A Survey on Vulnerability of Federated Learning: A Learning Algorithm Perspective
This review paper takes a comprehensive look at malicious attacks against FL, categorizing them from new perspectives on attack origins and targets, and providing insights into their methodology and impact. In this survey, we focus on threat models targeting the learning process of FL systems. Based...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2023-11 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Xie, Xianghua Hu, Chen Ren, Hanchi Deng, Jingjing |
description | This review paper takes a comprehensive look at malicious attacks against FL, categorizing them from new perspectives on attack origins and targets, and providing insights into their methodology and impact. In this survey, we focus on threat models targeting the learning process of FL systems. Based on the source and target of the attack, we categorize existing threat models into four types, Data to Model (D2M), Model to Data (M2D), Model to Model (M2M) and composite attacks. For each attack type, we discuss the defense strategies proposed, highlighting their effectiveness, assumptions and potential areas for improvement. Defense strategies have evolved from using a singular metric to excluding malicious clients, to employing a multifaceted approach examining client models at various phases. In this survey paper, our research indicates that the to-learn data, the learning gradients, and the learned model at different stages all can be manipulated to initiate malicious attacks that range from undermining model performance, reconstructing private local data, and to inserting backdoors. We have also seen these threat are becoming more insidious. While earlier studies typically amplified malicious gradients, recent endeavors subtly alter the least significant weights in local models to bypass defense measures. This literature review provides a holistic understanding of the current FL threat landscape and highlights the importance of developing robust, efficient, and privacy-preserving defenses to ensure the safe and trusted adoption of FL in real-world applications. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2894587717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2894587717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_28945877173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNik0LgkAURYcgSMr_8KC1oDOa1k4iadGiKNqK5dNGphmbD6F_n4to3erec8-dEI8yFgVZTOmM-MZ0YRjSVUqThHnklMPZ6QHfoCRcnZCoqxsX3I5DAwXWI1us4YCVlly2G8h_HXLRKs3t4wlH1KbHu-UDLsi0qYRB_5tzsix2l-0-6LV6OTS27JTTclQlzdZxkqVplLL_Xh9gNz8F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2894587717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Survey on Vulnerability of Federated Learning: A Learning Algorithm Perspective</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Xie, Xianghua ; Hu, Chen ; Ren, Hanchi ; Deng, Jingjing</creator><creatorcontrib>Xie, Xianghua ; Hu, Chen ; Ren, Hanchi ; Deng, Jingjing</creatorcontrib><description>This review paper takes a comprehensive look at malicious attacks against FL, categorizing them from new perspectives on attack origins and targets, and providing insights into their methodology and impact. In this survey, we focus on threat models targeting the learning process of FL systems. Based on the source and target of the attack, we categorize existing threat models into four types, Data to Model (D2M), Model to Data (M2D), Model to Model (M2M) and composite attacks. For each attack type, we discuss the defense strategies proposed, highlighting their effectiveness, assumptions and potential areas for improvement. Defense strategies have evolved from using a singular metric to excluding malicious clients, to employing a multifaceted approach examining client models at various phases. In this survey paper, our research indicates that the to-learn data, the learning gradients, and the learned model at different stages all can be manipulated to initiate malicious attacks that range from undermining model performance, reconstructing private local data, and to inserting backdoors. We have also seen these threat are becoming more insidious. While earlier studies typically amplified malicious gradients, recent endeavors subtly alter the least significant weights in local models to bypass defense measures. This literature review provides a holistic understanding of the current FL threat landscape and highlights the importance of developing robust, efficient, and privacy-preserving defenses to ensure the safe and trusted adoption of FL in real-world applications.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Literature reviews ; Machine learning ; Privacy ; Threat models</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2023-11</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xie, Xianghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Hanchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Jingjing</creatorcontrib><title>A Survey on Vulnerability of Federated Learning: A Learning Algorithm Perspective</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>This review paper takes a comprehensive look at malicious attacks against FL, categorizing them from new perspectives on attack origins and targets, and providing insights into their methodology and impact. In this survey, we focus on threat models targeting the learning process of FL systems. Based on the source and target of the attack, we categorize existing threat models into four types, Data to Model (D2M), Model to Data (M2D), Model to Model (M2M) and composite attacks. For each attack type, we discuss the defense strategies proposed, highlighting their effectiveness, assumptions and potential areas for improvement. Defense strategies have evolved from using a singular metric to excluding malicious clients, to employing a multifaceted approach examining client models at various phases. In this survey paper, our research indicates that the to-learn data, the learning gradients, and the learned model at different stages all can be manipulated to initiate malicious attacks that range from undermining model performance, reconstructing private local data, and to inserting backdoors. We have also seen these threat are becoming more insidious. While earlier studies typically amplified malicious gradients, recent endeavors subtly alter the least significant weights in local models to bypass defense measures. This literature review provides a holistic understanding of the current FL threat landscape and highlights the importance of developing robust, efficient, and privacy-preserving defenses to ensure the safe and trusted adoption of FL in real-world applications.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Threat models</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNik0LgkAURYcgSMr_8KC1oDOa1k4iadGiKNqK5dNGphmbD6F_n4to3erec8-dEI8yFgVZTOmM-MZ0YRjSVUqThHnklMPZ6QHfoCRcnZCoqxsX3I5DAwXWI1us4YCVlly2G8h_HXLRKs3t4wlH1KbHu-UDLsi0qYRB_5tzsix2l-0-6LV6OTS27JTTclQlzdZxkqVplLL_Xh9gNz8F</recordid><startdate>20231127</startdate><enddate>20231127</enddate><creator>Xie, Xianghua</creator><creator>Hu, Chen</creator><creator>Ren, Hanchi</creator><creator>Deng, Jingjing</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231127</creationdate><title>A Survey on Vulnerability of Federated Learning: A Learning Algorithm Perspective</title><author>Xie, Xianghua ; Hu, Chen ; Ren, Hanchi ; Deng, Jingjing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_28945877173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Threat models</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xie, Xianghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Hanchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Jingjing</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xie, Xianghua</au><au>Hu, Chen</au><au>Ren, Hanchi</au><au>Deng, Jingjing</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>A Survey on Vulnerability of Federated Learning: A Learning Algorithm Perspective</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2023-11-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>This review paper takes a comprehensive look at malicious attacks against FL, categorizing them from new perspectives on attack origins and targets, and providing insights into their methodology and impact. In this survey, we focus on threat models targeting the learning process of FL systems. Based on the source and target of the attack, we categorize existing threat models into four types, Data to Model (D2M), Model to Data (M2D), Model to Model (M2M) and composite attacks. For each attack type, we discuss the defense strategies proposed, highlighting their effectiveness, assumptions and potential areas for improvement. Defense strategies have evolved from using a singular metric to excluding malicious clients, to employing a multifaceted approach examining client models at various phases. In this survey paper, our research indicates that the to-learn data, the learning gradients, and the learned model at different stages all can be manipulated to initiate malicious attacks that range from undermining model performance, reconstructing private local data, and to inserting backdoors. We have also seen these threat are becoming more insidious. While earlier studies typically amplified malicious gradients, recent endeavors subtly alter the least significant weights in local models to bypass defense measures. This literature review provides a holistic understanding of the current FL threat landscape and highlights the importance of developing robust, efficient, and privacy-preserving defenses to ensure the safe and trusted adoption of FL in real-world applications.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2023-11 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2894587717 |
source | Free E- Journals |
subjects | Algorithms Literature reviews Machine learning Privacy Threat models |
title | A Survey on Vulnerability of Federated Learning: A Learning Algorithm Perspective |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T12%3A50%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=A%20Survey%20on%20Vulnerability%20of%20Federated%20Learning:%20A%20Learning%20Algorithm%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Xie,%20Xianghua&rft.date=2023-11-27&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2894587717%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2894587717&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |