Multi‐plant coordination in the U.S. beef packing industry

Most U.S. beef packers with multiple plants now openly employ multi‐plant coordination. Using a Salop Circular City framework that includes negotiated and formula pricing, we demonstrate that multi‐plant coordination leads to wider spreads between downstream beef prices and upstream fed cattle price...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of agricultural economics 2024-01, Vol.106 (1), p.382-415
Hauptverfasser: Pudenz, Christopher C., Schulz, Lee L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 415
container_issue 1
container_start_page 382
container_title American journal of agricultural economics
container_volume 106
creator Pudenz, Christopher C.
Schulz, Lee L.
description Most U.S. beef packers with multiple plants now openly employ multi‐plant coordination. Using a Salop Circular City framework that includes negotiated and formula pricing, we demonstrate that multi‐plant coordination leads to wider spreads between downstream beef prices and upstream fed cattle prices if multi‐plant coordination markdowns outweigh multi‐plant coordination efficiencies. Taken together with market concentration, geography and transportation costs, and cattle cycles and related beef packer capacity utilization, multi‐plant coordination helps explain persistently wide farm‐to‐wholesale beef price spreads. We find that, as cattle inventories decline, a multi‐plant coordinator will permanently shut down a plant before the same plant run as a separate profit center will shut down, which is consistent with packer behavior in recent years. We also demonstrate that adding a strategically‐located packing plant, owned by an entrant firm, can narrow price spreads. This framework is important for ongoing policy discussions regarding the structure, conduct, and performance of the beef packing industry.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ajae.12391
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2896455069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2896455069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4271-2ceb2f6b8dbe09313eb4e83edba1116ae1a362812f12d81de6258ff561ef5bfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KxDAQh4MouK5efIKCN6E1k7ZpCl6WZdc_rHjQPYe0nWjW2takRfbmI_iMPolZK3hzLsMwH78ZPkJOgUbg60JtFEbA4hz2yAQSnoWCZXyfTCilLMxpzg7JkXMbP1LIxYRc3g11b74-PrtaNX1Qtq2tTKN60zaBaYL-GYN19BAFBaIOOlW-mObJL6rB9XZ7TA60qh2e_PYpWS8Xj_PrcHV_dTOfrcIyYRmErMSCaV6IqkCaxxBjkaCIsSqU_5krBBVzJoBpYJWACjlLhdYpB9Rpoat4Ss7G3M62bwO6Xm7awTb-pGQi50maUp576nykSts6Z1HLzppXZbcSqNzZkTs78seOh4MRxrJtjPtDRZZRllCaeQRG5N3UuP0nTM5uZ4sx9hslenGX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2896455069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi‐plant coordination in the U.S. beef packing industry</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Pudenz, Christopher C. ; Schulz, Lee L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pudenz, Christopher C. ; Schulz, Lee L.</creatorcontrib><description>Most U.S. beef packers with multiple plants now openly employ multi‐plant coordination. Using a Salop Circular City framework that includes negotiated and formula pricing, we demonstrate that multi‐plant coordination leads to wider spreads between downstream beef prices and upstream fed cattle prices if multi‐plant coordination markdowns outweigh multi‐plant coordination efficiencies. Taken together with market concentration, geography and transportation costs, and cattle cycles and related beef packer capacity utilization, multi‐plant coordination helps explain persistently wide farm‐to‐wholesale beef price spreads. We find that, as cattle inventories decline, a multi‐plant coordinator will permanently shut down a plant before the same plant run as a separate profit center will shut down, which is consistent with packer behavior in recent years. We also demonstrate that adding a strategically‐located packing plant, owned by an entrant firm, can narrow price spreads. This framework is important for ongoing policy discussions regarding the structure, conduct, and performance of the beef packing industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8276</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajae.12391</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; alternative marketing arrangements ; Beef ; Cattle ; Coordination ; Farms ; Geography ; livestock economics ; Market concentration ; multi‐plant coordination ; Packaging ; Packing ; Plant shutdowns ; Prices ; Salop circle ; Transport costs</subject><ispartof>American journal of agricultural economics, 2024-01, Vol.106 (1), p.382-415</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Agricultural &amp; Applied Economics Association.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4271-2ceb2f6b8dbe09313eb4e83edba1116ae1a362812f12d81de6258ff561ef5bfd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4271-2ceb2f6b8dbe09313eb4e83edba1116ae1a362812f12d81de6258ff561ef5bfd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajae.12391$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajae.12391$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27928,27929,45578,45579</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pudenz, Christopher C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Lee L.</creatorcontrib><title>Multi‐plant coordination in the U.S. beef packing industry</title><title>American journal of agricultural economics</title><description>Most U.S. beef packers with multiple plants now openly employ multi‐plant coordination. Using a Salop Circular City framework that includes negotiated and formula pricing, we demonstrate that multi‐plant coordination leads to wider spreads between downstream beef prices and upstream fed cattle prices if multi‐plant coordination markdowns outweigh multi‐plant coordination efficiencies. Taken together with market concentration, geography and transportation costs, and cattle cycles and related beef packer capacity utilization, multi‐plant coordination helps explain persistently wide farm‐to‐wholesale beef price spreads. We find that, as cattle inventories decline, a multi‐plant coordinator will permanently shut down a plant before the same plant run as a separate profit center will shut down, which is consistent with packer behavior in recent years. We also demonstrate that adding a strategically‐located packing plant, owned by an entrant firm, can narrow price spreads. This framework is important for ongoing policy discussions regarding the structure, conduct, and performance of the beef packing industry.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>alternative marketing arrangements</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>livestock economics</subject><subject>Market concentration</subject><subject>multi‐plant coordination</subject><subject>Packaging</subject><subject>Packing</subject><subject>Plant shutdowns</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Salop circle</subject><subject>Transport costs</subject><issn>0002-9092</issn><issn>1467-8276</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9KxDAQh4MouK5efIKCN6E1k7ZpCl6WZdc_rHjQPYe0nWjW2takRfbmI_iMPolZK3hzLsMwH78ZPkJOgUbg60JtFEbA4hz2yAQSnoWCZXyfTCilLMxpzg7JkXMbP1LIxYRc3g11b74-PrtaNX1Qtq2tTKN60zaBaYL-GYN19BAFBaIOOlW-mObJL6rB9XZ7TA60qh2e_PYpWS8Xj_PrcHV_dTOfrcIyYRmErMSCaV6IqkCaxxBjkaCIsSqU_5krBBVzJoBpYJWACjlLhdYpB9Rpoat4Ss7G3M62bwO6Xm7awTb-pGQi50maUp576nykSts6Z1HLzppXZbcSqNzZkTs78seOh4MRxrJtjPtDRZZRllCaeQRG5N3UuP0nTM5uZ4sx9hslenGX</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Pudenz, Christopher C.</creator><creator>Schulz, Lee L.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Multi‐plant coordination in the U.S. beef packing industry</title><author>Pudenz, Christopher C. ; Schulz, Lee L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4271-2ceb2f6b8dbe09313eb4e83edba1116ae1a362812f12d81de6258ff561ef5bfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>alternative marketing arrangements</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>livestock economics</topic><topic>Market concentration</topic><topic>multi‐plant coordination</topic><topic>Packaging</topic><topic>Packing</topic><topic>Plant shutdowns</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Salop circle</topic><topic>Transport costs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pudenz, Christopher C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Lee L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pudenz, Christopher C.</au><au>Schulz, Lee L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi‐plant coordination in the U.S. beef packing industry</atitle><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>382</spage><epage>415</epage><pages>382-415</pages><issn>0002-9092</issn><eissn>1467-8276</eissn><abstract>Most U.S. beef packers with multiple plants now openly employ multi‐plant coordination. Using a Salop Circular City framework that includes negotiated and formula pricing, we demonstrate that multi‐plant coordination leads to wider spreads between downstream beef prices and upstream fed cattle prices if multi‐plant coordination markdowns outweigh multi‐plant coordination efficiencies. Taken together with market concentration, geography and transportation costs, and cattle cycles and related beef packer capacity utilization, multi‐plant coordination helps explain persistently wide farm‐to‐wholesale beef price spreads. We find that, as cattle inventories decline, a multi‐plant coordinator will permanently shut down a plant before the same plant run as a separate profit center will shut down, which is consistent with packer behavior in recent years. We also demonstrate that adding a strategically‐located packing plant, owned by an entrant firm, can narrow price spreads. This framework is important for ongoing policy discussions regarding the structure, conduct, and performance of the beef packing industry.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ajae.12391</doi><tpages>34</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9092
ispartof American journal of agricultural economics, 2024-01, Vol.106 (1), p.382-415
issn 0002-9092
1467-8276
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2896455069
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Agricultural economics
alternative marketing arrangements
Beef
Cattle
Coordination
Farms
Geography
livestock economics
Market concentration
multi‐plant coordination
Packaging
Packing
Plant shutdowns
Prices
Salop circle
Transport costs
title Multi‐plant coordination in the U.S. beef packing industry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T14%3A38%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi%E2%80%90plant%20coordination%20in%20the%20U.S.%20beef%20packing%20industry&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Pudenz,%20Christopher%20C.&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=382&rft.epage=415&rft.pages=382-415&rft.issn=0002-9092&rft.eissn=1467-8276&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajae.12391&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2896455069%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2896455069&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true