A practical framework for ethics assessment in wildlife management decision‐making
Wildlife professionals lack a framework and process for incorporating ethical considerations in a systematic and transparent way, along with ecological and social science, to support wildlife management decision‐making. We provide such a framework and process based on 3 of the major theoretical bran...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of wildlife management 2024-01, Vol.88 (1), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | The Journal of wildlife management |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Smith, Christian A. Tantillo, James A. Hale, Benjamin Decker, Daniel J. Forstchen, Ann B. Pomeranz, Emily F. Lauber, T. Bruce Schiavone, Michael V. Frohlich, Kipp Lederle, Patrick E. Benedict, R. Joseph Hurst, Jeremy King, Richard Siemer, William F. Baumer, Meghan S. |
description | Wildlife professionals lack a framework and process for incorporating ethical considerations in a systematic and transparent way, along with ecological and social science, to support wildlife management decision‐making. We provide such a framework and process based on 3 of the major theoretical branches ethicists have developed in Western culture: consequentialist moral theory, which focuses on consequences and outcomes; principle‐ and rule‐based approaches that deal with what is considered right or wrong; and virtue ethical theory, which considers factors such as character, virtue, and aesthetics. The framework can be used to anticipate the ethical consequences of alternative courses of action or taking no action. If wildlife professionals use this framework as an assessment tool to provide input into decision‐making, resulting decisions will be more transparent, better understood by stakeholders, and more consistent with public trust responsibilities.
Ethics, along with biological and social science, play a role in wildlife management decision making. This paper provides a practical framework and process that can be used to make assessment of ethical considerations explicit and transparent. Use of the framework will contribute to more fully informed decision making, consistent with public trust responsibilities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jwmg.22502 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2896680976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2896680976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2962-37b32a993bf89a6223b82a281e588b47561b072dec8fce9f46059e1c65ef872c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9OAjEQxhujiYhefIIm3kwW21m22x4JUdRgvGD01nTLFAv7B1sI4eYj-Iw-iYvr2dMkM7_55puPkEvOBpwxuFnuqsUAIGNwRHpcpXkCkufHpNcOIcmG_O2UnMW4ZCzlXIoemY3oOhi78daU1AVT4a4JK-qaQHHz7m2kJkaMscJ6Q31Nd76cl94hrUxtFvjbnqP10Tf19-dXZVa-XpyTE2fKiBd_tU9e7m5n4_tk-jx5GI-miQUlIEnzIgWjVFo4qYwASAsJpjWMmZTFMM8EL1gOrbx0FpUbCpYp5FZk6GQONu2Tq053HZqPLcaNXjbbULcnNUglhGQqFy113VE2NDEGdHodfGXCXnOmD6npQ2r6N7UW5h3cPor7f0j9-Po06XZ-AKV-cMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2896680976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A practical framework for ethics assessment in wildlife management decision‐making</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Smith, Christian A. ; Tantillo, James A. ; Hale, Benjamin ; Decker, Daniel J. ; Forstchen, Ann B. ; Pomeranz, Emily F. ; Lauber, T. Bruce ; Schiavone, Michael V. ; Frohlich, Kipp ; Lederle, Patrick E. ; Benedict, R. Joseph ; Hurst, Jeremy ; King, Richard ; Siemer, William F. ; Baumer, Meghan S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Christian A. ; Tantillo, James A. ; Hale, Benjamin ; Decker, Daniel J. ; Forstchen, Ann B. ; Pomeranz, Emily F. ; Lauber, T. Bruce ; Schiavone, Michael V. ; Frohlich, Kipp ; Lederle, Patrick E. ; Benedict, R. Joseph ; Hurst, Jeremy ; King, Richard ; Siemer, William F. ; Baumer, Meghan S.</creatorcontrib><description>Wildlife professionals lack a framework and process for incorporating ethical considerations in a systematic and transparent way, along with ecological and social science, to support wildlife management decision‐making. We provide such a framework and process based on 3 of the major theoretical branches ethicists have developed in Western culture: consequentialist moral theory, which focuses on consequences and outcomes; principle‐ and rule‐based approaches that deal with what is considered right or wrong; and virtue ethical theory, which considers factors such as character, virtue, and aesthetics. The framework can be used to anticipate the ethical consequences of alternative courses of action or taking no action. If wildlife professionals use this framework as an assessment tool to provide input into decision‐making, resulting decisions will be more transparent, better understood by stakeholders, and more consistent with public trust responsibilities.
Ethics, along with biological and social science, play a role in wildlife management decision making. This paper provides a practical framework and process that can be used to make assessment of ethical considerations explicit and transparent. Use of the framework will contribute to more fully informed decision making, consistent with public trust responsibilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Decision making ; Ethics ; human dimensions ; human values ; management ; policy ; Social sciences ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2024-01, Vol.88 (1), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Wildlife Society.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2962-37b32a993bf89a6223b82a281e588b47561b072dec8fce9f46059e1c65ef872c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9002-7861</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjwmg.22502$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjwmg.22502$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Christian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tantillo, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hale, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Decker, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forstchen, Ann B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomeranz, Emily F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauber, T. Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiavone, Michael V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frohlich, Kipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lederle, Patrick E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedict, R. Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurst, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siemer, William F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumer, Meghan S.</creatorcontrib><title>A practical framework for ethics assessment in wildlife management decision‐making</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Wildlife professionals lack a framework and process for incorporating ethical considerations in a systematic and transparent way, along with ecological and social science, to support wildlife management decision‐making. We provide such a framework and process based on 3 of the major theoretical branches ethicists have developed in Western culture: consequentialist moral theory, which focuses on consequences and outcomes; principle‐ and rule‐based approaches that deal with what is considered right or wrong; and virtue ethical theory, which considers factors such as character, virtue, and aesthetics. The framework can be used to anticipate the ethical consequences of alternative courses of action or taking no action. If wildlife professionals use this framework as an assessment tool to provide input into decision‐making, resulting decisions will be more transparent, better understood by stakeholders, and more consistent with public trust responsibilities.
