Stuart Hall, Development Theory, and Thatcher's Britain

This article traces the influence of theories of Third World underdevelopment on Stuart Hall's understanding of the nature of historical transitions. I show Hall's notion of “articulation,” central to his social theory, is indebted to ideas about development originating in the global South...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Modern intellectual history 2023-12, Vol.20 (4), p.1273-1296
1. Verfasser: Karayiannides, Efthimios
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1296
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1273
container_title Modern intellectual history
container_volume 20
creator Karayiannides, Efthimios
description This article traces the influence of theories of Third World underdevelopment on Stuart Hall's understanding of the nature of historical transitions. I show Hall's notion of “articulation,” central to his social theory, is indebted to ideas about development originating in the global South, rather than to the thinking of “Western Marxists.” By arguing that Antonio Gramsci was a theorist of “articulation,” Hall read Gramsci as a thinker comparable to development theorists he was engaging with in the same period. This had important implications, I suggest, for Hall's “Gramscian” analyses of British politics in the 1980s. Specifically, I show that by describing Thatcherism as a form of “regressive modernization,” Hall adopted the idiom of several theories of economic development to argue that the uneven development of capitalist relations of production is the key to understanding how advanced forms of capitalist accumulation can accommodate seemingly archaic and reactionary social relations and institutions.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1479244322000555
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2898725960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1479244322000555</cupid><sourcerecordid>2898725960</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-2314565f2d3325294a2e4ee01ef490f15f4b030a210d1de6eb791952aea48fb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLw0AQhRdRsFZ_gLeABy-Nzs7uJt2jtmqFgofWc9gkszYlTeLuVui_N6VFD-JpHsP73oPH2DWHOw48vV9wmWqUUiACgFLqhA32rxil4qc_WopzduH9GgA1QjJg6SJsjQvRzNT1KJrSF9Vtt6EmRMsVtW43ikxT9tqEYkXu1kePrgqmai7ZmTW1p6vjHbL356flZBbP315eJw_zuBAJhBgFlypRFkshUKGWBkkSAScrNViurMxBgEEOJS8poTzVXCs0ZOTY5lIM2c0ht3Pt55Z8yNbt1jV9ZYZjPU5R6QR6Fz-4Ctd678hmnas2xu0yDtl-n-zPPj0jjozZ5K4qP-g3-n_qGwrpZJk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2898725960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stuart Hall, Development Theory, and Thatcher's Britain</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Karayiannides, Efthimios</creator><creatorcontrib>Karayiannides, Efthimios</creatorcontrib><description>This article traces the influence of theories of Third World underdevelopment on Stuart Hall's understanding of the nature of historical transitions. I show Hall's notion of “articulation,” central to his social theory, is indebted to ideas about development originating in the global South, rather than to the thinking of “Western Marxists.” By arguing that Antonio Gramsci was a theorist of “articulation,” Hall read Gramsci as a thinker comparable to development theorists he was engaging with in the same period. This had important implications, I suggest, for Hall's “Gramscian” analyses of British politics in the 1980s. Specifically, I show that by describing Thatcherism as a form of “regressive modernization,” Hall adopted the idiom of several theories of economic development to argue that the uneven development of capitalist relations of production is the key to understanding how advanced forms of capitalist accumulation can accommodate seemingly archaic and reactionary social relations and institutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1479-2443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-2451</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1479244322000555</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Capitalism ; Dependency theory ; Developing countries ; Economic development ; Economic theory ; Forces and relations of production ; Interpersonal relations ; LDCs ; Middle class ; Modernization ; Modes of production ; New Left ; Politics ; Postcolonialism ; Reading ; Social relations ; Social theories ; Society ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>Modern intellectual history, 2023-12, Vol.20 (4), p.1273-1296</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-2314565f2d3325294a2e4ee01ef490f15f4b030a210d1de6eb791952aea48fb43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-2314565f2d3325294a2e4ee01ef490f15f4b030a210d1de6eb791952aea48fb43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1479244322000555/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27344,27924,27925,33774,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karayiannides, Efthimios</creatorcontrib><title>Stuart Hall, Development Theory, and Thatcher's Britain</title><title>Modern intellectual history</title><addtitle>Mod. Intell. Hist</addtitle><description>This article traces the influence of theories of Third World underdevelopment on Stuart Hall's understanding of the nature of historical transitions. I show Hall's notion of “articulation,” central to his social theory, is indebted to ideas about development originating in the global South, rather than to the thinking of “Western Marxists.” By arguing that Antonio Gramsci was a theorist of “articulation,” Hall read Gramsci as a thinker comparable to development theorists he was engaging with in the same period. This had important implications, I suggest, for Hall's “Gramscian” analyses of British politics in the 1980s. Specifically, I show that by describing Thatcherism as a form of “regressive modernization,” Hall adopted the idiom of several theories of economic development to argue that the uneven development of capitalist relations of production is the key to understanding how advanced forms of capitalist accumulation can accommodate seemingly archaic and reactionary social relations and institutions.</description><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Dependency theory</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Forces and relations of production</subject><subject>Interpersonal relations</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Middle class</subject><subject>Modernization</subject><subject>Modes of production</subject><subject>New Left</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Postcolonialism</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Social relations</subject><subject>Social theories</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>1479-2443</issn><issn>1479-2451</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLw0AQhRdRsFZ_gLeABy-Nzs7uJt2jtmqFgofWc9gkszYlTeLuVui_N6VFD-JpHsP73oPH2DWHOw48vV9wmWqUUiACgFLqhA32rxil4qc_WopzduH9GgA1QjJg6SJsjQvRzNT1KJrSF9Vtt6EmRMsVtW43ikxT9tqEYkXu1kePrgqmai7ZmTW1p6vjHbL356flZBbP315eJw_zuBAJhBgFlypRFkshUKGWBkkSAScrNViurMxBgEEOJS8poTzVXCs0ZOTY5lIM2c0ht3Pt55Z8yNbt1jV9ZYZjPU5R6QR6Fz-4Ctd678hmnas2xu0yDtl-n-zPPj0jjozZ5K4qP-g3-n_qGwrpZJk</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Karayiannides, Efthimios</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Stuart Hall, Development Theory, and Thatcher's Britain</title><author>Karayiannides, Efthimios</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-2314565f2d3325294a2e4ee01ef490f15f4b030a210d1de6eb791952aea48fb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Dependency theory</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Forces and relations of production</topic><topic>Interpersonal relations</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Middle class</topic><topic>Modernization</topic><topic>Modes of production</topic><topic>New Left</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Postcolonialism</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Social relations</topic><topic>Social theories</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karayiannides, Efthimios</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Modern intellectual history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karayiannides, Efthimios</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stuart Hall, Development Theory, and Thatcher's Britain</atitle><jtitle>Modern intellectual history</jtitle><addtitle>Mod. Intell. Hist</addtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1273</spage><epage>1296</epage><pages>1273-1296</pages><issn>1479-2443</issn><eissn>1479-2451</eissn><abstract>This article traces the influence of theories of Third World underdevelopment on Stuart Hall's understanding of the nature of historical transitions. I show Hall's notion of “articulation,” central to his social theory, is indebted to ideas about development originating in the global South, rather than to the thinking of “Western Marxists.” By arguing that Antonio Gramsci was a theorist of “articulation,” Hall read Gramsci as a thinker comparable to development theorists he was engaging with in the same period. This had important implications, I suggest, for Hall's “Gramscian” analyses of British politics in the 1980s. Specifically, I show that by describing Thatcherism as a form of “regressive modernization,” Hall adopted the idiom of several theories of economic development to argue that the uneven development of capitalist relations of production is the key to understanding how advanced forms of capitalist accumulation can accommodate seemingly archaic and reactionary social relations and institutions.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1479244322000555</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1479-2443
ispartof Modern intellectual history, 2023-12, Vol.20 (4), p.1273-1296
issn 1479-2443
1479-2451
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2898725960
source Cambridge Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Capitalism
Dependency theory
Developing countries
Economic development
Economic theory
Forces and relations of production
Interpersonal relations
LDCs
Middle class
Modernization
Modes of production
New Left
Politics
Postcolonialism
Reading
Social relations
Social theories
Society
Sociology
title Stuart Hall, Development Theory, and Thatcher's Britain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T21%3A39%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stuart%20Hall,%20Development%20Theory,%20and%20Thatcher's%20Britain&rft.jtitle=Modern%20intellectual%20history&rft.au=Karayiannides,%20Efthimios&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1273&rft.epage=1296&rft.pages=1273-1296&rft.issn=1479-2443&rft.eissn=1479-2451&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1479244322000555&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2898725960%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2898725960&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1479244322000555&rfr_iscdi=true