Efficacy of a Sink Tailpiece Heating Device to Decrease Microbial Colonization of Sink Drains
Background: Many institutions have reported transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms to patients from colonized sinks. Prior data have shown that bacterial colonization of the sink drain, which can occur via biofilm from a colonized p-trap or via seeding from above, results in dispersion of bac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2020-10, Vol.41 (S1), p.s208-s210 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | s210 |
---|---|
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | s208 |
container_title | Infection control and hospital epidemiology |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Park, Stacy Steinberg, Limor Carroll, Joanne Mathers, Amy Attai, April |
description | Background:
Many institutions have reported transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms to patients from colonized sinks. Prior data have shown that bacterial colonization of the sink drain, which can occur via biofilm from a colonized p-trap or via seeding from above, results in dispersion of bacteria in the area of the sink when water from the faucet comes in contact with the drain. Heat disruption of biofilm formation between the p-trap and sink drain is a potential strategy in preventing colonization of sink drains.
Methods:
In an academic center hospital, 54 tail-piece heaters were installed in 3 intensive care units and 2 acute-care units in an associated regional hospital. Half of the installed devices were sham (no heat). The devices were programmed to heat the tail piece to 72C for 1 hour every fourth hour. Rooms were randomized to heating or sham devices on a 1:1 basis within each unit. Sink drains and p-traps were sampled biweekly. Samples were assessed for semiquantitative growth of gram-negative bacteria on MacConkey agar, looking especially for
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
and
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) was detected by broth enrichment followed by growth on Colorex KPC agar. Frontline personnel were blinded to device assignment.
Results:
Linear mixed modeling revealed reduced risk of detectable gram-negative bacteria (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.037–0.536) and Enterobacterales (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.368–0.668) in sink drains with a heating device (Fig. 1), but no difference in risk of detectable
P. aeruginosa
or
S. maltophilia
(Table 1). We detected a trend toward reduction in CPE that did not reach statistical significance, and there was no difference in risk for detection of any bacteria in the p-trap between heating and sham devices. Audits of devices demonstrated that few reached the target heating temperature of 72C (median, 65.9C; range, 50.1–73.7C).
Conclusions:
Disruption of biofilm between the p-trap and the sink drain is a promising strategy for the prevention of sink-drain colonization with clinically important bacteria. The presence of a heating device was associated with reduced risk of detectable gram-negative organisms, specifically Enterobacterales, in sink drains. The limitations of this study included low overall rates of positivity for certain pathogens, including CPE, and suboptimal, inconsistent performance across heating devices. Further work with a larger sample size and more consiste |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/ice.2020.752 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2898304206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2898304206</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1462-302365379f311adea4adbb5e31a48b699e90aceb4072cfb1c26666c1a84aa10a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs3f0DAq1snH7ubHKWtVqh4sIIXCbNpVlLXTU1aof56U-tcZg4vz8w8hFwyGDFg9Y23bsSBw6gu-REZsLLURaWEPCYDUFoXiovXU3KW0goAaq3ZgLxN29ZbtDsaWor02fcfdIG-W3tnHZ053Pj-nU7cd2bTTciTjQ6To4_extB47Og4dKH3PzkZ-j3ljzGJ6Pt0Tk5a7JK7-O9D8nI3XYxnxfzp_mF8Oy8skxUvBHBRlaLWrWAMlw4lLpumdIKhVE2ltdOA1jUSam7bhlle5bIMlURkgGJIrg7cdQxfW5c2ZhW2sc8rDVdaCZAcqpy6PqTy5SlF15p19J8Yd4aB2Qs0-UmzF2iyQPELJL1i3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2898304206</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of a Sink Tailpiece Heating Device to Decrease Microbial Colonization of Sink Drains</title><source>ProQuest Central Essentials</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Park, Stacy ; Steinberg, Limor ; Carroll, Joanne ; Mathers, Amy ; Attai, April</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Stacy ; Steinberg, Limor ; Carroll, Joanne ; Mathers, Amy ; Attai, April</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
Many institutions have reported transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms to patients from colonized sinks. Prior data have shown that bacterial colonization of the sink drain, which can occur via biofilm from a colonized p-trap or via seeding from above, results in dispersion of bacteria in the area of the sink when water from the faucet comes in contact with the drain. Heat disruption of biofilm formation between the p-trap and sink drain is a potential strategy in preventing colonization of sink drains.
Methods:
In an academic center hospital, 54 tail-piece heaters were installed in 3 intensive care units and 2 acute-care units in an associated regional hospital. Half of the installed devices were sham (no heat). The devices were programmed to heat the tail piece to 72C for 1 hour every fourth hour. Rooms were randomized to heating or sham devices on a 1:1 basis within each unit. Sink drains and p-traps were sampled biweekly. Samples were assessed for semiquantitative growth of gram-negative bacteria on MacConkey agar, looking especially for
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
and
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) was detected by broth enrichment followed by growth on Colorex KPC agar. Frontline personnel were blinded to device assignment.
Results:
Linear mixed modeling revealed reduced risk of detectable gram-negative bacteria (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.037–0.536) and Enterobacterales (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.368–0.668) in sink drains with a heating device (Fig. 1), but no difference in risk of detectable
P. aeruginosa
or
S. maltophilia
(Table 1). We detected a trend toward reduction in CPE that did not reach statistical significance, and there was no difference in risk for detection of any bacteria in the p-trap between heating and sham devices. Audits of devices demonstrated that few reached the target heating temperature of 72C (median, 65.9C; range, 50.1–73.7C).
Conclusions:
Disruption of biofilm between the p-trap and the sink drain is a promising strategy for the prevention of sink-drain colonization with clinically important bacteria. The presence of a heating device was associated with reduced risk of detectable gram-negative organisms, specifically Enterobacterales, in sink drains. The limitations of this study included low overall rates of positivity for certain pathogens, including CPE, and suboptimal, inconsistent performance across heating devices. Further work with a larger sample size and more consistent heating devices is warranted, as are data regarding patient outcomes as a result of such interventions.
Funding:
None
Disclosures:
None</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-823X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-6834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/ice.2020.752</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Biofilms ; Colonization ; Disease control ; Disease transmission ; Drug resistance ; Gram-negative bacteria ; Heating ; Hospitals ; Risk reduction</subject><ispartof>Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2020-10, Vol.41 (S1), p.s208-s210</ispartof><rights>2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1462-302365379f311adea4adbb5e31a48b699e90aceb4072cfb1c26666c1a84aa10a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2898304206/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2898304206?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21368,21369,23236,27903,27904,33509,33682,33723,43638,43766,43784,64361,64365,72215,73850,74029,74048</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Stacy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Limor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathers, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attai, April</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of a Sink Tailpiece Heating Device to Decrease Microbial Colonization of Sink Drains</title><title>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</title><description>Background:
Many institutions have reported transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms to patients from colonized sinks. Prior data have shown that bacterial colonization of the sink drain, which can occur via biofilm from a colonized p-trap or via seeding from above, results in dispersion of bacteria in the area of the sink when water from the faucet comes in contact with the drain. Heat disruption of biofilm formation between the p-trap and sink drain is a potential strategy in preventing colonization of sink drains.
Methods:
In an academic center hospital, 54 tail-piece heaters were installed in 3 intensive care units and 2 acute-care units in an associated regional hospital. Half of the installed devices were sham (no heat). The devices were programmed to heat the tail piece to 72C for 1 hour every fourth hour. Rooms were randomized to heating or sham devices on a 1:1 basis within each unit. Sink drains and p-traps were sampled biweekly. Samples were assessed for semiquantitative growth of gram-negative bacteria on MacConkey agar, looking especially for
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
and
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) was detected by broth enrichment followed by growth on Colorex KPC agar. Frontline personnel were blinded to device assignment.
Results:
Linear mixed modeling revealed reduced risk of detectable gram-negative bacteria (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.037–0.536) and Enterobacterales (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.368–0.668) in sink drains with a heating device (Fig. 1), but no difference in risk of detectable
P. aeruginosa
or
S. maltophilia
(Table 1). We detected a trend toward reduction in CPE that did not reach statistical significance, and there was no difference in risk for detection of any bacteria in the p-trap between heating and sham devices. Audits of devices demonstrated that few reached the target heating temperature of 72C (median, 65.9C; range, 50.1–73.7C).
Conclusions:
Disruption of biofilm between the p-trap and the sink drain is a promising strategy for the prevention of sink-drain colonization with clinically important bacteria. The presence of a heating device was associated with reduced risk of detectable gram-negative organisms, specifically Enterobacterales, in sink drains. The limitations of this study included low overall rates of positivity for certain pathogens, including CPE, and suboptimal, inconsistent performance across heating devices. Further work with a larger sample size and more consistent heating devices is warranted, as are data regarding patient outcomes as a result of such interventions.
Funding:
None
Disclosures:
None</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Gram-negative bacteria</subject><subject>Heating</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><issn>0899-823X</issn><issn>1559-6834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs3f0DAq1snH7ubHKWtVqh4sIIXCbNpVlLXTU1aof56U-tcZg4vz8w8hFwyGDFg9Y23bsSBw6gu-REZsLLURaWEPCYDUFoXiovXU3KW0goAaq3ZgLxN29ZbtDsaWor02fcfdIG-W3tnHZ053Pj-nU7cd2bTTciTjQ6To4_extB47Og4dKH3PzkZ-j3ljzGJ6Pt0Tk5a7JK7-O9D8nI3XYxnxfzp_mF8Oy8skxUvBHBRlaLWrWAMlw4lLpumdIKhVE2ltdOA1jUSam7bhlle5bIMlURkgGJIrg7cdQxfW5c2ZhW2sc8rDVdaCZAcqpy6PqTy5SlF15p19J8Yd4aB2Qs0-UmzF2iyQPELJL1i3w</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Park, Stacy</creator><creator>Steinberg, Limor</creator><creator>Carroll, Joanne</creator><creator>Mathers, Amy</creator><creator>Attai, April</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Efficacy of a Sink Tailpiece Heating Device to Decrease Microbial Colonization of Sink Drains</title><author>Park, Stacy ; Steinberg, Limor ; Carroll, Joanne ; Mathers, Amy ; Attai, April</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1462-302365379f311adea4adbb5e31a48b699e90aceb4072cfb1c26666c1a84aa10a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Gram-negative bacteria</topic><topic>Heating</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Stacy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Limor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathers, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attai, April</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Stacy</au><au>Steinberg, Limor</au><au>Carroll, Joanne</au><au>Mathers, Amy</au><au>Attai, April</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of a Sink Tailpiece Heating Device to Decrease Microbial Colonization of Sink Drains</atitle><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>s208</spage><epage>s210</epage><pages>s208-s210</pages><issn>0899-823X</issn><eissn>1559-6834</eissn><abstract>Background:
Many institutions have reported transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms to patients from colonized sinks. Prior data have shown that bacterial colonization of the sink drain, which can occur via biofilm from a colonized p-trap or via seeding from above, results in dispersion of bacteria in the area of the sink when water from the faucet comes in contact with the drain. Heat disruption of biofilm formation between the p-trap and sink drain is a potential strategy in preventing colonization of sink drains.
Methods:
In an academic center hospital, 54 tail-piece heaters were installed in 3 intensive care units and 2 acute-care units in an associated regional hospital. Half of the installed devices were sham (no heat). The devices were programmed to heat the tail piece to 72C for 1 hour every fourth hour. Rooms were randomized to heating or sham devices on a 1:1 basis within each unit. Sink drains and p-traps were sampled biweekly. Samples were assessed for semiquantitative growth of gram-negative bacteria on MacConkey agar, looking especially for
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
and
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) was detected by broth enrichment followed by growth on Colorex KPC agar. Frontline personnel were blinded to device assignment.
Results:
Linear mixed modeling revealed reduced risk of detectable gram-negative bacteria (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.037–0.536) and Enterobacterales (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.368–0.668) in sink drains with a heating device (Fig. 1), but no difference in risk of detectable
P. aeruginosa
or
S. maltophilia
(Table 1). We detected a trend toward reduction in CPE that did not reach statistical significance, and there was no difference in risk for detection of any bacteria in the p-trap between heating and sham devices. Audits of devices demonstrated that few reached the target heating temperature of 72C (median, 65.9C; range, 50.1–73.7C).
Conclusions:
Disruption of biofilm between the p-trap and the sink drain is a promising strategy for the prevention of sink-drain colonization with clinically important bacteria. The presence of a heating device was associated with reduced risk of detectable gram-negative organisms, specifically Enterobacterales, in sink drains. The limitations of this study included low overall rates of positivity for certain pathogens, including CPE, and suboptimal, inconsistent performance across heating devices. Further work with a larger sample size and more consistent heating devices is warranted, as are data regarding patient outcomes as a result of such interventions.
Funding:
None
Disclosures:
None</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/ice.2020.752</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-823X |
ispartof | Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2020-10, Vol.41 (S1), p.s208-s210 |
issn | 0899-823X 1559-6834 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2898304206 |
source | ProQuest Central Essentials; ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); Cambridge Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Bacteria Biofilms Colonization Disease control Disease transmission Drug resistance Gram-negative bacteria Heating Hospitals Risk reduction |
title | Efficacy of a Sink Tailpiece Heating Device to Decrease Microbial Colonization of Sink Drains |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T08%3A28%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20a%20Sink%20Tailpiece%20Heating%20Device%20to%20Decrease%20Microbial%20Colonization%20of%20Sink%20Drains&rft.jtitle=Infection%20control%20and%20hospital%20epidemiology&rft.au=Park,%20Stacy&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=s208&rft.epage=s210&rft.pages=s208-s210&rft.issn=0899-823X&rft.eissn=1559-6834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/ice.2020.752&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2898304206%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2898304206&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |