Decoding the Link Between Magmatic Cyclicity and Episodic Variation of Tectonics and Crustal Thickness in the Overriding Plate

Cyclical change in subduction angle is the favorable mechanism to elucidate the cyclicity of continental arc magmatism, however, the role of episodic tectonics and variation of the lithosphere in overriding plates is much underestimated. Here we focus on structural, magnetic, and gravitational featu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tectonics (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2023-11, Vol.42 (11), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Meng, Lingtong, Chu, Yang, Lin, Wei, Zhao, Liang, Wei, Wei, Liu, Fei, Wang, Yin, Song, Chao, Wu, Qinying
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 11
container_start_page
container_title Tectonics (Washington, D.C.)
container_volume 42
creator Meng, Lingtong
Chu, Yang
Lin, Wei
Zhao, Liang
Wei, Wei
Liu, Fei
Wang, Yin
Song, Chao
Wu, Qinying
description Cyclical change in subduction angle is the favorable mechanism to elucidate the cyclicity of continental arc magmatism, however, the role of episodic tectonics and variation of the lithosphere in overriding plates is much underestimated. Here we focus on structural, magnetic, and gravitational features of the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous granites in the Mesozoic Paleo‐Pacific arc system of the North China block. By unraveling the emplacement process and regional tectonics, we establish a three‐staged extension‐contraction cycle with crustal thickness variation controlling the magmatic flux and behavior. The Late Jurassic extension produced high‐flux crustal‐derived magma (1.87 × 103 km2/Myr), but the thick crust >45 km accumulated large granitic batholiths by multi‐feeders emplacement at the middle‐lower crust and prevented magma ascent and eruption. Subsequently, the Latest Jurassic to Earliest Cretaceous contraction resulted in the magmatic lull and thickened crust of ca. 60 km, fueling crustal material for the ensuing magmatism. In the Early Cretaceous, intense crustal extension thinned the crust to 30 km and largely enhanced the magmatic flux (3.03 × 103 km2/Myr). The magma is prone to penetrate the thin crust with an intensive eruption. A small amount of magma was stored, and the emplacement was controlled by ductile detachments or normal faults. Our model emphasizes episodic the deformation of lithosphere and associated crustal thickness variation in controlling magma production, which may shed new light in understanding the magmatic cyclicity under continuous subduction. Plain Language Summary The magmatic cycle is key to forecasting volcanic eruption for hazard assessment. On a long‐time scale, the paleo‐magmatic cyclicity including alternating flare‐ups and lulls provides the case to study its driving forces. It is traditionally considered that the magmatic cyclicity is controlled by the subducted plate, however, it fails to explain whether magma erupts or stores, and why it emplaces variably in the different cycles. Taking the Late Mesozoic North China block as an example, we highlight that the overriding plate that experiences episodic variations of crustal deformation and crustal thickness plays an important role in the magmatic cyclicity. When the crustal thickness of the overriding plate was more than 45 km at the Late Jurassic, magma is prone to storage than eruption, and multi‐pulsed magma emplacement is predominated under this extensi
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2023TC008040
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2894383912</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2894383912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3459-f832c607efa8a769db64f6c38380b747549f082168b6ed2c56248ff47a870d8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqWw8QMssRJwbNcfI4TyIRWVIbBGrmO3boNTbJcqC7-d0DIwsbw3vPPukS4A5zm6yhGW1xhhUhYICUTRARjkktJM9vMQDBDmIuMU8WNwEuMSoZyOGBuArzuj29r5OUwLAyfOr-CtSVtjPHxW83eVnIZFpxunXeqg8jUcr13sPzR8U8H199bD1sLS6NR6p-OOKcImJtXAcuH0ypsYofM7wfTThOB2vpdGJXMKjqxqojn73UPwej8ui8dsMn14Km4mmSZ0JDMrCNYMcWOVUJzJesaoZZoIItCMUz6i0iKBcyZmzNRYjximwlrKleCoFpoMwcU-dx3aj42JqVq2m-B7ZYWFpH2QzHFPXe4pHdoYg7HVOrh3FboqR9VPw9Xfhnuc7PGta0z3L1uV46LEuWSSfAM5yny4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2894383912</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decoding the Link Between Magmatic Cyclicity and Episodic Variation of Tectonics and Crustal Thickness in the Overriding Plate</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Meng, Lingtong ; Chu, Yang ; Lin, Wei ; Zhao, Liang ; Wei, Wei ; Liu, Fei ; Wang, Yin ; Song, Chao ; Wu, Qinying</creator><creatorcontrib>Meng, Lingtong ; Chu, Yang ; Lin, Wei ; Zhao, Liang ; Wei, Wei ; Liu, Fei ; Wang, Yin ; Song, Chao ; Wu, Qinying</creatorcontrib><description>Cyclical change in subduction angle is the favorable mechanism to elucidate the cyclicity of continental arc magmatism, however, the role of episodic tectonics and variation of the lithosphere in overriding plates is much underestimated. Here we focus on structural, magnetic, and gravitational features of the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous granites in the Mesozoic Paleo‐Pacific arc system of the North China block. By unraveling the emplacement process and regional tectonics, we establish a three‐staged extension‐contraction cycle with crustal thickness variation controlling the magmatic flux and behavior. The Late Jurassic extension produced high‐flux crustal‐derived magma (1.87 × 103 km2/Myr), but the thick crust &gt;45 km accumulated large granitic batholiths by multi‐feeders emplacement at the middle‐lower crust and prevented magma ascent and eruption. Subsequently, the Latest Jurassic to Earliest Cretaceous contraction resulted in the magmatic lull and thickened crust of ca. 60 km, fueling crustal material for the ensuing magmatism. In the Early Cretaceous, intense crustal extension thinned the crust to 30 km and largely enhanced the magmatic flux (3.03 × 103 km2/Myr). The magma is prone to penetrate the thin crust with an intensive eruption. A small amount of magma was stored, and the emplacement was controlled by ductile detachments or normal faults. Our model emphasizes episodic the deformation of lithosphere and associated crustal thickness variation in controlling magma production, which may shed new light in understanding the magmatic cyclicity under continuous subduction. Plain Language Summary The magmatic cycle is key to forecasting volcanic eruption for hazard assessment. On a long‐time scale, the paleo‐magmatic cyclicity including alternating flare‐ups and lulls provides the case to study its driving forces. It is traditionally considered that the magmatic cyclicity is controlled by the subducted plate, however, it fails to explain whether magma erupts or stores, and why it emplaces variably in the different cycles. Taking the Late Mesozoic North China block as an example, we highlight that the overriding plate that experiences episodic variations of crustal deformation and crustal thickness plays an important role in the magmatic cyclicity. When the crustal thickness of the overriding plate was more than 45 km at the Late Jurassic, magma is prone to storage than eruption, and multi‐pulsed magma emplacement is predominated under this extensional regime. Afterward, the Latest Jurassic‐Earliest Cretaceous crustal shortening and thickening (ca. 60 km) prevent magma formation. When the crust thinned to 30 km during the Early Cretaceous, the magma was able to rise to the upper crust, and even to erupt. The magma emplacement is controlled by ductile detachments or by normal faults. Key Points Feedback between regional tectonics and magmatism account for the Late Mesozoic magmatic lulls/fare‐ups in the North China block Episodic variation in tectonics and crustal thickness controlled the magma behavior and associated emplacement mechanisms Overriding‐plate process is key to understanding the magmatic cyclicity under continuous subduction</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9194</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2023TC008040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Batholiths ; Cretaceous ; Crustal deformation ; Crustal shortening ; Crustal thickness ; Deformation ; episodic tectonics ; Fault lines ; Fluctuations ; gravity modeling ; Hazard assessment ; Jurassic ; Lava ; Lithosphere ; Magma ; magmatic cyclicity ; magnetic fabrics of the granite ; Mesozoic ; North China block ; overriding plate ; Plate tectonics ; Subduction ; Tectonics ; Volcanic eruptions</subject><ispartof>Tectonics (Washington, D.C.), 2023-11, Vol.42 (11), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3459-f832c607efa8a769db64f6c38380b747549f082168b6ed2c56248ff47a870d8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3459-f832c607efa8a769db64f6c38380b747549f082168b6ed2c56248ff47a870d8c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3253-9599 ; 0000-0001-8966-5399 ; 0000-0002-0219-8722</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2023TC008040$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2023TC008040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46443,46867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meng, Lingtong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Qinying</creatorcontrib><title>Decoding the Link Between Magmatic Cyclicity and Episodic Variation of Tectonics and Crustal Thickness in the Overriding Plate</title><title>Tectonics (Washington, D.C.)</title><description>Cyclical change in subduction angle is the favorable mechanism to elucidate the cyclicity of continental arc magmatism, however, the role of episodic tectonics and variation of the lithosphere in overriding plates is much underestimated. Here we focus on structural, magnetic, and gravitational features of the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous granites in the Mesozoic Paleo‐Pacific arc system of the North China block. By unraveling the emplacement process and regional tectonics, we establish a three‐staged extension‐contraction cycle with crustal thickness variation controlling the magmatic flux and behavior. The Late Jurassic extension produced high‐flux crustal‐derived magma (1.87 × 103 km2/Myr), but the thick crust &gt;45 km accumulated large granitic batholiths by multi‐feeders emplacement at the middle‐lower crust and prevented magma ascent and eruption. Subsequently, the Latest Jurassic to Earliest Cretaceous contraction resulted in the magmatic lull and thickened crust of ca. 60 km, fueling crustal material for the ensuing magmatism. In the Early Cretaceous, intense crustal extension thinned the crust to 30 km and largely enhanced the magmatic flux (3.03 × 103 km2/Myr). The magma is prone to penetrate the thin crust with an intensive eruption. A small amount of magma was stored, and the emplacement was controlled by ductile detachments or normal faults. Our model emphasizes episodic the deformation of lithosphere and associated crustal thickness variation in controlling magma production, which may shed new light in understanding the magmatic cyclicity under continuous subduction. Plain Language Summary The magmatic cycle is key to forecasting volcanic eruption for hazard assessment. On a long‐time scale, the paleo‐magmatic cyclicity including alternating flare‐ups and lulls provides the case to study its driving forces. It is traditionally considered that the magmatic cyclicity is controlled by the subducted plate, however, it fails to explain whether magma erupts or stores, and why it emplaces variably in the different cycles. Taking the Late Mesozoic North China block as an example, we highlight that the overriding plate that experiences episodic variations of crustal deformation and crustal thickness plays an important role in the magmatic cyclicity. When the crustal thickness of the overriding plate was more than 45 km at the Late Jurassic, magma is prone to storage than eruption, and multi‐pulsed magma emplacement is predominated under this extensional regime. Afterward, the Latest Jurassic‐Earliest Cretaceous crustal shortening and thickening (ca. 60 km) prevent magma formation. When the crust thinned to 30 km during the Early Cretaceous, the magma was able to rise to the upper crust, and even to erupt. The magma emplacement is controlled by ductile detachments or by normal faults. Key Points Feedback between regional tectonics and magmatism account for the Late Mesozoic magmatic lulls/fare‐ups in the North China block Episodic variation in tectonics and crustal thickness controlled the magma behavior and associated emplacement mechanisms Overriding‐plate process is key to understanding the magmatic cyclicity under continuous subduction</description><subject>Batholiths</subject><subject>Cretaceous</subject><subject>Crustal deformation</subject><subject>Crustal shortening</subject><subject>Crustal thickness</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>episodic tectonics</subject><subject>Fault lines</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>gravity modeling</subject><subject>Hazard assessment</subject><subject>Jurassic</subject><subject>Lava</subject><subject>Lithosphere</subject><subject>Magma</subject><subject>magmatic cyclicity</subject><subject>magnetic fabrics of the granite</subject><subject>Mesozoic</subject><subject>North China block</subject><subject>overriding plate</subject><subject>Plate tectonics</subject><subject>Subduction</subject><subject>Tectonics</subject><subject>Volcanic eruptions</subject><issn>0278-7407</issn><issn>1944-9194</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqWw8QMssRJwbNcfI4TyIRWVIbBGrmO3boNTbJcqC7-d0DIwsbw3vPPukS4A5zm6yhGW1xhhUhYICUTRARjkktJM9vMQDBDmIuMU8WNwEuMSoZyOGBuArzuj29r5OUwLAyfOr-CtSVtjPHxW83eVnIZFpxunXeqg8jUcr13sPzR8U8H199bD1sLS6NR6p-OOKcImJtXAcuH0ypsYofM7wfTThOB2vpdGJXMKjqxqojn73UPwej8ui8dsMn14Km4mmSZ0JDMrCNYMcWOVUJzJesaoZZoIItCMUz6i0iKBcyZmzNRYjximwlrKleCoFpoMwcU-dx3aj42JqVq2m-B7ZYWFpH2QzHFPXe4pHdoYg7HVOrh3FboqR9VPw9Xfhnuc7PGta0z3L1uV46LEuWSSfAM5yny4</recordid><startdate>202311</startdate><enddate>202311</enddate><creator>Meng, Lingtong</creator><creator>Chu, Yang</creator><creator>Lin, Wei</creator><creator>Zhao, Liang</creator><creator>Wei, Wei</creator><creator>Liu, Fei</creator><creator>Wang, Yin</creator><creator>Song, Chao</creator><creator>Wu, Qinying</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3253-9599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8966-5399</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0219-8722</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202311</creationdate><title>Decoding the Link Between Magmatic Cyclicity and Episodic Variation of Tectonics and Crustal Thickness in the Overriding Plate</title><author>Meng, Lingtong ; Chu, Yang ; Lin, Wei ; Zhao, Liang ; Wei, Wei ; Liu, Fei ; Wang, Yin ; Song, Chao ; Wu, Qinying</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3459-f832c607efa8a769db64f6c38380b747549f082168b6ed2c56248ff47a870d8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Batholiths</topic><topic>Cretaceous</topic><topic>Crustal deformation</topic><topic>Crustal shortening</topic><topic>Crustal thickness</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>episodic tectonics</topic><topic>Fault lines</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>gravity modeling</topic><topic>Hazard assessment</topic><topic>Jurassic</topic><topic>Lava</topic><topic>Lithosphere</topic><topic>Magma</topic><topic>magmatic cyclicity</topic><topic>magnetic fabrics of the granite</topic><topic>Mesozoic</topic><topic>North China block</topic><topic>overriding plate</topic><topic>Plate tectonics</topic><topic>Subduction</topic><topic>Tectonics</topic><topic>Volcanic eruptions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meng, Lingtong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Qinying</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Tectonics (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meng, Lingtong</au><au>Chu, Yang</au><au>Lin, Wei</au><au>Zhao, Liang</au><au>Wei, Wei</au><au>Liu, Fei</au><au>Wang, Yin</au><au>Song, Chao</au><au>Wu, Qinying</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decoding the Link Between Magmatic Cyclicity and Episodic Variation of Tectonics and Crustal Thickness in the Overriding Plate</atitle><jtitle>Tectonics (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><date>2023-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>11</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0278-7407</issn><eissn>1944-9194</eissn><abstract>Cyclical change in subduction angle is the favorable mechanism to elucidate the cyclicity of continental arc magmatism, however, the role of episodic tectonics and variation of the lithosphere in overriding plates is much underestimated. Here we focus on structural, magnetic, and gravitational features of the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous granites in the Mesozoic Paleo‐Pacific arc system of the North China block. By unraveling the emplacement process and regional tectonics, we establish a three‐staged extension‐contraction cycle with crustal thickness variation controlling the magmatic flux and behavior. The Late Jurassic extension produced high‐flux crustal‐derived magma (1.87 × 103 km2/Myr), but the thick crust &gt;45 km accumulated large granitic batholiths by multi‐feeders emplacement at the middle‐lower crust and prevented magma ascent and eruption. Subsequently, the Latest Jurassic to Earliest Cretaceous contraction resulted in the magmatic lull and thickened crust of ca. 60 km, fueling crustal material for the ensuing magmatism. In the Early Cretaceous, intense crustal extension thinned the crust to 30 km and largely enhanced the magmatic flux (3.03 × 103 km2/Myr). The magma is prone to penetrate the thin crust with an intensive eruption. A small amount of magma was stored, and the emplacement was controlled by ductile detachments or normal faults. Our model emphasizes episodic the deformation of lithosphere and associated crustal thickness variation in controlling magma production, which may shed new light in understanding the magmatic cyclicity under continuous subduction. Plain Language Summary The magmatic cycle is key to forecasting volcanic eruption for hazard assessment. On a long‐time scale, the paleo‐magmatic cyclicity including alternating flare‐ups and lulls provides the case to study its driving forces. It is traditionally considered that the magmatic cyclicity is controlled by the subducted plate, however, it fails to explain whether magma erupts or stores, and why it emplaces variably in the different cycles. Taking the Late Mesozoic North China block as an example, we highlight that the overriding plate that experiences episodic variations of crustal deformation and crustal thickness plays an important role in the magmatic cyclicity. When the crustal thickness of the overriding plate was more than 45 km at the Late Jurassic, magma is prone to storage than eruption, and multi‐pulsed magma emplacement is predominated under this extensional regime. Afterward, the Latest Jurassic‐Earliest Cretaceous crustal shortening and thickening (ca. 60 km) prevent magma formation. When the crust thinned to 30 km during the Early Cretaceous, the magma was able to rise to the upper crust, and even to erupt. The magma emplacement is controlled by ductile detachments or by normal faults. Key Points Feedback between regional tectonics and magmatism account for the Late Mesozoic magmatic lulls/fare‐ups in the North China block Episodic variation in tectonics and crustal thickness controlled the magma behavior and associated emplacement mechanisms Overriding‐plate process is key to understanding the magmatic cyclicity under continuous subduction</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2023TC008040</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3253-9599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8966-5399</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0219-8722</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-7407
ispartof Tectonics (Washington, D.C.), 2023-11, Vol.42 (11), p.n/a
issn 0278-7407
1944-9194
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2894383912
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Batholiths
Cretaceous
Crustal deformation
Crustal shortening
Crustal thickness
Deformation
episodic tectonics
Fault lines
Fluctuations
gravity modeling
Hazard assessment
Jurassic
Lava
Lithosphere
Magma
magmatic cyclicity
magnetic fabrics of the granite
Mesozoic
North China block
overriding plate
Plate tectonics
Subduction
Tectonics
Volcanic eruptions
title Decoding the Link Between Magmatic Cyclicity and Episodic Variation of Tectonics and Crustal Thickness in the Overriding Plate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A34%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decoding%20the%20Link%20Between%20Magmatic%20Cyclicity%20and%20Episodic%20Variation%20of%20Tectonics%20and%20Crustal%20Thickness%20in%20the%20Overriding%20Plate&rft.jtitle=Tectonics%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=Meng,%20Lingtong&rft.date=2023-11&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=11&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0278-7407&rft.eissn=1944-9194&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2023TC008040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2894383912%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2894383912&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true