotranspiration ; potential evapotranspiration (PET) ; Rivers ; Spatial variations ; SSP‐RCP scenarios ; Surface temperature ; Temperature rise ; Temporal variations</subject><ispartof>International journal of climatology, 2023-12, Vol.43 (15), p.7132-7151</ispartof><rights>2023 Royal Meteorological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2546-25d3cbc6e4138fdf6ca0d2ed0a59dd4bb1f326547b49d38af2d55082b44130763</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4399-1022</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjoc.8256$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjoc.8256$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhenjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Buda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Miaoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tao, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yanjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Tong</creatorcontrib><title>Will the ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon exist across China in the future?</title><title>International journal of climatology</title><description>The uneven changes in potential evapotranspiration (PET) in response to temperature rise are called the ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon, which is expected to intensify further under a warming climate. In this paper, we explored the spatial–temporal changes in the future ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon over China and its 10 major river sub‐regions under different climate change scenarios. Thus, this paper uses four global climate model outputs under seven shared socioeconomic pathway‐based scenarios (SSP1‐1.9, SSP1‐2.6, SSP2‐4.5, SSP3‐7.0, SSP4‐3.4, SSP4‐6.0 and SSP5‐8.5) from the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Considering the latest IPCC's 6th Assessment Report (AR6), this research emphasizes the 2021–2040 (near‐term), 2041–2060 (mid‐term) and 2081–2100 (long‐term) periods to anticipate the ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon. In this study, PET is estimated based on the modified Penman–Monteith (P‐M) method (considering CO2). Furthermore, the paradox phenomenon in this study is defined considering two pivotal conditions: the surface temperature increases but the evaporation decreases (Type I), and the temperature decreases but the evaporation still tends to increase (Type II). The results show that there were only Type I ‘evapotranspiration paradoxes’ that existed in the historical period, which were dominant especially before the 1990s. Nearly 50% of the areas experienced the Type I ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon that occurred during 1975–1994 and 1995–2014. Spatially, it covered 100% of the area of the Southeast River (SER) and the Liaohe River (LR) during 1975–1994 and the area of the SER, the HAR, the HHR and the LR during 1995–2014. In the future, the interdecadal growth rate of PET in China is projected to be the highest under the SSP5‐8.5 and the lowest under the SSP3‐7.0 with spatial variation. Importantly, the largest areas of approximately 36% and 45% with the Type I phenomenon are inclined to occur under the SSP1‐1.9 and SSP4‐6.0, respectively, over the long‐term period (2081–2100). The area with the Type I phenomenon will be less than 20% in the near‐term, and it is less than 12% in the mid‐term period. For the Type II evapotranspiration paradox, the uppermost 45% of the area is expected to experience the Type II phenomenon under SSP1‐1.9 during the mid‐term period, while it is 30% under SSP1‐2.6 during the long‐term period. However, this study's findings provide the scientific basis for formulating adaptation and mitigation strategies to combat ‘evapotranspiration paradox’‐related extremes at regional scales.
The ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ term is demarcated Type I and Type II on the grid scale. Only the Type I was found to occur during historical period. The area of the evapotranspiration paradox will expand under low radiative forcing SSPs but nearly disappear under high radiative forcing in the future.</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change scenarios</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>CMIP6</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>evapotranspiration paradox</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Global climate models</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Intercomparison</subject><subject>Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Paradoxes</subject><subject>Potential evapotranspiration</subject><subject>potential evapotranspiration (PET)</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>SSP‐RCP scenarios</subject><subject>Surface temperature</subject><subject>Temperature rise</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><issn>0899-8418</issn><issn>1097-0088</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqUgcQRLbNikjB0nsVcIRfyqEht-lpETO6qr1A52Au2ux4Dr9SSkLVsWo9l87828h9A5gQkBoFdzV004TdIDNCIgsgiA80M0Ai5ExBnhx-gkhDkACEHSEXp7N02Du5nGm_W3_pSt67y0oTVedsZZ3EovlVtu1j-4nWnrFsNYrJcmdFhW3oWA85mxEhu7c6n7rvf6-hQd1bIJ-uxvj9Hr3e1L_hBNn-8f85tpVNGEpRFNVFyVVaoZiXmt6rSSoKhWIBOhFCtLUsc0TVhWMqFiLmuqkgQ4LdkggCyNx-hi79t699Hr0BVz13s7nCyoGELGQONsoC731O5hr-ui9WYh_aogUGxbG1RVsW1tQKM9-mUavfqXK56e8x3_C55NcCE</recordid><startdate>20231215</startdate><enddate>20231215</enddate><creator>Li, Zhenjie</creator><creator>Su, Buda</creator><creator>Gao, Miaoni</creator><creator>Tao, Hui</creator><creator>Jiang, Shan</creator><creator>Gong, Yu</creator><creator>Wang, Yanjun</creator><creator>Zhou, Jian</creator><creator>Jiang, Tong</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4399-1022</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231215</creationdate><title>Will the ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon exist across China in the future?</title><author>Li, Zhenjie ; Su, Buda ; Gao, Miaoni ; Tao, Hui ; Jiang, Shan ; Gong, Yu ; Wang, Yanjun ; Zhou, Jian ; Jiang, Tong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2546-25d3cbc6e4138fdf6ca0d2ed0a59dd4bb1f326547b49d38af2d55082b44130763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change scenarios</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>CMIP6</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>evapotranspiration paradox</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Global climate models</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Intercomparison</topic><topic>Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Paradoxes</topic><topic>Potential evapotranspiration</topic><topic>potential evapotranspiration (PET)</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>SSP‐RCP scenarios</topic><topic>Surface temperature</topic><topic>Temperature rise</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhenjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Buda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Miaoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tao, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yanjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Tong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Zhenjie</au><au>Su, Buda</au><au>Gao, Miaoni</au><au>Tao, Hui</au><au>Jiang, Shan</au><au>Gong, Yu</au><au>Wang, Yanjun</au><au>Zhou, Jian</au><au>Jiang, Tong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Will the ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon exist across China in the future?</atitle><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle><date>2023-12-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>7132</spage><epage>7151</epage><pages>7132-7151</pages><issn>0899-8418</issn><eissn>1097-0088</eissn><abstract>The uneven changes in potential evapotranspiration (PET) in response to temperature rise are called the ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon, which is expected to intensify further under a warming climate. In this paper, we explored the spatial–temporal changes in the future ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon over China and its 10 major river sub‐regions under different climate change scenarios. Thus, this paper uses four global climate model outputs under seven shared socioeconomic pathway‐based scenarios (SSP1‐1.9, SSP1‐2.6, SSP2‐4.5, SSP3‐7.0, SSP4‐3.4, SSP4‐6.0 and SSP5‐8.5) from the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Considering the latest IPCC's 6th Assessment Report (AR6), this research emphasizes the 2021–2040 (near‐term), 2041–2060 (mid‐term) and 2081–2100 (long‐term) periods to anticipate the ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon. In this study, PET is estimated based on the modified Penman–Monteith (P‐M) method (considering CO2). Furthermore, the paradox phenomenon in this study is defined considering two pivotal conditions: the surface temperature increases but the evaporation decreases (Type I), and the temperature decreases but the evaporation still tends to increase (Type II). The results show that there were only Type I ‘evapotranspiration paradoxes’ that existed in the historical period, which were dominant especially before the 1990s. Nearly 50% of the areas experienced the Type I ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon that occurred during 1975–1994 and 1995–2014. Spatially, it covered 100% of the area of the Southeast River (SER) and the Liaohe River (LR) during 1975–1994 and the area of the SER, the HAR, the HHR and the LR during 1995–2014. In the future, the interdecadal growth rate of PET in China is projected to be the highest under the SSP5‐8.5 and the lowest under the SSP3‐7.0 with spatial variation. Importantly, the largest areas of approximately 36% and 45% with the Type I phenomenon are inclined to occur under the SSP1‐1.9 and SSP4‐6.0, respectively, over the long‐term period (2081–2100). The area with the Type I phenomenon will be less than 20% in the near‐term, and it is less than 12% in the mid‐term period. For the Type II evapotranspiration paradox, the uppermost 45% of the area is expected to experience the Type II phenomenon under SSP1‐1.9 during the mid‐term period, while it is 30% under SSP1‐2.6 during the long‐term period. However, this study's findings provide the scientific basis for formulating adaptation and mitigation strategies to combat ‘evapotranspiration paradox’‐related extremes at regional scales.
The ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ term is demarcated Type I and Type II on the grid scale. Only the Type I was found to occur during historical period. The area of the evapotranspiration paradox will expand under low radiative forcing SSPs but nearly disappear under high radiative forcing in the future.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/joc.8256</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4399-1022</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-8418 |
ispartof | International journal of climatology, 2023-12, Vol.43 (15), p.7132-7151 |
issn | 0899-8418 1097-0088 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2900030237 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Carbon dioxide China Climate change Climate change scenarios Climate models CMIP6 Evaporation Evapotranspiration evapotranspiration paradox Global climate Global climate models Global warming Growth rate Intercomparison Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Mitigation Paradoxes Potential evapotranspiration potential evapotranspiration (PET) Rivers Spatial variations SSP‐RCP scenarios Surface temperature Temperature rise Temporal variations |
title | Will the ‘evapotranspiration paradox’ phenomenon exist across China in the future? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T00%3A09%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Will%20the%20%E2%80%98evapotranspiration%20paradox%E2%80%99%20phenomenon%20exist%20across%20China%20in%20the%20future?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20climatology&rft.au=Li,%20Zhenjie&rft.date=2023-12-15&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=7132&rft.epage=7151&rft.pages=7132-7151&rft.issn=0899-8418&rft.eissn=1097-0088&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/joc.8256&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2900030237%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2900030237&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |