Power Laws in the Number of Copies Per Title in Libraries
Background. Power law distributions have been found in many contexts, both natural and social. This study examines one way of applying the power law distribution to characterize the breadth and accessibility of library collections. Objectives. The collections of three libraries were analyzed for evi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | LIBRES (Kent, Ohio) Ohio), 2022-12, Vol.32 (2), p.96-108 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 108 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 96 |
container_title | LIBRES (Kent, Ohio) |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Lane, Daniel J. |
description | Background. Power law distributions have been found in many contexts, both natural and social. This study examines one way of applying the power law distribution to characterize the breadth and accessibility of library collections. Objectives. The collections of three libraries were analyzed for evidence of power law distributions with regard to the number of copies per title. Methods. Data gathered at the three libraries were analyzed to obtain the coefficient of determination (R2) between the actual distribution of the number of copies for each library, and the number of copies predicted by a power law model. The slope of the best line fit represents the "power' of the distribution, which determines the shape of the particular power law distribution Residís. The results indicate that the number of copies per title in all three collections do in fact fit the power law distribution. But not merely that: although each library collection strongly resembles a power law distribution, the slope, or "power." of the distribution differs in each case, in a direction that indicates that the underlying theory is sound. The evidence is seen by comparing the results of two of the libraries studied here. As a small academic library with a policy directed at expanding its number of titles at the expense of number of copies, Kenyon College has the "flattest" slope or power; while Oak Park Public Library, a large public collection that must balance breadth with accessibility, has a much "steeper" slope to its distribution of titles to copies. Contributions. The results and methods presented here not only allow librarians to understand their collections in a new fashion, but may also have implications for anyone seeking to manage collections into the future: for example, baskets of securities in financial markets, and investments in weapon systems by militaries. Additionally, the results provide support for the "preferential attachment" explanation of the power law distribution development, an important theoretical issue with possible relevance to both the natural and social sciences, particularly economics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.32655/LIBRES.2022.2.2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2895420585</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2895420585</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-6e89a0769568fe453ff4bf7d5e2e8ca87e658fef72e876739c3f4dfbc4cade623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMtOwzAQtBBIlMKdYyTOCY4dP3KEqJRKEVRQzpbjrEWqtg52ooq_xyUc0Bx2Z3a0qx2EbnOcUcIZu69Xj2-L94xgQrKIMzTLMZMpF1ye_-sv0VUIW4zzsqBkhsq1O4JPan0MSXdIhk9IXsZ9EyVnk8r1HYRkHdmmG3ZwctRd47WP8jW6sHoX4OavztHH02JTPaf163JVPdSpIZwPKQdZaix4ybi0UDBqbdFY0TIgII2WAjiLAysiFVzQ0lBbtLYxhdEtcELn6G7a23v3NUIY1NaN_hBPKiJLVpD4GYsuPLmMdyF4sKr33V77b5Vj9RuQmgJSp4BUBP0BZnxYFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2895420585</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Power Laws in the Number of Copies Per Title in Libraries</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lane, Daniel J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lane, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Power law distributions have been found in many contexts, both natural and social. This study examines one way of applying the power law distribution to characterize the breadth and accessibility of library collections. Objectives. The collections of three libraries were analyzed for evidence of power law distributions with regard to the number of copies per title. Methods. Data gathered at the three libraries were analyzed to obtain the coefficient of determination (R2) between the actual distribution of the number of copies for each library, and the number of copies predicted by a power law model. The slope of the best line fit represents the "power' of the distribution, which determines the shape of the particular power law distribution Residís. The results indicate that the number of copies per title in all three collections do in fact fit the power law distribution. But not merely that: although each library collection strongly resembles a power law distribution, the slope, or "power." of the distribution differs in each case, in a direction that indicates that the underlying theory is sound. The evidence is seen by comparing the results of two of the libraries studied here. As a small academic library with a policy directed at expanding its number of titles at the expense of number of copies, Kenyon College has the "flattest" slope or power; while Oak Park Public Library, a large public collection that must balance breadth with accessibility, has a much "steeper" slope to its distribution of titles to copies. Contributions. The results and methods presented here not only allow librarians to understand their collections in a new fashion, but may also have implications for anyone seeking to manage collections into the future: for example, baskets of securities in financial markets, and investments in weapon systems by militaries. Additionally, the results provide support for the "preferential attachment" explanation of the power law distribution development, an important theoretical issue with possible relevance to both the natural and social sciences, particularly economics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-6768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1058-6768</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.32655/LIBRES.2022.2.2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Wee Kim Wee School of Communication & Information, Nanyang Technological University</publisher><subject>Accessibility ; Architecture ; Baskets ; Cities ; Collection management ; Librarians ; Libraries ; Library collections ; Power law ; Social sciences ; Weapon systems</subject><ispartof>LIBRES (Kent, Ohio), 2022-12, Vol.32 (2), p.96-108</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lane, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><title>Power Laws in the Number of Copies Per Title in Libraries</title><title>LIBRES (Kent, Ohio)</title><description>Background. Power law distributions have been found in many contexts, both natural and social. This study examines one way of applying the power law distribution to characterize the breadth and accessibility of library collections. Objectives. The collections of three libraries were analyzed for evidence of power law distributions with regard to the number of copies per title. Methods. Data gathered at the three libraries were analyzed to