Improvisation as a Method of Composition: Reconciling the Dichotomy

This article builds upon existing scholarship concerning the relationship between improvisation and composition. Sections 1 to 3 comprise an exploration into and analysis of both the traditional understanding of improvisation and composition as opposing categories, as well as the more modern, nuance...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The British journal of aesthetics 2022-07, Vol.62 (3), p.373-386
1. Verfasser: Davisson, Katya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 386
container_issue 3
container_start_page 373
container_title The British journal of aesthetics
container_volume 62
creator Davisson, Katya
description This article builds upon existing scholarship concerning the relationship between improvisation and composition. Sections 1 to 3 comprise an exploration into and analysis of both the traditional understanding of improvisation and composition as opposing categories, as well as the more modern, nuanced view of their interpenetrating natures. I conclude that the former view should be replaced by the latter. Sections 4 and 5 present and subsequently negate two potential failings of my argument. First, I confront the problem posed by Goehr’s work-concept, whose essence is opposed to the spirit of improvisation, but argue that recording allows for the solidification of these improvisations into works. Secondly, I undermine the view that composition is creation ex nihilo whilst improvisation is the mere reworking of old material. I uncover the originality of improvisation and formulae of composition to restore their compatibility and reinforce improvisation’s status as a method of broad- and narrow-sense composition.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/aesthj/ayac018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2896125293</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2896125293</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-41e12a9c0abc631fbcabbc832d0a72b38626791ffbab91857dff4ac26522bedd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM1LAzEUxIMoWKtXzwHP27687EfiTdavQkUQPYckm7gp3U3dbIX-9660p3eYYebNj5BbBgsGki-1S2O7WeqDtsDEGZmxvBQZihzPyQwAqgwk5JfkKqUNAMMCihmpV91uiL8h6THEnupENX1zYxsbGj2tY7eLKfxL9_TD2djbsA39Nx1bRx-DbeMYu8M1ufB6m9zN6c7J1_PTZ_2ard9fVvXDOrOIOGY5cwy1tKCNLTnzxmpjrODYgK7QcFFiWUnmvdFGMlFUjfe5tlgWiMY1DZ-Tu2Pu9PHPflqrNnE_9FOlQiHLaRFKPrkWR5cdYkqD82o3hE4PB8VA_YNSR1DqBIr_AT7dXtk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2896125293</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improvisation as a Method of Composition: Reconciling the Dichotomy</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Davisson, Katya</creator><creatorcontrib>Davisson, Katya</creatorcontrib><description>This article builds upon existing scholarship concerning the relationship between improvisation and composition. Sections 1 to 3 comprise an exploration into and analysis of both the traditional understanding of improvisation and composition as opposing categories, as well as the more modern, nuanced view of their interpenetrating natures. I conclude that the former view should be replaced by the latter. Sections 4 and 5 present and subsequently negate two potential failings of my argument. First, I confront the problem posed by Goehr’s work-concept, whose essence is opposed to the spirit of improvisation, but argue that recording allows for the solidification of these improvisations into works. Secondly, I undermine the view that composition is creation ex nihilo whilst improvisation is the mere reworking of old material. I uncover the originality of improvisation and formulae of composition to restore their compatibility and reinforce improvisation’s status as a method of broad- and narrow-sense composition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0904</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2842</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayac018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</publisher><subject>Composition ; Improvisation</subject><ispartof>The British journal of aesthetics, 2022-07, Vol.62 (3), p.373-386</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society of Aesthetics.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-41e12a9c0abc631fbcabbc832d0a72b38626791ffbab91857dff4ac26522bedd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davisson, Katya</creatorcontrib><title>Improvisation as a Method of Composition: Reconciling the Dichotomy</title><title>The British journal of aesthetics</title><description>This article builds upon existing scholarship concerning the relationship between improvisation and composition. Sections 1 to 3 comprise an exploration into and analysis of both the traditional understanding of improvisation and composition as opposing categories, as well as the more modern, nuanced view of their interpenetrating natures. I conclude that the former view should be replaced by the latter. Sections 4 and 5 present and subsequently negate two potential failings of my argument. First, I confront the problem posed by Goehr’s work-concept, whose essence is opposed to the spirit of improvisation, but argue that recording allows for the solidification of these improvisations into works. Secondly, I undermine the view that composition is creation ex nihilo whilst improvisation is the mere reworking of old material. I uncover the originality of improvisation and formulae of composition to restore their compatibility and reinforce improvisation’s status as a method of broad- and narrow-sense composition.</description><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Improvisation</subject><issn>0007-0904</issn><issn>1468-2842</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkM1LAzEUxIMoWKtXzwHP27687EfiTdavQkUQPYckm7gp3U3dbIX-9660p3eYYebNj5BbBgsGki-1S2O7WeqDtsDEGZmxvBQZihzPyQwAqgwk5JfkKqUNAMMCihmpV91uiL8h6THEnupENX1zYxsbGj2tY7eLKfxL9_TD2djbsA39Nx1bRx-DbeMYu8M1ufB6m9zN6c7J1_PTZ_2ard9fVvXDOrOIOGY5cwy1tKCNLTnzxmpjrODYgK7QcFFiWUnmvdFGMlFUjfe5tlgWiMY1DZ-Tu2Pu9PHPflqrNnE_9FOlQiHLaRFKPrkWR5cdYkqD82o3hE4PB8VA_YNSR1DqBIr_AT7dXtk</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Davisson, Katya</creator><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Improvisation as a Method of Composition: Reconciling the Dichotomy</title><author>Davisson, Katya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-41e12a9c0abc631fbcabbc832d0a72b38626791ffbab91857dff4ac26522bedd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Improvisation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davisson, Katya</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>The British journal of aesthetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davisson, Katya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improvisation as a Method of Composition: Reconciling the Dichotomy</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of aesthetics</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>373</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>373-386</pages><issn>0007-0904</issn><eissn>1468-2842</eissn><abstract>This article builds upon existing scholarship concerning the relationship between improvisation and composition. Sections 1 to 3 comprise an exploration into and analysis of both the traditional understanding of improvisation and composition as opposing categories, as well as the more modern, nuanced view of their interpenetrating natures. I conclude that the former view should be replaced by the latter. Sections 4 and 5 present and subsequently negate two potential failings of my argument. First, I confront the problem posed by Goehr’s work-concept, whose essence is opposed to the spirit of improvisation, but argue that recording allows for the solidification of these improvisations into works. Secondly, I undermine the view that composition is creation ex nihilo whilst improvisation is the mere reworking of old material. I uncover the originality of improvisation and formulae of composition to restore their compatibility and reinforce improvisation’s status as a method of broad- and narrow-sense composition.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</pub><doi>10.1093/aesthj/ayac018</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0904
ispartof The British journal of aesthetics, 2022-07, Vol.62 (3), p.373-386
issn 0007-0904
1468-2842
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2896125293
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Composition
Improvisation
title Improvisation as a Method of Composition: Reconciling the Dichotomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T16%3A43%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improvisation%20as%20a%20Method%20of%20Composition:%20Reconciling%20the%20Dichotomy&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20aesthetics&rft.au=Davisson,%20Katya&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=373&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=373-386&rft.issn=0007-0904&rft.eissn=1468-2842&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/aesthj/ayac018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2896125293%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2896125293&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true