Changing US Epidemiology of NDM-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, 2017–2019

Background: Due to limited therapeutic options and potential for spread, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)-producing New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDMs) are a public health priority. We investigated the epidemiology of NDM-producing CRE reported to the CDC to clarify its distribution a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2020-10, Vol.41 (S1), p.s25-s26
Hauptverfasser: Shugart, Alicia, Mahon, Garrett, Epstein, Lauren, Huang, Jennifer Y., McAllister, Gillian, Lawsin, Adrian, Sula, Erisa, Halpin, Alison Laufer, Smith, Amanda, Carman, Rebekah, Cassidy, P. Maureen, Morey, Karim, Paranandi, Anu, Downing, Randy, Noel, Diane, Kallen, Alexander J., Walters, Maroya Spalding
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page s26
container_issue S1
container_start_page s25
container_title Infection control and hospital epidemiology
container_volume 41
creator Shugart, Alicia
Mahon, Garrett
Epstein, Lauren
Huang, Jennifer Y.
McAllister, Gillian
Lawsin, Adrian
Sula, Erisa
Halpin, Alison Laufer
Smith, Amanda
Carman, Rebekah
Cassidy, P. Maureen
Morey, Karim
Paranandi, Anu
Downing, Randy
Noel, Diane
Kallen, Alexander J.
Walters, Maroya Spalding
description Background: Due to limited therapeutic options and potential for spread, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)-producing New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDMs) are a public health priority. We investigated the epidemiology of NDM-producing CRE reported to the CDC to clarify its distribution and relative prevalence. Methods: The CDC’s Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network supports molecular testing of CRE for 5 carbapenemases nationally. Although KPC is the most common carbapenemase in the United States, non-KPC carbapenemases are a growing concern. We analyzed CRE with any of 4 non-KPC plasmid-mediated carbapenemases (NDM, VIM, IMP, or OXA-48 type) isolated from specimens collected from January 1, 2017, through June 30, 2019; only a patient’s first isolate per organism–carbapenemase combination was included. We excluded isolates from specimen sources associated with colonization screening (eg, perirectal). We compared the proportion of NDM-producing CRE to all non-KPC–producing CP-CRE between period A (January to June 2018) and period B (January to June 2019). Health departments and the CDC collected additional exposure and molecular information in selected states to better describe current NDM-producing CRE epidemiology. Results: Overall, 47 states reported 1,013 non–KPC-producing CP-CRE (range/state, 1–109 isolates; median, 11 isolates); 46 states reported 631 NDM-producing CRE (range/state, 1–84; median, 6). NDM-producing CRE increased quarterly from the third quarter of 2018 through the second quarter of 2019; CP-CRE isolates with other non-KPC carbapenemases remained stable (Fig. 1). In period A, 124 of 216 emerging CP-CRE had NDM (57.1%), compared with 255 of 359 emerging CP-CRE (71.0%) during period B ( P = .1179). Among NDM-producing CRE, the proportion of Enterobacter spp increased from 10.5% in 2018 to 18.4% in 2019 ( P = .0467) (Fig. 2). In total, 18 states reported more NDM-producing CRE in the first 6 months of 2019 than in all of 2018. Connecticut, Ohio, and Oregon were among states that conducted detailed investigations; these 3 states identified 24 NDM-producing CRE isolates from 23 patients in period B. Overall, 5 (21.7%) of 22 patients with history available traveled internationally ≤12 months prior to culture; 17 (73.9%) acquired NDM-producing CRE domestically. Among 15 isolates sequenced, 8 (53.3%) carried NDM-5 (6 E. coli , 1 Enterobacter spp and 1 Klebsiella spp) and 7 (46.7%) carried NDM-1 (6 Enterobacter spp and 1 Klebsiel
doi_str_mv 10.1017/ice.2020.502
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2898304250</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2898304250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1462-f4d1212a9ffc94d80bcf13290fb3cdba5edb99ec3492f1b7475cd3a53aba9e133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtKAzEYRoMoWKs7H2DAbVNz7UyWMtYL1AtqwZUh1zqlnYzJdNGd7-Ab-iSm1NXZHP7v5wBwjtEYI1xeNsaNCSJozBE5AAPMuYCTirJDMECVELAi9P0YnKS0RAiVQuAB-Kg_Vbto2kUxfy2mXWPdugmrsNgWwReP1w_wOQa7MTuhVlGrzrVuDV9calKv2r6Ytr2LQSuT0SjjlBsVJP_y-_2TIU7BkVer5M7-OQTzm-lbfQdnT7f39dUMGswmBHpmMcFECe-NYLZC2nhMiUBeU2O14s5qIZyhTBCPdclKbixVnCqthMOUDsHF_m4Xw9fGpV4uwya2eVKSSlQUMcJRtkZ7y8SQUnRedrFZq7iVGMldQZkLyl1BmQvSPyM7ZA4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2898304250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changing US Epidemiology of NDM-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, 2017–2019</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Shugart, Alicia ; Mahon, Garrett ; Epstein, Lauren ; Huang, Jennifer Y. ; McAllister, Gillian ; Lawsin, Adrian ; Sula, Erisa ; Halpin, Alison Laufer ; Smith, Amanda ; Carman, Rebekah ; Cassidy, P. Maureen ; Morey, Karim ; Paranandi, Anu ; Downing, Randy ; Noel, Diane ; Kallen, Alexander J. ; Walters, Maroya Spalding</creator><creatorcontrib>Shugart, Alicia ; Mahon, Garrett ; Epstein, Lauren ; Huang, Jennifer Y. ; McAllister, Gillian ; Lawsin, Adrian ; Sula, Erisa ; Halpin, Alison Laufer ; Smith, Amanda ; Carman, Rebekah ; Cassidy, P. Maureen ; Morey, Karim ; Paranandi, Anu ; Downing, Randy ; Noel, Diane ; Kallen, Alexander J. ; Walters, Maroya Spalding</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Due to limited therapeutic options and potential for spread, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)-producing New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDMs) are a public health priority. We investigated the epidemiology of NDM-producing CRE reported to the CDC to clarify its distribution and relative prevalence. Methods: The CDC’s Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network supports molecular testing of CRE for 5 carbapenemases nationally. Although KPC is the most common carbapenemase in the United States, non-KPC carbapenemases are a growing concern. We analyzed CRE with any of 4 non-KPC plasmid-mediated carbapenemases (NDM, VIM, IMP, or OXA-48 type) isolated from specimens collected from January 1, 2017, through June 30, 2019; only a patient’s first isolate per organism–carbapenemase combination was included. We excluded isolates from specimen sources associated with colonization screening (eg, perirectal). We compared the proportion of NDM-producing CRE to all non-KPC–producing CP-CRE between period A (January to June 2018) and period B (January to June 2019). Health departments and the CDC collected additional exposure and molecular information in selected states to better describe current NDM-producing CRE epidemiology. Results: Overall, 47 states reported 1,013 non–KPC-producing CP-CRE (range/state, 1–109 isolates; median, 11 isolates); 46 states reported 631 NDM-producing CRE (range/state, 1–84; median, 6). NDM-producing CRE increased quarterly from the third quarter of 2018 through the second quarter of 2019; CP-CRE isolates with other non-KPC carbapenemases remained stable (Fig. 1). In period A, 124 of 216 emerging CP-CRE had NDM (57.1%), compared with 255 of 359 emerging CP-CRE (71.0%) during period B ( P = .1179). Among NDM-producing CRE, the proportion of Enterobacter spp increased from 10.5% in 2018 to 18.4% in 2019 ( P = .0467) (Fig. 2). In total, 18 states reported more NDM-producing CRE in the first 6 months of 2019 than in all of 2018. Connecticut, Ohio, and Oregon were among states that conducted detailed investigations; these 3 states identified 24 NDM-producing CRE isolates from 23 patients in period B. Overall, 5 (21.7%) of 22 patients with history available traveled internationally ≤12 months prior to culture; 17 (73.9%) acquired NDM-producing CRE domestically. Among 15 isolates sequenced, 8 (53.3%) carried NDM-5 (6 E. coli , 1 Enterobacter spp and 1 Klebsiella spp) and 7 (46.7%) carried NDM-1 (6 Enterobacter spp and 1 Klebsiella spp). Species were diverse; no single strain type was shared by &gt;2 isolates. Conclusions: Detection of NDM-producing CRE has increased across the AR Lab Network. Among states with detailed information available, domestic acquisition was common, and no single variant or strain predominated. Aggressive public health response and further understanding of current US NDM-CRE epidemiology are needed to prevent further spread. Disclosures: None Funding: None</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-823X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-6834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/ice.2020.502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Antibiotic resistance ; Antibiotics ; CRE bacteria ; Disease control ; Drug resistance ; E coli ; Epidemiology ; Public health</subject><ispartof>Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2020-10, Vol.41 (S1), p.s25-s26</ispartof><rights>2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1462-f4d1212a9ffc94d80bcf13290fb3cdba5edb99ec3492f1b7475cd3a53aba9e133</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2898304250/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2898304250?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21367,27901,27902,33721,43781,74045</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shugart, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahon, Garrett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jennifer Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAllister, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawsin, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sula, Erisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halpin, Alison Laufer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carman, Rebekah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassidy, P. Maureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morey, Karim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paranandi, Anu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downing, Randy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noel, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallen, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walters, Maroya Spalding</creatorcontrib><title>Changing US Epidemiology of NDM-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, 2017–2019</title><title>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</title><description>Background: Due to limited therapeutic options and potential for spread, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)-producing New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDMs) are a public health priority. We investigated the epidemiology of NDM-producing CRE reported to the CDC to clarify its distribution and relative prevalence. Methods: The CDC’s Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network supports molecular testing of CRE for 5 carbapenemases nationally. Although KPC is the most common carbapenemase in the United States, non-KPC carbapenemases are a growing concern. We analyzed CRE with any of 4 non-KPC plasmid-mediated carbapenemases (NDM, VIM, IMP, or OXA-48 type) isolated from specimens collected from January 1, 2017, through June 30, 2019; only a patient’s first isolate per organism–carbapenemase combination was included. We excluded isolates from specimen sources associated with colonization screening (eg, perirectal). We compared the proportion of NDM-producing CRE to all non-KPC–producing CP-CRE between period A (January to June 2018) and period B (January to June 2019). Health departments and the CDC collected additional exposure and molecular information in selected states to better describe current NDM-producing CRE epidemiology. Results: Overall, 47 states reported 1,013 non–KPC-producing CP-CRE (range/state, 1–109 isolates; median, 11 isolates); 46 states reported 631 NDM-producing CRE (range/state, 1–84; median, 6). NDM-producing CRE increased quarterly from the third quarter of 2018 through the second quarter of 2019; CP-CRE isolates with other non-KPC carbapenemases remained stable (Fig. 1). In period A, 124 of 216 emerging CP-CRE had NDM (57.1%), compared with 255 of 359 emerging CP-CRE (71.0%) during period B ( P = .1179). Among NDM-producing CRE, the proportion of Enterobacter spp increased from 10.5% in 2018 to 18.4% in 2019 ( P = .0467) (Fig. 2). In total, 18 states reported more NDM-producing CRE in the first 6 months of 2019 than in all of 2018. Connecticut, Ohio, and Oregon were among states that conducted detailed investigations; these 3 states identified 24 NDM-producing CRE isolates from 23 patients in period B. Overall, 5 (21.7%) of 22 patients with history available traveled internationally ≤12 months prior to culture; 17 (73.9%) acquired NDM-producing CRE domestically. Among 15 isolates sequenced, 8 (53.3%) carried NDM-5 (6 E. coli , 1 Enterobacter spp and 1 Klebsiella spp) and 7 (46.7%) carried NDM-1 (6 Enterobacter spp and 1 Klebsiella spp). Species were diverse; no single strain type was shared by &gt;2 isolates. Conclusions: Detection of NDM-producing CRE has increased across the AR Lab Network. Among states with detailed information available, domestic acquisition was common, and no single variant or strain predominated. Aggressive public health response and further understanding of current US NDM-CRE epidemiology are needed to prevent further spread. Disclosures: None Funding: None</description><subject>Antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>CRE bacteria</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Public health</subject><issn>0899-823X</issn><issn>1559-6834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNotkMtKAzEYRoMoWKs7H2DAbVNz7UyWMtYL1AtqwZUh1zqlnYzJdNGd7-Ab-iSm1NXZHP7v5wBwjtEYI1xeNsaNCSJozBE5AAPMuYCTirJDMECVELAi9P0YnKS0RAiVQuAB-Kg_Vbto2kUxfy2mXWPdugmrsNgWwReP1w_wOQa7MTuhVlGrzrVuDV9calKv2r6Ytr2LQSuT0SjjlBsVJP_y-_2TIU7BkVer5M7-OQTzm-lbfQdnT7f39dUMGswmBHpmMcFECe-NYLZC2nhMiUBeU2O14s5qIZyhTBCPdclKbixVnCqthMOUDsHF_m4Xw9fGpV4uwya2eVKSSlQUMcJRtkZ7y8SQUnRedrFZq7iVGMldQZkLyl1BmQvSPyM7ZA4</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Shugart, Alicia</creator><creator>Mahon, Garrett</creator><creator>Epstein, Lauren</creator><creator>Huang, Jennifer Y.</creator><creator>McAllister, Gillian</creator><creator>Lawsin, Adrian</creator><creator>Sula, Erisa</creator><creator>Halpin, Alison Laufer</creator><creator>Smith, Amanda</creator><creator>Carman, Rebekah</creator><creator>Cassidy, P. Maureen</creator><creator>Morey, Karim</creator><creator>Paranandi, Anu</creator><creator>Downing, Randy</creator><creator>Noel, Diane</creator><creator>Kallen, Alexander J.</creator><creator>Walters, Maroya Spalding</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Changing US Epidemiology of NDM-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, 2017–2019</title><author>Shugart, Alicia ; Mahon, Garrett ; Epstein, Lauren ; Huang, Jennifer Y. ; McAllister, Gillian ; Lawsin, Adrian ; Sula, Erisa ; Halpin, Alison Laufer ; Smith, Amanda ; Carman, Rebekah ; Cassidy, P. Maureen ; Morey, Karim ; Paranandi, Anu ; Downing, Randy ; Noel, Diane ; Kallen, Alexander J. ; Walters, Maroya Spalding</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1462-f4d1212a9ffc94d80bcf13290fb3cdba5edb99ec3492f1b7475cd3a53aba9e133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>CRE bacteria</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Public health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shugart, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahon, Garrett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jennifer Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAllister, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawsin, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sula, Erisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halpin, Alison Laufer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carman, Rebekah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassidy, P. Maureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morey, Karim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paranandi, Anu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downing, Randy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noel, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallen, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walters, Maroya Spalding</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shugart, Alicia</au><au>Mahon, Garrett</au><au>Epstein, Lauren</au><au>Huang, Jennifer Y.</au><au>McAllister, Gillian</au><au>Lawsin, Adrian</au><au>Sula, Erisa</au><au>Halpin, Alison Laufer</au><au>Smith, Amanda</au><au>Carman, Rebekah</au><au>Cassidy, P. Maureen</au><au>Morey, Karim</au><au>Paranandi, Anu</au><au>Downing, Randy</au><au>Noel, Diane</au><au>Kallen, Alexander J.</au><au>Walters, Maroya Spalding</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changing US Epidemiology of NDM-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, 2017–2019</atitle><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>s25</spage><epage>s26</epage><pages>s25-s26</pages><issn>0899-823X</issn><eissn>1559-6834</eissn><abstract>Background: Due to limited therapeutic options and potential for spread, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)-producing New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDMs) are a public health priority. We investigated the epidemiology of NDM-producing CRE reported to the CDC to clarify its distribution and relative prevalence. Methods: The CDC’s Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network supports molecular testing of CRE for 5 carbapenemases nationally. Although KPC is the most common carbapenemase in the United States, non-KPC carbapenemases are a growing concern. We analyzed CRE with any of 4 non-KPC plasmid-mediated carbapenemases (NDM, VIM, IMP, or OXA-48 type) isolated from specimens collected from January 1, 2017, through June 30, 2019; only a patient’s first isolate per organism–carbapenemase combination was included. We excluded isolates from specimen sources associated with colonization screening (eg, perirectal). We compared the proportion of NDM-producing CRE to all non-KPC–producing CP-CRE between period A (January to June 2018) and period B (January to June 2019). Health departments and the CDC collected additional exposure and molecular information in selected states to better describe current NDM-producing CRE epidemiology. Results: Overall, 47 states reported 1,013 non–KPC-producing CP-CRE (range/state, 1–109 isolates; median, 11 isolates); 46 states reported 631 NDM-producing CRE (range/state, 1–84; median, 6). NDM-producing CRE increased quarterly from the third quarter of 2018 through the second quarter of 2019; CP-CRE isolates with other non-KPC carbapenemases remained stable (Fig. 1). In period A, 124 of 216 emerging CP-CRE had NDM (57.1%), compared with 255 of 359 emerging CP-CRE (71.0%) during period B ( P = .1179). Among NDM-producing CRE, the proportion of Enterobacter spp increased from 10.5% in 2018 to 18.4% in 2019 ( P = .0467) (Fig. 2). In total, 18 states reported more NDM-producing CRE in the first 6 months of 2019 than in all of 2018. Connecticut, Ohio, and Oregon were among states that conducted detailed investigations; these 3 states identified 24 NDM-producing CRE isolates from 23 patients in period B. Overall, 5 (21.7%) of 22 patients with history available traveled internationally ≤12 months prior to culture; 17 (73.9%) acquired NDM-producing CRE domestically. Among 15 isolates sequenced, 8 (53.3%) carried NDM-5 (6 E. coli , 1 Enterobacter spp and 1 Klebsiella spp) and 7 (46.7%) carried NDM-1 (6 Enterobacter spp and 1 Klebsiella spp). Species were diverse; no single strain type was shared by &gt;2 isolates. Conclusions: Detection of NDM-producing CRE has increased across the AR Lab Network. Among states with detailed information available, domestic acquisition was common, and no single variant or strain predominated. Aggressive public health response and further understanding of current US NDM-CRE epidemiology are needed to prevent further spread. Disclosures: None Funding: None</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/ice.2020.502</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-823X
ispartof Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2020-10, Vol.41 (S1), p.s25-s26
issn 0899-823X
1559-6834
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2898304250
source Cambridge Journals; ProQuest Central
subjects Antibiotic resistance
Antibiotics
CRE bacteria
Disease control
Drug resistance
E coli
Epidemiology
Public health
title Changing US Epidemiology of NDM-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae, 2017–2019
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T01%3A39%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changing%20US%20Epidemiology%20of%20NDM-Producing%20Carbapenem-Resistant%20Enterobacteriaceae,%202017%E2%80%932019&rft.jtitle=Infection%20control%20and%20hospital%20epidemiology&rft.au=Shugart,%20Alicia&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=s25&rft.epage=s26&rft.pages=s25-s26&rft.issn=0899-823X&rft.eissn=1559-6834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/ice.2020.502&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2898304250%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2898304250&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true