obtain the coefficient of determination (R2) between the actual distribution of the number of copies for each library, and the number of copies predicted by a power law model. The slope of the best line fit represents the "power' of the distribution, which determines the shape of the particular power law distribution Residís. The results indicate that the number of copies per title in all three collections do in fact fit the power law distribution. But not merely that: although each library collection strongly resembles a power law distribution, the slope, or "power." of the distribution differs in each case, in a direction that indicates that the underlying theory is sound. The evidence is seen by comparing the results of two of the libraries studied here. As a small academic library with a policy directed at expanding its number of titles at the expense of number of copies, Kenyon College has the "flattest" slope or power; while Oak Park Public Library, a large public collection that must balance breadth with accessibility, has a much "steeper" slope to its distribution of titles to copies. Contributions. The results and methods presented here not only allow librarians to understand their collections in a new fashion, but may also have implications for anyone seeking to manage collections into the future: for example, baskets of securities in financial markets, and investments in weapon systems by militaries. Additionally, the results provide support for the "preferential attachment" explanation of the power law distribution development, an important theoretical issue with possible relevance to both the natural and social sciences, particularly economics.</description><subject>Accessibility</subject><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Baskets</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Collection management</subject><subject>Librarians</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>Library collections</subject><subject>Power law</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Weapon systems</subject><issn>1058-6768</issn><issn>1058-6768</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUMtOwzAQtBBIlMKdYyTOCY4dP3KEqJRKEVRQzpbjrEWqtg52ooq_xyUc0Bx2Z3a0qx2EbnOcUcIZu69Xj2-L94xgQrKIMzTLMZMpF1ye_-sv0VUIW4zzsqBkhsq1O4JPan0MSXdIhk9IXsZ9EyVnk8r1HYRkHdmmG3ZwctRd47WP8jW6sHoX4OavztHH02JTPaf163JVPdSpIZwPKQdZaix4ybi0UDBqbdFY0TIgII2WAjiLAysiFVzQ0lBbtLYxhdEtcELn6G7a23v3NUIY1NaN_hBPKiJLVpD4GYsuPLmMdyF4sKr33V77b5Vj9RuQmgJSp4BUBP0BZnxYFw</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Lane, Daniel J.</creator><general>Wee Kim Wee School of Communication & Information, Nanyang Technological University</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Power Laws in the Number of Copies Per Title in Libraries</title><author>Lane, Daniel J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-6e89a0769568fe453ff4bf7d5e2e8ca87e658fef72e876739c3f4dfbc4cade623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accessibility</topic><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Baskets</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Collection management</topic><topic>Librarians</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>Library collections</topic><topic>Power law</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Weapon systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lane, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>East & South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>LIBRES (Kent, Ohio)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lane, Daniel J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Power Laws in the Number of Copies Per Title in Libraries</atitle><jtitle>LIBRES (Kent, Ohio)</jtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>96</spage><epage>108</epage><pages>96-108</pages><issn>1058-6768</issn><eissn>1058-6768</eissn><abstract>Background. Power law distributions have been found in many contexts, both natural and social. This study examines one way of applying the power law distribution to characterize the breadth and accessibility of library collections. Objectives. The collections of three libraries were analyzed for evidence of power law distributions with regard to the number of copies per title. Methods. Data gathered at the three libraries were analyzed to obtain the coefficient of determination (R2) between the actual distribution of the number of copies for each library, and the number of copies predicted by a power law model. The slope of the best line fit represents the "power' of the distribution, which determines the shape of the particular power law distribution Residís. The results indicate that the number of copies per title in all three collections do in fact fit the power law distribution. But not merely that: although each library collection strongly resembles a power law distribution, the slope, or "power." of the distribution differs in each case, in a direction that indicates that the underlying theory is sound. The evidence is seen by comparing the results of two of the libraries studied here. As a small academic library with a policy directed at expanding its number of titles at the expense of number of copies, Kenyon College has the "flattest" slope or power; while Oak Park Public Library, a large public collection that must balance breadth with accessibility, has a much "steeper" slope to its distribution of titles to copies. Contributions. The results and methods presented here not only allow librarians to understand their collections in a new fashion, but may also have implications for anyone seeking to manage collections into the future: for example, baskets of securities in financial markets, and investments in weapon systems by militaries. Additionally, the results provide support for the "preferential attachment" explanation of the power law distribution development, an important theoretical issue with possible relevance to both the natural and social sciences, particularly economics.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Wee Kim Wee School of Communication & Information, Nanyang Technological University</pub><doi>10.32655/LIBRES.2022.2.2</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-6768 |
ispartof | LIBRES (Kent, Ohio), 2022-12, Vol.32 (2), p.96-108 |
issn | 1058-6768 1058-6768 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2895420585 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Accessibility Architecture Baskets Cities Collection management Librarians Libraries Library collections Power law Social sciences Weapon systems |
title | Power Laws in the Number of Copies Per Title in Libraries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A37%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Power%20Laws%20in%20the%20Number%20of%20Copies%20Per%20Title%20in%20Libraries&rft.jtitle=LIBRES%20(Kent,%20Ohio)&rft.au=Lane,%20Daniel%20J.&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=108&rft.pages=96-108&rft.issn=1058-6768&rft.eissn=1058-6768&rft_id=info:doi/10.32655/LIBRES.2022.2.2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2895420585%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2895420585&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |