Financial and Labor Benefits of the Individual TB Risk Assessment Model for Annual TB Screening

Background: Since 1991, US tuberculosis (TB) rates have declined, including among health care personnel (HCP). Non–US born persons accounted for approximately two-thirds of cases. Serial TB testing has limitations in populations at low risk; it is expensive and labor intensive. Method: We moved a la...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2020-10, Vol.41 (S1), p.s234-s234
Hauptverfasser: Sims, Kristin, Stienecker, Roger
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page s234
container_issue S1
container_start_page s234
container_title Infection control and hospital epidemiology
container_volume 41
creator Sims, Kristin
Stienecker, Roger
description Background: Since 1991, US tuberculosis (TB) rates have declined, including among health care personnel (HCP). Non–US born persons accounted for approximately two-thirds of cases. Serial TB testing has limitations in populations at low risk; it is expensive and labor intensive. Method: We moved a large hospital system from facility-level risk stratification to an individual risk model to guide TB screening based on Tuberculosis Screening, Testing, and Treatment of US Health Care Personnel: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2019. This process included individual TB risk assessment, symptom evaluation, TB testing for M. tuberculosis infection (by either IGRA or TST) for HCP without documented evidence of prior LTBI or TB disease, with an additional workup for TB disease for HCP with positive test results or symptoms compatible with TB disease. In addition, employees with specific job codes deemed high risk were required to undergo TB screening. Result: In 2018, this hospital system of ~10,000 employees screened 7,556 HCP for TB at a cost of $348,625. In 2019, the cost of the T Spot test increased from $45 to $100 and the cost of screening 5,754 HCP through October 31, 2019, was $543,057. In 2020, it is anticipated that 755 HCP will be screened, saving the hospital an estimated minimum of $467,557. The labor burden associated with employee health personnel will fall from ~629.66 hours to 62.91 hours. The labor burden associated with pulling HCPs from the bedside to be screened will be reduced from 629.66 hours to 62.91 hours as well. Conclusion: Adoption of the individual risk assessment model for TB screening based on Tuberculosis Screening, Testing, and Treatment of US Health Care Personnel: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2019 will greatly reduce financial and labor burdens in healthcare settings when implemented. Funding: None Disclosures: None
doi_str_mv 10.1017/ice.2020.787
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2898358563</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2898358563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1037-9d66e7305b7014b4f8e6ba09ef1328220eccfb4c8c9892b2d6a7ef998328704d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LAzEURYMoWKs7f0DArVPzMTNJlm2xWqgIWsFdyGReNLXN1GQq9N-b0q7e4p57HxyEbikZUULFg7cwYoSRkZDiDA1oVamilrw8RwMilSok45-X6CqlFSFEKEUHSM98MMF6s8YmtHhhmi7iCQRwvk-4c7j_BjwPrf_z7S5Dywl-8-kHj1OClDYQevzStbDGLvfGIZyYdxsBgg9f1-jCmXWCm9Mdoo_Z43L6XCxen-bT8aKwlHBRqLauQXBSNYLQsimdhLoxRIGjnEnGCFjrmtJKq6RiDWtrI8ApJXMqSNnyIbo77m5j97uD1OtVt4shv9RMZqySVc0zdX-kbOxSiuD0NvqNiXtNiT4o1FmhPijUWSH_B7g0YwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2898358563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Financial and Labor Benefits of the Individual TB Risk Assessment Model for Annual TB Screening</title><source>ProQuest Central</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Sims, Kristin ; Stienecker, Roger</creator><creatorcontrib>Sims, Kristin ; Stienecker, Roger</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Since 1991, US tuberculosis (TB) rates have declined, including among health care personnel (HCP). Non–US born persons accounted for approximately two-thirds of cases. Serial TB testing has limitations in populations at low risk; it is expensive and labor intensive. Method: We moved a large hospital system from facility-level risk stratification to an individual risk model to guide TB screening based on Tuberculosis Screening, Testing, and Treatment of US Health Care Personnel: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2019. This process included individual TB risk assessment, symptom evaluation, TB testing for M. tuberculosis infection (by either IGRA or TST) for HCP without documented evidence of prior LTBI or TB disease, with an additional workup for TB disease for HCP with positive test results or symptoms compatible with TB disease. In addition, employees with specific job codes deemed high risk were required to undergo TB screening. Result: In 2018, this hospital system of ~10,000 employees screened 7,556 HCP for TB at a cost of $348,625. In 2019, the cost of the T Spot test increased from $45 to $100 and the cost of screening 5,754 HCP through October 31, 2019, was $543,057. In 2020, it is anticipated that 755 HCP will be screened, saving the hospital an estimated minimum of $467,557. The labor burden associated with employee health personnel will fall from ~629.66 hours to 62.91 hours. The labor burden associated with pulling HCPs from the bedside to be screened will be reduced from 629.66 hours to 62.91 hours as well. Conclusion: Adoption of the individual risk assessment model for TB screening based on Tuberculosis Screening, Testing, and Treatment of US Health Care Personnel: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2019 will greatly reduce financial and labor burdens in healthcare settings when implemented. Funding: None Disclosures: None</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-823X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-6834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/ice.2020.787</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Disease control ; Employees ; Health care ; Hospital systems ; Hospitals ; Medical personnel ; Occupational health ; Risk assessment ; Tuberculosis</subject><ispartof>Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2020-10, Vol.41 (S1), p.s234-s234</ispartof><rights>2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2898358563/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2898358563?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21367,27901,27902,33721,43781,74045</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sims, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stienecker, Roger</creatorcontrib><title>Financial and Labor Benefits of the Individual TB Risk Assessment Model for Annual TB Screening</title><title>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</title><description>Background: Since 1991, US tuberculosis (TB) rates have declined, including among health care personnel (HCP). Non–US born persons accounted for approximately two-thirds of cases. Serial TB testing has limitations in populations at low risk; it is expensive and labor intensive. Method: We moved a large hospital system from facility-level risk stratification to an individual risk model to guide TB screening based on Tuberculosis Screening, Testing, and Treatment of US Health Care Personnel: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2019. This process included individual TB risk assessment, symptom evaluation, TB testing for M. tuberculosis infection (by either IGRA or TST) for HCP without documented evidence of prior LTBI or TB disease, with an additional workup for TB disease for HCP with positive test results or symptoms compatible with TB disease. In addition, employees with specific job codes deemed high risk were required to undergo TB screening. Result: In 2018, this hospital system of ~10,000 employees screened 7,556 HCP for TB at a cost of $348,625. In 2019, the cost of the T Spot test increased from $45 to $100 and the cost of screening 5,754 HCP through October 31, 2019, was $543,057. In 2020, it is anticipated that 755 HCP will be screened, saving the hospital an estimated minimum of $467,557. The labor burden associated with employee health personnel will fall from ~629.66 hours to 62.91 hours. The labor burden associated with pulling HCPs from the bedside to be screened will be reduced from 629.66 hours to 62.91 hours as well. Conclusion: Adoption of the individual risk assessment model for TB screening based on Tuberculosis Screening, Testing, and Treatment of US Health Care Personnel: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2019 will greatly reduce financial and labor burdens in healthcare settings when implemented. Funding: None Disclosures: None</description><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hospital systems</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><issn>0899-823X</issn><issn>1559-6834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1LAzEURYMoWKs7f0DArVPzMTNJlm2xWqgIWsFdyGReNLXN1GQq9N-b0q7e4p57HxyEbikZUULFg7cwYoSRkZDiDA1oVamilrw8RwMilSok45-X6CqlFSFEKEUHSM98MMF6s8YmtHhhmi7iCQRwvk-4c7j_BjwPrf_z7S5Dywl-8-kHj1OClDYQevzStbDGLvfGIZyYdxsBgg9f1-jCmXWCm9Mdoo_Z43L6XCxen-bT8aKwlHBRqLauQXBSNYLQsimdhLoxRIGjnEnGCFjrmtJKq6RiDWtrI8ApJXMqSNnyIbo77m5j97uD1OtVt4shv9RMZqySVc0zdX-kbOxSiuD0NvqNiXtNiT4o1FmhPijUWSH_B7g0YwQ</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Sims, Kristin</creator><creator>Stienecker, Roger</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Financial and Labor Benefits of the Individual TB Risk Assessment Model for Annual TB Screening</title><author>Sims, Kristin ; Stienecker, Roger</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1037-9d66e7305b7014b4f8e6ba09ef1328220eccfb4c8c9892b2d6a7ef998328704d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hospital systems</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sims, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stienecker, Roger</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sims, Kristin</au><au>Stienecker, Roger</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Financial and Labor Benefits of the Individual TB Risk Assessment Model for Annual TB Screening</atitle><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>s234</spage><epage>s234</epage><pages>s234-s234</pages><issn>0899-823X</issn><eissn>1559-6834</eissn><abstract>Background: Since 1991, US tuberculosis (TB) rates have declined, including among health care personnel (HCP). Non–US born persons accounted for approximately two-thirds of cases. Serial TB testing has limitations in populations at low risk; it is expensive and labor intensive. Method: We moved a large hospital system from facility-level risk stratification to an individual risk model to guide TB screening based on Tuberculosis Screening, Testing, and Treatment of US Health Care Personnel: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2019. This process included individual TB risk assessment, symptom evaluation, TB testing for M. tuberculosis infection (by either IGRA or TST) for HCP without documented evidence of prior LTBI or TB disease, with an additional workup for TB disease for HCP with positive test results or symptoms compatible with TB disease. In addition, employees with specific job codes deemed high risk were required to undergo TB screening. Result: In 2018, this hospital system of ~10,000 employees screened 7,556 HCP for TB at a cost of $348,625. In 2019, the cost of the T Spot test increased from $45 to $100 and the cost of screening 5,754 HCP through October 31, 2019, was $543,057. In 2020, it is anticipated that 755 HCP will be screened, saving the hospital an estimated minimum of $467,557. The labor burden associated with employee health personnel will fall from ~629.66 hours to 62.91 hours. The labor burden associated with pulling HCPs from the bedside to be screened will be reduced from 629.66 hours to 62.91 hours as well. Conclusion: Adoption of the individual risk assessment model for TB screening based on Tuberculosis Screening, Testing, and Treatment of US Health Care Personnel: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2019 will greatly reduce financial and labor burdens in healthcare settings when implemented. Funding: None Disclosures: None</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/ice.2020.787</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-823X
ispartof Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2020-10, Vol.41 (S1), p.s234-s234
issn 0899-823X
1559-6834
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2898358563
source ProQuest Central; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Disease control
Employees
Health care
Hospital systems
Hospitals
Medical personnel
Occupational health
Risk assessment
Tuberculosis
title Financial and Labor Benefits of the Individual TB Risk Assessment Model for Annual TB Screening
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T20%3A59%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Financial%20and%20Labor%20Benefits%20of%20the%20Individual%20TB%20Risk%20Assessment%20Model%20for%20Annual%20TB%20Screening&rft.jtitle=Infection%20control%20and%20hospital%20epidemiology&rft.au=Sims,%20Kristin&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=s234&rft.epage=s234&rft.pages=s234-s234&rft.issn=0899-823X&rft.eissn=1559-6834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/ice.2020.787&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2898358563%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2898358563&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true