Ethics, along with biological and social science, play a role in wildlife management decision making. This paper provides a practical framework and process that can be used to make assessment of ethical considerations explicit and transparent. Use of the framework will contribute to more fully informed decision making, consistent with public trust responsibilities.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>human dimensions</subject><subject>human values</subject><subject>management</subject><subject>policy</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9OAjEQxhujiYhefIIm3kwW21m22x4JUdRgvGD01nTLFAv7B1sI4eYj-Iw-iYvr2dMkM7_55puPkEvOBpwxuFnuqsUAIGNwRHpcpXkCkufHpNcOIcmG_O2UnMW4ZCzlXIoemY3oOhi78daU1AVT4a4JK-qaQHHz7m2kJkaMscJ6Q31Nd76cl94hrUxtFvjbnqP10Tf19-dXZVa-XpyTE2fKiBd_tU9e7m5n4_tk-jx5GI-miQUlIEnzIgWjVFo4qYwASAsJpjWMmZTFMM8EL1gOrbx0FpUbCpYp5FZk6GQONu2Tq053HZqPLcaNXjbbULcnNUglhGQqFy113VE2NDEGdHodfGXCXnOmD6npQ2r6N7UW5h3cPor7f0j9-Po06XZ-AKV-cMk</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Smith, Christian A.</creator><creator>Tantillo, James A.</creator><creator>Hale, Benjamin</creator><creator>Decker, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Forstchen, Ann B.</creator><creator>Pomeranz, Emily F.</creator><creator>Lauber, T. Bruce</creator><creator>Schiavone, Michael V.</creator><creator>Frohlich, Kipp</creator><creator>Lederle, Patrick E.</creator><creator>Benedict, R. Joseph</creator><creator>Hurst, Jeremy</creator><creator>King, Richard</creator><creator>Siemer, William F.</creator><creator>Baumer, Meghan S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9002-7861</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>A practical framework for ethics assessment in wildlife management decision‐making</title><author>Smith, Christian A. ; Tantillo, James A. ; Hale, Benjamin ; Decker, Daniel J. ; Forstchen, Ann B. ; Pomeranz, Emily F. ; Lauber, T. Bruce ; Schiavone, Michael V. ; Frohlich, Kipp ; Lederle, Patrick E. ; Benedict, R. Joseph ; Hurst, Jeremy ; King, Richard ; Siemer, William F. ; Baumer, Meghan S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2962-37b32a993bf89a6223b82a281e588b47561b072dec8fce9f46059e1c65ef872c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>human dimensions</topic><topic>human values</topic><topic>management</topic><topic>policy</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Christian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tantillo, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hale, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Decker, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forstchen, Ann B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomeranz, Emily F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauber, T. Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiavone, Michael V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frohlich, Kipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lederle, Patrick E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedict, R. Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurst, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siemer, William F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumer, Meghan S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Christian A.</au><au>Tantillo, James A.</au><au>Hale, Benjamin</au><au>Decker, Daniel J.</au><au>Forstchen, Ann B.</au><au>Pomeranz, Emily F.</au><au>Lauber, T. Bruce</au><au>Schiavone, Michael V.</au><au>Frohlich, Kipp</au><au>Lederle, Patrick E.</au><au>Benedict, R. Joseph</au><au>Hurst, Jeremy</au><au>King, Richard</au><au>Siemer, William F.</au><au>Baumer, Meghan S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A practical framework for ethics assessment in wildlife management decision‐making</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>1</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><abstract>Wildlife professionals lack a framework and process for incorporating ethical considerations in a systematic and transparent way, along with ecological and social science, to support wildlife management decision‐making. We provide such a framework and process based on 3 of the major theoretical branches ethicists have developed in Western culture: consequentialist moral theory, which focuses on consequences and outcomes; principle‐ and rule‐based approaches that deal with what is considered right or wrong; and virtue ethical theory, which considers factors such as character, virtue, and aesthetics. The framework can be used to anticipate the ethical consequences of alternative courses of action or taking no action. If wildlife professionals use this framework as an assessment tool to provide input into decision‐making, resulting decisions will be more transparent, better understood by stakeholders, and more consistent with public trust responsibilities.
Ethics, along with biological and social science, play a role in wildlife management decision making. This paper provides a practical framework and process that can be used to make assessment of ethical considerations explicit and transparent. Use of the framework will contribute to more fully informed decision making, consistent with public trust responsibilities.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.22502</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9002-7861</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-541X |
ispartof | The Journal of wildlife management, 2024-01, Vol.88 (1), p.n/a |
issn | 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2896680976 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Decision making Ethics human dimensions human values management policy Social sciences Wildlife management |
title | A practical framework for ethics assessment in wildlife management decision‐making |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A21%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20practical%20framework%20for%20ethics%20assessment%20in%20wildlife%20management%20decision%E2%80%90making&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Smith,%20Christian%20A.&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.22502&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2896680976%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2896680976&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |