A practical framework for ethics assessment in wildlife management decision‐making

Wildlife professionals lack a framework and process for incorporating ethical considerations in a systematic and transparent way, along with ecological and social science, to support wildlife management decision‐making. We provide such a framework and process based on 3 of the major theoretical bran...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2024-01, Vol.88 (1), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Christian A., Tantillo, James A., Hale, Benjamin, Decker, Daniel J., Forstchen, Ann B., Pomeranz, Emily F., Lauber, T. Bruce, Schiavone, Michael V., Frohlich, Kipp, Lederle, Patrick E., Benedict, R. Joseph, Hurst, Jeremy, King, Richard, Siemer, William F., Baumer, Meghan S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 88
creator Smith, Christian A.
Tantillo, James A.
Hale, Benjamin
Decker, Daniel J.
Forstchen, Ann B.
Pomeranz, Emily F.
Lauber, T. Bruce
Schiavone, Michael V.
Frohlich, Kipp
Lederle, Patrick E.
Benedict, R. Joseph
Hurst, Jeremy
King, Richard
Siemer, William F.
Baumer, Meghan S.
description Wildlife professionals lack a framework and process for incorporating ethical considerations in a systematic and transparent way, along with ecological and social science, to support wildlife management decision‐making. We provide such a framework and process based on 3 of the major theoretical branches ethicists have developed in Western culture: consequentialist moral theory, which focuses on consequences and outcomes; principle‐ and rule‐based approaches that deal with what is considered right or wrong; and virtue ethical theory, which considers factors such as character, virtue, and aesthetics. The framework can be used to anticipate the ethical consequences of alternative courses of action or taking no action. If wildlife professionals use this framework as an assessment tool to provide input into decision‐making, resulting decisions will be more transparent, better understood by stakeholders, and more consistent with public trust responsibilities. Ethics, along with biological and social science, play a role in wildlife management decision making. This paper provides a practical framework and process that can be used to make assessment of ethical considerations explicit and transparent. Use of the framework will contribute to more fully informed decision making, consistent with public trust responsibilities.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jwmg.22502
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2896680976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2896680976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2962-37b32a993bf89a6223b82a281e588b47561b072dec8fce9f46059e1c65ef872c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9OAjEQxhujiYhefIIm3kwW21m22x4JUdRgvGD01nTLFAv7B1sI4eYj-Iw-iYvr2dMkM7_55puPkEvOBpwxuFnuqsUAIGNwRHpcpXkCkufHpNcOIcmG_O2UnMW4ZCzlXIoemY3oOhi78daU1AVT4a4JK-qaQHHz7m2kJkaMscJ6Q31Nd76cl94hrUxtFvjbnqP10Tf19-dXZVa-XpyTE2fKiBd_tU9e7m5n4_tk-jx5GI-miQUlIEnzIgWjVFo4qYwASAsJpjWMmZTFMM8EL1gOrbx0FpUbCpYp5FZk6GQONu2Tq053HZqPLcaNXjbbULcnNUglhGQqFy113VE2NDEGdHodfGXCXnOmD6npQ2r6N7UW5h3cPor7f0j9-Po06XZ-AKV-cMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2896680976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A practical framework for ethics assessment in wildlife management decision‐making</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Smith, Christian A. ; Tantillo, James A. ; Hale, Benjamin ; Decker, Daniel J. ; Forstchen, Ann B. ; Pomeranz, Emily F. ; Lauber, T. Bruce ; Schiavone, Michael V. ; Frohlich, Kipp ; Lederle, Patrick E. ; Benedict, R. Joseph ; Hurst, Jeremy ; King, Richard ; Siemer, William F. ; Baumer, Meghan S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Christian A. ; Tantillo, James A. ; Hale, Benjamin ; Decker, Daniel J. ; Forstchen, Ann B. ; Pomeranz, Emily F. ; Lauber, T. Bruce ; Schiavone, Michael V. ; Frohlich, Kipp ; Lederle, Patrick E. ; Benedict, R. Joseph ; Hurst, Jeremy ; King, Richard ; Siemer, William F. ; Baumer, Meghan S.</creatorcontrib><description>Wildlife professionals lack a framework and process for incorporating ethical considerations in a systematic and transparent way, along with ecological and social science, to support wildlife management decision‐making. We provide such a framework and process based on 3 of the major theoretical branches ethicists have developed in Western culture: consequentialist moral theory, which focuses on consequences and outcomes; principle‐ and rule‐based approaches that deal with what is considered right or wrong; and virtue ethical theory, which considers factors such as character, virtue, and aesthetics. The framework can be used to anticipate the ethical consequences of alternative courses of action or taking no action. If wildlife professionals use this framework as an assessment tool to provide input into decision‐making, resulting decisions will be more transparent, better understood by stakeholders, and more consistent with public trust responsibilities. Ethics, along with biological and social science, play a role in wildlife management decision making. This paper provides a practical framework and process that can be used to make assessment of ethical considerations explicit and transparent. Use of the framework will contribute to more fully informed decision making, consistent with public trust responsibilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Decision making ; Ethics ; human dimensions ; human values ; management ; policy ; Social sciences ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2024-01, Vol.88 (1), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Wildlife Society.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2962-37b32a993bf89a6223b82a281e588b47561b072dec8fce9f46059e1c65ef872c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9002-7861</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjwmg.22502$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjwmg.22502$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Christian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tantillo, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hale, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Decker, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forstchen, Ann B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomeranz, Emily F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauber, T. Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiavone, Michael V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frohlich, Kipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lederle, Patrick E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedict, R. Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurst, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siemer, William F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumer, Meghan S.</creatorcontrib><title>A practical framework for ethics assessment in wildlife management decision‐making</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Wildlife professionals lack a framework and process for incorporating ethical considerations in a systematic and transparent way, along with ecological and social science, to support wildlife management decision‐making. We provide such a framework and process based on 3 of the major theoretical branches ethicists have developed in Western culture: consequentialist moral theory, which focuses on consequences and outcomes; principle‐ and rule‐based approaches that deal with what is considered right or wrong; and virtue ethical theory, which considers factors such as character, virtue, and aesthetics. The framework can be used to anticipate the ethical consequences of alternative courses of action or taking no action. If wildlife professionals use this framework as an assessment tool to provide input into decision‐making, resulting decisions will be more transparent, better understood by stakeholders, and more consistent with public trust responsibilities. Ethics, along with biological and social science, play a role in wildlife management decision making. This paper provides a practical framework and process that can be used to make assessment of ethical considerations explicit and transparent. Use of the framework will contribute to more fully informed decision making, consistent with public trust responsibilities.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>human dimensions</subject><subject>human values</subject><subject>management</subject><subject>policy</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9OAjEQxhujiYhefIIm3kwW21m22x4JUdRgvGD01nTLFAv7B1sI4eYj-Iw-iYvr2dMkM7_55puPkEvOBpwxuFnuqsUAIGNwRHpcpXkCkufHpNcOIcmG_O2UnMW4ZCzlXIoemY3oOhi78daU1AVT4a4JK-qaQHHz7m2kJkaMscJ6Q31Nd76cl94hrUxtFvjbnqP10Tf19-dXZVa-XpyTE2fKiBd_tU9e7m5n4_tk-jx5GI-miQUlIEnzIgWjVFo4qYwASAsJpjWMmZTFMM8EL1gOrbx0FpUbCpYp5FZk6GQONu2Tq053HZqPLcaNXjbbULcnNUglhGQqFy113VE2NDEGdHodfGXCXnOmD6npQ2r6N7UW5h3cPor7f0j9-Po06XZ-AKV-cMk</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Smith, Christian A.</creator><creator>Tantillo, James A.</creator><creator>Hale, Benjamin</creator><creator>Decker, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Forstchen, Ann B.</creator><creator>Pomeranz, Emily F.</creator><creator>Lauber, T. Bruce</creator><creator>Schiavone, Michael V.</creator><creator>Frohlich, Kipp</creator><creator>Lederle, Patrick E.</creator><creator>Benedict, R. Joseph</creator><creator>Hurst, Jeremy</creator><creator>King, Richard</creator><creator>Siemer, William F.</creator><creator>Baumer, Meghan S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9002-7861</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>A practical framework for ethics assessment in wildlife management decision‐making</title><author>Smith, Christian A. ; Tantillo, James A. ; Hale, Benjamin ; Decker, Daniel J. ; Forstchen, Ann B. ; Pomeranz, Emily F. ; Lauber, T. Bruce ; Schiavone, Michael V. ; Frohlich, Kipp ; Lederle, Patrick E. ; Benedict, R. Joseph ; Hurst, Jeremy ; King, Richard ; Siemer, William F. ; Baumer, Meghan S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2962-37b32a993bf89a6223b82a281e588b47561b072dec8fce9f46059e1c65ef872c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>human dimensions</topic><topic>human values</topic><topic>management</topic><topic>policy</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Christian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tantillo, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hale, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Decker, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forstchen, Ann B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomeranz, Emily F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauber, T. Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiavone, Michael V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frohlich, Kipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lederle, Patrick E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedict, R. Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurst, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siemer, William F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumer, Meghan S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Christian A.</au><au>Tantillo, James A.</au><au>Hale, Benjamin</au><au>Decker, Daniel J.</au><au>Forstchen, Ann B.</au><au>Pomeranz, Emily F.</au><au>Lauber, T. Bruce</au><au>Schiavone, Michael V.</au><au>Frohlich, Kipp</au><au>Lederle, Patrick E.</au><au>Benedict, R. Joseph</au><au>Hurst, Jeremy</au><au>King, Richard</au><au>Siemer, William F.</au><au>Baumer, Meghan S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A practical framework for ethics assessment in wildlife management decision‐making</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>1</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><abstract>Wildlife professionals lack a framework and process for incorporating ethical considerations in a systematic and transparent way, along with ecological and social science, to support wildlife management decision‐making. We provide such a framework and process based on 3 of the major theoretical branches ethicists have developed in Western culture: consequentialist moral theory, which focuses on consequences and outcomes; principle‐ and rule‐based approaches that deal with what is considered right or wrong; and virtue ethical theory, which considers factors such as character, virtue, and aesthetics. The framework can be used to anticipate the ethical consequences of alternative courses of action or taking no action. If wildlife professionals use this framework as an assessment tool to provide input into decision‐making, resulting decisions will be more transparent, better understood by stakeholders, and more consistent with public trust responsibilities. Ethics, along with biological and social science, play a role in wildlife management decision making. This paper provides a practical framework and process that can be used to make assessment of ethical considerations explicit and transparent. Use of the framework will contribute to more fully informed decision making, consistent with public trust responsibilities.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.22502</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9002-7861</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2024-01, Vol.88 (1), p.n/a
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2896680976
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Decision making
Ethics
human dimensions
human values
management
policy
Social sciences
Wildlife management
title A practical framework for ethics assessment in wildlife management decision‐making
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A21%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20practical%20framework%20for%20ethics%20assessment%20in%20wildlife%20management%20decision%E2%80%90making&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Smith,%20Christian%20A.&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.22502&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2896680976%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2896680976&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true