Changing US Epidemiology of NDM-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, 2017–2019
Background: Due to limited therapeutic options and potential for spread, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)-producing New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDMs) are a public health priority. We investigated the epidemiology of NDM-producing CRE reported to the CDC to clarify its distribution a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2020-10, Vol.41 (S1), p.s25-s26 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | s26 |
---|---|
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | s25 |
container_title | Infection control and hospital epidemiology |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Shugart, Alicia Mahon, Garrett Epstein, Lauren Huang, Jennifer Y. McAllister, Gillian Lawsin, Adrian Sula, Erisa Halpin, Alison Laufer Smith, Amanda Carman, Rebekah Cassidy, P. Maureen Morey, Karim Paranandi, Anu Downing, Randy Noel, Diane Kallen, Alexander J. Walters, Maroya Spalding |
description | Background:
Due to limited therapeutic options and potential for spread, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)-producing New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDMs) are a public health priority. We investigated the epidemiology of NDM-producing CRE reported to the CDC to clarify its distribution and relative prevalence.
Methods:
The CDC’s Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network supports molecular testing of CRE for 5 carbapenemases nationally. Although KPC is the most common carbapenemase in the United States, non-KPC carbapenemases are a growing concern. We analyzed CRE with any of 4 non-KPC plasmid-mediated carbapenemases (NDM, VIM, IMP, or OXA-48 type) isolated from specimens collected from January 1, 2017, through June 30, 2019; only a patient’s first isolate per organism–carbapenemase combination was included. We excluded isolates from specimen sources associated with colonization screening (eg, perirectal). We compared the proportion of NDM-producing CRE to all non-KPC–producing CP-CRE between period A (January to June 2018) and period B (January to June 2019). Health departments and the CDC collected additional exposure and molecular information in selected states to better describe current NDM-producing CRE epidemiology.
Results:
Overall, 47 states reported 1,013 non–KPC-producing CP-CRE (range/state, 1–109 isolates; median, 11 isolates); 46 states reported 631 NDM-producing CRE (range/state, 1–84; median, 6). NDM-producing CRE increased quarterly from the third quarter of 2018 through the second quarter of 2019; CP-CRE isolates with other non-KPC carbapenemases remained stable (Fig. 1). In period A, 124 of 216 emerging CP-CRE had NDM (57.1%), compared with 255 of 359 emerging CP-CRE (71.0%) during period B (
P
= .1179). Among NDM-producing CRE, the proportion of
Enterobacter
spp increased from 10.5% in 2018 to 18.4% in 2019 (
P
= .0467) (Fig. 2). In total, 18 states reported more NDM-producing CRE in the first 6 months of 2019 than in all of 2018. Connecticut, Ohio, and Oregon were among states that conducted detailed investigations; these 3 states identified 24 NDM-producing CRE isolates from 23 patients in period B. Overall, 5 (21.7%) of 22 patients with history available traveled internationally ≤12 months prior to culture; 17 (73.9%) acquired NDM-producing CRE domestically. Among 15 isolates sequenced, 8 (53.3%) carried NDM-5 (6
E. coli
, 1
Enterobacter
spp and 1
Klebsiella
spp) and 7 (46.7%) carried NDM-1 (6
Enterobacter
spp and 1
Klebsiel |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/ice.2020.502 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2898304250</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2898304250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1462-f4d1212a9ffc94d80bcf13290fb3cdba5edb99ec3492f1b7475cd3a53aba9e133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtKAzEYRoMoWKs7H2DAbVNz7UyWMtYL1AtqwZUh1zqlnYzJdNGd7-Ab-iSm1NXZHP7v5wBwjtEYI1xeNsaNCSJozBE5AAPMuYCTirJDMECVELAi9P0YnKS0RAiVQuAB-Kg_Vbto2kUxfy2mXWPdugmrsNgWwReP1w_wOQa7MTuhVlGrzrVuDV9calKv2r6Ytr2LQSuT0SjjlBsVJP_y-_2TIU7BkVer5M7-OQTzm-lbfQdnT7f39dUMGswmBHpmMcFECe-NYLZC2nhMiUBeU2O14s5qIZyhTBCPdclKbixVnCqthMOUDsHF_m4Xw9fGpV4uwya2eVKSSlQUMcJRtkZ7y8SQUnRedrFZq7iVGMldQZkLyl1BmQvSPyM7ZA4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2898304250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changing US Epidemiology of NDM-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, 2017–2019</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Shugart, Alicia ; Mahon, Garrett ; Epstein, Lauren ; Huang, Jennifer Y. ; McAllister, Gillian ; Lawsin, Adrian ; Sula, Erisa ; Halpin, Alison Laufer ; Smith, Amanda ; Carman, Rebekah ; Cassidy, P. Maureen ; Morey, Karim ; Paranandi, Anu ; Downing, Randy ; Noel, Diane ; Kallen, Alexander J. ; Walters, Maroya Spalding</creator><creatorcontrib>Shugart, Alicia ; Mahon, Garrett ; Epstein, Lauren ; Huang, Jennifer Y. ; McAllister, Gillian ; Lawsin, Adrian ; Sula, Erisa ; Halpin, Alison Laufer ; Smith, Amanda ; Carman, Rebekah ; Cassidy, P. Maureen ; Morey, Karim ; Paranandi, Anu ; Downing, Randy ; Noel, Diane ; Kallen, Alexander J. ; Walters, Maroya Spalding</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
Due to limited therapeutic options and potential for spread, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)-producing New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDMs) are a public health priority. We investigated the epidemiology of NDM-producing CRE reported to the CDC to clarify its distribution and relative prevalence.
Methods:
The CDC’s Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network supports molecular testing of CRE for 5 carbapenemases nationally. Although KPC is the most common carbapenemase in the United States, non-KPC carbapenemases are a growing concern. We analyzed CRE with any of 4 non-KPC plasmid-mediated carbapenemases (NDM, VIM, IMP, or OXA-48 type) isolated from specimens collected from January 1, 2017, through June 30, 2019; only a patient’s first isolate per organism–carbapenemase combination was included. We excluded isolates from specimen sources associated with colonization screening (eg, perirectal). We compared the proportion of NDM-producing CRE to all non-KPC–producing CP-CRE between period A (January to June 2018) and period B (January to June 2019). Health departments and the CDC collected additional exposure and molecular information in selected states to better describe current NDM-producing CRE epidemiology.
Results:
Overall, 47 states reported 1,013 non–KPC-producing CP-CRE (range/state, 1–109 isolates; median, 11 isolates); 46 states reported 631 NDM-producing CRE (range/state, 1–84; median, 6). NDM-producing CRE increased quarterly from the third quarter of 2018 through the second quarter of 2019; CP-CRE isolates with other non-KPC carbapenemases remained stable (Fig. 1). In period A, 124 of 216 emerging CP-CRE had NDM (57.1%), compared with 255 of 359 emerging CP-CRE (71.0%) during period B (
P
= .1179). Among NDM-producing CRE, the proportion of
Enterobacter
spp increased from 10.5% in 2018 to 18.4% in 2019 (
P
= .0467) (Fig. 2). In total, 18 states reported more NDM-producing CRE in the first 6 months of 2019 than in all of 2018. Connecticut, Ohio, and Oregon were among states that conducted detailed investigations; these 3 states identified 24 NDM-producing CRE isolates from 23 patients in period B. Overall, 5 (21.7%) of 22 patients with history available traveled internationally ≤12 months prior to culture; 17 (73.9%) acquired NDM-producing CRE domestically. Among 15 isolates sequenced, 8 (53.3%) carried NDM-5 (6
E. coli
, 1
Enterobacter
spp and 1
Klebsiella
spp) and 7 (46.7%) carried NDM-1 (6
Enterobacter
spp and 1
Klebsiella
spp). Species were diverse; no single strain type was shared by >2 isolates.
Conclusions:
Detection of NDM-producing CRE has increased across the AR Lab Network. Among states with detailed information available, domestic acquisition was common, and no single variant or strain predominated. Aggressive public health response and further understanding of current US NDM-CRE epidemiology are needed to prevent further spread.
Disclosures:
None
Funding:
None</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-823X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-6834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/ice.2020.502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Antibiotic resistance ; Antibiotics ; CRE bacteria ; Disease control ; Drug resistance ; E coli ; Epidemiology ; Public health</subject><ispartof>Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2020-10, Vol.41 (S1), p.s25-s26</ispartof><rights>2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1462-f4d1212a9ffc94d80bcf13290fb3cdba5edb99ec3492f1b7475cd3a53aba9e133</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2898304250/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2898304250?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21367,27901,27902,33721,43781,74045</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shugart, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahon, Garrett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jennifer Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAllister, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawsin, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sula, Erisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halpin, Alison Laufer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carman, Rebekah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassidy, P. Maureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morey, Karim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paranandi, Anu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downing, Randy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noel, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallen, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walters, Maroya Spalding</creatorcontrib><title>Changing US Epidemiology of NDM-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, 2017–2019</title><title>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</title><description>Background:
Due to limited therapeutic options and potential for spread, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)-producing New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDMs) are a public health priority. We investigated the epidemiology of NDM-producing CRE reported to the CDC to clarify its distribution and relative prevalence.
Methods:
The CDC’s Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network supports molecular testing of CRE for 5 carbapenemases nationally. Although KPC is the most common carbapenemase in the United States, non-KPC carbapenemases are a growing concern. We analyzed CRE with any of 4 non-KPC plasmid-mediated carbapenemases (NDM, VIM, IMP, or OXA-48 type) isolated from specimens collected from January 1, 2017, through June 30, 2019; only a patient’s first isolate per organism–carbapenemase combination was included. We excluded isolates from specimen sources associated with colonization screening (eg, perirectal). We compared the proportion of NDM-producing CRE to all non-KPC–producing CP-CRE between period A (January to June 2018) and period B (January to June 2019). Health departments and the CDC collected additional exposure and molecular information in selected states to better describe current NDM-producing CRE epidemiology.
Results:
Overall, 47 states reported 1,013 non–KPC-producing CP-CRE (range/state, 1–109 isolates; median, 11 isolates); 46 states reported 631 NDM-producing CRE (range/state, 1–84; median, 6). NDM-producing CRE increased quarterly from the third quarter of 2018 through the second quarter of 2019; CP-CRE isolates with other non-KPC carbapenemases remained stable (Fig. 1). In period A, 124 of 216 emerging CP-CRE had NDM (57.1%), compared with 255 of 359 emerging CP-CRE (71.0%) during period B (
P
= .1179). Among NDM-producing CRE, the proportion of
Enterobacter
spp increased from 10.5% in 2018 to 18.4% in 2019 (
P
= .0467) (Fig. 2). In total, 18 states reported more NDM-producing CRE in the first 6 months of 2019 than in all of 2018. Connecticut, Ohio, and Oregon were among states that conducted detailed investigations; these 3 states identified 24 NDM-producing CRE isolates from 23 patients in period B. Overall, 5 (21.7%) of 22 patients with history available traveled internationally ≤12 months prior to culture; 17 (73.9%) acquired NDM-producing CRE domestically. Among 15 isolates sequenced, 8 (53.3%) carried NDM-5 (6
E. coli
, 1
Enterobacter
spp and 1
Klebsiella
spp) and 7 (46.7%) carried NDM-1 (6
Enterobacter
spp and 1
Klebsiella
spp). Species were diverse; no single strain type was shared by >2 isolates.
Conclusions:
Detection of NDM-producing CRE has increased across the AR Lab Network. Among states with detailed information available, domestic acquisition was common, and no single variant or strain predominated. Aggressive public health response and further understanding of current US NDM-CRE epidemiology are needed to prevent further spread.
Disclosures:
None
Funding:
None</description><subject>Antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>CRE bacteria</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Public health</subject><issn>0899-823X</issn><issn>1559-6834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNotkMtKAzEYRoMoWKs7H2DAbVNz7UyWMtYL1AtqwZUh1zqlnYzJdNGd7-Ab-iSm1NXZHP7v5wBwjtEYI1xeNsaNCSJozBE5AAPMuYCTirJDMECVELAi9P0YnKS0RAiVQuAB-Kg_Vbto2kUxfy2mXWPdugmrsNgWwReP1w_wOQa7MTuhVlGrzrVuDV9calKv2r6Ytr2LQSuT0SjjlBsVJP_y-_2TIU7BkVer5M7-OQTzm-lbfQdnT7f39dUMGswmBHpmMcFECe-NYLZC2nhMiUBeU2O14s5qIZyhTBCPdclKbixVnCqthMOUDsHF_m4Xw9fGpV4uwya2eVKSSlQUMcJRtkZ7y8SQUnRedrFZq7iVGMldQZkLyl1BmQvSPyM7ZA4</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Shugart, Alicia</creator><creator>Mahon, Garrett</creator><creator>Epstein, Lauren</creator><creator>Huang, Jennifer Y.</creator><creator>McAllister, Gillian</creator><creator>Lawsin, Adrian</creator><creator>Sula, Erisa</creator><creator>Halpin, Alison Laufer</creator><creator>Smith, Amanda</creator><creator>Carman, Rebekah</creator><creator>Cassidy, P. Maureen</creator><creator>Morey, Karim</creator><creator>Paranandi, Anu</creator><creator>Downing, Randy</creator><creator>Noel, Diane</creator><creator>Kallen, Alexander J.</creator><creator>Walters, Maroya Spalding</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Changing US Epidemiology of NDM-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, 2017–2019</title><author>Shugart, Alicia ; Mahon, Garrett ; Epstein, Lauren ; Huang, Jennifer Y. ; McAllister, Gillian ; Lawsin, Adrian ; Sula, Erisa ; Halpin, Alison Laufer ; Smith, Amanda ; Carman, Rebekah ; Cassidy, P. Maureen ; Morey, Karim ; Paranandi, Anu ; Downing, Randy ; Noel, Diane ; Kallen, Alexander J. ; Walters, Maroya Spalding</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1462-f4d1212a9ffc94d80bcf13290fb3cdba5edb99ec3492f1b7475cd3a53aba9e133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>CRE bacteria</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Public health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shugart, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahon, Garrett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jennifer Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAllister, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawsin, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sula, Erisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halpin, Alison Laufer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carman, Rebekah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassidy, P. Maureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morey, Karim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paranandi, Anu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downing, Randy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noel, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallen, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walters, Maroya Spalding</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shugart, Alicia</au><au>Mahon, Garrett</au><au>Epstein, Lauren</au><au>Huang, Jennifer Y.</au><au>McAllister, Gillian</au><au>Lawsin, Adrian</au><au>Sula, Erisa</au><au>Halpin, Alison Laufer</au><au>Smith, Amanda</au><au>Carman, Rebekah</au><au>Cassidy, P. Maureen</au><au>Morey, Karim</au><au>Paranandi, Anu</au><au>Downing, Randy</au><au>Noel, Diane</au><au>Kallen, Alexander J.</au><au>Walters, Maroya Spalding</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changing US Epidemiology of NDM-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, 2017–2019</atitle><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>s25</spage><epage>s26</epage><pages>s25-s26</pages><issn>0899-823X</issn><eissn>1559-6834</eissn><abstract>Background:
Due to limited therapeutic options and potential for spread, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)-producing New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDMs) are a public health priority. We investigated the epidemiology of NDM-producing CRE reported to the CDC to clarify its distribution and relative prevalence.
Methods:
The CDC’s Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network supports molecular testing of CRE for 5 carbapenemases nationally. Although KPC is the most common carbapenemase in the United States, non-KPC carbapenemases are a growing concern. We analyzed CRE with any of 4 non-KPC plasmid-mediated carbapenemases (NDM, VIM, IMP, or OXA-48 type) isolated from specimens collected from January 1, 2017, through June 30, 2019; only a patient’s first isolate per organism–carbapenemase combination was included. We excluded isolates from specimen sources associated with colonization screening (eg, perirectal). We compared the proportion of NDM-producing CRE to all non-KPC–producing CP-CRE between period A (January to June 2018) and period B (January to June 2019). Health departments and the CDC collected additional exposure and molecular information in selected states to better describe current NDM-producing CRE epidemiology.
Results:
Overall, 47 states reported 1,013 non–KPC-producing CP-CRE (range/state, 1–109 isolates; median, 11 isolates); 46 states reported 631 NDM-producing CRE (range/state, 1–84; median, 6). NDM-producing CRE increased quarterly from the third quarter of 2018 through the second quarter of 2019; CP-CRE isolates with other non-KPC carbapenemases remained stable (Fig. 1). In period A, 124 of 216 emerging CP-CRE had NDM (57.1%), compared with 255 of 359 emerging CP-CRE (71.0%) during period B (
P
= .1179). Among NDM-producing CRE, the proportion of
Enterobacter
spp increased from 10.5% in 2018 to 18.4% in 2019 (
P
= .0467) (Fig. 2). In total, 18 states reported more NDM-producing CRE in the first 6 months of 2019 than in all of 2018. Connecticut, Ohio, and Oregon were among states that conducted detailed investigations; these 3 states identified 24 NDM-producing CRE isolates from 23 patients in period B. Overall, 5 (21.7%) of 22 patients with history available traveled internationally ≤12 months prior to culture; 17 (73.9%) acquired NDM-producing CRE domestically. Among 15 isolates sequenced, 8 (53.3%) carried NDM-5 (6
E. coli
, 1
Enterobacter
spp and 1
Klebsiella
spp) and 7 (46.7%) carried NDM-1 (6
Enterobacter
spp and 1
Klebsiella
spp). Species were diverse; no single strain type was shared by >2 isolates.
Conclusions:
Detection of NDM-producing CRE has increased across the AR Lab Network. Among states with detailed information available, domestic acquisition was common, and no single variant or strain predominated. Aggressive public health response and further understanding of current US NDM-CRE epidemiology are needed to prevent further spread.
Disclosures:
None
Funding:
None</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/ice.2020.502</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-823X |
ispartof | Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2020-10, Vol.41 (S1), p.s25-s26 |
issn | 0899-823X 1559-6834 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2898304250 |
source | Cambridge Journals; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Antibiotic resistance Antibiotics CRE bacteria Disease control Drug resistance E coli Epidemiology Public health |
title | Changing US Epidemiology of NDM-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, 2017–2019 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T01%3A39%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changing%20US%20Epidemiology%20of%20NDM-Producing%20Carbapenem-Resistant%20Enterobacteriaceae,%202017%E2%80%932019&rft.jtitle=Infection%20control%20and%20hospital%20epidemiology&rft.au=Shugart,%20Alicia&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=s25&rft.epage=s26&rft.pages=s25-s26&rft.issn=0899-823X&rft.eissn=1559-6834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/ice.2020.502&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2898304250%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2898304250&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |